Five-Year-Old Fairphone 2 Getting Updated To Almost Three-Year-Old Android 9 (theverge.com) 57
Sustainable smartphone manufacturer Fairphone has gotten Google's certification for its Android 9 update for the Fairphone 2. The Verge reports: Getting certification for a nearly three-year-old version of Android doesn't sound that impressive until you realize that it's running on a phone originally released five years ago when it ran Android 5. The roll-out of the software starts today, and will continue until April 18th, Fairphone says. It's a length of support that's basically unheard of among Android phone manufacturers. Although Fairphone 2 owners aren't going to be able to enjoy the latest Android 11 features, the more important thing is that they're running a version of Android that's still officially supported. Google's latest Android security bulletin from this month includes multiple fixes for security issues in Android 9. "To get Google certification for Android 9 for Fairphone 2 just as we hit five years of support for the smartphone is a huge achievement for Fairphone," says CEO of Fairphone Eva Gouwens. "In order to get certification, we had to pass approximately 477,000 Google tests." "We want to show the industry that this kind of thing is possible, that a smartphone doesn't have to be discarded after 2-3 years, we can prolong it's lifespan," the CEO added.
Buried the lead (Score:2)
The company says the phones should be updated to Android 11 in the second half of this year
The real question is why they waited so long to update the firmwares.
Re: (Score:1)
Updating the Android version does not typically involve updating firmware.
Firmware updates are very different from operating system and platform updates.
Something I'd been waiting for for some time.. (Score:2)
That's great news.. I'd looked at Fairphone before (and I'm still pondering them when it's time to move phone), simply because of them being modular. You need to upgrade something? Swap out a module. Most of the phone stays there, and it's only the bit you need that you pay for and actually use.
I have a firm dislike of monolithic "We glued everything together so you need to replace it if the unimportant thing that we made flimsily ever breaks". I especially like the greater than 5 year support. The l
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Something I'd been waiting for for some time.. (Score:1)
Most people replace phones more frequently than they drop them in the toilet. Some manufacturers make special phones for old people which may suit you.
Re: (Score:2)
Most people replace phones more frequently than they drop them in the toilet. Some manufacturers make special phones for old people which may suit you.
And by special phones you mean ones which are robust, reliable, work for at least a decade and don't have a shit ton of tracking software on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, exactly. It is called a land line. 8^)
Re: (Score:1)
Most people replace phones more frequently than they drop them in the toilet.
You don't have children, do you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I used to feel that way especially about laptops; but when it comes to most portables. There is little worth reusing.
While I have stuff that certainly ended its useful life because a key component gave up, the battery, the back light, that I might have continue to use otherwise if you examine the state of the rest of the bits they are also pretty tired. The monitor hinges are tired, the chassis is banged up, fan bearings are worn and noisy, plastic parts of ports are tired and usb cables fall out to easily
Re: (Score:2)
That's great news.. I'd looked at Fairphone before (and I'm still pondering them when it's time to move phone), simply because of them being modular. You need to upgrade something? Swap out a module. Most of the phone stays there, and it's only the bit you need that you pay for and actually use.
I have a firm dislike of monolithic "We glued everything together so you need to replace it if the unimportant thing that we made flimsily ever breaks". I especially like the greater than 5 year support. The last several phones I've upgraded, I only needed to do so because the companies stopped supporting them, leaving them to older known flaws. I'd still happily be on a ten year (or older) phone if someone supported it.. And with a bit more cash in the pocket from not having to upgrade!
I think if you research the upgradeability of the Fairphone you will find it is limited. There were limited replacement and upgrade parts for the Fairphone 2, and the camera module was unavailable for many months. I just saw in their forums that they recently announced the end of "bottom module" replacement part sales. Things may be better for the Fairphone 3.
Re: (Score:3)
That's great news.. I'd looked at Fairphone before (and I'm still pondering them when it's time to move phone), simply because of them being modular. You need to upgrade something? Swap out a module. Most of the phone stays there, and it's only the bit you need that you pay for and actually use.
I have a firm dislike of monolithic "We glued everything together so you need to replace it if the unimportant thing that we made flimsily ever breaks". I especially like the greater than 5 year support. The last several phones I've upgraded, I only needed to do so because the companies stopped supporting them, leaving them to older known flaws. I'd still happily be on a ten year (or older) phone if someone supported it.. And with a bit more cash in the pocket from not having to upgrade!
I think if you research the upgradeability of the Fairphone you will find it is limited. There were limited replacement and upgrade parts for the Fairphone 2, and the camera module was unavailable for many months. I just saw in their forums that they recently announced the end of "bottom module" replacement part sales. Things may be better for the Fairphone 3.
Here's the thread on the bottom module. Some users are saying they had to replace it almost once a year:
https://forum.fairphone.com/t/... [fairphone.com]
Re: (Score:1)
I think if you research the upgradeability of the Fairphone you will find it is limited.
Fairphone: Limited upgradeability.
Other phones: What? Fuck off.
Re: (Score:2)
I think if you research the upgradeability of the Fairphone you will find it is limited.
Fairphone: Limited upgradeability.
Other phones: What? Fuck off.
Other phones don't market "modular upgradeability" as their raison d'etre.
Re: (Score:1)
Other phones don't market "modular upgradeability" as their raison d'etre.
Neither does Fairphone.
Fairphone's raison d'etre is the first four letters of its name.
Re: (Score:2)
Other phones don't market "modular upgradeability" as their raison d'etre.
Neither does Fairphone.
Fairphone's raison d'etre is the first four letters of its name.
You should read their website: https://www.fairphone.com/en/i... [fairphone.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Still better than my tablets (Score:2)
One tablet stuck at 2.4ish but I was running linux on it so I really didn't care.
The 8 year old 7 inch tablet I usually use for reading ebooks is stuck at 4.something.
I have a couple other tablets which are mostly only good for sucking electricity one has IR for controlling some home theater electronics.
Re: (Score:2)
Years ago when tablets where hyped, my GF bought a Samsung Galaxy Pro, it had an impressive screen and all, was $$$ too, it came with Android KitKat 4.4 and there was never ever an upgrade, after a few years it became unusable as some apps simply do not install on it.
I bought a Nexus7 2013 and it was upgraded to 5 and 6 at least, and we still use it, we installed all the Netflix, Disney+, Youtube, Hulu, whatever streaming app and the tablet is used to cast on the big TV through Chromecast (I have dumb TV, n
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is that a HTC Flyer? (Score:2)
Wow (Score:3)
Making progress faster than GNU HURD!
How is that impressive? (Score:2)
Getting certification for a nearly three-year-old version of Android doesn't sound that impressive until you realize that it's running on a phone originally released five years ago when it ran Android 5
I guess it is impressive for Android but not impressive for iPhone. The iPhone SE (1st gen) [wikipedia.org] released almost 5 years ago recently got the latest iOS update. But bear in mind, the iPhone SE internals are from iPhone 6S which had been released 6 months earlier.
Re: (Score:2)
That's impressive for Apple as well, I'm glad they've turned around. The last time I bought something from them (an iMac) they stopped giving OS updates in less than 3 years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"iMac DV+", with the slot-loading DVD drive and the Motorola G3.
Re: (Score:1)
The iMac DV did have a shorter lifespan than most, but it was released at the tail-end of the G3 era, and was supported through the G4/G5 eras and into the Intel MacOS era. The first Intel Macs shipped with MacOS 10.4. MacOS10.5 dropped support for G3s(requiring a G4 or higher).
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong model, I got mine in '99. It came with OS 8.6 and never got any version of OS X.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Full bubble iMac, lime green plastic over white, puck mouse and all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong model, I got mine in '99. It came with OS 8.6 and never got any version of OS X.
Literally every iMac was able to install OS X. . . I don’t think you are remembering correctly.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that stopped when Apple went to Intel and Apple deprecates support only when the OS can't support it anymore. OS X stopped supporting 32-bit UEFI graphics first, then stopped support 32-bit UEFI boot. Then they stopped supporting 32-bit graphics, then 32-bit only chips.
Same goes on iOS these days - the reasons they drop support is
Alternate headline: (Score:2)
Missing info (Score:3)
What they don't point out is the phone has been stuck on Android 7.1 until now, which was last updated in December 2019.
Android 7.1 came out in 2016.
Re: (Score:1)
Why is this remarkable? (Score:2)
Re: Why is this remarkable? (Score:1)
What you call "fragmented" is the whole point. It is not a monoculture of goosestepping lowest-common-denomonator drones.
There is choice. There is individualization.
You just need to ... and that is the part that makes you shudder ... *decide for yourself*. Like a damn grown-up.
Typical Apple drone. You just do not get concepts like freedom and choice, or being an individual.
Re: (Score:2)
I would be willing to pay more for an Android phone if the manufacturer ensured say 5 years of OS upgrades along with hardware strong enough to be likely to still be working at that point. Since no brand is apparently willing to offer that I end up buying midrange phones since high-end aren't gonna be much better in terms of support anyway.
Blame Qualcomm (Score:4, Informative)
Fairphone explains why it took so long, in a video [youtu.be].
The problem is that on Android devices, new Android versions usually come from the SoC vendor, in this case Qualcomm. Drivers are closed-source.
Qualcomm stopped supporting the chipset with Android 6, so Fairphone had to develop the upgrade without any help from them. They admit to using code from the open-source LineageOS.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Blame Qualcomm (Score:1)
This needs some (+4, Insightful)!
Something needs to give... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Once the battery is flat it is no longer hazardous, at least in terms of fire.
Re: Something needs to give... (Score:1)
Uum, lithium is always hazardous! Try swallowing a gram of it. (Go ask your doctor what you'd enjoy then.)
As are many other things in there.
Re: (Score:2)
Try replying to the comment I actually wrote, champ
Never heard of them (Score:1)
Re: Never heard of them (Score:1)
Thank you for this beautiful example of small-minded moronity. I will use your comment in my encyclopedia.
Re: (Score:2)
Since they're priced in â, I may have some difficulty getting one in the UK, but that's because of our act of communal sepukku. I'm quite certain I could get one if I wanted though, without even travelling outside the NW European Archipelago. I'm much less sure that the warranty would work outside their "continental Europe" region now though.
Hmmm, not entirely clear, on further investigation [fairphone.com].
LineageOS 17.1 (Android 10) has been available. (Score:2)
Now I get why manufacturers don't update! (Score:1)
44,000 tests?? And probably not fully automated! Let alone with any automatic converters!
And a manufacturer, I would say "fuck that!" too.
No wonder they are making their own AOSP forks. It's literally less of a hassle!
What so so hard about an update? (Score:2)
So, what's so hard about keeping Android updated on such a well-documented hardware? Isn't it basically taking the AOSP source, adding the necessary drivers and then adjusting things a little bit?
Could someone explain, please?
Re: (Score:2)
Also, apart from the technical hurdles (which could be overcome with enough monetary incentive), many manufacturers don't see any monetary gain from supporting old devices so they just don't do it.
LineageOS (Score:3)