Enthusiast Hacks WiFi Into Treo 650 242
Sammy at PalmAddict writes "Shadowmite, a Palm enthusiast has managed to hack his Palm One Treo 650 smartphone, enabling it to work with the Palm One WiFi card, despite Palm admitting the Treo was never designed to use WiFi technology. Shadowmite managed to get his hands on the Pa1m One WiFi card and modify it so that his Treo 650 could use it. The experiment was a success, and is causing quite a stir -- putting pressure on Palm One to provide support and fully support the new drivers."
What? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think so.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:Nintendo isn't as desperate for marketshare (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:5, Insightful)
The article explains it clearly. This isn't really that clever of him, but he's just the first person to do it. The SIDO Wifi card fits into the Treo, just like other Palm products, and it only makes sense that it should work. The software was just lacking. That's all there is to it.
You can just hear the board meeting in your head at Verizon/Other Cell Provider with the Palm Treo Sales guy:
Palm: And not only that... but this thing is practically a mini computer! It's got Bluetooth, and file-transfer, and wifi...
Verizon: Wait. stop right there. What was that last thing you said?
Palm: Wifi. it's awesome, you can just be a part of any nearby network.
Verizon: Isn't that exactly what VoIP handsets do? Those things we don't own, and can't charge for?
Pam:
Verizon: Take that out.
Re:What? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What? (Score:2)
They ARE crippling the products (Score:2)
It's kind of sad that so many people on slashdot are blaming the cell phone companies, because they have nothing to do with it. This is something Palm has be
Re:They ARE crippling the products (Score:2)
But seriously, the wireless carriers make sure that anything and everything that can connect to their network. Maybe it's Palm this time (yes, I know all about their whole "remove XYZ so we can sell the one with XYZ for more" thing), but who's to say it's not Sprint?
Re:They ARE crippling the products (Score:2)
palminfocenter.com [palminfocenter.com] for one
geek.com [geek.com] for another.
Yes, the Treo 600 supposedly didn't have the wiring to drive a wifi card, but "legal issues" are what's cited as the main concern. These links are the first couple of hits on a quick google search, but I spent a couple of days researching this in early 2004. Back then, SanDisk had more info on their site about the legal battles with PalmOne that were preventing the driver releases. SyChip, who wrote the drivers, wanted to r
Re:What? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What? (Score:2)
And the T2, which I own.
Palm has been restricting Wi-Fi capabilities in their devices for quite some time for devices with and without an integrated phone. It's not new, just research the Sandisk SDIO Wifi card and it's battles to get Palm to let them release the drivers.
Palm has been using licensing constraints to restrict the Sandisk card's supported platforms. I COULD have wifi support for my T2 this afternoon, if the PHBs at Palm would let the drivers be released.
Re:What? (Score:3, Interesting)
Wait, something broke? Why, I'm sure that Dell will support it.
*cough*
No, I doubt Dell gives a shit about supporting everything under the sun, either.
Noone owes you anything. You want to hack wifi into the thing? Go for it. Still expect the manufacturer to support it? Are you high? That'd be like me asking for support after hacking an Xbox.
Give the company a reason to support it, they might. Otherwise, bitching about it and acting as though it's your birt
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:2)
That's exactly the point. The company isn't obligated to supplant every wish that you have if it isn't sold with that feature enabled. If that was the case Chevrolet would be having a bitch of a time making a profit, seeing that they'd have to be throwing larger engines in all the time for customers like you.
My previous analogy may have sucked, but this one does not.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Wait, something broke? Why, I'm sure that Dell will support it.
Poor choice for an analogy. Dell may not support questions about your home installation, but they do sell them [dell.com] like that.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What? (Score:2)
Same is true of the project I'm working on. You're not so clever yourself, AC, so would you mind just finishing it up for me?
Depends on your viewpoint... (Score:5, Insightful)
In this context, they should own up the lie and, at the minimum, come clean on it. This is the same sort of crap about crippled Bluetooth on some Moto models except worse, they came up with a lame-ass lie to cover for the real reasons. In all honesty, they should eat the pain from the Telcos and the Telcos should be revealed for what they are over all of this.
This is all Palm's doing (Score:2)
Look at the list of Palm devices that were available for sale in the last year and a half that have SDIO ports, but not integrated Wifi. There's a lot of them, aren't there? Did you know that Sandisk has drivers that would let any Palm device with an SDIO port running Palm OS 5.x use the Sandisk wifi card?
Did you know that Palm has been blocking Sandisk from releasing these drivers with what the Sandisk w
Re:What? (Score:4, Insightful)
And I disagree. They claimed that it was incapable of working, so they wouldn't provide it or support it that way. They were proven to be liars. Since the only reason given was that of a technical problem, and that technical problem was solved, then they should be required to support it. And by "should be required" I think that if there was a law suit against them, they would lose. They lied in the marketing. They committed an offense called "false advertising." Of course, it is different than the usual case because they lied in claiming that their device was less capable than it really is, but they still lied in order to sell more of their products.
Or, to ask it another way, why do you support people (or corporations) being able to lie with impunity?
Re:What? (Score:2)
That is truely an incredible line of reasoning. Perhaps you just didn't make your point clear, or perhaps you're just trolling.
The maker of a device is free to choose what features it will or will not support (except where there are law
Re:What? (Score:2)
They would have done the same as claiming that the case would work fine for hammering nails, but that if you struck the case, the screen would break.
Of course, someone went out, struck a nail with it, and the screen didn't break. Now, their claims that the only reason they don't support it doubling as a hammer has been proven false, they should support it being a hammer.
It isn't just about what it can and
False claims? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:2, Funny)
Of course they should support it, its a market for their product!
Re:What? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What? (Score:2)
Nothing wrong with letting them know we actually want this capability to work.
Re:What? (Score:3, Insightful)
People involved want support for it. So they pressure the company. Are they going to the courts
Re:What? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What? (Score:2)
One [telus.net]
Two [telus.net]
Three [telus.net]
I don't know whether to be sad or amazed.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:What? (Score:2)
Still waiting (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Still waiting (Score:5, Interesting)
Original link (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Still waiting (Score:2)
Re:Still waiting (Score:2)
Re:Still waiting (Score:2)
albiet the software is yet to be written. Don't
fret -- it will be. When the GSM Treo comes out,
you can get unlimited GPRS from T-Mobile, and use
your voip without wifi, on the road where there
are no hotspots, all with no per-minute fees. While your laptop is browsing via bluetooth, even.
Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:4, Interesting)
This brings up a question I want to ask T-Mobile.
My BlackBerry 7100i can be used as a wireless GPRS modem connected to my notebook via the USB cable. It works; I *know* it works, because:
(1) I've read the forums where people tell how they got it to work (after getting T-Mobile to unblock some ports); and
(2) I've done it to send/receive e-mail via Outlook when I enable their t-zones service.
Now for the question:
When the products the carriers promote have these capabilities, why do they not support them? I would be willing to pay for the service if T-Mobile would admit that it works and support it. If a Treo 650 can handle WiFi, that's a selling point and likely to result in more sales.
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:4, Interesting)
But the people selling the devices are really selling cellular service. If you can use WiFi, you can use VoIP for free rather than the cellular minutes. It has been alleged that it was Sprint that explicitly asked PalmOne to not provide WiFi drivers for the Treo 650.
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:4, Insightful)
I get the 3585 home and discover theyve disabled *ALL* the text messaging features, the Java VM, even the ability to select rings for different callers...
Anyone want to go on a killing spree with me?
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:5, Interesting)
In Finland carriers can't subsidize phones, as by law it's illegal to tie the phone and the subscription. If you offer a phone, the price and terms of sale must be same with or without subscription to any service, so you can't tie the two.
So phone manufacturers sell their phones. More features = more sales. They don't have to bend over for the carriers - they are not their customers. So if carrier would prefer that the phone doesn't have WiFi... well, tough, they don't have a say in it.
And we have pretty damn cheap airtime, as the only way carriers can compete for customers is by offering a good cheap product - they can't just toss a cooler phone free, tied to some stupid package that appears cheap, but ties you to one operator for x months (or years).
Sure, phones cost money. Shocker. Feature rich phones cost a lot of money. Double shocker. At the same time your phonebill isn't used to subsidize someone elses shiny new phone used to lure him to the crappy service that you are stuck with.
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:4, Interesting)
This year, I ordered 5 Sony Ericsson T610's from Amazon with T-Mobile service. I paid $50 for each phone, and there was $250 in rebates available for each phone. I put them all on a family plan for $80/mo. Then I sold the phones themselves on ebay (I kept the 5 Motorola phones that I got in a similar deal last year).
The math works out like this:
+$250 (5 phones @ $50 ea.)
+$175 (5 x $35 activation fee)
+$960 (12 mo x $80/mo for a family plan w 5 phones)
+$228 (~$19 in taxes/fees per month, x 12)
-$1250 ($250 in rebates per phone, x 5)
-$500 (sell all 5 phones on ebay, make $100 on each)
--------------------
Total: get paid $137.
Plus I get another year of service for 5 phones! Subsidized crap phones are the only reason why I can even afford a mobile phone.
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2, Interesting)
The T610 is gone now because it's a piece of shit (I work for a T-Mobile Indirect...). We de-stocked them because they were always being returned due to poor reception. It was a neat little phone (except for the mostly useless QVGA camera) but the reception killed it.
(Posting Anonymously because of this...) I hope you got your rebates back before you sold the T610s. T-Mobile USA has started making sure the SIM you put down the phone as using is actually being used with that IMEI or else they don't issue t
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
To clarify, I mean supporting in terms of "the features work"... I have no idea what their phone techs are like.
--
Evan
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
Regardless of their treatment of that particular model, they do appear to be significantly better in general than Sprint or Cingular/AT&T, which are my only other two options. My focus is getting a good phone with good coverage and unlimited bandwidth of dialup speeds or better (obviously faster is better, but dialup is sufficient for my needs).
Honestly, my town is
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
--
Evan "Never even heard of the Loophole"
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
Probably because the marketing department often likes to rush features into promotion that the engineering department doesn't yet have ready for production.
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
My guess? The decision-makers at these phone companies are old geezers from the Ma Bell days; when the phone company was a monopoly and could do whatever they pleased.
Take a look at ATT's stock price and market share; the same thing is going to happen to these vendo
Re:Why do wireless carriers not support features? (Score:2)
Voip (Score:4, Interesting)
The only 'pressure' is $$$ (Score:3, Interesting)
I have a fully functional Handspring/VisorPhone unit. At the point where the new treos offer something more (802.11) then I will consider paying $500+ for new hardware.
It is palm's loss. At the point where I have VOIP and 802.11 working everwhere else will I look to make a change. If Palm does not have a solution, I WILL jump to Windows CE or Sybian.
I left the Newton to Palm....I can leave Palm.
Re:The only 'pressure' is $$$ (Score:2)
*ahem*....do you mean Symbian, or is your mind in a completely different place than mine?
Google Sybian if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Re:The only 'pressure' is $$$ (Score:2)
War-walking (Score:5, Interesting)
Tones...? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:War-walking (Score:2, Interesting)
Although it could be argued they should do this... (Score:2, Interesting)
I've got a few pieces of hardware that still work, but doesn't have support in Windows XP. No practical reason for it, but the hardware was inexpensive and purchased maybe a year before XP came out. The cost was based on the level of support the companies anticipated providing, so good equipment becomes paperweights with a system upgrade.
Don't buy cheap and expect more than you pay for. This was a clever hack but I'm sure Palm sells stuf
Re:Although it could be argued they should do this (Score:2)
They do, but it's a PDA, not a phone (or a really crappy phone in some cases). That's why they bought the Handspring Treo.
Besides being a cute hack, this does actually fill a void in the product line.
Re:Although it could be argued they should do this (Score:5, Insightful)
OK, so you don't know what you're talking about. palmOne (there is no such company as "Palm" anymore, hasn't been for a year) sells exactly ONE model with integrated Wi-Fi, the Tungsten C. They also support Wi-Fi on 3 other models via their Wi-Fi SD card, which is an imperfect solution. (It takes up the card slot.) The Treo 650 price varies with the carrier, but is typically in the $500-$600 rage or up. It's NOT a cheap product.
Meanwhile, most new Dell PPCs and HP PPCs come with Wi-Fi now, and the PPC world is now being inundated with variants on the BlueAngel/Harrier design: Bluetooth, GSM/GPRS, AND Wi-Fi. All three wireless types in one fairly nice handheld. (Still uses Windows Mobile, which bites, and it's not against-the-face-friendly, but it's still a good device.)
Your point about "don't buy cheap and then complain" is valid, but has nothing to do with this issue. The Treo 650 is NOT cheap, it's a top-shelf product. Other products in similar price ranges all have Wi-Fi. You're NOT getting what you paid for here, that's what people are upset about.
(That said, I still want to get a GSM/EDGE Treo 650 when it comes out. The lack of Wi-Fi is just annoyingly stupid.)
Re:Although it could be argued they should do this (Score:3)
Then there's a good damn reason to be pissed off. You didn't get what you paid for.
But I suspect you're saying that the fact that you didn't get a feature that wasn't claimed to be in the product means you didn't get what you paid for just because other products in the price range have it?
Well shit, I'm going to sue Dodge because my $30k truck didn't come with navigation, traction control, front ABS, side curtain airbags, an MP3
Restriction of trade (Score:2, Insightful)
That's illegal restriction of trade. It's a per se violation of the Sherman anti-trust act. You can't collude to prevent the development
Re:Although it could be argued they should do this (Score:4, Insightful)
free minutes! (Score:2, Interesting)
Fark Palm (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Fark Palm (Score:3, Informative)
feh.
I have an ipaq that I use for wireless web control of devices. it works - but if you look at it the wrong way, you must soft reset.
its not a 3finger salute, but it needs to be done just as often
Re:Fark Palm (Score:2)
If you've got a 3xxx or 5xxx series PDA, that's when you install Familiar Linux [handhelds.org] onto it. Once I stopped fucking with shit I ought not to be fucking with (the "Geee, let's see what this will do" syndrome), the only resets I've had to do are when letting the battery empty on accident. Rock-solid, and binary-compatible with Debian for ARM, and Sharp Zaurus software (GUI software for the Zaurus requires the Opie qt-based environment). Haven't missed anything from WinCE at all on my iPaq 3800.
Re:Fark Palm (Score:2)
Re:Fark Palm (Score:2)
its a GREAT piece of hardware. that's why I bought it.
its just that wince sucks.
(btw, are they still using wince in the bmw 7-series?)
Download link (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Download link (Score:2)
Greedy Carriers (Score:5, Insightful)
Imagine 10 years ago if a cell phone carrier told Motorola that their new cell phones were "way too small, anyone could just carry this around in their pocket. What will happen to our public telephone branch?! We have too much invested in the current infrastructure!"
Re:Greedy Carriers (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Greedy Carriers (Score:5, Insightful)
For instance, I worked at Intel in the early 80s. Intel invested a lot in development tools, compilers, assemblers, etc. It was the de facto leader in the technology. They sold their tools on their own platform, for which they charged about $25K.
When the IBM PC came out, all the software geeks said, "Hey, let's port this great software to the IBM PC, and think of all the developers we'll get." Intel management said, wait, if we do that we'll only make a couple hundred a shot for a compiler rather than $25K a shot for a development system. No way.
End result, Borland and others (and eventually Microsoft) introduced software that ran on the IBM PC and development system sales crashed anyway. Not only that, but now no one even bought Intel's software.
Moral: You can buy some short-term profit, but screwing your customers is a bad strategy long-term.
Oddly, Nothing to do with Cell Phone companies (Score:2)
This isn't about the Cell Phone companies, this is about Palm trying to force users to buy more expensive hardware to get the "built-in" wi-fi support. the only reason there is a Palm Wi-Fi card that has even minimal device support is because they're giving a slight nod to customer demand.
They have purposely refused to release drivers to let the Wi-Fi card work on lower
Re:Oddly, Nothing to do with Cell Phone companies (Score:2)
I am not blindly complaining about my own purchasing mistakes, but trying to help others avoid the same error. If this was all about me and my mistake, I'd moan about it and leave it at that. I want other people to know Palm is deliberately crippling their hardware.
Re:Greedy Carriers (Score:2)
How much do you want to bet... (Score:2, Insightful)
A hackaday keeps the teachers... (Score:2, Interesting)
palmOne - going down the tubes (Score:5, Interesting)
I started out with a Handspring Visor, my girlfriend has a Palm 3 series PDA. Almost all my friends and family uses Palm PDAs. That said, my Palm T3 will most likely be the last Palm PDA that I'll buy.
Started out with me purchasing my Nokia 6820 video phone in Asia - naively thinking that, "Hey, it's bluetooth, it'll be supported". It took almost half year after that phone's release before Palm would release drivers for it in their phone update - but, the drive only works as a modem driver. SMS and remote dialer apps for the phone isn't support. It *is* supported fully for the Palm T5 though.
Side by side comparison the T5 really isn't that much different from the T3 - minor tweaks in OS, faster processor and more memory. But what if I were to upgrade to the T5?
Forget it. I'd be ditching the "Collapsing PDA" feature that makes the T3 small and compact to carry, the silent, vibrating alarm for when you don't want to be obnoxious, the voice recorder functionality. I gain the ability to use the PDA as a flash drive, which I already own a few, and can add into the PDA via 3rd party software. They tossed out the Palm Universal Port which up till now most accessories use, as a standardized interface to the PDA - and for a top of the line product, the damn thing doesn't even come with a cradle.
What the hell are they thinking?
With the improvement of Pocket PC handhelds - and more vendors resulting in more selections - I'd have a hard time justifying purchasing another Palm PDA.
-=- Terence
Sprint's Vision Service (Score:3, Informative)
Sprint especially doesn't want people to connect their phones to a PC or laptop through a USB cable or Bluetooth, because they want you to pay $80/mo for the unlimited wireless internet (Vision) through a PCMCIA card.
Verizon is even worse since they cripple their phones a lot more. But I still switched to Verizon from Sprint since it gets better reception for me (GSM is horrible over here). But at least Verizon's wireless internet is much more stable than Sprint's was for me. I use USB cables to connect my phone to my laptop to get free wireless internet using my minutes on off-peak hours.
Phone Crippling - A Question (Score:2)
Here's my example - I had a handset that came with my contract. Cost me twenty bucks. About a year later, I got drunk at a party and lost it. So I went back to the Rogers store, and wante dto buy another handset, whereupon I was told that since it wasn't the start of the plan I had to pay C$250 for a SonyEricsson T226 - which they called "full price." (B
This is pretty old news... (Score:5, Informative)
Why not just ebay a PPC and needed add ons? (Score:2)
Re:Why not just ebay a PPC and needed add ons? (Score:2)
I went through a period of dissatisfaction with my Treo and I did basically the same thing you describe above. It was incredibly inconvenient, to say the least. And, I looked like a total tard.
My Treo is the best cell phone I've ever had, but it still has a ways to go, imho.
Haha Very funny healine! (Score:2)
Oh yes, Sammy. The whole 10 people who've posted on Internet forums claiming to have done this hack will really make those guys at Palm One to feel the pressure. I hear their developers will take time away from profitable projects just so you can hack an old phone.. They would really like to do that instead of selling you a next generation phone.
No wonder america is in trouble, nobody took economics 101.
Re:Haha Very funny healine! (Score:2)
Instead of honoring their mistakes by buying a broken device, then investing time in to modding it to make it usable -- Just buy the best competitor's item. I'm just saying, you aren't going to influence a major corporation any other way..
I'm sure life won't end if you threw it away today. I am suprised, though, this occurance seems to be a weekly headline. The "I bought som
Unsurprising (Score:3, Informative)
Perhaps if we had the option to pay less just for the services we want, without giving up our ability to choose any carrier we want, it would balance the slight increases to the cost of the handsets? We'd have more choice, more competition, and more innovation.
WIFI SD card with support for Linux? (Score:2, Interesting)
I only knew one from Fujitsu [fujitsu.com], but it seem it has been removed for end users.
Due to tremendous number of inquiries from our System Module Products prospects, Fujitsu will be basically selling the System Module Products to OEM customers only, unfortunately, it will not be available for end-user. Sorry for the inconvenience. Fujitsu appreciates your understanding in advance.
SD cards [zaragozawireless.org]
Palm enthusiast (Score:3, Funny)
While I won't go there, I'm sure someone did/will.
Re:Poorly explained (Score:4, Informative)
See this thread [treocentral.com] for more information about WiFi drivers on the 650.
Also this thread [treocentral.com] has some useful information on a patch that was obtained by someone that fixes problems with the sound quality of the Treo 650 microphone.
Re:Why Linux (Still) Sucks (Score:2, Insightful)
Bitchin about manufacturers who don't support linux doesn't solve any problems, but boycotting their products just might.
Re:Why Linux (Still) Sucks (Score:2)
Re:Welcome Slashdot visitor!..Isn't it Refreshing? (Score:2)
Re:whew (Score:2)
Re:When spellcheck doesn't cut it...... (Score:2)
It's spelled Voilà by the french