Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Android Google Handhelds Open Source

Google Posts Images, Binaries For New Nexus 7 80

In the wake of AOSP maintainer Jean-Baptiste Quéru's resignation, there was speculation that there would be no factory images or binary drivers released for Google's new Nexus 7 tablet. Happily, that's not the case — whatever other open source gaps there are in the Android world, Ars reports that those images and binaries have been released for the Nexus 7.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Posts Images, Binaries For New Nexus 7

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 10, 2013 @04:44PM (#44532571)

    Get an iPad instead, there's more apps and the ecosystem is far far more secure anyway.

    I'll take neither. Apple is one of the few companies I trust less than Google.

  • Same moronic moaning (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 10, 2013 @05:16PM (#44532699)

    Every season the usual idiots tell us Google won't release the source and binaries for new, proper Android devices, and every season the usual idiots are proven wrong. Why does Slashdot keep dribbling this same old rubbish?

    There is ZERO mystery as to what Android is, or what strategy it is pursuing. Too many cretins who claim some expertise in computing actually don't know the first thing about the subject. Look at all the morons who claim 'protected path' for DRM video rendering in Android somehow "locks the device down". One minute of research explains exactly what the 'protected path' initiative actually is, and how it will NEVER infringe on the ability to decode non-DRM video.

    The REAL question about Google's relationship with Android is when they will finally release the DESKTOP version, and provide a free alternative to XP, Vista, Win7, Win8 and all the funny Linux distributions no-one wants to use that way. Most Android hardware is already far better than the first PCs that ran XP. Google merely has to choose a windows interface and shell, and stand behind that choice. The current Android kernel and API sets are already good enough (although they can always be improved for the coming muti-core 64-bit ARM parts).

    In the meantime, the new Nexus 7 is a killer tablet that shames Apple, Microsoft, Intel and Nvidia. It projects Qualcomm to the top of the game as the 'new' Intel. And this is before Qualcomm even goes A15 or one of the new 64-bit cores. And worse for Intel, Qualcomm has the leading GPU solution in its space.

    Again, for those to thick to get it- Google is NOT going to close source Android. It is NOT going to prevent you from watching your own videos, or reading your own books, regardless of the source or the file format. This would be technically impossible, since by design Android gives apps access to their own rendering surface, just like Windows. Now, if only Google would make the new Android (desktop version) as much like XP on the surface, a true workhorse desktop/laptop OS for people who need to get things done, we could actually move into a true post-Microsoft era.

  • by SnapperHead ( 178050 ) on Saturday August 10, 2013 @05:29PM (#44532751) Homepage Journal

    I am a long time Apple fanboy, really love the iPad. But honestly, I am starting to get annoyed with some missing customizations that Android has had for ages. Not talking themes.

    For example: Intents. iOS 6 looked like Apple was headed that way with the way you share pictures or links. However, only a few select companies are integrated with it. I want to be able to add a screenshot right into Evernote. Use a different "read later" provider. I use Chrome on the desktop, which doesn't integrate with iCloud reader. Same thing goes for bookmarks. I use xmarks for syncing across multiple machines and I primarily use Chrome. Xmarks is also awesome for having work profiles. iOS xmarks integration is very limited because of Apple.

    Widgets: I can't believe that after all these years of widgets in OS X they haven't brought them over to iOS. It would be very nice to have a dashboard for lets say system status at work. I don't want anything too abusive on system resources, but allowing one of these widgets to update in the background or via notifications would be awesome.

    I was honestly considering picking up a Nexus 7 once the LTE version is announced. The announcement of factory images for the Nexus 7 has sealed the deal for me. Will I customize it to that level ? Not sure. But I would like the option.

  • by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Saturday August 10, 2013 @10:56PM (#44533685) Journal

    Trusting Google is a hard thing to do.

    The really funny thing is that this conversation about it being hard to trust Google is in response to an article disclosing that Google has fulfilled its promises and, indeed, been trustworthy.

  • Re:Apple is EVIL (Score:4, Interesting)

    by petermgreen ( 876956 ) <plugwash.p10link@net> on Sunday August 11, 2013 @06:52AM (#44534741) Homepage

    They are "evil" in different ways.

    Apple is strongly pushing locked down "curated computing" devices where you have little choice* but to buy all your apps from their appstore

    Google is providing devices where there are officially allowed (i.e. unlikely to dissapear) ways to unlock the bootloader and do whatever you like to the device and are releasing the sourcecode for their OS (minus a handful of third party blobs). OTOH they are also pushing software as a service and all the crap that brings with it (features you need can dissapear at any time and you have no recourse, your data is far more readilly available to the spooks than it would be on your own machines). Then there is the whole fiasco of replacing talk (open federated platform) with hangouts (closed platform).

    * You can register as a developer for an annual fee or you can hack the device in ways that are unsupported and may become unusable at any time.

  • Google still doesn't own all that source.

    They are in charge. They make the choices about who to partner with and under what agreements.

    No, no they don't. Google selects from the available choices. They don't get to write their own ticket. None of the available choices provides what you want. nVidia is beginning to, so you will have a valid complaint eventually.

    And you really can't expect the source to Google Apps themselves.

    Then they shouldn't use GPL components. At least Apple got it right and went with BSD.

    And in this case, you'll have a point when you can show that the Google Apps contain GPL code. You don't understand the licenses you're complaining about.

    Fuck you too.

    You'd need a ladder.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...