



Google Ends Android Collaboration With Huawei. No Gmail, Play Store For Future Huawei Phones (reuters.com) 293
An anonymous reader quotes Reuters:
Alphabet Inc's Google has suspended business with Huawei that requires the transfer of hardware and software products except those covered by open source licenses, a source close to the matter told Reuters on Sunday, in a blow to the Chinese technology company that the U.S. government has sought to blacklist around the world.
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd will immediately lose access to updates to the Android operating system, and the next version of its smartphones outside of China will also lose access to popular applications and services including the Google Play Store and Gmail app... Huawei will continue to have access to the version of the Android operating system available through the open source license that is freely open to anyone who wishes to use it. But Google will stop providing any technical support and collaboration for Android and Google services to Huawei going forward, the source said.
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd will immediately lose access to updates to the Android operating system, and the next version of its smartphones outside of China will also lose access to popular applications and services including the Google Play Store and Gmail app... Huawei will continue to have access to the version of the Android operating system available through the open source license that is freely open to anyone who wishes to use it. But Google will stop providing any technical support and collaboration for Android and Google services to Huawei going forward, the source said.
Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:5, Insightful)
I never considered getting a Huawei, but not having all that bloatware from Google certainly is a big point for it.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm a little behind on this issue but why all the Huawei hate all of the sudden?
Re: (Score:2)
You're way past "a little behind" on this issue, it's been going on for months now.
Re:Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:5, Insightful)
Decades. But perhaps the body of court cases in which Huawei was somehow involved or responsible, combined with a president whose platform basically requires ruining trade relationships with China means they actually can be held accountable for what they do.
The real problem perhaps is that Huawei was seen as unassailable until Trump decided he wanted to "renegotiate trade". While his particular method of "negotiating" and "helping America" are bizarre, one upshot is Huawei actually gets the scrutiny it has deserved. Whatever relationship we end up establishing with China, and whoever gets that done, needs to ensure that companies like Huawei can be held responsible for their actions and that we're free to forbid such entities from accessing our markets.
Re: (Score:2)
You know Huawei's sins far exceed the possible spying that the US government is accusing them of. From my standpoint if that's what it took for the US government to take interest and act, I'll accept it. But Huawei in particular is very, very bad and needs to go.
Re:LEARN TO READ CHI-COM APOLOGIST FAGGOTS (Score:5, Insightful)
The number of times that article is linked by people without accounts that use flamebait titles has destroyed any credibility it may have had that survived its own clickbait headline.
I'm now treating that article as unreliable and worthless.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're using a racial slur and a homosexual slur, and you expect to be taken seriously. Okay....
Re: Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:2, Insightful)
Huawei is pushing hard to be the major supplier of 5g hardware as various countries start rolling it out. The concern is that being a Chinese company means using that hardware for critical communication infrastructure is a possible security risk with how the Chinese government has control and influence over Chinese corporations â" control and influence that it routinely exercises.
Huawei has basically offered a promise not to hand over access to the Chinese government at any point in the future, but th
Re: Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes but America does intercept nearly every nations communications. America also economically and physically engages in war with any nation it wants and there have been many. Where as it seems China does neither, in fact trading with nations it doesn't like quite freely. It would seem America uses it's spying for advantage it doesn't want China to have.
The risks to nations seems much greater from America than China because of Americans persistent use of War against nations.
So for a nations safety and the world's it would seem China is a wiser choice to partner with for communications equipment.
This excludes to high probability that as America looses it's status of the world's most powerful nation it goes psychotic and starts WW3, which it is doing right now. Then I think we are largely all fucked as America has enough WMDs to fuck everyone unlike Iraq, North Korea, Iran or any nation it accuses as a "threat". The real threat is America.
Re: (Score:2)
So true.
This should be modded with a Score:6,Insightful.
Is this an anti-Trump thing? Serious question. (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm not sure why there's been so much cynicism/dismissiveness about the Huawei kerfuffle (is it because of Trump's China BS, is that why people scorn it?). For nearly ten years now, I've had friends who were contractors for three letter orgs warning me about suspected backdoors in phones from several different manufacturers. Surprised it took so long for people to start taking it more seriously. "The Chinese government doesn't really care about spying on *me*" isn't a good response. Any backdoors that do exist might end up being targeted by groups that do care about owning your device for their own profit.
Anyway, you can dislike/hate Google crap and also not like the idea of Chinese backdoors. I haven't been keeping up with current developments but last I checked, plenty of phones from other manufacturers are compatible with LineageOS [wikipedia.org] or other ROMs [wikipedia.org], allowing you to selectively opt-in to only those Google Apps that you care about (if any.)
Or is it really, honestly some sort of anti-Trump virtue signaling thing to either disbelieve or pointedly not care about this stuff? Serious question.
Re:Is this an anti-Trump thing? Serious question. (Score:5, Informative)
I don't think there is any evidence that Huawei or any other Chinese company is spying on users. That would actually be pretty stupid. There is as much reason to believe Apple is spying on its users. Baseless tin foil hat conspiracy theories until or unless there is actual evidence.
Don't really care about burden of proof here (Score:5, Insightful)
2) Well you can believe what you want to believe, but I've had people I know and trust warning me about several specific Chinese manufacturers years before mainstream media began to pick up on the story. I don't expect thirdhand information from a random poster to persuade you but on my end, there is zero reason for the guy I've known since middle school to lie to me about this. And there are reasonable security reasons to not publicly reveal the full scope of our knowledge (e.g. so China doesn't know that we've been overlooking something.)
This isn't some weird science fiction thing. Israel and the USA have already [wikipedia.org] done it [wikipedia.org] with USB drives. There's every reason in the world to believe China is doing this sort of thing for their own reasons, and there's no reason to be totally apathetic about it as a knowledgeable end user except as some sort of dumb virtue signaling thing.
I don't care if the details have been published or not; it makes all the sense in the world for there to be back doors. And back doors can get owned or leaked.
Reason for keeping back doors a secret (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As a Canadian, it is much safer for me to be spied upon by China than by the US. I don't intend to go to China and I know China won't give any personal info to my government.
Re: (Score:3)
Also, China is nothing if not pragmatic. I wouldn't trust them to not to anything in particular. China's hostility towards Canada (or the USA, for that matter) is not so huge as to preclude the possibility that they would help them spy on their own citizens in exchange for something.
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite under a rock but I've not been following the news nearly as much in recent years.
Anyways, the point is, backdoors haven't been found in Huawei's cellphones, so I suppose you shouldn't be suggesting to buy that either.
Yes they have. I personally know one person in particular who knew about this and warned me before it hit the news. I don't know how persuasive that is to anyone, but they sho
So dump the US too (Score:5, Insightful)
2) Media have been speaking of the US long before they spoke about china. But you nkow the difference ? So far there is no clean evidence about china having backdoor. Contrary to NSA. Elliptic algorithm with specifically chosen number anyone ?
By YOUR standard of evidence, we should rather buy chinese than American.
God damn but modern leftists are so depressing (Score:3)
Turn this into this apologetic either-or defense of China and "well they haven't released the full details of the vulnerability" is pathetic. Of course they haven't; why would they reveal to China the full extent of our knowledge? And
Re:So dump the US too (Score:5, Insightful)
So it really is the worst kind of diseased thinking partisan hackery that could get someone to twist something like this around into "actually, it's a great idea to buy Huawei! Because we spy too, don'tchaknow???!"
I despise and am worried about Snowden's revelations and I know that's just the tip of the iceberg. I know for a fact that other three letter agencies are involved in this too (including the NRO) and since they aren't under the microscope right now, they can probably get away with a lot more. I think the public should be educated. I think that all of these companies should have canaries to use in the case of NSL letters, and if there was a manufacturer that had an NSL canary I'd be happy to recommend them to anyone.
In other words, I'M ON YOUR SIDE, you dumb fuck, but you've descended to such despicable and unrelentingly partisan depths of sophistry and/or sloppy thinking that, that... that we have to even be having this conversation.
Re: (Score:2)
1) As I said, the presence of backdoors is concerning enough.
It would be if they actually existed in any meaningful way.
Re: (Score:3)
China doesn't need to backdoor anything.
Man, go away, you astroturfing asshole. (Either that you're a very useful idiot who hasn't bothered registering a /. account.)
Do you partisan dorks actually think that Trump is smart and powerful enough to engineer this controversy? Why would our intel community go along with it; is our moron in chief really that persuasive to them?
Re: (Score:2)
Nice job cherry picking your quotes. Read the next sentence.
I didn't need to. Skimming your reply, the belief/attitude I had a beef with is definitely there. I don't know the precise reasons why but I don't hugely care. I have all the proof I need. And that's no proof to you, my own sources of off-record info can't be, but then you're an AC so I'm not going to spend energy convincing you anyway.
It's a diseased way of thinking. Cyber espionage is a thing and we need to be aware of it and fighting it regardless of source. Kicking and screaming conspiracy theories
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks to Snowden we have proof that some US hardware is backdoored. Internal NSA documents show that they intercept hardware during shipping to install malware, sometimes hardware based so it can't be removed. Other documents show that Apple was, probably unwittingly, part of the XKeyScore system that allows the NSA to view your private documents, messages and photos stored in the Apple iCloud.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm fine rooting out, fixing, and/or boycotting all exploits no matter where they come from. American firms openly and actively opposed and promoted awareness of Stuxnet and Flame, which were American-Israeli malware.
The virtue signaling aspect of this is disturbing and weird. We should act on multiple levels to oppose Chinese back doors. That doesn't mean
Re: (Score:2)
I'm fine rooting out, fixing, and/or boycotting all exploits no matter where they come from.
I strongly suspect iphones are backdoored, but I can't prove it. No one can. They do it in a way that is essentially undetectable. Boycott or not? Or rather do I wait until it has been proven or do I just assume it based on the fact that it is very very likely?
Re: (Score:2)
I fo
Re:Is this an anti-Trump thing? Serious question. (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't think Huawei is being accused of spying on users.
It's being accused of installing back-doors. That doesn't mean it's spying on everyone (or even anyone) now, but (if true), it means that Huawei (or more likely, the Chinese government) could spy on anyone (or everyone) who uses that equipment at some time in the future.
As for the presence/absence of evidence, nobody is going to come to your home and do a free penetration-test for you. OTOH, you can either find a security expert you trust, and take their word for it, or do your own security audit, if you have the skills to do so. The fact that you (like me, and most people) probably don't have the skills to directly view the evidence, doesn't mean that the evidence doesn't exist.
Can't we just agree that back doors are bad? (Score:2)
OTOH, you can either find a security expert you trust, and take their word for it
I do. I have a guy I've known since middle school who has been doing spook jobs for three letter agencies for the past 10+ years and he warned me about this stuff long before the mainstream media picked up on it. He never told me very many
Re: (Score:2)
Huawei isn't being accused of installing backdoors, the concern raised is that China has a law which seems to allow the government to force Huawei to install backdoors on request. Just like the US and UK governments can do with their domestic companies. But it's China, and there is a trade war on, so...
Re: (Score:2)
And that's as it should be. I'm all for more openness and anti-malware measures being taken regardle
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, you do understand it will have different bloatware, not less... right?
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. Will definitely consider Huawei for my next phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, let's buy a phone with back doors just to be Google-free instead of simply installing LineageOS or Replicant or one of the many other Google-free derivatives on a device that has no known back doors.
Re: (Score:2)
I am a security expert. You are not. And it shows drastically.
Here is a hint: Why would I ever trust anything secret to a _phone_? And who says I would not install Lineage? I do, in fact, expect that this will increase support for Lineage.
Re: (Score:2)
You also had some hysterical lie and said (I'm paraphrasing from memory; forgive me if I get it slightly wrong) that a fire at a single nuclear waste facility would result in such a radionuclide release as to actually sterilize the entire Earth.
You apparently like to say dumb shit on the internet
Re: (Score:2)
And if you're gonna install LineageOS than obviously there's no reason at all to specifically buy Huawei
So because he's replacing the OS, it doesn't matter what hardware he chooses? Okayyyy ... sure.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard about that little thing called "compatibility"? No? Shame, because otherwise you would know that Lineage has to be supported on a specific phone to work reliably, because hardware is not very standardized on phones.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I see what you problem is: Messed up memory. I never said that thing about sterilizing the earth. There is this scientifically sound number that you can kill about 1M people with 1g of PU (lung cancer), but you need to deliver it and global delivery of dust does not work due to weather. Even if fine dust can travel astonishing distances. I might have said that if the spend fuel pool at Fuckupshima had caught fire and the wind was right, that Tokyo may have become inhabitable. And that is actually a re
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe he prefers government sponsored malware, have you considered that?
Re: (Score:2)
Is there any evidence for this Apple malware you speak of? Was there an Apple warrant canary or are you just being paranoid? Don't smoke so much reefer, man. Your iPhone is probably not spying on you.
Re: (Score:2)
Well good point. iPhones may or may not be surveillance machines for the NSA. I am just saying there is no particular reason to believe they are. Well except that obviously the US government 3 letter agencies would do pretty much anything to make that happen and since, like Google, Apple is a US company it's possible that the 3 letter agencies could force them like they did with the webmail companies. Google and Facebook are basically branches of the NSA at this point.
Yeah I guess there is some reason to be
Re: (Score:3)
At least I got to pick which gouvernment sponsored the malware on my phone....
Re: (Score:2)
I'd give you the funny mod if I ever got a mod point to give.
Re: Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:2)
On my new android phone I have explicitly never logged onto google. I have a tablet that never leaves home to access the play store with. If I want a play store app on the phone I use apk extractor to move an apk file from the tablet to the phone. For updates Aptoide lets me get updates on important apps. It hasn't been hard at all to use this new phone that has never had a google account touch it.
Services (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem are the proprietary blob services "Google Play Service" (com.google.android.gms) that some apps require.
That's the blob where the evil bits lives.
Most app are going to rely on it. And it comes pre-installed on most non-chinese smartphones (include export versions by chinese manufacturer).
This is the service that is going to do all the horrible thing like constantly ping google servers with your position.
Even if you didn't connect your phone to google accounts.
You best hope is to wipe the phone,
Re:Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:4, Insightful)
You know a person is out of touch with reality when he claims Google apps are "bloatware"
No. Any app that the user doesn't need installed on his device can be considered bloatware. Google apps that can not be removed despite the user's wishes are worse than bloatware.
no Google apps means no Google Location Service
Good! I don't want this spyware on my phone. How can I uninstall it?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: Hmm, sounds interresting (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
any bundled app can be an app that some user doesn't need.
And the user should be able to delete it.
Any anyways, the harsh reality is that so many apps rely on Google Play Services that most users need it.
What the user needs should be their decision, not yours, and not Google's.
Any phone without Play Services is considerably less useful.
Not your call.
BTW the preinstalled Google apps are part of the immutable system partition and cannot be uninstalled.
There is no technical reason for this: it's all because Google wants access to the user's data, no matter what the user's choices are. If the phone in question really belonged to the user, he should be able to decide what runs on it, and what fills the device's memory. Google, however, behaves as if the phone is theirs, and the user is only tolerated to use it at their (Google's)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure if your requirements are mapping software. But that's not the only thing Google Maps provides.
One man's bloat is another's critical feature. Do you have street view offline without Google?
Not only game in town: UnifiedNLP, MicroG (Score:2)
Maybe you don't know, but Google isn't the only game in town.
e.g.: Mozilla and Apple also operate their own servers and services that similarly are able to extrapolate position from visible network access point.
Not only that but there are other different type of service that don't require online servers: local daemons that write down access point as they see them while the GPS is active, so they can quickly refer to them later when GPS isn't ready yet.
Or other services that allow to download a local copy of
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah Samsung and LG are just tripping over themselves trying to selling them. I hear an Apple Pi is next!
Re: (Score:3)
Political considerations over technical? (Score:2)
This branch really touched a nerve about the uninstallability issue (which has security ramifications), though some carriers are trying to bloat as much as the google... But:
Does the google know something I don't know?
Obviously a rhetorical question. However the most interesting answers involve what the google knows about me that I don't even know about myself.
My take on this topic has been that Huawei software is just as secure as software from other sources and their hardware should be MORE secure precise
Re: (Score:2)
By all means, we shouldn't trust the American government, either. But we shouldn't buy a device with known back doors based on this logic. That's insane. I mean hell, it's entirely possible that American three letter agencies will figure out how to exploit that back door for their own benefit.
One more reason that this is stu
Lack of information.... (Score:2)
I sure wish I knew why my government had such a big burr up it's ass about Huawei. I can read all the speculation, WAGs, and official statements I want, and yet none of it is particularly enlightening.
Re: (Score:2)
I can read all the speculation, WAGs, and official statements I want, and yet none of it is particularly enlightening.
Gotta call bullshit on that one. If you don't know, it means you did not try to understand their feelings. That is on you. They've explained their feelings clearly already.
The reason I talk about feelings is because the decisions aren't decisions you will make. So the part for you to become enlightened about is why they're doing it, which is about their conclusions, not your own.
But really you're simply pretending not to know why, because [personal reasons.]
Walled Gardens (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Walled Gardens (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most people prefer to have a walled garden than the risky stuff that is running MS Windows. I would prefer applications to be whitelisted by somebody with authority rather than keeping track with any new hazard myself. In this case, I do not know best.
But how do you know that the state of not knowing is worse than the state of being credulous that somebody else both knows, and also cares about your interests?
It may be that knowing you don't know is the specific type of knowing that prepares you to protect yourself!
For example, if you know you don't know if an app is safe, maybe you don't install every app that you saw somebody else using, or every app in the list that included your search term?
Maybe if you know you don't know, then when an app asks to ha
Re: (Score:2)
In the long run, is any system acceptable?
- "Walled gardens" are unacceptable because they are only as safe and secure as the company that is providing the wall.
- "Open countryside" is unacceptable because the vast majority of phone users are not knowledgeable or conscientious enough to handle security issues themselves.
So what's left? There's never going to be a mass transformation of consumers into information-security experts (sorry), and we aren't all going to throw away our cell phones and go back to
Re: Walled Gardens (Score:2)
What is next (Score:2)
Can eBay handle the large amount of listings for almost useless Huawei phones?
Re: (Score:3)
Huawei cannot put the Play Store or Google apps on the phone. Users can install them by themselves though. If anything, this probably makes the Huawei offering superior. Clean Android.
The irony (Score:2, Insightful)
So the govt. that owns the NSA and its bulk data collection & surveillance programmes, & Google, which is the biggest bulk data collecting & surveillance corporation, say that Huawei shouldn't be allowed to collect US citizens' data & surveil them. Pot. Kettle. Black.
Harming Huawei, or helping Baidu and Tencent? (Score:2)
Chinese Android (Score:2)
Indeed. This will split the Android market. There will be a Chinese only version which might even be open source, with the big Chinese players working on it, all beholden to the Chinese government. It will have all the major apps that Google and others provide, just not the obscure ones.
It will further isolate China further from the west. Which is a very mixed blessing.
Re:Chinese Android (Score:4, Interesting)
Chinese fortune cookie time! (Score:2)
"By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." --Confucius
Confucius forgot to mention "by copying everything on their smartphones".
(Consider this weak joke an invitation to do better.)
P.S. Actually, many people argue that Huawei's main sin was the "by imitation" point. Maybe Confucius knew something after all?
Tizen (Score:2)
Huawei Notorious for Theft of Patented Tech (Score:2)
This is quite disapointing. (Score:2)
They will lose access to updates? This is not good. My new Huawei phone is so damn good, it's so good.
It has a flat NON stupid curved screen
It has a headphone jack
It's so stupid fast, it's out of this world, it's nutty how quick this is
Battery life is ASTOUNDING
It still has a notification LED
I think the blutooth is actually v5 even?
The settings menu blows me away, I find cool new features every couple of months:
I can enable a charge mode, to charge OUT of my phone, charging another phone off mine.
I can not
Re:Someone explain this to me? (Score:4, Insightful)
Of course.
Huawei does not put US spyware, malicious software, tracking, and sekret security holes generated by the US three-letter-agencies in their software. This severely curtails the ability of the US to spy on anyone using Huawei hardware and software. Therefore, US companies must be prohibited from using Huawei software and hardware and forced to use hardware and software that has been backdoored by US companies instead in order to ensure continued access.
It is purely self-interest.
+5, Astroturfing Conspiracy Theorist (Score:2)
We need more independent third party review of phones, hardware and software. We need more companies with anti-NSL canaries. I would happily crow the virtues of any tech company who did such a thing.
But you know what, Huawei is not that company. Despite all of the cyberwarfare we do, the most likely explanation for the continuing Huawei
Re: (Score:3)
Your link is less than convincing for me.
Re: (Score:2)
Your state of being unconvinced is unconvincing to me. I say the US Government should act based on their own state of being convinced, and Google should (and has) acted on their own state of being convinced.
You being unconvinced just means you're not paying attention to who is making a particular decision, and you presume your own opinion is as valuable as the opinions of the people whose prerogatives are actually involved.
If you wanted to understand the reasons for the concerns or actions, that analysis
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The US gave ZTE similar treatment a year or two ago, but that ended a day or two after the head of ZTE invested $500 million in a new Trump resort in Southeast Asia.
So maybe Trump has another new venture that needs an influx of cash?
Re:Someone explain this to me? (Score:4, Informative)
That's complete horseshit.
ZTE paid a $1,000,000,000 penalty, and placed $400,000,000 in a holding account in case of further violations.
I agree with people who say that money doesn't in any way forgive their violations, but it was Orange Man's decision, and he decided.
You're getting confused about what actually happened, and maybe what you heard somebody repeat. Hard to avoid, when your habit is to "know" whatever people told you.
The actual story that you received and repeated via a game of "telephone" was that the government of China (not ZTE) loaned $500,000,000 to an Indonesian Company that is building a theme park. That theme park is licensing Trump's name, in some capacity. They're going to have some sort of Trump ride or attraction. Trump doesn't make any more or less money this way, this doesn't change what he'll make from the licensing, and this is a major project by a major local developer who already had an equal amount of money in direct investment before getting the loan. It is more convenient for them to get the loan from China than from the Saudis, but it isn't any sort of surprise that they were able to get the loan.
Notice a pattern? The details are ho-hum, but the accusation is breathless and untrue. The details don't even live on the same street as the story you told.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's best to wait for some confirmation on this story anyway. There would doubtless have been contracts in place for long term support of Huawei products and if Google tried to walk away from them there would be legal consequences.
Re:Someone explain this to me? (Score:5, Informative)
ZTE invested $500 million in a new Trump resort in Southeast Asia [google.com]
Re: (Score:3)
You just proved GP's point -- you searched for "ZTE invested" and got "a Chinese bank made a loan." Did you notice that?
Re:Someone explain this to me? (Score:4, Insightful)
When a strong claim of corruption is made, yes, I do fucking expect to see actual evidence.
This is particularly true when it comes to Donald Trump. There is so much shit being written by politically biased journalists that I pretty much have to reject anything lacking evidence as just more lies made up by the media.
They've done this to themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Can someone explain to me why the US is so pissed off at Huawei?
There is a good enough reason right in the summary, though it is one of the smaller ones:
Alphabet Inc's Google has suspended business with Huawei that requires the transfer of hardware and software products except those covered by open source licenses
The more important reasons are technical, and have to do with the security differences between a LAN and a WAN and a public network. There is no way to teach network engineering to the public in order for them to "understand" these parts of the reasons; if you don't understand, you'll just have to either be comfortable not knowing, or choose who to have Faith in. Or just recognize that the US does care about these detai
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is a good enough reason right in the summary, though it is one of the smaller ones:
Alphabet Inc's Google has suspended business with Huawei that requires the transfer of hardware and software products except those covered by open source licenses
Yeah, that's what piqued my attention too. What exactly was Google required to transfer? Chinese law requires foreign companies to transfer their intellectual property [chinalawblog.com] to Chinese partners/joint ventures as the price of entry to the Chinese market. Is this an instance of this?
If so, Google has fallen into the trap so many other American companies have fallen into before: they have greedily looked for short term gains, and lost the long term competitive advantage. Even though late, Google may have finally awa
Re: (Score:2)
Dude. They're an Android smartphone vendor.
They were getting no special treatment.
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, that's correct "requires the transfer of hardware and software products" is the main thing here. See other linked article earlier which was supplied as evidence. It included zero evidence of installing back-doors and wiretapping in Huawei gear, but it did have evidence that Huawei blatantly copied designs of Cisco and Motorola equipment. This is the big reason for those other companies to be wary of Huawei - that they don't respect patents and copyright. Google has every reason to be wary of a company
Re: (Score:2)
The orange man is incompetent at trade politics. So now he tries protectionism, i.e. killing competition using laws. That never ends well, but it can work for a short time and that is all he needs to get re-elected. Basically the kind of scam governments run to con their citizens into thinking they do a good job. No other reason.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's kinda weird that the governments in the EU seem supremely unconcerned about this, and the only real competitors for Huawei 5G network gear are Ericsson and Nokia. Nokia is Finnish and this an EU country and Ericsson is Swedish with a strong EU base. If there was a sniff of this the EU have competitive reasons to be all over it, and they simply are not.
So this makes me skeptical.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah until the powers on both sides kiss and make up then hand each other the data they've been hording on the other's citizens.
Re: (Score:2)
Does game theory follow strict logic?
I mean, you're taking a simplistic view of this. Would subverting the NSA's data capture merely accelerate global data sharing, thus bringing about sooner the loss of your data privacy in every country, rather than merely in the US?
Basic logic just isn't going to cut it.
Re:Google found something? (Score:4, Informative)
Huawei was placed on the Commerce Department's "Entity List" a few days ago, which basically means U.S. companies can't do business with Huawei without government approval.
Re: (Score:2)
Classical protectionism, one of the last means commonly used to try to save a failing market. Never works long-term though, but people are stupid and have short memories.
Re: (Score:2)
Out of curiosity have you ever contemplated trying to engage with people in a manner that doesn't immediately make them reject you as a rambling idiot that doesn't even know that faggots are edible meat balls in a tasty gravy?
Re: Oh boy (Score:2)
Oops.