Nearly All of Apple's Newest Devices Have an Unannounced Thread Radio On Board (theverge.com) 93
Apple has quietly added a Thread radio to nearly all of its newest iPads, MacBooks, and iMacs. The Verge reports: While the company doesn't list Thread on the specs of any of these products, FCC reports indicate that many of Apple's latest devices have had Thread radios tested for compliance. Generally, you don't test a radio that's not there. We found evidence of Thread testing in the following models: iPad Pro 13-inch (M4) (Wi-Fi + Cellular), iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) (Wi-Fi + Cellular), iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) (Wi-Fi), iPad Air 11-inch (M2) (Wi-Fi + Cellular), iPad Air 13-inch (M2) Wi-Fi, MacBook Air 15-inch (M3), MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3), MacBook Pro 14-inch (M3 Pro or M3 Max), MacBook Pro 16-inch (M3 Pro or M3 Max), iMac (M3, two ports), and iMac (M3, four ports).
The FCC requires manufacturers to list every radio contained in a device and to test them in every possible scenario to make sure they comply with its transmission regulations. Tom Sciorilli, director of certification for Thread Group, told The Verge that the FCC reports reference FCC 15.247, "which confirms the device will essentially 'stay in its lane' and not interfere with other radios when operating." The reports we found are tests of the IEEE 802.15.4 transmitter functionality -- 802.15.4 is the radio standard Thread runs on. While it supports a number of technologies, the reports mention Thread explicitly.
Thread is the primary wireless protocol for the new smart home standard Matter, which Apple helped develop and that is now the underlying architecture for its Apple Home smart home platform. A low-power, low-bandwidth, mesh networking protocol specifically designed for IoT devices, Thread is shown to be faster than Bluetooth and offers better range, making it ideal for connecting products like smart lights, locks, thermostats, and sensors. [...] So why is it there? The Apple Home app runs on Macs and iPads, and Thread radios could allow them to communicate directly with smart home devices and act as Thread border routers. It's possible Apple is planning to turn your Mac or iPad into a home hub, but iPads used to be home hubs, and the company discontinued that capability for its new Apple Home architecture. Those iPads didn't have Thread radios, though.
The FCC requires manufacturers to list every radio contained in a device and to test them in every possible scenario to make sure they comply with its transmission regulations. Tom Sciorilli, director of certification for Thread Group, told The Verge that the FCC reports reference FCC 15.247, "which confirms the device will essentially 'stay in its lane' and not interfere with other radios when operating." The reports we found are tests of the IEEE 802.15.4 transmitter functionality -- 802.15.4 is the radio standard Thread runs on. While it supports a number of technologies, the reports mention Thread explicitly.
Thread is the primary wireless protocol for the new smart home standard Matter, which Apple helped develop and that is now the underlying architecture for its Apple Home smart home platform. A low-power, low-bandwidth, mesh networking protocol specifically designed for IoT devices, Thread is shown to be faster than Bluetooth and offers better range, making it ideal for connecting products like smart lights, locks, thermostats, and sensors. [...] So why is it there? The Apple Home app runs on Macs and iPads, and Thread radios could allow them to communicate directly with smart home devices and act as Thread border routers. It's possible Apple is planning to turn your Mac or iPad into a home hub, but iPads used to be home hubs, and the company discontinued that capability for its new Apple Home architecture. Those iPads didn't have Thread radios, though.
I'm intrigued (Score:1, Troll)
Makes you wonder how they'll bastardize the standard to keep their disciples in their own walled garden.
Re:I'm intrigued (Score:4, Insightful)
They keep this "disciple" by making high quality products that don't need replaced for 7 years. I'm still using an iPhone 7+.
Re: (Score:1)
The only people I hear about bubble colour from are Android users.
Re: I'm intrigued (Score:2)
Apple to it's credit has been almost singularly resistant to that amazingly. But walled gardens are never good long term.
Re: (Score:2)
They keep this "disciple" by making high quality products that don't need replaced for 7 years. I'm still using an iPhone 7+.
And I an iPhone8 Plus.
Goes well with my still working mid-2012 MacBook Pro.
Re: (Score:3)
They'll require 3rd parties to pay them royalties in order to gain support for their devices in Apple's ecosystem, just like they do already. Why anyone would support this in home automation, where it is literally the antithesis of what everyone wants, is beyond me. Apple HomeKit is an abomination.
Re: (Score:2)
Not really "a radio" (Score:5, Informative)
Thread uses the 2.4GHz band, the same as WiFi and Bluetooth, and not far off some 4G bands. They have one radio device that is software defined, and they just added support for the Thread protocol to it.
It's the reason why turning off Bluetooth tends to have little to no impact on battery life. It's not a separate radio, it's just a software switch that says "ignore Bluetooth packets" and the hardware remains powered up for WiFi.
Re:Not really "a radio" (Score:5, Informative)
Wi-Fi and 802.15.4/Bluetooth Classic/BLE use different modulation schemes so they are entirely different transceivers even though they almost operate entirely within the same ISM band. Bluetooth's frequency band is actually slightly larger than 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for FCC/IC regions.
For single package/chip components that support both 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth have two dedicated radio transceivers that will operate in co-existence mode when both are enabled for transmit, however both may receive at the same time.
It's the reason why turning off Bluetooth tends to have little to no impact on battery life. It's not a separate radio, it's just a software switch that says "ignore Bluetooth packets" and the hardware remains powered up for WiFi.
The whole reason for Bluetooth, and even more so for Bluetooth Low Energy, is a low-power personal area network (PAN). So turning it off I would expect it to show little to no power usage impact for say a mobile phone or tablet that mostly communicates over Wi-Fi or cellular network. Now days we have BLE beacons used for tracking items that lasts for years on a single coin cell battery.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't work that way these days, they are DSPs that have very little overhead when it comes to demodulating multiple different modulations. I'm not a DSP expert but they are very efficient ASICs with fast ADCs, optimized for the kind of bonkers modulations like 4096-QAM that are in use these days.
Re: (Score:3)
Nothing is using 4096-QAM these days - it requires linear power amplification on the mobile device and hence wastes battery power. The GP is correct in that WiFi and Bluetooth are fundamentally different and are implemented with separate hardware, even when it's on the same chip.
Re: (Score:2)
WiFi 7, which some current gen phones support, use 4096-QAM.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Not really "a radio" (Score:5, Insightful)
Thread is a network protocol based on IEEE 802.15.4, which is a standard for low power mesh networks. Lots of other things use IEEE 802.15.4 for physical and low level networking layers, but they all have different upper layers. One example is Zigbee.
Thread is unique in that every device on the network has an IPv6 address, or at least is addressable by one.
Thread is used by the Matter standard for IoT devices, which is supported by Google, Apple, and many others. Matter is quite good really, it works fully local only and the IP based interface makes it easy to interoperate with.
There is an open source reference implementation of Thread. Apple will use it to control IoT devices in the home.
Re: (Score:2)
So then what is this "Thread" and what does it do? I tried asking Google what a "thread radio" is, and it pointed me back to stories about Apple including one on their recent devices unannounced. Thanks, that clears everything right up.
Apparently your "investigation" didn't include reading TFS all the way to the third paragraph, so I'll repeat it here:
Thread is the primary wireless protocol for the new smart home standard Matter, which Apple helped develop and that is now the underlying architecture for its Apple Home smart home platform. A low-power, low-bandwidth, mesh networking protocol specifically designed for IoT devices, Thread is shown to be faster than Bluetooth and offers better range, making it ideal for connecting products like smart lights, locks, thermostats, and sensors.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, it's wrong. Thread is an IP protocol. IEEE 802.15.4 is the actual wireless protocol. "Thread radio" doesn't really make sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Thread is the primary wireless protocol for the new smart home standard Matter
Which is actually incorrect. The primary wireless radio for Matter is WiFi. Wifi is far and away the most prevalent radio used in Matter devices.
In contrast, the primary use case for Thread is in Matter. Aside from a few Nest accessories, Thread was going nowhere in the consumer space. It is still problematic as Thread network conflicts are still common.
Re: (Score:2)
So then what is this "Thread" and what does it do?
You have to read through the explanation that was buried in the third paragraph: "Thread is the primary wireless protocol for the new smart home standard Matter, which Apple helped develop and that is now the underlying architecture for its Apple Home smart home platform. A low-power, low-bandwidth, mesh networking protocol specifically designed for IoT devices."
Re: (Score:3)
Also the radio device they use is a module, probably a Broadcom module.
The protocol stuff is all handled within the module. To certify the device properly handles the protocol they don't have to redo all the testing, they just need to attach the existing Broadcom certification.
The FCC certification including Thread support likely means that the module they are using happens to include Thread support rather than any indication of Apple's support or intentions.
Re: (Score:2)
I love how they call it a "Thread radio" when it's 802.15.4, a standard that has existed for a very long time. Thread is a protocol, the "Thread radio" is more appropriately called a "Zigbee radio". And what's the mystery about them integrating it? Apple has product plans, duh.
What can Thread do? (Score:2)
We already have 433MHz, Z-Wave, Zigbee, and WiFi for home automation. Why one more?
Re: What can Thread do? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: What can Thread do? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't Apple bring Lightning to its consumers to stop them from using standard USB and didn't it have to be forced by regulators to switch?
Re: What can Thread do? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Possibly but maybe they also saw that mini usb and micro usb absolutely fucking sucked and thought they could design what turned out to be a much better, more robust, easier to use connector that last what 10-15years before changing to usb? Or are you talking about the 30 pin dock connector that solved various connectivity issues that were previously solved in many different ways by various manufacturers often using multiple and proprietary cables as well?
Dude, stop ruining his hategasm with 'facts'.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.cnx-software.com/w... [cnx-software.com]
Yes, that was also the solution for higher-power charging. And don't forget the USB On-The-Go adapters.
Re: (Score:3)
FALSE. Lightning was a replacement for the iPod connector. It had nothing to do with seeing that "mini usb and micro usb" "absolutely fucking sucked" nor is that even true.
"Or are you talking about the 30 pin dock connector that solved various connectivity issues that were previously solved in many different ways by various manufacturers often using multiple and proprietary cables as well?"
No, that would be known as USB which Apple did NOT develop. The "30 pin dock connector" was just one of these "many
Re: (Score:2)
FALSE. Lightning was a replacement for the iPod connector. It had nothing to do with seeing that "mini usb and micro usb" "absolutely fucking sucked" nor is that even true.
I'll disagree with you on the mini and micro USB connectors.
Suckage:
* USB A -- moderately high
* Mini-USB -- off the scale. Mechanically horrible.
* Micro-USB -- less bad than Mini-USB, which is not a high bar to reach.
* USB-C -- does not suck
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
USB-C didn't exist for a few years after Apple introduced Lightning. It was a couple years before USB-C even existed on paper, which then took a couple years to exist on real devices people could buy, then yet a few years more for standards on getting audio and video through USB-C was worked out.
Then, many years after Lightning was on the market, we saw different manufacturers of USB-C cables and chargers offer products that violated the USB specs. We saw cell phones go up in flames because some charger d
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Apple did nothing to develop USB except take credit for it. USB was developed entirely by Intel and tested by the PC industry. Apple got the jump delivering it solely because Microsoft was late with USB support. Also, many PC manufacturers delivered USB before Apple, you just don't know because of Microsoft's failure to support it, and your susceptibility to Apple propaganda.
Apple has a history of doing exactly the opposite of what you claim. Same will happen here.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple did nothing to develop USB except take credit for it. USB was developed entirely by Intel and tested by the PC industry. Apple got the jump delivering it solely because Microsoft was late with USB support. Also, many PC manufacturers delivered USB before Apple, you just don't know because of Microsoft's failure to support it, and your susceptibility to Apple propaganda.
Apple has a history of doing exactly the opposite of what you claim. Same will happen here.
Yes, many "PC" motherboards had perfectly UNusable USB Connectors on them for a few YEARS before the iMac came out in August, 1998, and Apple changed the World of Computing. Again.
Even though USB hardware existed since 1995, and the Protocol was Available since 1996, and Microsoft was on the USB Standards Committed (while Apple was not!), Windows didn't have USB Support until Windows 95, OSR2, in August, 1997 (not that there was anything to use it with). Linux was even more embarrassing.
Re: (Score:3)
You should do the tiniest bit of research on this one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Having done zero research, my guess would be, "new proprietary standard so we can lock in consumers".
The money quote. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Could Apple use this to build a peer-to-peer messaging network of iPhones to be used in the event where there was a massive outage with the local cellular networks?
I'd love to give Apple the benefit of the doubt on this one, and hope that they're building something that might actually be a benefit to humanity someday instead of building yet another home automation protocol.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
the software is already out there, research mesh network
Yeah but it isn't mass deployed and only the people that read sites like this would be ready for that in some sort of outage. If it was built-in to iPhones, then half the people would be ready to use mesh and it could just happen automatically.
Re: (Score:2)
Current model iPhones have, off the top of my head, cellphone data, WiFi, BT, and freaking satellite radio capabilities [apple.com] as-is, and now is adding the tether protocol also - was there really no way to put iPhones into a peer-to-peer network before tether was added?
Re: (Score:2)
We already have 433MHz, Z-Wave, Zigbee, and WiFi for home automation. Why one more?
Thread works on the existing 2.4Ghz frequency, uses the same antennas, and plays nicely without interfering with your Wi-Fi networks.
Re: (Score:2)
"without interfering with your Wi-Fi networks"
Depends on your definition of "interfere". They do "interfere", however they can coexist.
Re: (Score:3)
Thread is a bit different because it uses IP routing (via a border router) which makes it compatible with the hub standard "Matter". WiFi also meets that criteria, but Thread shares the benefit of Z-Wave/Zigbee in being a mesh network so it's more resilient with lots of devices connected and low power devices can connect more easily without needing lots of APs
Re: (Score:2)
One new standard that everyone can support, and that Apple can close off to collect royalties.
And a "Thread radio" and Zigbee are the same thing, in this context.
Re: (Score:2)
One new standard that everyone can support, and that Apple can close off to collect royalties.
And a "Thread radio" and Zigbee are the same thing, in this context.
Apple, Google, Amazon and the OTHER 675 Corporate Members (Brands) of The Connectivity Alliance are "Making This Go"; so it seems to be Quite far-along to Actually Be Something That Works. For You and Me. For Fucking once. . .
Yes, Everyone Knows that Thread is a close Cousin to Zigbee; but that doesn't make it Bad. Zigbee has good Range, Low Power and supports those Handy-Little MESH "PAN"s.
But, for now, just be glad you (and we all) can finally have a Decent Selection of Home Automation and Security Periph
Re: (Score:2)
One new standard that everyone can support, and that Apple can close off to collect royalties.
And a "Thread radio" and Zigbee are the same thing, in this context.
Matter is Open Source.
https://handbook.buildwithmatt... [buildwithmatter.com]
More pointless tech... (Score:1)
... that hardly anyone wants or will use, is another thing that could be hacked to gain access to the machine but will no doubt jack up prices anyway.
I never got the whole home tech stuff. When did getting off your backside to operate a light switch become a problem that needed to be solved? And no , a TV remote is an equivalent - I could flick through 20 channels to find something, I don't flick a light switch on and off 20 times before I'm done.
Re: (Score:2)
On occasion being able to remotely control my garage door has been handy such as when on vacation and worth the $50 worth of convenience I paid for that but light switches... I guess having lights turn on n off on a timer while out of town would be nice too but there are low tech solutions for that, too.
Re: (Score:3)
>When did getting off your backside to operate a light switch become a problem that needed to be solved?
It's far more than light switches, though that's how most people start.
It allows for things like having lights turn on as you enter a room, or putting them on a semi-random schedule to make a home appear occupied while you're on vacation (a regular timer fools nobody). Or turning off that light you somehow missed on your way to bed that night.
Then you can move on to adding your thermostat and having i
Re: (Score:2)
This - I don't get peoples fascination with turning on and off lights, hvac, etc. I get the industries fascination because its well 'easy to do'
Most of the cases that are valid - I don't want to come home to a dark house at night, etc are easily addressed with a photo switch from 30 years ago, on a hall light.
What would be 'interesting useful' is if for example you could have temperature and rain sensors that could make decisions like its warmer outside than in and its over 68 degrees out, open all second
Re: (Score:2)
This - I don't get peoples fascination with turning on and off lights...
This [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I've never gotten it either. I have a few gadgets like a robot vac I might run when I'm not home. It has an app. For everything else, I just turn it on when I need it and turn it off when I don't with a switch. I'm sure there are people so fantastically lazy or living in mansions who might appreciate some way of turning on the lights on / off from a single command. For everyone else it just seems like massively expensive way to do what they can do from a simple switch on the wall.
Re: (Score:2)
These days it's more for the techie type people, the ones that would write a shell script to automate their job, but it's rapidly expanding and becoming more accessible
There are lots of useful reasons for connecting devices and automating tasks. Lighting, HVAC, security, common tasks. China makes lots of cheap devices (that can run locally, no possible way to connect to the internet) so it's not even an expensive hobby
Re: (Score:2)
This smart home things, with perhaps the exception of Home Assistant are very much intended for consumers. Maybe consumers who are attracted to tech gadgets but still consumers. Personally I don't get it and I develop IOT stuff (for factories). Spending 10x much on a "smart" bulb that must be constantly on just so someone can turn the lights on with a voice command instead of a switch makes no sense to me. I can see there are niche uses, possibly some security ones. But there are also low tech solutions to
Re: (Score:2)
I have some smart switches and smart bulbs. The smart bulbs are nice since you can adjust the color temperature but they cost $10-$20 each. Smart switches can use any lighting fixture so they're cheaper and easier in some situations.
I don't use voice commands to turn on a light, that's just like needing to flip a switch. Mostly I have motion/presence sensors or tied to things like doors opening or timers tied to the sun. It means I almost never need to turn on or off a light (still have a couple like in
Re: (Score:2)
but you may need to change 20 different light switches in multiple locations to turn lights on an off in a room. Perhaps if you had more than one light source in a room you'd understand?
Also, curious you thing this is only about lights?
Re: (Score:2)
I could flick through 20 channels to find something, I don't flick a light switch on and off 20 times before I'm done.
Depends on how much Acid. . .
Nothing new here, heres why (Score:2)
Apparently this thread radio thing or whatever just happens to be part of the wifi chip same as many mp3 players would have an fm radio in them because thats what the chip the use is capable of. Not every mp3 player revealed the fm radio to the user.
Apple just happen to be using a chip that does other things that also has this functionality.
We know about it because they have to present any radio device to the fcc .
Apple h
Re: (Score:1)
I read about this months ago dunno why itâ(TM)s suddenly news again.
Because posting anything Apple related on Slashdot gets the Apple-haters to pile in by the bus-load and if you embed Android related ads in the story you get lots of clicks and advertising $$.
1984 (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:1)
put better radios in (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Please no. I have my beginner HAM license. I don't need kids on iphones joining in on the Nets. What a nightmare.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, put a free police scanner into every cell phone. I'm sure the police/military will have no problem with that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In some jurisdictions, having a police scanner on you while committing a crime is illegal, and gets you a separate charge.
Would be interesting to see every criminal with an iphone be charged for that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Nothings funnier (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is literally what HomeKit is.
Lightning is also USB with Apple proprietary lock-in.
Re: (Score:2)
So your saying you expect that "thread radio" will not be proprietary and only work on Apple ecosystems, and will be available for developers to integrate into their code with HomeKit?
Re: (Score:2)
Sigh,,,"WITHOUT HomeKit".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't this how they introduced NFC? (Score:2)
Didn't they start doing NFC the same way? suddenly a new model phone came out with an NFC radio, but they didn't' have many plans for it. Now apple pay, NFC read/write apps, device pairing, contact sharing, etc can work with it. Maybe not all of those are NFC based, but some are.
And honestly I'm interested in anything that will make pairing new smart devices easier. I have 18 brands of devices at the house and 17 different apps to get them set up. At least once they're set up I can control them all wit
Re: (Score:2)
Hue use zigbee which the echo supports. Sounds like all the other devices are Wifi, so they would benefit more from a Matter hub for connecting to your network and being controlled. It's a technology that pairs with Thread so in the end everything could be used in one place
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, i just bought a new plug (Kasa) and paid the extra $5 to get the version with Matter. I was able to add it to alexa without downloading the Kasa app, which was nice. I've learned that all the features that the individual apps give me end up causing me problems in the long run.
Faster? (Score:2)
>> Thread is shown to be faster than Bluetooth [...] making it ideal for connecting products like smart lights
So my lights turn on in 100 milliseconds, versus 200 ms today..... wow. Sounds incredibly useful.
Re: (Score:2)
It matters when you have to turn on 20 lights in a scene.
Poor and ignorant is no way to go through life.