Swype Beta For Android Is Open, Temporarily 104
FyreWyr writes "In 2008 we discussed Swype, which allows a mobile (phone, e.g.) user to draw a path over a virtual keyboard to enter words, rather than requiring precise tapping to accomplish the input. Using this software, a Swype intern (Franklin Page) beat the Guinness record by about 6 WPM for the Guinness-standard phrase: The razor-toothed piranhas of the genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus are the most ferocious freshwater fish in the world. In reality they seldom attack a human. (Unfortunately the video at that link is marked private.) TechCrunch reports that Swype is presently in open beta, and will be available for 'a couple of days,' supporting English, Spanish, and Italian entry. Finally, while the deadline has apparently passed, I was able to retrieve the Android beta for testing a few minutes ago. I'm posting it here for the benefit of Android-enabled Slashdot readers."
Typed using Swype Beta (Score:1, Funny)
First post!
The Guinness record ... (Score:2, Insightful)
(Unfortunately the video at that link is marked private.)
If no one can see it, it didn't happen, although I smell bear shit...
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Here's someone doing it in 34.9 seconds [youtube.com] on a Nexus One...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Look, I can understand the distrust of anything and everything surrounding a corporate marketing push, but we should probably actually look before we call bull(bear)shit. Let's give credit where credit is due:
That's not the only video... in fact It was on national television:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXmmOmR7M9w [youtube.com]
Here's the writeup of the event at Guinness World Records:
http://community.guinnessworldrecords.com/_Clackers-in-a-TV-ad-What/blog/2271291/7691.html?b= [guinnessworldrecords.com]
Already on (Score:5, Informative)
It's pre installed on the Samsung Galaxy S, you just have to click and hold on a text input field to get the menu up that lets you enable it.
Swype is really awesome (Score:4, Interesting)
My girlfriend and I recently got new phones, and I wanted to go Android but got an HTC HD2 (running Windows Mobile) with the intention of returning it within the 14 days allowed, because the phone I wanted was coming out a week later...
Anyways, long story short, I stuck with the HD2 in very large part because I was so enamored with Swype, and was distraught that Swype wasn't available for Android.
It's not perfect, of course, but I enjoy it. In particular, it can be a bit fiddly with smaller words (e.g. me, of, to), but once you get a rhythm going it is, dare I say it, actually fun. It's like every text message is a little game.
It's also very intuitive and you pick it up very quickly. If you've got an Android, definitely give this a look.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? How recent is that? Interesting.
I'm with T-Mobile (the Droid's only on Verizon), but I'm pretty sure when I did my research I just looked for android in general, not any specific phones.
It wasn't that long ago, a bit under a month I guess. I probably missed it.
C'est la vie.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Swype is really awesome (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been running Swype for months on my Motorola Droid. It works great, and it was not at all difficult to locate it using Google. AFAICT, it's been running on most or all Android phones for quite awhile (though mostly with questionable legality).
That said, it's great that the beta is open -- this way, I get to legally use Swype. Hopefully, some day, they'll actually let me pay for it -- I'd love to give these guys a few bucks.
Re: (Score:2)
That said, it's great that the beta is open -- this way, I get to legally use Swype. Hopefully, some day, they'll actually let me pay for it -- I'd love to give these guys a few bucks.
Same here - I've only been using it over the weekend, but I already feel it's integral to the Android experience and that I'd hate to see it go away (if the beta expires and they decide not to re-issue). The sooner I can pay for this and know that it's mine for keeps, the better.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Strange, 'cause it doesn't. I have one, I had to get in the beta.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not Much Interest In This Article? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Either there aren't too many 'Swypers' reading
Re: (Score:1)
Well, Skype can be worth having on your mobile if your overseas or long-distance calls are expensive and your data traffic limits aren't too restrictive. I would probably use it a lot if it weren't for the fact that I spend too much time using older networks that don't have the bandwidth to make it work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The razor-toothed piranhas of the genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus are the most ferocious freshwater fish in the world. In reality they seldom attack a human.
to someone using my phone, I can like totally call them, and it only takes about 6 seconds to say, while I'm guessing "kthxby" doesn't gain a lot of speed from being "swyped".
Meanwhile, a pox on Yet Another Stupid Internet Word like "swype".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're paying too much attention to the phone aspect. Not only is this application not just for phones (it might actually make tablets useful for writing up information on the move, for instance), it's great on the phone for email, making lists, taking down notes, etc. If you think this is unnecessary, you've probably not spent much time trying to enter text on small, touchscreen devices. Even on the "text" front, there are many instances where it might be preferable to send a text message than to make a ca
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe all the android owners are watching Nascar right now. I just came out of Infinion raceway and I didn't see many iPhones but a lot of people had Droids
PS. Typed on my eris with swype
Re: (Score:1)
:: crickets ::
Either there aren't too many 'Swypers' reading /. today or they're all having trouble 'swyping' on their non-phone keyboards. Either way this wins this week's "Sleepy Sunday Afternoon Story Award".
Um...It's Father's Day in the USA? :)
Re: (Score:2)
Quite a feat, considering it's Monday morning.
You see those of us who aren't iTards have known about swipe for quite some time as well as knowing about the swype beta. As seems to happen so often on Slashdot, this is not news.
Re: (Score:2)
Krogdor (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Krogdor (Score:4, Interesting)
shapewriter (Score:4, Interesting)
For the moment, I am extremely impressed with Shapewriter. And for a few days more, you can get that for free with no expiration and it is not a beta. So I don't see a need for Swype right now:
http://www.androidcentral.com/shapewriter-being-pulled-market-get-it-while-you-still-can [androidcentral.com]
Re: (Score:1)
They're all `for a few days` or beta only, right? What are they going to cost when they're out for good?
And why does Swype disable my Desire's `pinch to zoom` occasionally? Hope that's fixed in the final release...assuming it's free, otherwise I won't bother.
Re: (Score:2)
>They're all `for a few days` or beta only, right? What are they going to cost when they're out for good?
It is likely Swype's beta will expire. Shapewriter will not. The reason Shaprewriter is free for a while is because they are being bought by Nuance. Not sure WHY they are related, but Shapewriter will disappear from the market soon, and probably be released as a different product.
The one thing that is missing in *both* is that the voice recognition button is missing, which is a real drag.
Re: (Score:1)
> The one thing that is missing in *both* is that the voice recognition button is missing, which is a real drag.
There's a mod which does that (htc_ime) which works well, for the Desire at least. It uses the voice search which you get from pressing the search button, but you can use it anywhere you can enter text with the keyboard. It adds a bunch of other features too, such as limited gesture support (swipe left to delete last sentence, etc).
Re: (Score:2)
Dasher (Score:5, Interesting)
A "sweeping" mobile input method always reminds me of Dasher. I guess one reason why it doesn't get all the attention is that it must be tuned to a particular corpus of text, so it's not immediately usable like something qwerty-based.
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/ [cam.ac.uk]
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
It also looked awesome while you 'typed'. Like some sort of bizarre arcade game.
Re: (Score:2)
Well I'm certainly glad you posted this! (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Sweet, could be sweeter (Score:5, Informative)
It beats the living snot out of the standard soft keyboard, and may be faster than the slider keyboard on my Moto Droid, except that I can use *two* thumbs on the slider.
I haven't yet gotten used to the right actions to say, "no, it's not one of those eight words" without having to reswype the whole word -- annoying on lengthy words. It's accuracy is pretty darn good anyway, even if I swerve because I'm going the wrong way toward a letter, it often gets the right word.
Only app I haven't gotten it to work on is Twisty, an interactive fiction interpreter -- it would be a big help there.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't yet gotten used to the right actions to say, "no, it's not one of those eight words" without having to reswype the whole word -- annoying on lengthy words.
I don't know about Swype, but I've found ShapeWriter seems to actually work better with longer words since there are less matches for a given pattern. ShapeWriter gives you a choice of ten words.
It's accuracy is pretty darn good anyway, even if I swerve because I'm going the wrong way toward a letter, it often gets the right word.
Yep, if I accidentally stop on the wrong letter and have to change direction, ShapeWriter (and I'm assuming Swype) seems to have enough fuzzy logic to say "the user has no idea what they're doing, so I'll just guess" and gets it right. :)
Re: (Score:2)
How does it deal with words like "fuck"? T9 is horrible if you like to use any sort of colorful language.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Try swyping words like shit, cunt, fuck... Yep, it doesn't work. Swype will not predict "offensive" words.
Aren't these words part of the English language? Aren't they in every single modern English dictionary? Then why can't input them on my phone keyboard? I guess I need to add them to my user dictionary as if they were something special and not part of normal day-to-day communication.
This is totally unacceptable. After Apple censoring apps that are adaptations of c [tinyurl.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it's not - it will use whatever your standard dictionary is, so if you already have those words, Swype is happy to let you use them. Now, the basic Android dictionary probably doesn't come pre-loaded with your favourite expletives, but tell me, in what way does "doesn't come as part of the standard dictionary" equate to "you're not allowed to write those words"? You've never used a slang word that's not in the official dictionary? If you choose to limit your expression to words that are only in an
Re: (Score:2)
Privacy? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
It will say that anytime you install -any- input method.
Flick Input (Score:3, Informative)
I really prefer flick input, to be honest - 9-key layout, and a small "drag" in different directions determine which character to enter. You got big, easy to hit keys, and you're not dependent on the predictive input to get words right. I started using it for Japanese, but it's so convenient I now use it for English as well. Now, if I could add the Swedish characters to the Xperia Japanese/English flick keyboard I would never have to switch input method again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The keyboard I use is the one included in the Japanese Xperia, and is actually the best one I've used so far. Simeji (http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.adamrocker.android.input.simeji/ [appbrain.com]) and OpenWnn (http://www.appbrain.com/app/com.owplus.ime.openwnnplus [appbrain.com]) are similar Japanese input methods, and both have several modes including flick input (the left screenshot in the Simeji link and right screenshot for OpenWnn shows flick input in action for Japanese).
Of those two I like OpenWnn better, but both do suffer a b
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
"They are faster than multi-tap for sure, but, with the exception of typing obscure non-dictionary words, swype will be way faster."
In my particular case (admittedly not very common) I write in multiple languages. An input method that relies on dictionary matching would require me to switch the input language all the time. You could solve it by allowing the use of multiple simultaneous dictionaries of course, but I know of no input system that would allow me to do so (and there may be reliability problems i
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Actually, ShapeWriter for Android, which is functionally similar to Swype, appears to support multiple dictionaries at once. Available for download are French, German, Spanish, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I've tried shapewriter; that's the basis of comparison for me. Swedish and English is available, but no Japanese. Anyway, that's not the main reason I don't use it. I just prefer flick input myself. Different strokes - literally :).
Re: (Score:2)
a new level of non-responsive (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I have it loaded on my G1, and it's running just fine. You might wanna check out your hardware, or possibly uninstall some stuff that runs in the background.
I love Swype, but hate their marketing strategy (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would guess that this is heading towards some future update for android, although if they want to license it, that could be difficult. Why why why won't I be able to buy it!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What would the input method be for a normal desktop? If it's touchscreen it sounds incredibly uncomfortable leaning forwards to "type", specially while operating the mouse with the other hand, especially since people tend to use their favoured hand for the mouse (so you'd be using your left hand to learn forward and type via the screen if you were right-handed, not nice). If you were going to hobble yourself that way, you may as well use the mouse as the Swype input, at least you could lean back and do that
Try ShapeWriter too (Score:1)
I've used both, and prefer ShapeWriter
Oops! (Score:2)
I'm sorry, I shouldn't be on this thread, for some reason I thought Swype == VoIP + BitTorrent.
Was forced to try it by cow-orkers... (Score:2)
...specifically because I hate word prediction/correction and always turn it off.
And holy shit! This is awesome!
Swype works alright. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Shapewriter (Score:1)
Replace regular keyboard? (Score:1)
Is this something that could be useful in place of a hardware keyboard? There are IR projected devices, or some other invention perhaps, I dunno, where a touch input (Star Trek!!!) can be used in place of a key pressing physical device. Or are we not judging like for like? Is there software for use with normal keyboard that predicts what you type allowing you to use tab-completion or something?