
Denmark To Ban Mobile Phones In Schools and After-School Clubs (theguardian.com) 66
Denmark is set to ban mobile phones in schools and after-school clubs, following a government commission's recommendation that children under 13 should not have their own smartphones. The Guardian reports: The government said it would change existing legislation to force all folkeskole -- comprehensive primary and lower secondary schools -- to become phone-free, meaning that almost all children aged between seven and 16-17 will be required by law not to bring their phones into school. The announcement marks a U-turn by the government, which had previously refused to introduce such a law. It comes as governments across Europe are trying to impose tighter regulations on children's access to phones and social media.
The Danish wellbeing commission was set up by the prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, in 2023 to investigate growing dissatisfaction among children and young people. Its long-awaited report, published on Tuesday, raised the alarm over the digitisation of children and young people's lives and called for a better balance between digital and analogue life. Among its 35 recommendations was the need for government legislation banning phones from schools and after-school clubs.
The minister for children and education, Mattias Tesfaye, told Politiken: "There is a need to reclaim the school as an educational space, where there is room for reflection and where it is not an extension of the teenage bedroom." There will be scope for local authorities to make exceptions, including for children with special educational needs, but he said mobile phones and personal tablets "do not belong in school, neither during breaks nor during lessons." He said the government had started preparing a legislative amendment.
The Danish wellbeing commission was set up by the prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, in 2023 to investigate growing dissatisfaction among children and young people. Its long-awaited report, published on Tuesday, raised the alarm over the digitisation of children and young people's lives and called for a better balance between digital and analogue life. Among its 35 recommendations was the need for government legislation banning phones from schools and after-school clubs.
The minister for children and education, Mattias Tesfaye, told Politiken: "There is a need to reclaim the school as an educational space, where there is room for reflection and where it is not an extension of the teenage bedroom." There will be scope for local authorities to make exceptions, including for children with special educational needs, but he said mobile phones and personal tablets "do not belong in school, neither during breaks nor during lessons." He said the government had started preparing a legislative amendment.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Smuggled cell phones are less common in Scandinavian prisons, because prisoners are allowed to use prison phones without paying punitive rates.
Re: (Score:3)
Prison phones are monitored and conversations are listened to/recorded. The most important reason why cell phones are smuggled into prisons is for criminal activities management so bosses can order hits or moves for their organizations without being listened to, not to call their wives and kids.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Prison phones are monitored and conversations are listened to/recorded. The most important reason why cell phones are smuggled into prisons is for criminal activities management so bosses can order hits or moves for their organizations without being listened to, not to call their wives and kids.
Nordic nations are so very rarely plagued by organised crime that they need to worry about monitoring the phones 24/7 for secret codes... and most of the organised crims end up being deported because they're not Nordic. I mean who's heard of the Norweigan Mafia? I'd make a joke with slashed O but /. doesn't support unicode.
Some of the prisoners are probably permitted mobile phones... and the Nordic nations have some of the lowest recidivism rates in the world
The closest thing the Danes have to a home
Re: (Score:2)
I'd make a joke with slashed O but /. doesn't support unicode.
You mean like this:
ØØØØØ
Re: (Score:2)
It could simply be for preventing somebody in jail for domestic violence to phone his wife to threaten her so she drops any charges for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
"According to Norwegian police statistics, 5,284 cases of domestic violence were reported in 2008."
Re: (Score:2)
It could simply be for preventing somebody in jail for domestic violence to phone his wife to threaten her so she drops any charges for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] "According to Norwegian police statistics, 5,284 cases of domestic violence were reported in 2008."
5000 cases in 2008? Got anything more recent and how does that compare to the US... The UK shamefully had 2.4 million estimated victims of DV last year (approx 1.6m women and 0.8m men), 850,000 reported to the police with 50,000 prosecutions and the US will probably make that look good.
You do know that most civilised nations don't lock people up for anything?
You've got to be pretty bad to be locked up for DV, even in the UK. Usually a non custodial sentence is better as they're not usually hardened cr
Re: (Score:2)
I see your arguments have absolutely nothing to do with my OP which you replied to in the first place.
https://theprisondirect.com/ca... [theprisondirect.com]
"Countries like Norway and Sweden have reported reduced recidivism rates and improved inmate behavior through controlled phone access."
Emphasis on "contolled". Who cares if inmates have a "controlled" cell phone? Same thing, they can listen in and record calls.
My point was about smuggled phones and what they are used for.
Re: (Score:2)
and important difference between a school and a prison is that one tries to kick you out and the other tries to keep you in.
Re: (Score:1)
In my country (also Europe) phones are banned in schools (all the way up to high schools) as well. The kids just put them in their locker in the morning, and take them out again when they leave. If you get caught with it, you face detention. So yeah, that works.
So its ok for the first couple years at school? (Score:1)
"almost all children aged between seven and 16-17 will be required by law not to bring their phones into school."
So the under 7 year olds get to keep their smartphones?
Say are all schools in Denmark under government control?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:So its ok for the first couple years at school? (Score:4, Funny)
As an American, I don't understand how Danish parents keep their children from crying if not by putting a tablet or smartphone in front of them for 15 hours a day.
Re: So its ok for the first couple years at school (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have children?
Re: (Score:2)
I read that as "don't let children use tablets, unless they really want it."
But seriously, being the ideal parent is a luxury here. I don't know how average people are supposed to manage it.
Putting a roof over a child's head typically requires there be two incomes to the households, especially in major US cities. We've been raising children by television for a few generations now. I typically came home as a 10 year old to an empty house, with one of my parents only a few hours away from coming home. Some da
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot the sarcasm tag, buddy.
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, maybe I was a little too dry. But I don't mind it if if it triggers an interesting thread.
Re: (Score:2)
Say are all schools in Denmark under government control?
Yes. Objectively in most democratic countries all schools are under government control. Even private schools are at the mercy of what curriculum needs to be taught in a case of national education standards.
But presumably the rule will only affect public schools not private ones. But why would you send your kid to private school. This isn't America, in Denmark private schools are for stupid kids or stupid parents who think the education system isn't capable of teaching precious little Timmy the right way.
Re: (Score:2)
The article got a detail wrong, and you missed a fundamental point about the Danish education system:
- The article said 7 years old, but should have said 6, as that is the typical age of entry into Folkeskole
- You didn't grasp that Danish children only start going to school at this age. There's no school before Folkeskole. Same is true in Finland where the starting age really is 7 (for most) and primary school is called alakoulu. But don't worry, because these education systems are typically ranked among th
Great idea (Score:2)
A situation (Score:1)
My kid is in 3rd grade. I recently learned at least one kid in his class has a phone (as well as two Switches, an XBox and a VR headset of some kind).
My kid has begged for a phone for a couple of years now. He has been told quite plainly that it isn't happening, for many, many years. Ideally, not until at least high school.
Re: (Score:3)
Smart phone over-use is going to be the mental health equivalent of smoking [oup.com] and likely will have a deleterious effect on academic performance [sciencedirect.com].
Re: A situation (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Or, you know, a public phone in the office that kids can use to call parents.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, same for us - and our kids school does enforce locking phones away for the day.
I'd also say that we (a) didn't give them the latest iphones, and (b) locked them down so much that they're really pretty boring. We're letting the line out slowly, and they are starting to get some (non-social-media) apps. We're hoping the UK Government will increase the social media minimum age from 13 to 16 in the next couple of years. Yes, I know it won't enforce all that much, but it gives us an easy standard to adhere
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The difference between my childhood and his, we had land lines back in the 80s/90s and I could easily call my friends to see if they wanted to get together. Now I have to send a message to his friends' parents and see if his friend is available (most of them live at least a few miles away and the area is not bike friendly).
Luckily there's a group of boys in the neighborhood so he normally has kids to play with
Re: (Score:1)
Now I have to send a message to his friends' parents and see if his friend is available (most of them live at least a few miles away and the area is not bike friendly).
Nobody has a computer at home?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see how a computer at home would be useful to arrange a play date that occurs between school and home, unless the computer at home is used to arrange the play date a day in advance. Having everyone stop by home before arranging a play date risks extending the play date either past sunset or past when the evening shift city bus drivers go home to their own families for the night. Either way, there's no time for homework because of all the time spent riding buses.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, I guess I didn't realize you were talking about same-day activities.
In our household, there is just no way anything happens "same day". Even with two parents working from home and only one kid to worry about, the best we can manage is a 5-7 day lead time. Even if all parties had a phone, the odds of a same-day play date happening on a school day are virtually nil.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My kid has begged for a phone for a couple of years now. He has been told quite plainly that it isn't happening, for many, many years. Ideally, not until at least high school.
There are alternatives to "no phone at all".
In our family, daughter got a Nokia 110 dumbphone when she was 7 - it could do PSTN calls and texts, nothing else. She needed to talk and message her friends anyway, and it's not like we have a landline.
Last summer (age: 10) we got a cheap Motorola M13 Android "smartphone". But guess what, it
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Mistyped that one - meant a debit card. So yeah, cannot overspend.
Fantasy (Score:1)
Nice try.
First, you don't die from carbon monoxide poisoning from being in a closed room.
Second, any room without adequate ventilation that might pose a risk of oxygen deprivation should be marked and either have a non-lockable door or an emergency exit. Not many schools have bank vaults or hermetically sealed detention rooms.
Re: (Score:2)
money and transportation? (Score:2)
A better solution is using wifi access points such as those from Huawei to install 5G Pico cells throughout the schools and block communication throughout the school except for payment processing and "find my" applications for parents.
Ot
Re: (Score:2)
I presume they are going to use lockboxes or Yondr pouches etc, for exactly the reason you stated. That seems to be what's happening elsewhere, including in the UK, where it's happened at my daughter's school (and it has been a joyless and shitty thing, too)
Re: (Score:2)
How about banning content? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
no school shooters (Score:2)
must be nice
Re: (Score:2)
must be nice
It is, you should try it.
Signed
- The rest of the freaking world.
Some schools ban them for the wrong reasons (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"because we didn't have the proliferation of handguns and military grade semiautomatic rifles resulting in their increased availability to kids like we do now."
Well that simply isn't true. My wife likes to talk about how when she was in high school many of her fellow students had rifles and shotguns in the vehicles they drove to school. Nobody used them on other students.
The AR-15 was first manufactured in 1959 and proved to be such a popular and reliable consumer-grade rifle that the US military ordered a military-grade version in 1963. There were one or two school shootings (at universities I think) between 1960 and Columbine.
As for handguns, well, you
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The US Constitution guarantees the right of individuals to bear arms. Early drafts went so far as to require citizens to possess military-grade weapons, similar to the Swiss model, but that was dropped as too expensive and not future-proofed.
Citizens cannot form a militia if they lack appropriate
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Guns have always been commonplace in the US. School shootings have not. Therefore, the one did not cause the other. It seems more reasonable to me to investigate what actually has caused the rise in school shootings then to assume it will be corrected by changing a non-causal variable and stripping the people of an explicit Constitutional right in the process.
In other words, if guns were the cause
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Some schools ban them for the wrong reasons (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)