Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking Communications Government Security United States

How A Contractor Exploited A Vulnerability In The FCC Website (wirelessestimator.com) 69

RendonWI writes: A Wisconsin wireless contractor discovered a flaw in the FCC's Antenna Structure Registration (ASR) database, and changed the ownership of more than 40 towers from multiple carriers and tower owners into his company's name during the past five months without the rightful owners being notified by the agency, according to FCC documents and sources knowledgeable of the illegal transfers. Sprint, AT&T and key tower companies were targeted in the wide-ranging thefts... Changing ASR ownership is an easy process by applying online for an FCC Registration Number (FRN) which is instantly granted whether the factual or inaccurate information is provided. Then, once logged in, an FRN holder can submit a form stating that they are the new owner of any or multiple structures in the database. As soon as it is submitted, the change is immediately reflected in the ASR.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How A Contractor Exploited A Vulnerability In The FCC Website

Comments Filter:
  • Summary? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Rockoon ( 1252108 ) on Sunday June 25, 2017 @08:32AM (#54686171)
    Why doesnt the summary indicate in any way what was gained by the perpetrator in doing this?
    • by Anonymous Coward

      The perpetrator gained super karma somewhere on Reddit for having such a cool story bro.

    • Why doesnt the summary indicate in any way what was gained by the perpetrator in doing this?

      I would think a warm cell and three meals a day?

      • The way I see it the summary might as well read "The competition of a wireless contractor..." because at least then there is a motive.
    • by dog77 ( 1005249 )
      The article says "It is unknown why Nix changed the ownership of the structures or what benefits would be derived by being able to identify that Aura owned a $12-plus million group of towers.".
    • Are we sure this guy wasn't a Comcast contractor? That would explain much.
  • ugh..... (Score:4, Informative)

    by starblazer ( 49187 ) on Sunday June 25, 2017 @08:34AM (#54686173) Homepage
    What a jackass... now the FCC is going to burden us honest folk with extra paperwork. I liked being able to submit my AU to the ULS and it being approved the next day automatically.
    • What a jackass... now the FCC is going to burden us honest folk with extra paperwork.
      I liked being able to submit my AU to the ULS and it being approved the next day automatically.

      I'm that was convenient and all, but what if it was someone mucking about with your records and changing stuff in them?

  • Why? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mhkohne ( 3854 ) on Sunday June 25, 2017 @09:30AM (#54686381) Homepage

    From the article: "It is unknown why Nix changed the ownership of the structures or what benefits would be derived by being able to identify that Aura owned a $12-plus million group of towers."

    This seems like a 'Step 2: ???' kinda plan, since the FCC database gets you exactly nothing in terms of money, or ability to transfer ownership of the towers.

    Weird.

    • My guess would be to try and sell them

      • You know, I'll bet you're right. Selling them would be like selling a bridge you don't own, and the con would work a lot easier if you can show that the FCC has you down as the owner.

      • by PPH ( 736903 )

        Borrow against them.

        After 2008, bankers are desperate to write new loans against practically anything. Since the home mortgage business is being watched like a hawk by regulators, lots of business scams are popping up.

        • by mysidia ( 191772 )

          Bankers are going to require more paperwork to show clear title than a listing in the FCC database,
          just because you're listed as owner doesn't mean there's no Lien or other mortgage against the property, for example.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Obviously he was just trying to get laid. Women get soaking wet over guys who own a lot of cellular infrastructure. There's even a famous rap song about it.

      Sprint, Cricket, Let me stick it
      in your butt hole like T-Mobile,
      slide in your buns like Verizon,
      This nigga own so many towers
      you gonna be suckin my dick for hours

    • This seems like a 'Step 2: ???' kinda plan, since the FCC database gets you exactly nothing in terms of money, or ability to transfer ownership of the towers.

      Just because the reporter who wrote the story didn't have details of the scam, doesn't mean that there were no details. It just means they're not going to be able to tell you.

      An obvious thing would be scamming investors by making your company look larger than it is. Who knows? Chances are, catching him at this stage means whatever the rest of the plan was we'll never know because he won't be able to do it now.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 25, 2017 @10:49AM (#54686673)

    When I, a small wISP owner, want to access a tower I look up the tower owner in the FCC database. I then contact said owner and proceed to work out a lease agreement. When I, a small wisp owner, want a bank loan I attach my FCC Database records as part of proof of ownership. The structure itself very often does not have records with the county like land does. The land can be owned by J. Q. Public, Et Al. Now I have $12M worth of assets and can get a 3 to 5m loan with a very attractive rate because its so far under my asset value.

  • "Changing ASR ownership is an easy process by applying online for an FCC Registration Number (FRN) which is instantly granted whether the factual or inaccurate information is provided. Then, once logged in, an FRN holder can submit a form stating that they are the new owner of any or multiple structures in the database. As soon as it is submitted, the change is immediately reflected in the ASR."

    That is a breathtakingly bad process. Epic, in fact.

    Thousands of security analysts around the country are feeling

  • My news source says that this guy was actually legitimately buying the towers, but because of some backroom HILBAMA scheme after he spent the money it got reversed, he was blamed for hacking.

    As far as motivation, according to several anonymous sources that couldn't be contacted for further details, word on the street was this guy had a lot of secret details THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW about the REAL story of..... BatBoy!

I THINK THEY SHOULD CONTINUE the policy of not giving a Nobel Prize for paneling. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

Working...