Apple Tweaks iOS Animation In China In Attempt To Avoid Sales Ban (theverge.com) 47
Apple released a tiny update to iOS this week designed to avoid a sales ban in China. iOS version 12.1.2 contains software changes exclusive to China that are designed to circumvent Apple's patent dispute with Qualcomm, which won an initial sales ban over claims that Apple violated a pair of its patents. The Verge reports: The update changes the animation for when an app is forced to close, according to MacRumors, seemingly avoiding a Qualcomm patent around app management. Previously a closed app would slide off the top of the screen, but it now shrinks and disappears into the middle of the screen. Last month, Qualcomm won a court injunction that banned Apple from selling iPhone models including the 6S, 6S Plus, 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus, and X. iOS 12.1.2 The patents related to how software resizes pictures and manages applications. This fix appears to change application management, but it's currently unclear what, if anything, has changed about the process of resizing pictures.
Re: (Score:1)
Qualcomm was the one filing suit not Apple.
Re: (Score:1)
Hurr hurr hurr.
Re: Holy crap that is what this is about (Score:1)
Their second attempt violates the looney toons ending sequence, probably a copyright violation vs patent
Re: (Score:2)
Still there is an engineer that had to draft the spec
and document it, and write the code.
Hey dude, your a dumb ass, this is not innovation, but easy shit any coder could do even in the 80s.
What a prick of an engineer to think he can claim this patent, who is it, hes gotta be a be a dick head wanker.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey dude, your a dumb ass, this is not innovation, but easy shit any coder could do even in the 80s.
This is a misunderstanding. There is no patent on the code. There is a patent on the action. And there are many things that get patented that _could_ have been done in the 80s, but nobody came up with the idea of doing it.
Of course it is Qualcomm's bad luck that today, with developers used to lots of graphics effects, any decent developer can on the spot replace this apparently patented animation with one that isn't patented out of the million possible animations. Or at least not patented by Qualcomm.
Surreal (Score:5, Insightful)
If this constitutes a valuable piece of intellectual property which deserves the protection of patent law then I suspect evolution has run its course and humanity is about to become extinct. Either that or the next populist dictator could do worse than round up the entirity of the "tech" world and execute them posthaste.
Re: (Score:3)
> "humanity is about to become extinct"
This is actually, very very likely in the next 300 years.
Re: (Score:2)
It's extremely ironic that this happened to Apple, who previously enforced patents on bouncing when reaching the end of a scrolling list, on rounded corners and on a lack of adornments.
I'm surprised no-one bothered to patent the notification shade. When Apple ripped that off from Android I expected a lawsuit, but it seems that no-one is claiming to have invented it and unlike all this other nonsense it's an actually useful and slightly original UI element.
A trivial animation is patentable? (Score:2)
What in the world made this patentible.
Oh! I know. Over worked patent examiners who let anything through with a big enough pile of paper.
BULL$#1T
Re: (Score:2)
This has absolutely zero to do with overworked examiners, because it's less work to read part of a patent application and deny it than to read the whole thing and Grant it. It's because the patent office gets more money when they Grant than when they deny.
Back dat up (Score:2)
I first read the headline as "Apple Twerks...".
I think I may have been spending too much time browsing Instagram.
rounded corners (Score:5, Insightful)
I seem to recall similar totally ridiculous patents. Didn't Apple sue Samsung at great length about, what was it, bouncing when you couldn't scroll any more? Or was it rounded corners? This sounds like payback.
Really, this patent issue is well and truly out of hand.
Can I patent the wheel, please? How about a box?
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately some dweeb patent examiner who probably slept through the lecture didn't know it, and granted the patent. I rate the patent about as bad as the stupid XOR patent [wikipedia.org]. Both literally handed a company a patent on a fundame
Re: (Score:2)
Can I patent the wheel, please? How about a box?
Didn't someone in Australia manage to get a patent on the wheel? Ah yes...
https://yro.slashdot.org/story... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Except it wasn't a ridiculous patent. It was industrial design, and Samsung *did* blatantly copy it in an effort to make a phone that was a near identical iphone clone. It was more akin to copyright than patent.
You can't patent industrial design. Or at least, you're not supposed to be able to.
Oh, now we're patenting screen transitions (Score:5, Funny)
Not that these transitions have been used in movies since the 1930s or anything.
But they're on a phone now, so that makes it totally fucking original.
Re: (Score:2)
Not that these transitions have been used in movies since the 1930s or anything. But they're on a phone now, so that makes it totally fucking original.
Movies are up on that big screen. A phone is in your hand. That's COMPLETELY different -- stupid.
(Walking off...) Gaaa, why do you guys keep trying to interfere with my money stream?
Re: (Score:2)
Exit stage left.
I mean, up
You know (Score:2)
Unless someone comes to their senses about all this patent, copyright, Intellectual Property insanity, there will come a time in the future where you won't be able to create anything new because there will already be a bazillion hazy, wide-reaching and / or totally bullshit patents ( and patent trolls ) standing by to cash in on your work.
You'll end up having to pay off so many people it won't even be worth the effort to bring your idea to market.
Seriously ? A patent on an window close animation ?
THIS is w
Re: (Score:2)
Qualcomm doesn't make or sell phones or os's... (Score:1)
But is suing those who do. Specifically apple because of their disagreement over royalties isn't it?