

Samsung Is Reportedly Throttling the Performance of 10,000 Popular Apps (xda-developers.com) 69
A new finding suggests Samsung is throttling the performance of thousands of Android apps on Galaxy smartphones, including Google and Samsung's first-party apps. XDA Developers reports: Samsung has an app called Game Optimization Service that comes preinstalled on many Galaxy phones. Although the name suggests the app helps improve gaming performance, it's apparently being used to limit the performance of non-gaming apps. Users on the Korean tech forum Meeco have posted a list of affected apps that are subject to performance throttling. The list includes 10,000 popular apps, including Instagram, TikTok, Netflix, Microsoft Office, Google Keep, Spotify, Snapchat, YouTube Music, and more. Samsung's own apps such as Samsung Pay, Secure Folder, Bixby, and others are also on the list. Notably, there are no benchmark apps on this blacklist.
A video posted by Korean YouTuber shows how blacklisted apps are subject to inferior performance while benchmark apps are given a free hand. In his test, the YouTuber changed the package name of the 3DMark benchmark app to Genshin Impact, one of the apps on the blacklist. The unmodified version of 3D Mark scored 2618 points in the Wild Life Extreme test. When he ran the same test with the spoofed version, there was a significant drop in the score -- 1141 points. In other words, the spoofed version performed 56% worse than the unmodified version. It's not immediately clear if the Game Optimization Service app is installed on every Galaxy phone. Samsung is reportedly aware of the issue and conducting an internal investigation. "While Samsung hasn't clarified why it's throttling Android apps, it's likely in an attempt to improve battery life," notes XDA.
A video posted by Korean YouTuber shows how blacklisted apps are subject to inferior performance while benchmark apps are given a free hand. In his test, the YouTuber changed the package name of the 3DMark benchmark app to Genshin Impact, one of the apps on the blacklist. The unmodified version of 3D Mark scored 2618 points in the Wild Life Extreme test. When he ran the same test with the spoofed version, there was a significant drop in the score -- 1141 points. In other words, the spoofed version performed 56% worse than the unmodified version. It's not immediately clear if the Game Optimization Service app is installed on every Galaxy phone. Samsung is reportedly aware of the issue and conducting an internal investigation. "While Samsung hasn't clarified why it's throttling Android apps, it's likely in an attempt to improve battery life," notes XDA.
Compared to Apple (Score:1)
In both cases this is not necessarily a bad thing, if only the companies would have been upfront and made it opt in.
Re: (Score:2)
Not just phones. When Apple released their first macbooks with i9 they were getting so hot that Apple had to start throttling all apps to prevent overheating.
Re: (Score:2)
Not just phones. When Apple released their first macbooks with i9 they were getting so hot that Apple had to start throttling all apps to prevent overheating.
Good thing they fixed that issue once and for all!
Re: (Score:2)
Of course they did, apple is such an honest company.
Got nothing to do with honesty; they just ditched those horribly inefficient Intel CPUs.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny story. I was actually considering buying an i9 mac at the time when they were about to be released. I went to an Apple Store and asked one of the techies if they were not concerned about all the extra heat and the techie said "No way, mate! They have a cooling system like in jet engines!", and I was like "Yeah... right...". Eventually, I decided to wait until the actual release and some initial reviews instead of preordering and voila - first week after the release and everyone was reporting that they
Re: (Score:2)
Funny story. I was actually considering buying an i9 mac at the time when they were about to be released. I went to an Apple Store and asked one of the techies if they were not concerned about all the extra heat and the techie said "No way, mate! They have a cooling system like in jet engines!", and I was like "Yeah... right...". Eventually, I decided to wait until the actual release and some initial reviews instead of preordering and voila - first week after the release and everyone was reporting that they could cook a full English breakfast on their macs, like they were a new set of aluminum pots. :-)
Which gets me back to my original statement; that Apple fixed the thermal problem by creating, and switching to, their own SoCs that were far more performant, Watt for Watt, than the Intel ones they were using.
Re: (Score:2)
Hurrr hurrr durrr
Re: (Score:2)
Hurrr hurrr durrr
Precisely the intelligence level of your "argument".
Re: Compared to Apple (Score:2)
Oh please, now, my good bitch
Re: (Score:2)
In both cases this is not necessarily a bad thing, if only the companies would have been upfront and made it opt in.
Yep. Maybe those apps are needlessly guzzling battery and need throttling.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have an actual point to make? With data?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if opt-in would be a great idea. The choice was throttle or risk fire, in that case, throttling is the least lawsuit inducing action. Where they screwed up was in not explaining why they were doing it, and being open about it.
So what? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
none of the apps listed require the full weight of the silicon to be snappy
just a numbers game
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. This is probably a non-issue, a storm in a teacup.
Re: (Score:2)
its almost certainly to improve battery life
Then why are games whitelisted? Those tend to be the most battery-hungry apps of all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
But that's not actually what it does. It slows down games, not Office. The reason for this is that games tax both GPU and CPU for prolonged amounts of time, which causes the phone to overheat, and drains the battery rapidly. That's literally how Samsung explains what it does: it "optimizes CPU and GPU performance to prevent excessive heat during long game play." In other words, they allow the phone to go full tilt in benchmarking tools, in order t
Re: (Score:2)
Games are notorious for not self throttling - burning 100% of a subset of CPU/GPU features resulting in 1000+fps in menus. It could simply be that samsung's engineers looked at Genshin's SoC usage and came to the conclusion that throttling selected API call rates results in the same 60fps but 50% better battery life. For Genshin this throttling just stops a runaway pointless loop but in a benchmark that is trying to do as many of them as it can in a second it will greatly impact the aggregate score even if
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People need to stop worrying about benchmarks and just look at how well the phone works. If you look at the MKBHD review of the latest Galaxy devices he talks about how smooth and responsive it is, how long the battery lasts, how good the camera is. He never bothers benchmarking it, he only cares how well it works in real world use.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what it's supposed to do... throttle other apps to maximize performance in specific games.
No. What it's supposed to do is absolutely nothing when games aren't running. It seems to run all the time which is the issue at hand.
Re: (Score:2)
No. What it's supposed to do is absolutely nothing when games aren't running. It seems to run all the time which is the issue at hand.
What if it's actually saving battery on apps that don't need all the CPU but are using it anyway?
I'd want that.
Re: (Score:2)
That's fine as long as the user has the option to turn it off.
Re: So what? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I believe there are preinstalled apps that cannot even be disabled, though I don't know if this is one of them. It doesn't appear to be present on my phone.
So what fps does the game hit? (Score:2)
As long as an application interface manages to hit 60 fps on a mobile app any clockspeed to go faster is wasted power. Presumably Netflix and Youtube aren't dropping frames, is Genshin Impact?
The OS should probably try to learn app fps on the fly and change clockspeed accordingly rather than with some pre-programmed list of clock scaling factors, but ehh.
History repeats itself (Score:2)
End the bloat (Score:2)
Sometimes I'd like to throttle Bixby, but it's easier to essentially choke him to death by using a non-Samsung phone.
Gee whiz! (Score:2)
Some highlights from this poorly-written, poorly-reasoned outrage fishing trip:
1. Throttles non-gaming apps to promote power for gaming, as designed. It may be to preserve battery life!
2. Doesn't throttle benchmark apps. Why would it? You'd want to see performance with the optimizer running. Disable it if you want non-gaming apps to run a little faster. Most aren't number crunchers anyway and would be fine on a calculator from 1981.
Re: (Score:3)
From TFS:
In his test, the YouTuber changed the package name of the 3DMark benchmark app to Genshin Impact, one of the apps on the blacklist.
Would it surprise you to learn that "Genshin Impact" is the name of a game? How does throttling a game promote power for gaming?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe they tested "Genshin Impact" and noticed that it runs at 60 fps with the phone underclocked a little, so decided that there was no point wasting battery power running at full speed when it wouldn't make the game play any better.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't played Genshin on mobile, I did play it for a while on PC and the frame rate is extremely variable like it is in most mobile games. So the question is, what's the minimum frame rate while throttled? You don't want the game going all postcard-y while you're in the middle of a big battle.
Basically android prioritization sucks (Score:2)
Android apparently has no way to prioritize foreground apps, so manufacturers have to resort to hacks like this.
Re: (Score:2)
Android apparently has no way to prioritize foreground apps, so manufacturers have to resort to hacks like this.
Doesn't Android have nice, or some variation thereof?
Serious question
I tested here (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Keep an eye on the battery life. That's undoubtedly the entire point of throttling non-gaming apps. Definitely seems like you shouldn't need to root your phone to turn stuff like that off, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: I tested here (Score:2)
How does this affect battery life? Does it restrict a process to lower power CPU cores? Otherwise, isn't it a case that any operation takes has the same requirements, over different periods of time, or is it that throttling prevents either extra usage or limits inefficient code from running too many excess ops?
You can disable it (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
No you can not disable it (on Android 10 anyway). On top of this the app constantly tries and calls home which I block with NoRoot Firewall.
Even if you force stop it loads again and tries to call home.
Confirmed dumbest article ever (Score:2)
I concur with all other comments here. This is the dumbest article ever.
Seems to be working 100% as designed. This isn't a big expose uncovering a hidden truth or objectionable nefarious plot.
Re: (Score:2)
I concur with all other comments here. This is the dumbest article ever.
Seems to be working 100% as designed. This isn't a big expose uncovering a hidden truth or objectionable nefarious plot.
Neither was Apple's user communications faux-pas regarding their aging battery compensation; but that didn't stop the Forum Hate and Class-Actions and Spanish Inquisitions, ALL alleging nefarious intent, now, did it?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd say apple's move was very different.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd say apple's move was very different.
Of course; it was from Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
More than dying faster, it could cause a fire due to the voltage dropping requiring higher amperage which was more than the battery leads could handle.
Re: Confirmed dumbest article ever (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At least they included themselves (Score:2)
I was going into this expecting that Samsung's apps would all magically be exempted, but looks like they didn't do that, so this is (probably) not the result of any sort of nefarious plot.
Why is this needed? (Score:2)
Assuming that this is solving the problem of apps wasting power, are these just poorly written apps doing things they donâ(TM)t need to? The summarized list contains big name apps, who you would think have a vested interest to not have their apps known as a battery hog. So why is there anything for Samsung to even try to fix here?
Uhhh really (Score:2)
Did someone write this with a straight face? "How could maximizing resources available to gaming apps possibly help them?!"
Just uninstall "Game Optimization Service" then (Score:2)
AMD throttles! (Score:2)
VW Emissions Scandal of phones? (Score:2)
How is this not false advertising or the VW emissions scandal of phones?
After all Samgsung advertise their phone by stating the CPU, it's core count and the speed of the cores. The stats also give expected battery life.
In what part of that material does it state that the the expected battery life can only be achieved by intentionally limiting the performance of apps that are not on Samgsung's approved list ?
Par for the course for Samsung (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)