Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Wireless Networking Technology

Kohler Unveils a Camera For Your Toilet (techcrunch.com) 97

Kohler has launched the Dekoda, a $599 smart toilet camera that analyzes users' waste to track hydration, gut health, and detect potential issues like blood. "It also comes with a rechargeable battery, a USB connection, and a fingerprint sensor to identify who's using the toilet," reports TechCrunch. From the report: The Dekoda is currently available for preorder, with shipments scheduled to begin on October 21. In addition to the hardware purchase fee, customers will need to pay between $70 and $156 per year for a subscription. If you're uneasy about the privacy implications of putting a camera right below your private parts, the company says, "Dekoda's sensors see down into your toilet and nowhere else." It also notes that the resulting data is secured via end-to-end encryption.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Kohler Unveils a Camera For Your Toilet

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Just no.
  • by TigerPlish ( 174064 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:49PM (#65739370)

    This is Peak Stupidity. Paying for the privilege of having your poop photographed and analyzed in your toilet.

    I want my old timeline back. The one without social media, interconnected thermostats and such, and cameras to analyze your poop.

    • by dfghjk ( 711126 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @07:14PM (#65739458)

      "This is Peak Stupidity."

      No, peak stupidity will be requiring it or your health insurance will go up 30%.

      Incidentally, my old employer did exactly this. Required annual blood tests or your rates went up. They used the data to promote the "health" of their work force, not for your benefit. What a piece of shit company they were. National Instruments for those interested.

      • by msauve ( 701917 )
        Whenever they wanted me to take a drug test, I said "OK, which ones do you want me to test?"
      • by mjwx ( 966435 )

        "This is Peak Stupidity."

        No, peak stupidity will be requiring it or your health insurance will go up 30%.

        Incidentally, my old employer did exactly this. Required annual blood tests or your rates went up. They used the data to promote the "health" of their work force, not for your benefit. What a piece of shit company they were. National Instruments for those interested.

        Peak stupidity is allowing, let alone supporting private companies to have control over your health care.

        Requiring your shit to be analysed to see what they can charge you more for is so far over the peak you're in another country. I can see it happening though.

        • "This is Peak Stupidity."

          No, peak stupidity will be requiring it or your health insurance will go up 30%.

          Incidentally, my old employer did exactly this. Required annual blood tests or your rates went up. They used the data to promote the "health" of their work force, not for your benefit. What a piece of shit company they were. National Instruments for those interested.

          Peak stupidity is allowing, let alone supporting private companies to have control over your health care. Requiring your shit to be analysed to see what they can charge you more for is so far over the peak you're in another country. I can see it happening though.

          My company's been doing this for a decade and a half. This is healthcare in America. Everything is for profit, including your health issues. It's one of the reasons I refuse to even participate in it. If I die, I die. So be it.

        • Peak stupidity is allowing, let alone supporting private companies to have control over your health care.

          Still....better than having the Federal bureaucracy in charge of it....

          Ugh....can you imagine health centers ala DMV?

          *shudder*

          • by mjwx ( 966435 )

            Peak stupidity is allowing, let alone supporting private companies to have control over your health care.

            Still....better than having the Federal bureaucracy in charge of it....

            Ugh....can you imagine health centers ala DMV?

            *shudder*

            Imagine being able to get the medical care you need without having to worry about it bankrupting you.

            You don't worry at all.

            That's life in every other western country. Also dealing with the DVLA (DMV here in the UK) is a breeze. It's all done online, in my 10 years here I haven't had to visit a DVLA office for anything and previous to that in Australia, the last time I visited a DOT office was the day I got my license. Everything else could be done by post or online.

            Maybe the US needs to start ele

            • Imagine being able to get the medical care you need without having to worry about it bankrupting you.

              That's already the case with me. I have decent insurance through work....

              Hell, I recently had to have surgery, and it didn't break the bank at all.

              And I guess you're lucky over there for here dealing with the DMV is generally an all day cluster fuck, if you can get lucky and only deal with it 1 days.

              There are some things the govt needs to do, by necessity that private could not do it...ie Defense, etc.

              B

              • by Archfeld ( 6757 )

                I can send a letter via the USPS for a $.55 to Alaska from the continental US in 3 days. Fedex/UPS wants $Bucketload to ship a single sheet to anywhere.
                The USPS is perhaps the best and maybe the only truly functioning government service. If they were allowed to keep their profit every year they would be making decent money. Instead they start at $0 and are always forced to ask the monkeys in Congress for money. The legislative chimps just want to line their pockets with what privatizing the postal service w

      • "This is Peak Stupidity."

        No, peak stupidity will be requiring it or your health insurance will go up 30%.

        Requiring a subscription service or... God damn you. Stop giving them ideas!

    • This is Peak Stupidity.

      For a toilet manufacturer, yeah, pretty much.

      the End Times are Upon Us

      No, it's just the end times for Kohler as they telegraph to potential customers that the engineers have left the building and its now run by the idiots in marketing. No company lasts forever. The inspired leadership there at the beginning eventually ages out. Boeing, Disney, etc. Kohler is no different.

      • by HiThere ( 15173 )

        Actually there are markets where these might be reasonable. (MIGHT, I'm not real sure of their capabilities.) The ones I'm thinking of are pretty niche, though. Generally hospitals or care homes. (But they probably couldn't pay the costs.)

      • This is Peak Stupidity.

        For a toilet manufacturer, yeah, pretty much.

        TFA shows the camera clips onto the rim of your existing toilet, below the seat; it's not a toilet with a built-in camera - not yet anyway. In any case; seems super dumb. Also, it has a fingerprint reader at the toilet-rim level - yuk. Sure the reader is on the outside, but sill below the seat at rim level.

  • by Baron_Yam ( 643147 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:50PM (#65739372)

    Who in their right mind would give their personal health information to a corporation that also has their billing information and can associate the two?

    It's a matter of time before the database is cracked or sold (or, more likely, access is discretely rented). Then you try to get insurance, or it becomes part of employment background checks, or it's used to target you with yet more advertising.

    If it could run locally and had a single upfront price, it might be an interesting health tool. As it likely really is, it's nothing but a privacy nightmare.

    • Who in their right mind would give their personal health information to a corporation that also has their billing information and can associate the two?

      Well, we all do this all the time. After all, our doctors, labs, and health insurance are all for-profit entities that have our very private financial and health info that we somehow trust will be secure and not misused.

      The bigger question is whether this technology exists and whether it works. I use ColoGuard to detect colon cancer, but there is substantial published research to support its effectiveness. Does such published research exist for this camera-based method? I imagine detecting blood is doab

      • Well, we all do this all the time. After all, our doctors, labs, and health insurance are all for-profit entities that have our very private financial and health info that we somehow trust will be secure and not misused.

        Doctors and labs have to comply with HIPPA rules. I'm not sure if it applies to Kohler, but if they are serious they would comply voluntarily anyway. I don't sense seriousness here though.

    • Agree that running locally and being a single purchase would be better, but most of the other issue just aren't a problem for most of the world. insurance eligibility isn't an issue and the data protection safeguards prevent it from being used for employment reasons.

      What's really interesting on this post is just how many people are having an emotional meltdown to one of the few recent innovations that could quite literally save their lives. Early detection of bowel cancer has a _massive_ impact on both surv

  • by markdavis ( 642305 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:54PM (#65739382)

    >"Kohler has launched the Dekoda, a $599 smart toilet camera that analyzes users' waste to track hydration, gut health, and detect potential issues like blood."

    Um. No thanks. And, by the way, I think most people can manage to see blood and know what "normal" movements look like.

    >"and a fingerprint sensor to identify who's using the toilet,"

    Right, because we wouldn't want people to lie or something.

    >"customers will need to pay between $70 and $156 per year for a subscription."

    Of course. No modern purchase would be complete without an endless "service" revenue costing the consumer thousands of additional dollars!

    >"It also notes that the resulting data is secured via end-to-end encryption."

    We are REALLY concerned about the poo data being intercepted between the toilet and your servers. We are not at all concerned about your servers being hacked, or the data being shared or misused or any silly thing like that.

    • "I think most people can manage to see blood "

      This isn't intended to be in favour of this gadget but most people can't see blood in their urine or feces but it's there and detectable in a lab.

      Which is why you submit samples to the lab for such things as colorectal screening.

      • >"This isn't intended to be in favour of this gadget but most people can't see blood in their urine or feces but it's there and detectable in a lab."

        Yeah, but my comment is in reference to a "camera". How is that going to detect blood better than my eyes? A camera isn't a lab instrument :)

        I am sure future models might actually have fancier sensors that could do more. But, really, how is this silly toilet better than just pointing your smartphone in the toilet and using some app?

    • >"and a fingerprint sensor to identify who's using the toilet,"

      This is so that it associates the data with the correct person, when multiple people use the same toilet.

      > Of course. No modern purchase would be complete without an endless "service" revenue costing the consumer thousands of additional dollars!

      If there was no subscription and no cloud, this could be a good product. But that would require a nearby toilet hub (computer) that could do the computations. If this hub were a general purpo

    • I think most people can manage to see blood and know what "normal" movements look like.

      You'd be surprised how very little people know about what healthy looks like. Yeah seeing blood is a good indication that something is wrong, but the world is full of people struggling to squeeze out a turd oblivious to the fact that this is a direct indication of an unhealthy diet, poor gut health, and can lead to a world of poor health outcomes.

      Now if you'll excuse me I need to go outside and have a smoke.

      *this is a joke, but hopefully on the nose enough to make it immediately obvious a significant portio

  • by Revek ( 133289 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:59PM (#65739396)
    There is no way I'm going to have a poop camera. Just imagine the cops getting a warrant.

    The prosecutor at a trial. if the jury will observe the screen the defendant clearly had corn the day before the incident clearly linking him to the crime. I'm sure there will be a NCIS or whatever with that plot soon.
  • just wait for the scam calls saying you need to flip the camera

  • And people are gonna pay to watch you poop on the dark web

  • Ahhh, a special Facebook group for everyone who owns one of these cameras and has a subscription to support it. Quizzes, contests, prizes!! More! Kids, get your parents to buy one of these cameras. Loads of fun! No home should be without one. Oh, I forgot. This is in America! No home should be without two or three or more of these cameras.

    Special product announcement! New camera specially designed for your cat's kittylitter tray. Don't have a cat? That's OK, just get one for your boyfriend.
    • You're joking but latest cat litter machines have cameras. Here from Petkit https://petkit.com/products/pu... [petkit.com]

      The camera is useful if you have several cats, so you can then check on them while travelling. Cats might get stuck in a cardboard box or push a door and be stuck in a room. A cat litter machine without camera distinguishes them by weight, but that might not be enough to make sure they are all ok if two or more have similar stature.

      Their cat litter includes pH colour indicator so they also help check

      • by ve3oat ( 884827 )
        Thank you. I am now better informed. (You didn't say it, but I guess that is where the idea came from.)
        • by cstacy ( 534252 )

          You're joking but latest cat litter machines have cameras. Here from Petkit https://petkit.com/products/pu [petkit.com]... [petkit.com]

          Thank you. I am now better informed. (You didn't say it, but I guess that is where the idea came from.)

          The kittys are not what they seem.

  • Holy shit! (Score:5, Funny)

    by RitchCraft ( 6454710 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @07:04PM (#65739418)

    A toilet with a subscription! I shit you not, I did not see this coming.

    • You didn't see it coming, cause you didn't have the camera! It is a crappy situation.

    • And the price! They must think we're flush with cash.
    • someone is going to make a crapload of dough...

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Mod parent funnier, but the angle I was looking for in this story was analysis of urine to detect hydration and salt levels as well as general kidney function. But even I think analyzing the feces is going too far into the BS and the camera part of this story must be some kind of joke.

      But I am reminded of Volume 22 of the "secrets" series. "Toire no Himitsu" in Japanese, sponsored by Toto. Everything you ever wanted to know about washlets and some more besides. (I've read the entire set, even including the

    • If you shit it not, then it didn't see you coming either.

  • What we really need are self-cleaning toilets, using that gecko technology that prevents anything from sticking.

  • Aside from the obvious privacy issues, the concern I have is that this product seems to be positioned as a medical device, but lacks any information about how it is measuring what it purports to measure. What studies support the analyses it claims to perform, and how are its methodologies validated?

    It's deeply deceptive to sell a product that claims to track health-related data without disclosing how accurate or meaningful it is. Not only is such marketing exploiting the uneducated public and leading them

    • Now that you frame it this way, I'm thinking of Theranos and their wild claims of how they'd do blood analysis.

  • GIGO? (Score:4, Funny)

    by gawbl ( 941021 ) on Monday October 20, 2025 @07:22PM (#65739482)
    Is this another example of GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out)?

    It's still missing the obligatory AI to mis-interpret the results.

    To be meme-complete, the collected data should be permanently recorded on the blockchain.
  • subject says it all

  • What a wasted opporunity.
  • smart toilet camera that analyzes users' waste to track hydration, gut health, and detect potential issues

    Can it be attached to an F-18? Because someone apparently has some really, really bad intestinal issues [truthsocial.com] that need analyzing ...

  • Literally.
  • Assuming that the poop shots can be easily accessed and posted to sites that vote on the best turd, it may turn turd wars into a viral sensation

  • Sorry! you did not pay for the flushing option!
  • All I can say is that I'm glad I didn't have to write the firmware and do the beta testing.
    • by cstacy ( 534252 )

      All I can say is that I'm glad I didn't have to write the firmware and do the beta testing.

      Hardware and Software can also be a problem.
      You want just the right amount of firmware.

  • Uh, where exactly am I sticking my finger?

    They should talk to Xerox. I'm sure they have a large catalog of butt prints from drunken office parties we can use for identification.

  • The Japanese already did this - https://mainichi.jp/english/ar... [mainichi.jp]

    It scans the poop with a laser instead of taking a photo, and it sounds like processing is done on the device and results sent to a smartphone app.

    Still ridiculous, but sounds like a more elegant solution than a wifi-connected camera if you're really interested in cataloguing the shape and texture of your bowel movements for some reason.

  • No saw that coming except the AI camera that was watching your screens, and eavesdropping on other household noises and conversations to sell you... shit, of course.
  • So, does this make Kohler a registered sex-offender?
    • by coreyh ( 30451 )

      I logged in purely to make a Smart Pipe comment. I didn't recognize Mark Proksch in that video when it first came out in ~2014.

  • You don't need a camera or some service contract. Just meet with your doctor on a regular basis (typically every three years, more frequently as you get older)

  • "Thank You, Master."
    "Insufficient sample, may I please have another?"

    But do you really need an AI to tell you that your crap is too hard or too soft and that you are bleeding from your ass?

  • Someone in corporate was reading articles about enshitification and was not clear on the concept.

    But aen't you glad I didn't say "being on the cutting edge"?

  • "Smart Pipe" by Adult Swim parodied this over 10 years ago.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]

    • by SendBot ( 29932 )

      The seriousness of that went over the top and then built new things to go over the top of. Moderators please spend your points on the parent comment ^

  • Where is it placed? And all other related questions...
    Or does every ass have a unique print, and it recognizes that?

  • Next level Enshittification
  • Last time _I_ revealed _my_ camera for a toilet, the cops came!

  • Does it livestream for my followers?
  • Poo-Pic Pro
    Waste Watch Wizard
    Crapalyzer

    and of course:
    CrapSnap, the new social media app to share your crappings.

"Everyone is entitled to an *informed* opinion." -- Harlan Ellison

Working...