

SeattleWireless TV Broadcasts Again 44
adpowers writes "After a month long hiatus, SeattleWireless TV is back. This break allowed them time to include footage from August's Wireless Field Day. The episode also includes a how-to for making a BiQuad antenna and an interview with SeattleWireless founder Matt Westervelt about how SW is different from other community wireless networks. You can download an MPEG version with BitTorrent. Windows Media and Real Media versions are available on the website."
Back when I was a kid (Score:5, Funny)
Now we have the cable, like everybody else, but it doesn't sound like you youngsters know that there was TV before the cable.
Re:Back when I was a kid (Score:3, Interesting)
And I wonder if you youngsters even know that before there was voice, there was just simple beeping ( .-- .... . . ). And before that, there were moving pictures again, but they took the form of smoke signals ...
Seriously though, my daughter (2.5 years old) thinks that TV is `on demand'. She comes into a room, sees a TV and starts screaming for Dora! (the Explorer.) And since DirectTV lets you have Tivos on every
Re:Back when I was a kid (Score:2)
Re:Back when I was a kid (Score:2)
When the traffic info comes up on the radio on the way home and I don't catch it until it's almost over, I think an "instant-replay" button on the car stereo would be a Good Thing.
Re:Back when I was a kid (Score:3, Interesting)
Amazing! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Amazing! (Score:3, Funny)
There is also this marvelous idea to make hardcopies of e-mail and physicaly transport the hardcopy to the recipient, thus allowing you to communicate with people who don't have access to the internet, or even a computer. The lag is a little worse thought, but I'm sure they are working on that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Amazing! (Score:2)
He had a good point.
Re:What a couple of nerds. (Score:4, Funny)
These guys are massive nerds.
This is Slashdot. The fact that they are nerds are just a pro around here.
Re:What a couple of nerds. (Score:1)
Interesting concept (Score:1, Funny)
broadcast...? or better? (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't get me wrong, this is pretty cool in itself, but I was a little disappointed when reality reminded me that this wasn't some multicast video streaming thingie, with a program being available almost simultaneously over all nodes in the network. (Although, a sniffer-based audio/video player could be kinda cool, too, and actually be like a real broadcast, with lots of little repeaters...)
Then again, traditional time-based network shows (or informative / documentary shows) may be on the way out, and this is, in fact, a future video structure.
Re:broadcast...? or better? (Score:1)
A broadcast is defined essentially as any over-the-air transmission intended for the general public -- as in, not designated for any particular person. So while this may not meet your definition of a broadcast, it may well meet the FCC's definition. Although I can't find any reference in the article to what you'r
Re:broadcast...? or better? (Score:1)
Re:broadcast...? or better? (Score:2, Interesting)
Bram Cohen of Bittorrent has said that he'd like to create a live streaming Bittorrent for the purposes of a virtual 'real broadcast'. This is the only real solution for those without buckets of cash and internet2 connectivity.
But the problem in this is that the ability to enforce 'tit-for-tat' downloads is lost in a live broadcast, and this is what mak
FCC Part 15 (Score:4, Informative)
How about they do an episode on how to get an Amateur Radio license so you can operate under FCC Part 97 (not 15) and build your own antennas and perform all the radio modifications you want -- legally
Re:FCC Part 15 (Score:3, Funny)
It's called a callsign, and it's not pr0n, it's "binary files" to test link integrity...
Re:FCC Part 15 (Score:2)
Re:FCC Part 15 (Score:2)
Please leave Bittorrent windows open (Score:5, Insightful)
Please leave Bittorrent windows open so that others can easily download the file. Seattle Wireless is doing their best to cope with
Slashdot rules (Score:1)
MPEG mirrors? (Score:1, Interesting)