How Technology Caught the Austin Serial Bomber (foxnews.com) 148
Wednesday police in Austin, Texas finally located the "serial bomber" believed to be responsible for six package bombs which killed two people over the last three weeks. "The operation was aided by different uses of technology, including surveillance cameras and cell phone triangulation." An anonymous reader shares this article:
The suspect, who has been identified as 24-year-old Mark Anthony Conditt, was killed near the motel he was traced to thanks to surveillance footage from a Federal Express drop-off store, The Austin American-Stateman reported. The authorities were able to gather information after police noticed the subject shipped an explosive device from a Sunset Valley FedEx store, a suburb approximately 25 minutes away from Austin. The evidence included the security footage from the store, as well as store receipts obtained showing suspicious transactions. The authorities were also able to look at the individual's Google search history, the Statesman noted, which gave them further insight into his dealings...
The authorities were also able to use cell phone triangulation technology, which provides a cell phone's location data via information collected from nearby cell towers... The phone's GPS capabilities can track the phone within 5 to 10 feet and can also provide "historical" or "prospective" location information. It can also "ping" the phone, forcing it to reveal its exact location... As cell phone companies store this type of data, law enforcement authorities must request it via the appropriate court processes.
"Authorities in Austin were able to use this technology to trace the suspect to a hotel in Williamson County."
The authorities were also able to use cell phone triangulation technology, which provides a cell phone's location data via information collected from nearby cell towers... The phone's GPS capabilities can track the phone within 5 to 10 feet and can also provide "historical" or "prospective" location information. It can also "ping" the phone, forcing it to reveal its exact location... As cell phone companies store this type of data, law enforcement authorities must request it via the appropriate court processes.
"Authorities in Austin were able to use this technology to trace the suspect to a hotel in Williamson County."
Technology didn't catch him, douchebags! (Score:1)
People caught him using technology, moron editors!
He was a terrorist (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: He was a terrorist (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe he just liked blowing people up.
Re: (Score:2)
There's only one sane solution!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Actually the bomber identified as a Conservative, albeit a reaaaally dumb and confused one.. So yeah, it's likely safe to say he's a Trump supporter also. He's a right wing extremist in either case.
Of course I'd say there are probably more specific sub-designations of right-wing extremist - sheltered internet reichtard, daddy-raised nazi, too inbred to think, etc.
Re: (Score:1)
His point is Americans are a bunch of racists, which is pretty much the case.
If this guy practiced Islam, he'd be called a terrorist regardless of whether he's an "individual element" or not.
Americans have a small terrorism problem, but it's highly related to their big racism problem.
Re: He was a terrorist (Score:1)
Thank you. Americans are racist, but so is everyone else. However, America is forced to be a melting pot whereas many other countries get to largely be one religion/race.
Re: (Score:2)
Australia had the best solution. Build al natiomal mythology about being a nation of immigrants. Wait until racism was out of fashion. THEN stir the melting pot.
Re: (Score:1)
Systematic coercion is also known as an ideology.
Try again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not every sentence. Just ones with extra unimportant words.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: He was a terrorist (Score:1)
Was he? (Score:5, Interesting)
It does disturb me he was home schooled. School isn't just about learning, it's about socializing.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The police have a 25 minute video of him though that they won't release until the investigation's done.
They are trying to identify some organization he mentions having worked on behalf of. And find the identities of other members that might have been involved in a conspiracy. The detective work could take months or even years.
Has anyone heard of a group calling itself the Lulz?
Re: (Score:3)
Actually TMZ reported several odd things about him. All from while he attended community college from blogs.
He was homophobic.
He was very pro choice.
He had an odd perspective on the sex offender registry. He was against it feeling like those who served their time in prison should not be further penalized.
Additionally, he was home schooled as you mentioned and a pretty religious family.
Re: Was he? (Score:1)
Home schooling has nothing to do with this. This might be the first documented case in relation with homeschooling in fact. A statistical anomaly.
Personally, I wish more children were homeschooled provided their parents have both the time and drive to provide it. Itâ(TM)s a well documented fact that home school children on average do better academically. Actually, truth be told, any child will do better with parental involvement regardless of where they go to school.
This teen was a loner. Nothing was g
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He blew up two black people, two white people, and one Asian with four mail bombs and one trip-wire trap.
If he was racially motivated, he had a very odd way of showing it - not targeting a specific race and all.
You are misleading people. Only TWO people were killed. They both are black and were targeted (2 different bombs). The two white people were injured and were NOT targeted but rather by chance because it was left at a sign with trip-wire trap. The so called "Asian" in your post is NOT Asian but Hispanic. She was injured. Actually another person who is FedEx employee was injured and that was ALSO not targeted but the bomb discharged accidentally. The last kill is HIMSELF and yes this kill is WHITE. Along the
Re: (Score:1)
Nice to see the main stream still won't call a white guy a terrorist.
He wasn't just any old terrorist, he was an Alt-right terrorist.
There was a 25 minute video they won't release which I suspect is to avoid further violence/retribution.
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Oh so all Alt Righters are terrorists now?
About as much as all muslims are terrorists.
Re: He was a terrorist (Score:1)
Oh shiiiiiiiiiit.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:He was a terrorist (Score:5, Insightful)
In it's simplest form, "terrorist" can be defined as "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
While we may not have seen the video associated with this case and we do not fully understand this individual's motivations, it is not unreasonable to theorize that those motivations were political on some level, and therefore not unreasonable to refer to this jackass as a domestic terrorist (or simply terrorist) until such time as evidence of his true motives is presented.
Re: (Score:2)
In it's simplest form, "terrorist" can be defined as "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
While we may not have seen the video associated with this case and we do not fully understand this individual's motivations, it is not unreasonable to theorize that those motivations were political on some level, and therefore not unreasonable to refer to this jackass as a domestic terrorist (or simply terrorist) until such time as evidence of his true motives is presented.
Then why does the media not apply the same definition to anyone who is brown or black and does something illegal?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Based on early reports, this guy seems to be a straight out psychopath [usatoday.com]. His motive seems to be nothing more than doing it for thrills. Timothy Mcveigh [wikipedia.org] was a white terrorist. I'm not convinced that this guy is. Anarchist is probably a better match.
Re: He was a terrorist (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If a guy kills people by planting bombs for no reason other than he's just out for kicks, is he a terrorist? Usually when we say terrorist we mean someone who is trying to strike fear into society with an agenda in mind, usually political. I don't know what this guy's politics is but it seems he may just have been crazy. Or maybe he did have something driving him but if so I haven't heard of anything official. Still, a killer is a killer. I don't care why he's killing, he needed to be stopped. Call him anyt
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Ironically you attempt to disprove that the MSM is parroting far-right talking points by quoting a shallow MSM talking head (who leans right) parroting a far-right talking point for support.
A welcome change (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
At least this time, the suspect wasn't killed while resisting arrest. We may never know his motives or if the victims were targeted or random and if the bombings stop, we may never really know for sure if he was guilty, but nobody will be able to claim that the cops killed an innocent man.
What? From TFA:
The suspected serial bomber who killed two people and terrorized Austin, Texas for three harrowing weeks was killed in a dramatic confrontation with police overnight Wednesday, authorities said.
The suspect wasn't killed while resisting arrest? Nobody will be able to claim the cops killed an innocent man? Where are you getting this?
Re: (Score:3)
The suspect was killed when a bomb he was carrying exploded. TFA doesn't say that the police were responsible for the explosion. It may have been triggered by the suspect and it may have gone off unintentionally, but I see nothing in TFA that implies that the police were responsible. Generally speaking, the expression, "killed while resisting arrest" implies that the suspect was killed, either directly or indirectly by the police. Unless you have evide
Rare Battery? (Score:3)
I thought they were able to identify a "rare" battery that he used in the device that malfunctioned and then were able to find out where in Austin batteries of that type were shipped.
BS. FedEx told the police who mailed the package (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
I saw the security footage... He walked up to the fedex counter wearing gloves and a wig. What did he honestly think was going to happen?
The counter guy thought he was going to a party? It is Austin, you know.
lame (Score:5, Interesting)
The Google search history on the guys computer was used after he was caught. By triangulation of his cell phone, I think the author kind of means, "the fact that most people now carry cell phones", which can be triangulated.
Nothing about this is implausible to have happened 30 years ago with some moron using the pay phone system periodically instead. Makes me believe that the stupidity of criminals, and old fashioned police work based on our *current* laws are the solution to calls for increasingly invasive privacy monitoring and backdoors specially (ahem) for law enforcement.
Re:lame (Score:5, Informative)
The "technology" that caught the bomber has been around for >30 years. Stores have been recording video and cops have been using it since your grandparents by this point.
I know this may be a surprise to you, but we're not all Millennials. My grandparents died in 1967, 1982, 1986, and 1998. The last of those was in a nursing home for 10 years with severe Alzheimer's. 30 years ago, I was in university. The Berlin Wall was still standing, the Cold War was in full swing, the "World Wide Web" was several years from being born, "Car phones" were something only the rich could afford, and "cell phones" were a brick connected to a briefcase--something only affordable by the wealthy.
"Google search history", "cell tower data", and "cell phone GPS data" (listed in TFS) most certainly did NOT exist 30 years ago.
If you think 30 years ago is "your grandparent's time", you're obviously young. It might surprise you to know that "the government can track you everywhere you go" is something that your grandparents almost certainly considered "unAmerican"--if not outright "evil". That's what the Nazis and the Commies did, not America.
Re:lame (Score:5, Informative)
It might surprise you to know that "the government can track you everywhere you go" is something that your grandparents almost certainly considered "unAmerican"--if not outright "evil". That's what the Nazis and the Commies did, not America.
Yup. I was in college when Reagan was elected the first time. I remember one of the most popular memes* among my Reaganite friends was a joke about Soviet internal passports (which were really a thing).
Fast-forward to the past decade - we have on more than one occasion had American bureaucrats propose the same thing for us, for the same reason the Soviets had been doing it way back in the day.
Re: (Score:3)
So what was the joke?!
It was really only funny to people of a particular mindset. A Reaganite would ask a more liberal person (like myself) to "show your internal passport, comrade" with the implication that being liberal would inevitably lead to a complete loss of freedom such as was exhibited in the
"liberal" Soviet Union.
Of course, I wasn't above doing similar things. I remember one day (the presidential campaign was in full swing) we were in the college's dining hall, and there were a bunch of school kids visiting. I don't kn
Re:Triangulation and pinging? (Score:2)
There were plenty of red flags (Score:2, Interesting)
The bomber was white, Christian, home-schooled, anti-LGBT and conservative. This fits the profile of almost all domestic terrorists in the US. Why wasn't he on the FBI's radar?
Where was he radicalized? Why hasn't the rest of the white, home-schooled, anti-LGBT, conservative community denounced him?
I saw on TV that white folks in South Carolina were celebrating with each bombing. There's video. Why isn't the mainstream media talking about that?
Don't stop fighting for the truth. The reckoning is coming
#
Re:There were plenty of red flags (Score:5, Interesting)
The bomber was white, Christian, home-schooled, anti-LGBT and conservative. This fits the profile of almost all domestic terrorists in the US. Why wasn't he on the FBI's radar?
Any how do you know he's wasn't. The FBI follows lots of right wing nuts. But contrary to popular belief, the FBI can't surveil *everybody* (that, apparently, was the CIA's job). There have been dozens of cases that have come to light where people *known* to the FBI and other authorities have slipped under the radar (or cell phone tower) and committed crimes.
The successful MO is coming clear - be white, be socially inept, have some technology background and have an axe to grind.
Oh. Wait....
Re:There were plenty of red flags (Score:4, Insightful)
He wasn't a radicalized terrorist, he was a serial killer. There is a difference. He had no ideological causes, no politicla target, whether or not he was white, home schooled, Christian or anti-LGBT, it had nothing to do with it.
What he did was because he was intelligent, psychopathic and his skills were most likely undervalued by his family and/or community. He probably had recently gone through some psychological trauma (girlfriend breaking up, fight with his dad, fired from his job) culminating into the thoughts that he was going to "show the world" with the hubris that he could get away with the cat-and-mouse game with agents he perceives to be less intelligent. He started low-end with someone disposable like a transient or a prostitute and worked his way up, probably to the perceived "target" but primarily to show that he can get away with it.
Especially towards the end, they virtually all end up in a killing spree where they either commit suicide or get caught (and then commit suicide). Some choose guns, some choose hands, some knives, there are a number of currently active serial killers, they are not terrorists, they aren't profiled as terrorists, they typically work alone instead of in a cell although rarely a team of 2 will happen.
Re:There were plenty of red flags (Score:4, Insightful)
They are not mutually exclusive, as the Austin bomber shows. Anyway, serial killers seldom commit suicide, as Mark Anthony Conditt did. However, radicalized terrorists very often commit suicide.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, they aren't mutually exclusive, there are probably some Al Qaeda psychopaths doing their serial murdering, however there appears to be no political motive for the Austin bomber, hence he is not a terrorist.
Terrorist: a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Serial killer: a person who commits a series of murders, often with no apparent motive and typically following a characteristic, predictable behavior pattern.
To conflate the
Re: (Score:2)
Thats why police and the FBI have to be very aware of who they are looking for.
A person of faith can be fully supported by the texts of their faith and could have the full support of a large faith community in the USA.
A community that would fund, support and hide a person.
That could offer a person a no go area for people of the faith to hide in.
Where any attempts at CCTV is removed by criminals of the same faith.
To provide a new real identity for any person of faith on t
Re: (Score:2)
Incorrect. The more thoughtfully crafted bombs he sent all specifically targeted the homes of sociopolitically prominent people of color, and the rest that came later were of much lesser construction. I call diversion.
Moreover, the attitudes of the misogynistic and racist church and community is well known to us in Austin.
Now whatever you decide, please consider doing something for this kid who watched her father die right in front of her. https://www.gofundme.com/tx-bo... [gofundme.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Your opinion doesn't matter when there are textbooks and dictionaries.
Re: (Score:2)
The bomber was white, Christian, home-schooled, anti-LGBT and conservative. This fits the profile of almost all domestic terrorists in the US. Why wasn't he on the FBI's radar?
Because that profile is quote close to those currently leading our nation?
Wait, was that a rhetorical question?
Re: (Score:3)
The bomber was white, Christian, home-schooled, anti-LGBT and conservative. This fits the profile of almost all domestic terrorists in the US.
That profile also fits millions of non-terrorists. With a sufficiently loose definition of anti-LGBT, it fits a large minority of people where I live. If you remove "home-schooled" as well (and with the aforementioned loose definition) it fits almost everyone.
Your statement is akin to saying that the FBI should be watching all Arab Muslims who go to Mosque daily.
Profiling is questionable in any case, but it's just stupid when the 99.999% of the people who fit the profile aren't a problem.
Re: (Score:3)
Gosh, so if I understand you correctly, you're saying that it sucks to be classified as some sort of danger to society just because of your race and/or religion?
No shit, Sherlock. That was the point. We have a lot of jackoffs in this country who say exactly that. A bunch of them work in the White House and one is golfing in Florida today on the taxpay
Re: (Score:1)
It feels different when it's topsy-turvey, with you turvey instead of topsy, doesn't it?
It feels exactly the same level of ludicrous both ways to me. Actually, it doesn't "feel" any way; I try to think with my brain.
If the purpose of your post was simply to illustrate that profiling is stupid, then we agree. But that's not how it came across. It came across as a serious proposal and you are a sufficiently assholish and irrational leftist that I found that completely believable.
Re: (Score:1)
Hmmmm. Wow. Narcissistic perhaps? Obviously blind to reality...
So at the most the intersection of all is 2.
its true! (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, he was a criminal (Score:1)
They called him "Mark Anthony" and not just "Mark." We've known at least since the time of Lee Harvey Oswald that dangerous people have three names.
Thank You For the Good Use of Technology (Score:3)
But they claim they are going dark! (Score:2)
It is lucky for us it was the local police that caught him. The FBI is convinced that they are going dark because of encryption so would have just put out a press release calling for backdoors in cell phones and web etc.
It is reasonably obvious that despite encryption which is shutting some traditional doors that the cops were used to looking through, that there is a plethora of new data that can be used instead.
Triangulation (Score:4, Interesting)
how to hack (Score:1)