OS X On the MSI Wind 219
Ruler of Planets writes "PlanetX64 has just published an article on loading OS X on an MSI Wind, effectively creating a machine that is smaller and lighter than a Macbook Air. The exercise was done solely for academic purposes and doing so voids all kinds of warranties, but hey, now you can slip a Mac into a lab coat pocket!"
Done in August with Video (Score:5, Interesting)
I read and saw the videos about triple booting with MSI wind [tech-recipes.com] back in August. He's got a video there and a bunch of hard to grab OS X drivers. If you are going to purchase a MSI wind, please note the issues with the non synaptics trackpads in some circumstances.
You will need an extra stick of RAM, DVD drive, and WLAN card as well. This hack will get you up to OS X 10.5.4. The hackint0sh community is usually a point release or two behind.
The planetx64 version also has problems with the internal mic, the microphone port and the headset port.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Every time I read an article like this (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder what the world would look like if Apple would sell software as well. I know they'd get a worse reputation because people would blame the OS for hardware / driver issues but it would certainly be neat to use OS/X on hardware other than that sold by Apple.
They would not have the margins they currently do, but it is very well possible that they'd take huge marketshare from microsoft.
And it would mean an instant end to the microsoft tax on new hardware.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder what the world would look like if Apple would sell software as well.
Apple will never sell software sans hardware. They've got a control obsession. Their greatest strength & weakness as a company.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, WATB, they have an obsession with not going out of business. They don't have an OS monopoly and can't lock in Dell or HP into selling OS X on their machines. They can't make the $$$ on volume like Microsoft can, so they'd have to charge much more money for their operating systems - inviting rampant piracy.
Stop drinking the anti-Apple Kool Aid.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:4, Insightful)
Except... hackintosh-ing invites rampant piracy.
No, because getting OS X to run on a vanilla PC has some technical hurdles, and the number of pirates goes down with each hoop that needs to be jumped through. If Apple releases a version of Leopard that installs (if not runs) on PC's without trouble, goodnight Shirley.
One thing that Apple does actually do to encourage piracy is the fact that they don't have a mid to low end tower. I'm considering doing a Hackintosh after Apple adds ZFS support, as I want a tower with four terabyte hard drives but want my total cost to be less than $1000, not start out at $2800 (base Mac Pro) before I even add the drives.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There are a bunch of external USB and firewire hard drive products out there that would require a significantly less amount of work to plug into a mac mini or imac.
External drives are great for temporary use, not so much for permanent use. Reasons to use internal over external:
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Unless you count the free act-a-likes of expensive enterprise distributions.
Are you some sort of fucking idiot? That's not piracy.
Re: (Score:2)
In reality, if Apple wanted to go into business as a software vendor, they wouldn't be undercutting MS to do it. They would gain market share, not on price but because people would be convinced through marketing that MacOS will work better with their Ipods.
Apple does not want to get into supporting their OS on any hardware, because, frankly, it might be worse than Windows at doing it. If they took that step and failed, they might never recover from it. Like you said, they want to stay in business and rig
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the late 90s I worked for UMAX, which made Mac clones when this was (briefly) legal. The business was successful, and was quickly killed by Apple, for exactly the same reason. Namely, UMAX could sell a more powerful machine than Apple did, for less money. Remember this was when Apple chipsets used the PPC 603 and 604, not x86 CPUs.
Nowadays, if things opened up and the beige-box makers could bring their enormous x86 economies of scale to bear, Apple's hardware market would change drastically. The Mac
Re: (Score:2)
Back in the late 90s I worked for UMAX, which made Mac clones when this was (briefly) legal. The business was successful, and was quickly killed by Apple, for exactly the same reason. Namely, UMAX could sell a more powerful machine than Apple did, for less money. Remember this was when Apple chipsets used the PPC 603 and 604, not x86 CPUs.
I remember them - we bought uMax machines do do our paper layout for the very reasons you mentioned - more powerful machines for less money. When we bought them we wondered how long it would be before Apple killed their OS license business.
Re: (Score:2)
>No, WATB, they have an obsession with not going out of business.
Opening your platform to more hardware is a good way to expand your market and create new profits.
The GP is correct. Apple's corporate philosophy is to deliver an all-in-one highly controlled solution. This has big advantages for the technophobic home market. Maintaining a 'it just works' reputation is important to them, but arguably an more open approach would be better, at least in dollars in the long run.
This is also why they wont let m
Re: (Score:2)
Apple will never sell software sans hardware.
Just wait, one day they'll start giving it away. Everyone will use OSX. Then Steve (who will reveal himself to be a highlander) will then use the internal kill switch to eliminate the entire population of computer using highlanders. And the few other people brave enough to use OSX for anything other than iMovie.
Well, they do sell it. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You can buy a boxed version of Leopard anywhere. Sure, their EULA forbids one from installing in anything that is not Apple hardware.
Wasn't that "Apple-branded hardware"?
And they do give you those quaint stickers you can use to brand any piece of hardware...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Because monopolies aren't illegal.
Re: (Score:2)
In all honesty, I can't see why AMD hasn't filed a lawsuit against Apple for artificially locking them out of their hardware sales and granting Intel a monopoly in Mac products.
Because every company has a monopoly on the products it makes. Ford has a monopoly on Mustangs. GM has a monopoly on Corvettes. Neither has a monopoly on the car market, just as Apple doesn't have a monopoly on operating systems, computer hardware or MP3 players.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you would too if you'd been fucked over from lisencing your products previously... remember the Mac clones and that huge fuck up?
No, I don't own a Mac, I just see why they do things the way they are. Frankly, most users are too stupid to own a computer, let alone be trusted to install the OS on their own random bits of hardware. Hell, even with driver disks and Windows they seem to still fuck it up.
The way I see it if you want Mac OS you should be more than happy to fork out the extra cash for one...
*
Re: (Score:2)
The cliches are coming, thick and fast.
Unlike your average /. reader.
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:4, Insightful)
And how, exactly, would this change "the world"? Just because you have your head so far up Steve Jobs's arse that you can see the light doesn't mean the world in any way revolves around Apple's business plans. It's just you.
And re "the microsoft tax on new hardware": it doesn't exist. You can buy MSI Wind without Windows. You can buy whichever component you want without giving a cent to Microsoft. Perhaps you're confusing it with the Apple tax, the extra money you have to pay for an Apple approved version of graphics cards and some sound cards.
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:5, Insightful)
If I had my 10 mod points I would have wanted to give you them all.
Wtf is up with the special mac graphic cards for real macs when hacks run BIOS cards? If the EFI connection in the OS is so loose can't they somehow make it possible to just use regular video cards? Or just skip EFI totally since it's not like they have released lots of EFI cards anyway and the world don't seem to move on to EFI just yet anyway.
Geforce 8800 GT 512MB Mac Pro upgrade kit: $279.00
Same card for a PC on newegg: $110.99
(Not to forget it's a shitty card anyway compared to some other options, but those aren't options even on a hack since all cards isn't supported anyway. Though I guess it can't be hard for Apple to get support for HD3000- and HD4000-series if they wanted to as well.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
... Or just sell they card at market price and not at some remarkable markup.
Where does this hate come from? (Score:4, Insightful)
We're talking about computers here. This isn't a religion. This isn't anything life altering or anything like that. These are computers.
Where does the "Just because you have your head so far up Steve Jobs's arse" vitriol come from?
Come on...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. Which is why I flame these people who see life-changing circumstances in Apple's schemes, and complain about "Windows tax" as if their own idol wasn't the biggest of all offenders. I wish the fanboy idiots could just shut up and leave the discussion to someone else. Especially when what they have to say isn't even remotely true.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Where does the "Just because you have your head so far up Steve Jobs's arse" vitriol come from?
Because it is fun teasing fanatics - religious or not, they're still a bunch of crazies.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:5, Insightful)
Suppose they did it this way...
1. published a list of exactly what hardware they supported, ie. a restricted driver model not the windows model of anybody can create anything they want and sell it for windows.
2. allowed OEMs to choose that supported hardware and display a "Apple Ready" sticker
3. allowed home builder to choose from that list and be "Apple Ready"
4. then anybody could buy and install Apple OS - if during boot up it detected unsupported hardare it would either refuse to install or warn the user that some hardware would not be support
I would expect them to release a free tool that would allow you to confirm if your platform was supported.
If this was done then OEMs could sell apple OS PCs, you'd see PC with "ready for windows" and "apple ready" label you'd know you could dual boot.
But let's face it, this is pure fantasy. Apple restrict the OS because they want money from the HW and they want to enforce a beautiful uniform image for their equipment. They very last thing they was is an ugly square chinese box proclaiming to be an apple.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Except knowing Apple they'd ask for an insane price for the benefits of having that sticker on your box or part of the profit since soooo many mac users would buy their cards, of which the OEM would say fuck that and things would remain as they is. =P
For half the price and same specs I'd for sure take the chinese box :)
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:4, Interesting)
I dunno. I bought a Macbook Air just for the hardware alone. It boots to Windows. I don't use their OS but I really REALLY like the laptop. I'd have considered a netbook but I really wanted something with a full size keyboard and screen as well as plenty of power.
Re: (Score:2)
For the size, the beauty, and that it fits my power needs. It is light, thin, has the full size keyboard and a large screen. It has held up really well being tossed onto the passenger seat sans case, dropped a couple of times from the bed to the floor, and being used as a tool and not a piece of art or anything.
I like it because it is very light and thin and that makes it fit my lifestyle well. It was very overpriced and all but, generally was worth the expense to me. It certainly isn't worth it to many peo
Re: (Score:2)
A more practicable (but only slightly more likely situation) would be to allow OEMs to license the ability to install Mac OS X for hardware which doesn't compete w/ hardware made by Apple ---consider he following form-factors which Apple doesn't address:
- netbook / smaller than MacBook Air machines
- slate-style pen computers
- convertible pen computer laptops
- full desktop replacement laptops
- mid-size tower w/ just one or two slots
- larger than 1U rack server
W
Re: (Score:2)
Apple users are safe (Score:2)
I suggest you act like/simulate that you are a top of line Mac Pro workstation owner and shopping for a new GPU (graphics card).
They run Intel right? Industry standard port too... Check how many GPU choices you have and their prices, support. Also simulate that you bought the device and have low FPS and look to ATI/NVIDIA support site. Don't waste so much time on that since they will eventually send you to Apple.
Sound is similar too...
This is a Wintel puppet IT scene and even having unheard (for Apple after
Re:Apple users are safe (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
"I wonder what the world would look like if Apple would sell software as well."
Apple sell plenty of software. What they don't sell is their OS for use with generic hardware, but they sell plenty of other stuff, some of which runs on platforms other than OS X.
Re: (Score:2)
You could have provided a list.
I keep hoping that they'll offer Logic for Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You could have provided a list.
I keep hoping that they'll offer Logic for Windows.
"You could have provided a list."
A list of Apple software, or Apple software that runs on platforms other than OS X?
"I keep hoping that they'll offer Logic for Windows."
I agree it would be nice if they did, especially the new Logic Studio Pack, which contains a lot more stuff than Logic Pro did, is a much nicer to use, and sells for less than 1/3 of the old price.
NB: the "pro" Apple software I know runs on non-OS X systems is the Shake movie production suite, which is also available for Linux at no less tha
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, because the Apple tax is much better ..
(I know that's not what you mean, in any case it's easy to get a PC without paying Microsoft as well, if nothing else just buy the parts.)
No need to blame the OS for any such issues if they said what hardware is supported, if you use unsupported parts then you got no one else to blame than yourself.
I'm not sure if would be such a huge success though, I have a mac now but it's not that awesome. FreeBSD + KDE works for me if only there was some commercial apps to.
B
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:5, Informative)
The mid 90s called. They have the answer to your question. But here's a reminder:
The fact you don't remember/know those two pieces of history suggest it wasn't really a stunning success.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. I would actually use OS/X if it didn't mean I'd have to buy new hardware (I currently have no need to upgrade my hardware).
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:4, Insightful)
Their margins would be arguably higher, as selling software carries little additional cost versus hardware sales. Each additional unit is more-or-less pure profit.
I'm not convinced that it would be an instant end to the microsoft tax, but at least it would be another alternative. Neither option is free.
Two points:
1) revenue would take a big hit if people switches from Apple branded hw to others
2) shipping fewer units would mean higher unit costs and lower margins on those products
3) support costs would go up as Apple would have to ensure it worked on a variety oh hardware combos with products they currently do not support but are cmmon such as WiFi cards from various manufacturers, or
4) they cut a deal with say Dell and HP but then they will need to significantly drop prices and stop update the build everytime an internal component changes
Re:Every time I read an article like this (Score:4, Interesting)
Why do you have so little confidence in Apple's hardware?
If, as we are often told, Apple's hardware is so much better, then there should not be a "big hit" from people switching.
I actually think it may be the other way 'round. Most of the people I see using "Macs in public" would still buy the Apple product even if it came with Windows only.
Re: (Score:2)
revenue would take a big hit if people switches from Apple branded hw to others
Why do you have so little confidence in Apple's hardware?
If, as we are often told, Apple's hardware is so much better, then there should not be a "big hit" from people switching.
I actually think it may be the other way 'round. Most of the people I see using "Macs in public" would still buy the Apple product even if it came with Windows only.
It's not lack of confidence in Apple's hw (which I own and appreciate) but absolute confidence in the buying public's willing to forgo great hardware for cheap hardware if it saves them a buck. If you can get the MacOS experience on a $500 (laptop + MacOS) machine many people would buy it and not a Macbook or Mac desktop. Sure the $500 machine is not as fast or as cool but it is good enough - and good enough plus a few hundred cash in the pocket trumps better every time.
Take the educational market as an e
more points and reponses to yours (Score:2)
1) revenue would take a big hit if people switches from Apple branded hw to others.
Yes but they will get revenue from people buying mac os x as well people who are not buying mac due to the lack of hardware that fits them.
2) shipping fewer units would mean higher unit costs and lower margins on those products
Apple can come out with products that are better priced at lower margins and ship more units and mac os x shipping units will go up.
3) support costs would go up as Apple would have to ensure it worked o
Re: (Score:2)
1) revenue would take a big hit if people switches from Apple branded hw to others.
Yes but they will get revenue from people buying mac os x as well people who are not buying mac due to the lack of hardware that fits them.
Yes, but the revenue from an OS sale is a fraction of that from a machine; they'd have to sell at least 10 MacOS licenses for every Mac hw sale they lost to make up the revenue hit; which I doubt would happen. That's teh crux pf the problem - would selling a stand alone MacOS canabalize existing sales or result in incremental revenue? My guess is the former.
2) shipping fewer units would mean higher unit costs and lower margins on those products
Apple can come out with products that are better priced at lower margins and ship more units and mac os x shipping units will go up..
So margins and revenue go down as teh result and it's good for Apple? How? Their stock would take a real hit from that. Considering they could lowe
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Yes, the percentage margin could be higher, particularly if they go more direct (as in, online download & activation).
But there is no real way Apple could reinvent themselves as a software-only company [as they tried the sell-hardware & license OS to competitors before and got their asses handed to them before they stopped it].
Problems include:
-price for both OEM and retail set by Microsoft. America is cheap. See Walmart & Dell (well, Dell in the past, now they are kinda bloated). If customer
Re: (Score:2)
And what would force Apple to support OS X on the MSI wind and all other x86 hardware in the world just because they sold the OS?
Pretty shitty country you live in if companies can be forced to support whatever hardware you happen to have. I'd like to live in that country if they same would be true for software though: "So, I've bought warhammer and I want to play it on my leenucks machine."
Also in the world I live the hardware vendors is responsible for drivers, not the OS vendors. If MSI wants OS X on the
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know of any such countries, but it's common to have laws that require companies to actually support the hardware they claim to support and that's a big difference. Not doing so is false marketing/fraud.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Good luck competing against Windows if you can't run on the same hardware. Not to mention the time wasted and customer dissatisfaction when a customer buy's OS X for their new Vaio only to find out it isn't supported.
Re: (Score:2)
I think what we're really saying here is that there is need in the marketplace for another manufacturer of a professional, commercial operating system, that is well-funded and well made.
Re: (Score:2)
but i'm quite sure that'd be total oblitirated by the amount of software they'd sell.
... yes, because everyone who uses windows would jump ship... You know there are still very few games, and not very much business software that is made to run on OSX. Sure, some of the big ones work - but what about all the custom applications? OSX might see some adoption if it was sold separately, but it is so foreign to the average windows user that they'd wait until their next new PC to switch. And if they didn't like it, they wouldn't stay with it.
Any chance? (Score:3, Interesting)
Any chance that this could spur something on Apple's end? The Air is a joke of a machine, with its sole (count 'em - one) expansion port, just begging for failure. It'd sure be nice to have something more Mac Mini & Eee inspired, or the holy of holies - A Fujitsu Lifebook P8240 or Gigabyte M912-inspired Mac.
On a related note, any sign of new Mac Minis?
Re:Any chance? (Score:5, Interesting)
Macbook Air is a concept machine designed to fit a specific lifestyle and usage style.
If you have a "Mac Pro" or high end iMac running on top of line ISP line with 811.11N network installed at home and live in industrial city with top of line 3G coverage, you will buy and like Macbook Air.
See the Apple Japan store top 10 sellers if you don't believe me.
While speaking about Japan, Casio watches now even come with "atomic time sync" and they are cheaper than $200. Does it make Rolex a failure as it can only display time and date for $3000?
Re: (Score:2)
It's not a concept machine. Concept machines are not production items...they are prototypes/proof of concept that may later become a production item.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes even car companies ship cars which were supposed to be concept. They aren't ordinary and doesn't have all features same class car has but people buy them.
Here is example for you. If you compare it to a WV Golf, you will ask "which moron would buy it?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audi_TT [wikipedia.org]
They buy it and they are happy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Please tell us more about this "specific lifestyle" so we can go smack the poncy fruit in the head. With love, I mean.
I'm feeling a little lower-class today because my Conde Nast care package hasn't arrived yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Macbook Air is for people with already working high end desktop and ordinary laptop having high end Apple 811N "time capsule". It costs a lot but it doesn't make buying or shipping one a crime.
Would I buy a Macbook Air? Hell no. I am not even a laptop user. Nokia E90 and Sony Ericsson P1i (which has FRACTION of Air CPU speed and RAM) is good for my usage. They cost more than laptop and I guess I am another guilty filthy rich.
Re: (Score:2)
Now that you mention it...
Re: (Score:2)
Macbook Air is a concept machine designed to fit a specific lifestyle and usage style.
Yes, the MBA is used to make you look trendy and cool, as you carry it around. It appeals to people with more money than brains. That is the MBA lifestyle.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That entirely depends on whether or not the Rolex buyers buy Rolex because the appreciate the style and quality of the watch, or if they buy it so they can conspicuously look at the time in from of people that don't have a Rolex.
Buying something expensive doesn't make you pretentious, being pretentious makes you pretentious.
Re: (Score:2)
On that note, the amount of spam I get from Apple is just as much as the amount I get for Rolex watches.
Re:Any chance? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm an Apple pundit, but I jump at the opportunity to vent my hatred of the MacBookAir.
You're right: it's a disaster waiting to happen. A friend of mine has one and wrecked the USB port (the manner of failure being essentially irrelevant). Once the port died, the only way of getting information in or out of the machine was the wireless network interface. Digicams and DVDs became off-limits, as did 3G cellphone coverage. In short, it became a stylish paperweight.
Suddenly, my friend understood the concept of "robustness under single failure".
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
A friend of mine has one and wrecked the USB port (the manner of failure being essentially irrelevant).
Yes, no matter how many times I warned steve (our mutual friend), he was adamant - That MBA was totally hot, and totally into him. After that first night of passion, he was ready for more - but she was ruined.
So, on one hand, Steve was upset because his new GF wasn't able to put out anymore. But on the other hand, he now thinks he's god's gift to women.
Re: (Score:2)
One could hope that Apple might expand a little from the MacbookAir.
A lot of its compromise are exactly the compromises I've always preferred. Over the years, I've had old Powerbook Duos, Toshiba Porteges, Dell "X" series, and now, a couple of generations of IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad "X" series. I keep coming back to 12" screen, one-spindle laptops. They're perfect, especially since WiFi.
But, the MBAir is too far. Give me even two USB ports and a docking port, and it might very well be my next laptop. Apple
More OS X on Installations on Small Laptops (Score:4, Informative)
Another Vibrant site (Score:4, Informative)
And here's another site using Vibrant's in-text ads, with the "disable" tab turned off.
Vibrant's in-text ads are the most annoying online advertising scheme since X-10. But bad as they are you used to be able to turn them off... now increasingly often the "disable" tab doesn't show up when you try to do that. Sites that use this technology should not be supported by Slashdot eyeballs any more than spammers should. And just because you can use adblock to hide them doesn't excuse this abusive advertising trick... ignoring it because adblock works is like ignoring spam because you have a good spam filter: we know where that leads.
Re: (Score:2)
If everyone had adblock by default, I believe it would be banned by the government.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I view ads (and sometimes even click them) to support the websites I view and enjoy. Its called paying for what you use (in this case paying with your attention, however brief).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm talking about boycotting DRM-infested games which deny to run in I have some software which the publishers find questionable.
Sounds more like to me your downloading the DRM-infested software from piratebay and applying a crack.
Boycotting would be not visiting the website. You're advocating visiting it with adblock.
Re: (Score:2)
Your analogy is like instant coffee.
Re: (Score:2)
If everyone in the world had a good spam filter, and/or adblock, do you really think there would be annoying ads or spam any more?
If you assume a false statement, you can prove anything. This argument has been used to ridicule active anti-spam efforts for over 15 years now, and it's no more likely now than when the "Green Card" ads were first run.
Apple will be as displeased as usual (Score:4, Interesting)
I can't see Apple being well pleased with this. They have a reputation to sustain! [today.com]
In any case, OS X on netbooks is old hat. You can put it on an original Eee, for instance. [uneasysilence.com]
OS X really does work fine on general hardware. If your hardware is something Apple has a driver for. So, a bit like Linux without anything like as broad a support base, then.
(I personally prefer FreeBSD, but Linux supports my laptop immaculately.)
SC Johnson will be as displeased too (Score:5, Funny)
As this combination of hardware and software will inevitably be called WindeX.
The point? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, as OS X Intel runs on same x86 CPU, it can work. No need to run a lab for that.
When will people understand that OS X and hardware in total gives "Apple experience" and FreeBSD 6 with WindowMaker/WINE is a way better choice for such portable?
OS X is not only a X86 OS. It becomes meaningful when hardware matches too.
I bet Sony Vaio can run OS X too but I would run Windows or Linux on that machine. It will work way better than a hacked OS.
Therotically as it runs same CPU and most of mobile chip manufacturers are common, my Nokia and Sony Ericsson smart phones can run iPhone OS rather than Symbian they come with. If someone spent needless time for such a hardcore hack and shipped, would I install? Hell no. iPhone experience is broken right when hardware part is gone and smallest hack has to be applied.
Can't they work on meaningful things such as enhancing the linux/bsd support and performance rather than making people joke with MSI?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I am a Symbian user. I am not defending their scheme of doing things but one gotta admit it is a unique concept in smart phone and can't be copied.
It is mix of hardware and software. In fact it is hardware designed by a software company to run their software.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Creating a machine? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think I must have misunderstood the summary. In what way does installing a piece of piece of software onto something "create a machine smaller and lighter than the MacBook Air"?
Also, does installing software on a machine really void the warranty? If you reload the original OS from recovery disks before sending it back, how would the manufacturer even know?
It's strange, /. summaries are usually so clear and well-written.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Opening the case to swap out the wifi card is what voids the warranty.
I agree that slashdot summaries are occasionally sub-optimal, but this is usually solved by RTFA. :)
No, I am not new here.
Re: (Score:2)
Here we go again (Score:4, Funny)
"OMG, I would totally buy OSX in a second and run it on my box. Why doesn't Apple become a software company? Everyone would drop MS in a second. Apple would make a lot of money on volume."
etc
etc
This is why few boards of directors come to Slashdot looking for their next CEO.
Re: (Score:2)
MAC OS for Virtualization? (Score:5, Interesting)
My thought is that, just maybe, Apple should consider a license of Mac OS for Virtualizations. Pick one platform... VMWare, xVM, whatever.
This would solve the "but there are a billion network cards and a billion video cards out there" argument. Inside the VM, there is only the one configuration.
Sure, it wouldn't be the world's speediest thing. But, it would get a lot of people thinking about Mac OS part-time. Some of us Linux people who have a Windows window in the corner (when absolutely necessary) would ditch it most of the time for a legit copy of Mac. If I had to run a shrink-wrap app, I'd buy the Mac version if it ran well. I'd also be more willing to develop and test for Mac.
Too cannibalistic of their hardware sales, though?
MSI wind warranty (Score:2)
doing so voids all kinds of warranties
I am not very familiar with the MSI Wind myself, but it sounds to me like these guy have may just broken some wind?
Re: (Score:2)
Living in the past (Score:2)
but hey, now you can slip a Mac into a lab coat pocket!
You're living in the past. Modern day lab coats can handle atleast 2 big macs, no problems (no void of warranty, either).
(The experiments conducted to verify these results were done for purely academic purposes, of course).
Re:Looks like the site is being hosted on an MSI W (Score:5, Interesting)
I've got some of the pages in cache.
1. Connect your external USB dvd drive to the MSI wind while the computer is off.
2. Turn on the dvd drive and eject the tray. Place the MSI Leopard disk in the drive and close the tray.
3. Turn on the MSI wind. After the MSI logo screen, you will be prompted for 5 seconds at the darwin screen. Just tap the space bar within the 5 seconds provided in order to boot from the disk. You will see the installation commence.
4. The process will take around 5 minutes before you get to the main OSX installation GUI screen. On your way there, you will see a blue screen with the spinning multicolored beach ball as your mouse representation.
5. Shortly thereafter you will arrive at the language selection screen. Select English and click next.
6. You will arrive at the Welcome screen for the install. At this point you need to stop and blow away your drive partitions to start fresh. Drag your mouse to the top edge of the screen, and click on âoeUtilitiesâ.
7. Then go down and select âoeDisk Utilityâ.
8. Click on your main drive in the left side.
9. Select âoePartitionâ on the right side.
10. In âoeVolume Schemeâ, select âoe1 partitionâ.
11. Assign your disk a name. Then Click on âoeApplyâ. It will take a few seconds to process the disk.
12. Click on âoeQuit Disk Utilityâ from the menu.
13. It will take you back to the main installer âoeWelcomeâ page. Click on âoeContinueâ.
14. Click to accept the licensing agreement.
15. Select your drive destination which you just partitioned.
16. Very Important to STOP on the next screen titled âoeInstall Summaryâ. In the lower left hand corner there is a âoeCustomizeâ button. Click it.
17. Go into Patches, then Kernel, and Uncheck it.
18. Click on done, and you will be taken back to the âoeInstall Summaryâ page and click on âoeInstallâ.
19. Sit back and have a cup of coffee while the machine goes thru the whole install process. Don't be alarmed if it loooks like no activity is going on. If you don't see the dvd drive light going, you will notice the HD light on the MSI blinking while installation happens in the background.
20. Once it is finished and reboots, unplug the dvd usb cable.
21. This time when the âoeDarwinâ boot screen comes up, don't click space bar. The grey Apple logo screen should come up upon booting. If all went well, core animation and sound were installed, and you should see the welcome intro movie playing smoothly. That's it, you are home free.
Re:Looks like the site is being hosted on an MSI W (Score:5, Informative)
Pros
Power management/Sleep work normally for the most part. The only difference from actual Apple hardware, is that you need to tap the power button to wake from sleep, as opposed to screen lid, mouse movement or space tap. Fans work properly, same as on a macbook. They kick in on heavy CPU usage and high temps. However, I must say, the device keeps very cool most of the time. Other pluses include Portability & Price. The 6 cell battery gets you around 5 hours of usage.
Working perfectly:
* Core image
* Core animation
* Core audio
* Video Out & Graphics in general
* Wired Ethernet
* Webcam
* Internal Speakers
* USB
* SD Card Slot
* Sleep
* Bluetooth
* Wifi
* TouchPad
* Function Keys
Cons
Not able do perform Major OS point upgrades. There is no support for this. Warranty becomes Void. You are totally on your own. Web Cam, Wifi & Bluetooth, need to be activated via the function keys before the OS will see them (very PC like). The trackpad feels a little clunky, however I prefer a small mouse (wired or bluetooth). If you try to save a few dollars by going with the 3 cell battery, you will only get 2 hours of usage.
Not working:
* Internal Microphone
* Microphone port
* Headset port
WTF? 10" Macbook? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Which 10" MacBook are you referring to?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:OSX is just another OS.. (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, or even a phone!
Oh, wait...