RIM Attracts 15,000 Apps For BlackBerry 10 In 2 Days 193
CWmike writes "It's starting to look like the BlackBerry store will be well stocked with apps when Research In Motion launches BlackBerry 10 (see YouTube preview) at the end of this month. The company held an event over the weekend where it offered app developers incentives to port their programs to the BlackBerry 10 platform and managed to attract 15,000 app submissions. 'Well there you have it. 37.5 hours in, we hit 15,000 apps for this portathon. Feel like I've run a marathon. Thanks to all the devs!' wrote Alec Saunders, vice president of developer relations at RIM, in a Twitter message. The 'port-a-thon' event was held in two parts: One aimed at Android developers and the other at apps written in other platforms, including Appcelerator, Maramalade, Sencha, jQuery, PhoneGap and Qt. RIM was offering $100 for each app ported and subsequently approved for sale in the BlackBerry 10 app store, up to certain limits. Developers could also win BlackBerry 10 development handsets and a trip to RIM's BlackBerry Jam Europe developer event." It's hard to believe that many current iOS or Android users are leaping toward Blackberry, though. If you're in one of those camps, is that so crazy?
The question is... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:The question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
5,000 single-site frontends and 10,000 fart apps.
Re: (Score:2)
OK, so how long will it take to QA 15000 aps?
A cynic might think that having many aps "approved" quickly, and hence marketed as in the store, might put some pressure on the QA staff to pass things after just a quick glance....
Re: (Score:2)
It took from 2 days to 2 weeks for most of the apps to past QA.
I have apps from the port-a-thon that still haven't gone through QA yet though.
Their QA is very strict. Also, for the portathon you can't have apps that are too similar, apps that perform a single or simple function or apps that don't meet their quality checks. They don't even accept emulators.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Doesn't the Apple store count a book as an "app"?
No Apple do not count books as "apps". A simple search can turn up this info.
Re:The question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
How many of those 15,000 "apps" are actually useful, and how many are just worthless single-site frontends?
And how is this question relevant here vs. every other app store boasting the same 1:1,000 ratio of good to worthless apps?
Seems a bit premature to bash RIM for doing nothing more than what everyone else does...and that is publish huge nicely rounded marketing numbers for apps, regardless of value-add.
Re: (Score:2)
And how is this question relevant here vs. every other app store boasting the same 1:1,000 ratio of good to worthless apps?
Well for a start, it would mean that Blackberry has 15 good apps, vs 700+ good apps on iOS and Android.
Re: (Score:2)
I bailed on RIM almost 4 years ago.
Went to Android. I will not be switching back but....
If I was still using a BB I would be very happy right now.
The keyboard looks very nice. The time shifting photo thing is awesome.
There are some real nice ideas in there. Would love to see that keyboard on my Galaxy Nexus.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Seems a bit premature to bash RIM for doing nothing more than what everyone else does
In the general case, that's true. But when you consider the thrashing they've been taking in recent memory, doing "nothing more" than anyone else does probably won't accomplish a whole lot for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The question is... (Score:4, Informative)
Quite relevant because what matters is the true count of useful applications - not the filler. By your reckoning (1:1000) that means RIM has 15 useful applications for BB10. Nothing to brag about. I've got 4 times that many very useful iOS apps on the devices I own and I've just scratched the surface. Android using friends of mine have dozens of useful apps on theirs.
More specifically it means that they have 15 useful applications *from this portathon*. I suspect the number to be higher - as it's fairly easy to port opengl games and html5 apps, outside of android apps.
They've already said they'll have over 70k apps at launch - it's not like this one-weekend event is their only effort to get applications on the platform. Unofficial estimates put them over 100k. That'll mean ~100 useful apps (if we stick with 1:1000) -- whhich is, frankly, on par with other platforms.
They've also previously said that they have 90% of the most popular 600 android and ios apps, and 18 of the top 20 apps .
Re: (Score:3)
have you missed the part where most android apps will work on BB10 and Playbook?
simply only need to repackage/sign an existing android installer package into a BB package.
anyone can do it. i've done it.
Re: (Score:2)
that is, free android apps or your own android apps. no piracy involved.
Re:The question is... (Score:4, Funny)
But, RIM's dead! The interblogs told me so!
Pay no attention to those Apple fanbois, or the fandroids neither. It's only the loyal BB partisans who have The Truth.
(Hmmm ... We could use an official site to inform us of the current buzzwords for properly insulting the users of various successful commercial products. Anyone know what the BB loyalists are actually disparaged these days?)
Re:The question is... (Score:5, Funny)
But, RIM's dead! The interblogs told me so!
Pay no attention to those Apple fanbois, or the fandroids neither. It's only the loyal BB partisans who have The Truth.
(Hmmm ... We could use an official site to inform us of the current buzzwords for properly insulting the users of various successful commercial products. Anyone know what the BB loyalists are actually disparaged these days?)
"BB loyalist" is about as disparaging as you need to be...
Re:The question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
"BB loyalist" is about as disparaging as you need to be...
this is a blanket?
jah
and we are pigs?
jah
then this is funny, jah?
jah! that is a good one!
Cheap jokes aside, IMHO this is lots of room for BB to move back into being a player.
First, they still have a very large user base and second, the other players all have significant weak areas that BB could target.
BB has always been about business communications and productivity, areas that Apple has never been any good at. Email on iPhones is a joke at best. Even if you jailbreak and install "mail enhancer pro" (jah, that is a good one too!), the mail tool is missing core functionality.
Multitasking on iPhones is pathetic and a total pain to move data between apps. BB 10, if it is still based on QNX, should have the built in capability to change how parallel applications and parallel processing paths function on mobile devices. Raise the bar as they say.
The iPad is interesting and a decent lightweight tool for browsing web but again absolutely not a power tool. More like a kids workbench.
The two vendors who have traditionally been powers in the business space, Microsoft and BB, seem to recognize this and are making plays in an area that Apple just does not understand or fails to address well.
I don't quite know what to make of Android in this area as it should be able to fill the void as well but does not seem to have a leader in the business arena.
BYOD is popular amongst the working population but corporately there is a desire to retain control over corp. communications and security, at least in the Fortune 500. Time is ripe for BB to get back into business.
Anyways, competition is good and from that point of view I am hoping BB succeeds.
Best not to be too religious about platforms, companies, hardware etc. They are just tools and who wants to be mired in a world dominated by iOS and Android when other excellent systems exist?
Re: (Score:2)
This is too sensible. Please leave Slashdot. The sense is killing me.
Re: (Score:2)
Sigh.
sorry for being such an insensitive clod
Re: (Score:2)
I want competition, I just want it to be somebody other than RIM. Palm should have done better and HP should have handled them better. WebOS was actually interesting and the hardware was pretty nice if slightly underspecced.
I honestly would like to know how you can take seriously as a mobile device vendor a company that thinks it's a good idea to route all mobile data traffic through their servers? The outages Blackberries have had are impossible on any of the other platforms, they're just not that tight
Re: (Score:2)
You know, I didn't say I like BB or RIM. I said there is plenty of room for competition and that Apple as a market leader in NA has significant weaknesses, and I said I like competition from another player. I'm not religious for or against Apple, RIM, MSoft, Google, Mozilla or whatever.
As far as routing mobile traffic through servers, this happens in many places and many circumstances but usually transparent to the user (one obvious example: firewalls). The trick is to have a good reason for doing it
Re: (Score:2)
Multitasking on iPhones is pathetic and a total pain to move data between apps. BB 10, if it is still based on QNX, should have the built in capability to change how parallel applications and parallel processing paths function on mobile devices. Raise the bar as they say.
Yes because BSD can't multitask. The iPhone's implementation is purely a design choice. Having QNX below it wouldn't have changed anything. Multitasking on BB10 (I've used it somewhat extensively) is a design choice that RIM has made. I have mixed feeling about both approaches.
Good call! I knew I was spouting gibberish when I blamed iOS for bad multitasking at the user interface layer. The devil made me do it.
I guess my hope is that an OS like QNX will inspire or foster an attitude which supports useful multitasking at the user level. Naive, I know.
Cheers
Re: (Score:2)
we BB fans do not have to disparage anything. we're wayyy too happy :)
and i want more weather apps! NEVER enough weather apps!
Re: (Score:2)
Jokes aside, there was a rim.jobs [rim.jobs] website a while ago, for applying for employment at RIM.
Re: (Score:2)
Paying $100 dollars for an app and then using app numbers to point to at the success of the platform is hardly a useful metric of adoption. All it means is that a lack of apps won't be the specific reason for their failure.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be more interested in finding out how many of those are even legit.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57562905-94/blackberry-app-world-said-to-hawk-pirated-android-apps/ [cnet.com]
Re:The question is... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'd be more interested in finding out how many of those are even legit.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57562905-94/blackberry-app-world-said-to-hawk-pirated-android-apps/ [cnet.com]
That's not a platform issue, it's an asshattery issue. You can also find tens of thousands of apps that are repackaged iOS/Android apps on iOS/Android - with few or no changes.
Like any other platform, they can't reasonably go to check each app submission against every known platform and verify the credentials of the developer match up - it's not realistic which is why none of the others do it.
RIM has made it very easy for any legitimate app developer to file a claim and have an app taken down - and responds to such complaints much more quickly than its rivals based on actual results.
Re: (Score:2)
A better question: how many of those 15,000 apps were actually ported by the original developer [theregister.co.uk]? Apparently RIM has had a slew of unauthorized individuals grabbing popular Android apps, stripping them of their protection, then using RIM's own tools to convert them to a format compatible with BB10, before finally submitting the apps as their own original work. The fact that they just incentivized that behvaior by paying $100 for every cheap port suggests to me that they likely had a whole lot of that going o
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not suggesting it's a problem that is unique to them, merely that they're incentivizing this problem in ways that don't exist on most other platforms. Also, as that article points out, they have been approving these apps.
Re:The question is... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If it's purely a webview encapsulated in an app, then of course it's worthless. But most web apps aren't that. They have more functionality than a web page.
There are examples of simple webview apps on iOS, but it's a tiny proportion.
so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:4, Insightful)
instead of an iphone or one of the Galaxy phones?
do they do anything that iOS or Android does not?
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:5, Funny)
it has... Canadian Technology!
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:5, Funny)
it has... Canadian Technology!
So....it asks you nicely before it crashes? Or just apologizes afterwards?
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:5, Funny)
No it cross checks you into the boards while serenading you with Alanis Morissette songs, before pouring maple syrup on your concussed head, ya hoser.
Re: (Score:3)
Hey, take off, eh?
Johnny! (Score:2)
It's voice technology that competes with SIRI would be fantastic!
"Hey hoser, in aboot 100 metres take a left eh?"
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:4, Funny)
There's an excellent "Cold Or Not" app...
Re: (Score:2)
And a poutine finder.
Re: (Score:2)
To me, the only thing that differentiates the BlackBerry devices is the presence of the BES server so you can access your company Exchange. And I think the phone to phone messaging is supposed to be more secure.
But, as a consumer, BlackBerry has always had its strengths in the corporate environment -- which is why people started buying the other makes of smart phones when they became available. Because, for the most part, people have no need to connect to a corporate Exchange on their personal phone.
And,
Re: (Score:2)
Android, iOS and WinPhone now can talk directly to Exchange and any other email server that uses ActiveSync. They can also be controlled that way, so BES is not really that valuable anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
that's not the issue. BES can control individuals or groups of phones to only run certain programs or access certain features. that's what's missing from those alternatives + Exchange
Re: (Score:2)
you can do this with add on products for ios and android. and you can do it to some extent on iOS as well with some little known apple tools to manage iphones in the enterprise
but why would anyone want to? the itunes app store already weeds out malware. this whole management thing sounds like power hungry IT nazis wanting some sense of control.
i can understand in situations like HIPAA or some other special cases, but most organizations BES is overkill
Re: (Score:2)
In other words, it's all about "Enterprise features", or, to give it it's real name "CIO wants to use Windows/BB, etc.".
The world has moved on to BYOD, why would I want someone else to be able to control what programs I can run on my personal device? The answer to this dilemma is virtual machines running on the phone, with the VM able to acces
Re: (Score:2)
The world has moved on to BYOD, why would I want someone else to be able to control what programs I can run on my personal device?
I'm guessing you work at a company or office dominated by "white collar" workers. In the larger business world, the preponderance of headcount is of "blue collar" and "grey collar" workers, and companies are giving those workers smart devices in rapidly proliferating numbers. Whether it's because they want their workers to be able to respond to e-mail, run Point of Sale apps on their devices, run job clock in/clock out & GPS tracker apps, dispatch and routing apps... in many cases your local garbage tru
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh, I agree ... historically, that's been the primary reason for BlackBerry stuff. If you can access Exchange from other devices readily, what does RIM bring to the table?
At which point, they're just another manufacturer with nothing to differentiate themselves or make their platform a better choice.
If they don't have something nobody else does, I don't know what is going to bring customers they've already lost back.
I'd love to see a list of reasons why someone should go with a BlackBerry, because I'm at a loss to come up with a single one myself. That's not to say they don't exist, but they need to be sure to explain to people why it's worth looking at their products.
There was a time I'd have said "a phone running QNX, wow, that must be awesome". Now I just wonder how badly they've mangled QNX.
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:4, Informative)
Email, mostly. It's much easier to type out an email message (or text, for that matter) on a physical keyboard than on a touchscreen. For me, that's a really big deal.
There's also an argument to be made about the Blackberry feeling more "industrial" or "professional" than iPhones or Androids. I don't particularly care about being able to play games or watch Netflix on my phone because I use my phone for business and for placing calls. I imagine I'm in the minority on that one though, because it seems like many people today view their phone as some all-in-one gaming machine that happens to make phone calls as well.
Personally, I can't wait to be able to ditch my Android and get back to a half-screen-half-keyboard Blackberry, provided the phone is responsive and the battery life is decent.
Re: (Score:2)
That pretty well leaves you with Image. That isn't something that can really be argued one way or the other, although you seem to try.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would I buy an iPhone just to be able to get a case that acts like a keyboard, when I could just buy a Blackberry?
Re: (Score:2)
I think the other reason was that the BB messaging stuff was secure so the cops couldn't intercept the messages you send to your mates when you were planning to go out and riot (the London riots were apparently inflamed massively because of BBM. It also has some nifty group features in it apparently. (I've not used it).
This is also why it was a hit with corporates - you email about the meeting you go to would be unavailable to people snooping on the wireless comms. (I make no comment about the value of the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can ask the same question in all three directions- why choose an iPhone or Android phone over BlackBerry?
Traditionally the answer to that question has been "because BlackBerry sucks". But I'm open to the possibility that that might change. If BB10 has sorted out the user interface, found a way of stocking the app store, and improved the reliability (perhaps built in some fallback modes that prevent the device from bricking up every time the RIM servers go down), then I see no reason not to consider it a
Re: (Score:2)
easy to root implies easy to hijack with malware... not sure i like that possibility.
sideloading is no problem on bb10/playbook.
Re: (Score:2)
instead of an iphone or one of the Galaxy phones?
do they do anything that iOS or Android does not?
Well, you cannot get your meeting schedules synced to your BMW without a Blackberry.
But with 10, I think RIM is losing one important selling point - the physical keyboard. Touch screens are orders of magnitude more error prone, and capacitive screens are even unusable in some conditions. (The Galaxy Note II has a stylus, but who wants to lug THAT thing around?)
It becomes just one of many.
Re:so why would i buy a blackberry? (Score:4, Informative)
instead of an iphone or one of the Galaxy phones?
do they do anything that iOS or Android does not?
Well, you cannot get your meeting schedules synced to your BMW without a Blackberry.
But with 10, I think RIM is losing one important selling point - the physical keyboard. -snip-.
No, RIM is releasing models with both all-touch and physical keyboards.
Re: (Score:2)
No, RIM is releasing models with both all-touch and physical keyboards.
That's good to know - they didn't with the Torch, and I am pretty sure that cost them.
Re: (Score:2)
Your BMW is old.
Production date December 2012.
My BMW's Connected Drive has worked completely fine without.
You get the full range of Contacts, Messages, Calendar, Tasks, Notepad and Reminders in the iDrive Office without a Blackberry phone?
Re: (Score:2)
Why, do you want to donate it to a museum?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Port existing apps? Of course they would (Score:2)
If you're a developer / company with an existing BB app, and you see that your product is about to be EOL'd because there's an new OS coming out, then it be prudent to port your app to the new version. Presumably at least some existing apps make money on RIM devices. I have no idea what's involved in the port - whether it's a refactoring of codebase or complete re-write, but 15,000 apps that want to keep pulling money in the door sounds relatively low compared to the total number in iOS or driod stores...
App bounty (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Which is dirt cheap considering hourly rates for even starting developers. I would expect that Microsoft, for example, has poured tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars for boosting the WP app store.
Re:App bounty (Score:5, Insightful)
Which, if you think about it, probably is a wise investment.
If on day one there's 15 apps, nobody is going to buy one because it's dead on arrival and the money you spent developing it would be a waste. If there's 15,000 apps, it's possible to conclude it's not a completely useless platform.
Releasing it without apps would be suicide, because there's nothing interesting about a smart phone you can't get software for. By now, anybody who has had a smart phone has a list of a handful of apps which are deal breakers.
Now, the question remains as to if enough people will care enough to buy these. I'm not sure anything RIM does at this point is going to make me say "oooh, I need a BlackBerry" ... but they do need to get a significant amount of people to do that.
RIM basically bought the apps (Score:3)
FTFA:
"RIM was offering US$100 for each app ported and subsequently approved for sale in the BlackBerry 10 app store"
This isn't any indication that people are leaving their favorite fondle-slab for RIM's.
Yah, sure (Score:5, Insightful)
Because 100 dollars is a fortune! I mean, it would get you a whole hour of my time! I will EAT TONIGHT!
The smart developer doesn't restrict himself to one platform, especially in a market that already has seen major shifts.
Poor reviewers... (Score:2)
Do they still require a business plan? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, right. (Score:2)
Most of those "apps" are probably some kind of web content that was run through a packaging system to turn it into an "app".
Re: (Score:2)
better that than a half baked re invention of the wheel atrocity of an interface (looking at you, facebook for android)
Maramalade? (Score:4, Informative)
So for those interested, it's spelled exactly like the stuff you put on toast. Info here.. [madewithmarmalade.com]
Blackberry popular in Africa (Score:3)
RIM is popular in Africa:
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21567977-its-devices-are-still-popular-there-africa-wont-save-rim-blackberry-babes [economist.com]
And for your amusement, check out this genius sketch from Ronnie Corbett, "My Blackberry is not Worlking" [Credit: BBC - thanks Beeb!]:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
BB10 more sellable than Win8/WinRT (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
In all honest, Blackberry even as it stands now has better integration, infrastructure, and toe-holds in the enterprise market for mobile than Microsoft will ever get with respect to mobile.
First, I'm not remotely a Windows fan. I like my iPhone and I could be happy with an Android, but I have zero interest in Windows Portable Tiny or whatever the official name is this month. That said, you really think BB could have better enterprise - read: "Exchange" - integration than Microsoft could (if they decided they wanted to pursue it)? It would be pretty easy for MS to market themselves as the "real" messaging provider, not the knockoff who just piggybacks off their stuff. Or more simply, "why play
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
BB10 supports ActiveSync. So BES will no longer be needed for email integration with Exchange.
Making BB yet another Exchange client among many. What does it bring to the table here?
Re: (Score:2)
BB10 supports ActiveSync. So BES will no longer be needed for email integration with Exchange.
Making BB yet another Exchange client among many. What does it bring to the table here?
It means that you can use a BB10 device in a BYOD setting without IT having to install BES. Same as with an Android or iPhone.
If they want more control over the device, IT can choose to use BlackBerry Fusion which gives them similar control as BES.
Why are more options a problem?
Battery & Better Hardware/Usability can tip sc (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The only way they'll do that is if they skimp on the screen. A small or low res screen can be used with a smaller backlight. My Android phone will last nearly a week if I don't use it. It'll only go about 4 or so hours with the screen on. It's not like Blackberry have some energy saving magic no one else has access to. Their older phones with keyboards sacrificed screen size for the keyboard, giving them less screen space to illuminate.
Yes, it's worth it (Score:3)
RIM may not have the largest customer base, but BlackBerry users do actually *buy* apps (unlike Android...)
And the apps are a joy to develop, at least if you have a real BB10 to test with (I do: I have a Dev Alpha). I get a choice between Eclipse and QT Creator for my C/C++, and a huge range of libraries. The platform is QL, and now Nokia have sold that to Digia, QT is coming to Android and Win8 phone in Q3, so I can port even C++ apps between platforms easily.
What's not to like?
Circular argument (Score:2)
What languages are used? (Score:2)
I figured someone would describe a bit about how to develop for the BB. Of course this being slashot we have instead fanboi rants from all directions. In any case, you can see it here:
https://developer.blackberry.com/develop/platform_choice/bb10.html [blackberry.com]
C/C++
Java
C++/QT
AIR
HTML5
are supported.
Meaningless Statistic... (Score:2)
At this rate Blackberry will exceed Apple and Google's 700,000 applications in 73 days!
RIM is back on top!
I own an iPhone; this is relevant to my interests (Score:3)
I've never owned a Blackberry. But I like interesting OSes, and I like marketplace diversity. It's this sort of stuff that makes it interesting to own a device.
I have an iPhone 4. The only Android device that's tempted me at all so far is one of the recently announced Sonys (waterproof, ANT+, Sony's typically good camera) and that's about it. The current state of the market offers me very little that's meaningful in my day-to-day life, and so phones are kind of boring. Samsung vs. Apple. Android vs. iOS vs. WP8! It's Meh vs. Meh if you ask me.
I stick with iOS because it's a Mac household, I have other iOS devices, and my friends and family have iPhones. iMessage and Facetime are staples for me. It'll take an awful lot to pry me away from that.
But that said, if the new Blackberry is interesting enough, I'll give it a serious look. The small players have to work harder to make things interesting, and RIM is now a legitimate 'small' player in this market. It's a bit do-or-die, so I expect some interesting stuff.
I'm Looking (Score:2)
Like many folks here, the lack of a real keyboard annoys me. I do tend to draft e-mails that are more than one or two sentences long, and the on-screen keyboard just doesn't cut it. My last phone was a Moto Charm, sort of a low powered android BB clone, and having real clicky keys was SO much better.
As for apps, the sad fact is that 90% of them are crap. Including many from large c
Blackberry Playbook (Score:2)
I bought a Blackberry Playbook that I am really enjoying for the princely sum of $131.00, so this is good news.
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Thankfully... (Score:5, Interesting)
That's my thinking. If all you have to do is a quick rejig and recompile because the APIs are so close to the Android ones, then it's a near-zero effort situation. I don't know much about the new platform, but I thought I had read that it would support Android apps out of the box, so it may literally may be just pushing a button.
Not that there's a damned wrong with that. If Android compatibility or portability is good enough, then you already have thousands of apps ready to go and you don't need to put massive amounts of effort into convincing developers to support your platform (like Redmond is doing).
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Thankfully... (Score:5, Informative)
That's my thinking. If all you have to do is a quick rejig and recompile because the APIs are so close to the Android ones, then it's a near-zero effort situation. I don't know much about the new platform, but I thought I had read that it would support Android apps out of the box, so it may literally may be just pushing a button.
Not that there's a damned wrong with that. If Android compatibility or portability is good enough, then you already have thousands of apps ready to go and you don't need to put massive amounts of effort into convincing developers to support your platform (like Redmond is doing).
BB10 contains the Android Player, which essentially runs repackaged Android APK files (I'm don't know if the reason for the different package format is technical or not). This is different from the native APIs, but the user experience is quite seamless. I "ported" one of my apps to the Playbook, and it was not even a recompile - it is a package converter.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a pretty significant subset [blackberry.com] of the Android API that's not supported, but if you're app doesn't use any of those then it should be as simple as clicking compile. Frankly I'm surprised they got so many taker, Amazon has an app store that literally only requires a re-upload of the file you sent to the Google Play Store and yet it has a tiny fraction of the apps, I figured a recompile would be too much work (and for the majority of apps it probably will be in the long run).
Re: (Score:2)
Be careful soon the RIM fanbois will be out saying bad things about you for admitting this. It can't possibly be that there is something wrong with BES, no it has to be every person to ever admin it was incompetent and untrained.
Re: (Score:3)
Be careful soon the RIM fanbois will be out saying bad things about you for admitting this. It can't possibly be that there is something wrong with BES, no it has to be every person to ever admin it was incompetent and untrained.
RIM fanbois?...thinks for awhile....you mean employees?
Re: (Score:3)
Here I will call them out for you:
BES sucks, getting rid of it was a huge win for the entire sysadmin team. We no longer had to repush servicebooks or restart the BES just so one user could start to get emails again. Doing that last one was painful because then the other BES users, who did not read the email about the pending restart, would call in to inform us that they were not getting mail during the restart. We no longer have to send back devices that for no known reason will never allow themselves to b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A shame, it was one of the least temperamental s
Re: (Score:2)
Depends. The Maemo-powered Nokia N900 was the first device to receive Angry Birds and yet Nokia treated the device as its red-headed step child and ran the Maemo platform into the ground.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And you know this because you're an industry insider who's gotten a demo unit to play with? Oh wait, no you're not, you've never touched a BB10 device either and you're just talking out of your butt.
Re: (Score:2)