NoScript Anywhere In Development For Android 57
CaffeineAddiction writes "NoScript Anywhere (NSA) is the nickname for the next major iteration of the NoScript security add-on (NoScript 3), whose guts are being turned upside down in order to match Mozilla's Electrolysis multiprocessing architecture and implement a porting for Firefox 4 Mobile, available on Android and Maemo smartphones and tablets."
NoScript and VideoDownloadHelper on OPERA? (Score:3, Interesting)
Why can't Opera get into any of this? And none of the cheap hacks: Opera needs to get on the bandwaggon, maybe with a cross-over tool so it can use Firefox Add-ons because everything in the Opera community just has a "cheapened" feeling to it when someone makes something they say has equivalent function of a Firefox plugin or Add-on.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Reminds me. I owe that guy money. (Score:5, Interesting)
NoScript is probably the most useful thing on my computer aside from the browser itself. And without it, I'd think the internet and by extension the browser were awful, so the probability is approaching unity.
Time to donate to the cause [noscript.net].
Re: (Score:1)
+1000 insightful on this.
I will not use Chrome or Opera (or IE for that matter) simply for their lack of anything even remotely approaching NoScript.
Re: (Score:2)
As noted above, it doesn't even approach the same functionality so I don't count it. Hyperbolic rhetoric still pumped. Flame on!
Re:Reminds me. I owe that guy money. (Score:5, Informative)
Don't forget the shady stuff the maker of NoScript tried just 2 years ago. He silently killed part of AdBlock on comuters it was installed on, and obfuscated what he was doing. The shit really hit the fan before he started backpedaling and reversed his position. I don't trust the guy.
http://www.techjaws.com/the-noscript-controversy/ [techjaws.com]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoScript [wikipedia.org]
http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/app-security/217201461 [informationweek.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That reminds me I owe the Adblock Plus [adblockplus.org] project a few ducats as well.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Pff, I think NoCSS and NoGUI are more useful! Also, I can't wait until NoASCII works with Firefox 4, and I can finally surf by just looking at my trusty oscilloscope, without all that useless bloat!
Add-ons in mobile FF? Yeah, right. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, as in all things, YMMV, but I've never had cause to complain about FF4's performance on my modded (CM7.0.3) HTC Desire CDMA. Fairly snappy, although admittedly a tiny but noticeable bit slower than Android's native browser, Whatchamacallit*. OTOH, FF4 doesn't make a horrible unusable hash of some of the websites I visit like Whatchamacallit does.
Add NoScript and it becomes head and shoulders better than the built-in one.
*Does it even have a distinct product name? I don't recall ever seeing it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Add-ons in mobile FF? Yeah, right. (Score:4, Informative)
This 1000x, wtf is with everybody deciding my mobile browser needs to be redirected to m.url if I wanted to do that I would have typed in that url. Btw use about:debug on the stock android browser then select settings -> more to get to the user agent switch
Re: (Score:3)
wtf is with everybody deciding my mobile browser needs to be redirected to m.url
This is due to a majority of mobile users preferring to use a site that is designed with their smaller screen size in mind.
I would guess that in nearly every case, the owner of the web site knows more about their web site than random /. guy. Providing a scaled down version of the full page is a courtesy web site owners give to their users.
You might find that constructing a large fence in your front yard does indeed keep people off your lawn, but it also partitions you off into your own little reality.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's slow on the N900 due to the dearth of RAM. 256MB total, with notably less free on boot. You're instantly in a paging situation once the browser is up and running due to its memory usage.
With 512MB of RAM it's quite nice, and does so well on the Nook Color I'm currently attempting to shove MeeGo 1.2 on.
Re: (Score:2)
Dearth of RAM... a mere 256. In a fracking *cell phone*.
I feel so old...
Re: (Score:2)
The N900, and most modern smartphones, are much more than just cellphones.
You can still get cellphones with less than 32MB of RAM, they just don't do much.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:site-specific permissioning (Score:5, Informative)
Applications Boundaries Enforcer. (Options -> Advanced -> ABE)
Site *.googleapis.*
Accept from *.whateveryoursiteis.com
Deny
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I agree that FF mobile is slow to load. The only reason that I keep it around is that some sites don't display correctly on other browsers. I also like to be able to spoof the user agent so that I can see the full site.
You can type about:debug in the standard android browser to enable more setting when you go to Menu > Settings, including a user agent changer.
Good English there ... (Score:2)
"Implement a porting?"
Sheesh.
Re: (Score:3)
Funny, I love it for that reason. When I go to a new site and see it has twenty different domains trying to load in ads, tracking, social garbage, and the like, that's generally a big clue that I want nothing to do with that place.
Untrustworthy developer. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But what do you use in its place?
(I just use a separate browser with JS turned off.)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, he did apologize.
That's more than we usually get when this sort of thing happens.
not yet available? (Score:1)