Apple's US iPhones Can All Be Made Outside of China If Needed, Says Foxconn (bloomberg.com) 126
A senior executive at Foxconn says they have enough capacity to make all iPhones bound for the U.S. outside of China if necessary. Bloomberg reports: China is a crucial cog in Apple's business, the origin of most of its iPhones and iPads as well as its largest international market. But President Donald Trump has threatened Beijing with new tariffs on about $300 billion worth of Chinese goods, an act that would escalate tensions dramatically while levying a punitive tax on Apple's most profitable product. Hon Hai, known also as Foxconn, is the American giant's most important manufacturing partner. It will fully support Apple if it needs to adjust its production as the U.S.-Chinese trade spat gets grimmer and more unpredictable, board nominee and semiconductor division chief Young Liu told an investor briefing in Taipei on Tuesday. "Twenty-five percent of our production capacity is outside of China and we can help Apple respond to its needs in the U.S. market," said Liu, adding that investments are now being made in India for Apple. "We have enough capacity to meet Apple's demand."
This is particularly noteworthy because the U.S. market accounts for one in every four iPhones sold worldwide, "so it represents a huge portion of Foxconn's manufacturing business inside China," Strategy Analytics analyst Neil Mawston said.
This is particularly noteworthy because the U.S. market accounts for one in every four iPhones sold worldwide, "so it represents a huge portion of Foxconn's manufacturing business inside China," Strategy Analytics analyst Neil Mawston said.
Bet they can't make dupes as fast as /. (Score:5, Informative)
Dupe de dupe dupe dupe dup dup
Who says you have to go overseas for volume manufacturing?
Re: (Score:2)
Who says overseas volume manufacturing needs to be in China?
Just because it isn't made in China, it doesn't mean it is going to be made in America.
We will just be paying more for our devices, without bringing in any additional jobs to the States.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I agree that no manufacturing will happen in the US, but no, we won't be paying more for our devices. If you pay attention to international markets, you'd know that wages in China have been rising fast. And there's not a huge advantage in price of labor in China any more. Still cheaper than the US, but now it's like 1/3rd or 1/4th the price, not 1/100th the price. Because of this, a few years ago manufacturers started ramping up in cheaper markets. I in fact made a killing in either 2016 or 2017 bettin
Re: Bet they can't make dupes as fast as /. (Score:2)
. I in fact made a killing in either 2016 or 2017 betting on a manufacture ramp up in Vietnam.
Your unnecessary and redundant addition of the word "either" reveals unconscious embellishment and betrays the fact that you're lying.
Re: (Score:2)
Not everyone has impeccable memories (just so we are clear: I'm not the AC.) I don't even remember what I did last year, nevermind three or four years ago.
Re:Bet they can't make dupes as fast as /. (Score:4, Insightful)
Labor costs haven't been a real factor in companies placing manufacturing in China for some time. The real advantage to manufacturing in China is the supply chain. Every possible component, electronic or mechanical, is readily available there. Not so here in North America. And although labor is cheap in Vietnam, they still would have to ship all the parts from China. It's been quite fascinating to watch the "Strange Parts" YouTube channel about this sort of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
The real advantage to manufacturing in China is the supply chain. Every possible component, electronic or mechanical, is readily available there.
Shipping around the world is so cheap that if you know what parts you need in advance, every possible component is readily available anywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Cost of living in such places is much cheaper. It is not unreasonable to expect the cost of labour in such places to also be much cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
From what I recall of the article, Foxconn mentioned their facilities in India. They aren't moving any production back here no matter what lies *some* have publicized.
Of course they can (Score:2)
Final Assembly (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This gives no leverage at all. If it goes on long enough it will just force China to retaliate further.
It will be the usual Trump "victory", like the recent Mexico deal. Undefined goals, so no way to measure success or failure, and eventually a little deal is done that allows him to claim victory. The question is how much pain will you have to endure before it happens.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Undefined goals, so no way to measure success or failure, and eventually a little deal is done that allows him to claim victory. The question is how much pain will you have to endure before it happens.
It is far worse that that. He is not accomplishing anything, and in the process he is hurting the economy by placing a large tax that mostly goes to those at the bottom, so basically he is making things worse. Also, a tariff policy with metrics and goals designed to do one thing, such as tariff goods higher that are produced in countries that pollute more, as a way to reduce pollution might have had a positive impact, since the tariffs could have been automatically reduced as environmental controls improv
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I'd love to know what goes on in his head. Take the recent claims that China pays the tariffs. White House staff claim that it's what Trump actually believes, but it seems so ludicrous I find it hard to accept, even from him.
When he does stuff like re-stock the swamp with his own people, does he believe he is actually doing something else, something better, or is he fully aware? When he lies about random, trivial things, is that a conscious decision or does it work on some subconscious level where things th
Re:Final Assembly (Score:4, Interesting)
Take the recent claims that China pays the tariffs. White House staff claim that it's what Trump actually believes, but it seems so ludicrous I find it hard to accept, even from him.
He's so ignorant of everything, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he does actually believe that China is paying the tariffs.
It's obvious he doesn't know anything about business, how the government works, basic civic administration, and a host of other things. He's a gold-plated moron who grew up wealthy and as a result never had to learn anything.
I honestly doubt Trump could figure out how to buy car insurance, compare prices in a grocery store, or change a tire.
He's never had to overcome a challenge or figure anything out- he's always had someone else to do the miscellaneous day-to-day tasks that you and I do all the time.
Remember, this is a guy who thinks that windmills cause cancer and that you need ID to buy groceries. I literally know of no one else who's that uninformed.
Re: (Score:3)
I wonder what he thinks about his failed casinos. Does he consider them to be some kind of success? Or blame someone else?
Re: (Score:2)
Whoever in the USA who's not rich and voted for Trump must be an idiot. Sorry, folks, but... seriously. We had that coming!
When you have a system that gives you the choice of hillary clinton or donald trump you're fucked either way.
Re: (Score:2)
When you have a system that gives you the choice of hillary clinton or donald trump you're fucked either way.
Really though?
What do you think she would have done that would have been as bad as what is happening now?
Re: (Score:3)
I think the truth is between these two views. Yeah, you're getting fucked either way, but if I'm getting fucked against my will, I want the lube. I want the lube real bad.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the truth is between these two views. Yeah, you're getting fucked either way, but if I'm getting fucked against my will, I want the lube. I want the lube real bad.
Couldn't have put it better myself
Re: (Score:3)
When you have a system that gives you the choice of hillary clinton or donald trump you're fucked either way.
Really though?
What do you think she would have done that would have been as bad as what is happening now?
Probably not, it would be a different kind of bad but a lot closer to the business as usual bad that is to be expected, not great though by a long shot. She definitely wouldn't be the international laughing stock Trump is though.
Re: (Score:1)
When you have a system that gives you the choice of hillary clinton or donald trump you're fucked either way.
Hillary was awful, for sure, but she would have been nowhere near as bad as Trump has been and continues to be. At least she understood how the government worked, which is something Trump had demonstrated he has no real knowledge of.
Do you think Hillary believes that you need ID to buy groceries?
Do you think that she thinks that windmills cause cancer?
Would she ever say something so stupid as “Take the guns first, go through due process second”?
Seriously, the man is a moron and if you can't see
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know you at all, but I'd bet $10,000 that you'd be a better president than he's been so far.
I'd bet you double that a drowned rat could do a better job. I didn't mean to imply she would be just as bad or anything, a different kind of bad sure but certainly not great.
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, if Trump does invade another country, he'll replace Bush as the worst president of the century.
Re: (Score:2)
What country did Hillary "invade"?
I'm genuinely curious, because that wasn't a power she had in any role, not as a Senator and not as the Secretary of State.
So again, what country did Hillary "invade"? What troops did she order sent, or what missiles or bombs did she order to be deployed?
Re: Final Assembly (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So in other words, Hillary didn't invade Lybia.
According to you she may have advocated for it, but she didn't actually invade Lybia, she didn't give the order to invade Lybia, she didn't authorize any deployment of any forces or weapons against Lybia, and she didn't have the authority land a single soldier in Lybia.
And yet, somehow that translates into "Hillary invaded Lybia".
Re: Final Assembly (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What you're saying, essentially, is that if you tell me to steal a candy bar and I do, then by your logic, you stole the candy bar.
That's not the way it works. I understand what you're saying, but that's still not the way it works.
Re: (Score:1)
"They consider anything criticising Trump to be trolling." Trump considers anything criticizing Trump to be trolling. They are only mindlessly following their inept leader.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Another anonymous commie hero.
Trump is a moron but the problem remains. (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually unlike the Mexico non-deal and unnecessary threatening for no actual gain, it's necessary to hold China's feet to the fire. It has nothing to do with Trump, he's obviously the most senile American businessman since 1985-1994.
With China there's no hope that Trump will convince anyone of anything they don't already know or scare them into a position. What will happen is he'll do his usual junk yard dog barking act, acting crazy, being crazy, saying stupid shit constantly, and eventually China's eco
Re: (Score:1)
The Mexico Deal is actually a bit more shaky than even that. Mexico is promising 6000 National Guard troops to the Guatemala border. That the National Guard they don't currently have but are promising to stand up....soon...any day now, in fact....right nigh tomorrow...in the fullness of time.... Trump bargained for a hill of beans and declared Victory with Honor, in honor of Richard Nixon.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
The recent Mexico deal isn't a personal victory for Trump anyway. The important details were ironed out by his outgoing head of DHS. Then he claimed that the threat of tariffs was responsible. What a disingenuous dickbag.
Re: Final Assembly (Score:2)
This gives no leverage at all.
Well, shit... if it's you saying it, its got to be true.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, I'm like the Pope. Only infallible when I say I'm infallible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
US has tons of leverage, China very little. Who's going to buy their crap?
Is that what you think? China has customers lined up out the door. If they stop making your crap, who will? Are americans going to sit in a factory churning out poor quality maga hats for ten bucks a day? I really don't think they are.
Re: (Score:1)
Who's going to buy their crap?
China literally can't make their crap fast enough. For example, over 97% of the world's electric busses are in China. They would really love to export them, but can't make them fast enough to satisfy domestic demand.
Same with electric cars. I'd love to buy a BYD but there are huge waiting lists in China already, despite them ramping up production as fast as they can.
China doesn't need US (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Trump will DESTROY America you stupid pinko
FTFY
Re: (Score:1)
China's currency is propped up quasi-exclusively by owning American T-notes. It's a "you've got my throat but I'm cupping your balls" maneuver. Nobody wants to do anything real rash as a result, both parties would be damaged.
If the US decided to go to full economic war with China, it would hurt the Chinese economy... 100 percent. Their pink asswipes wouldn't hold 50% value after a week.
Re:China doesn't need US (Score:5, Informative)
China holds about 4.7% of Federal securities, AND due to the maturity schedule on the securities, they wouldn't be able to call in all of the debt at once. If China started calling on maturity all of their debt, it likely wouldn't do much to the US, but would impact their Yuan trading rate in a bad way.
Re: China doesn't need US (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
100% of those devices are currently made in China, and it's questionable whether foxconn actually has that much capacity online in the US yet. Virtually all the stuff they're made from also comes from China, like most of the components. The tariffs will still affect iDevices.
Re: China doesn't need US (Score:2)
100% of those devices are currently made in China
Even the SOC's?
Re: (Score:2)
An SoC is not a device, it is a component.
Most SoCs are not made in China, but pretty much everything else in there is.
Re: (Score:2)
However historically many US Allies tend to mirror US policies. So while China can weather the economic impact of US trade, but if its allies get on board and match then there are more problems.
That said, The Trump Administration hasn't done a really good job keeping its Allies inline with the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump has been actively kicking allies in the knees, why should they following down the rat hole?
Re: (Score:2)
That is the worst part about being the Adult in the room. If they dump the US right now, and in luckily a year and a half, or less then luckily 5 1/2 years in the future there is new leadership who is back to making America the standard of power and influence. They don't want to start from step one to rebuild their relationships.
I just ran out of pop corn... (Score:2)
We can still build them (Score:2)
Re:We can still build them (Score:5, Insightful)
The new robots and more advanced production lines are ready.
Smaller parts no longer need what China had to offer.
What once would have been the next upgrade in China can be done for less outside China.
No Communism needed.
Potential Duplicate comment (Score:2)
I am sure others have already commented on this, but this being Slashdot I won't bother checking.
So ...
this story is a duplicate of one posted yesterday.
https://mobile.slashdot.org/st... [slashdot.org]
Sure they can (Score:2)
"Apple's US iPhones Can All Be Made Outside of China If Needed, Says Foxconn"
Sure they could be made here, they'd just cost twice as much.
The only way they could be made here at any reasonable price point is if the manufacturing was done 100% through robotic assembly, testing, and packaging.
But then Apple expects people to pay $1000 for a monitor stand (!!), so maybe the suckers would be happy to stand in line to buy an iPhone for $3000.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Labor is what, 1/1000th the price?
Wrong. Labor is one of the most expensive parts of most manufactured goods.
For example, do you know what the most expensive part of most vehicles is? It's not the engine or the body or the drive train, or even the interior. It's the worker's health care and pension plan (if any). Look it up.
Ever wonder why there are virtually no phones made in America? (And I don't mean "sold", I mean actually made and assembled.) I'll tell you: it's because the labor costs are prohibitive.
Re: (Score:2)
Yippie! (Score:2)