Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Communications Wireless Networking Government

FCC Threatens EchoStar Licenses For Spectrum That's 'Ripe For Sharing' (arstechnica.com) 14

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened to revoke EchoStar licenses for radio frequency bands coveted by rival firms including SpaceX, which alleges that EchoStar is underutilizing the spectrum. "I have directed agency staff to begin a review of EchoStar's compliance with its federal obligations to provide 5G service throughout the United States per the terms of its federal spectrum licenses," Carr wrote in a May 9 letter to EchoStar Chairman Charles Ergen. EchoStar and its affiliates "hold a large number of FCC spectrum licenses that cover a significant amount of spectrum," the letter said.

Ergen defended his company's wireless deployment but informed investors that EchoStar "cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome" of the FCC proceedings. The letter from Carr and Ergen's statement is included in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing submitted by EchoStar today. EchoStar's stock price was down about 8 percent in trading today. EchoStar bought Dish Network in December 2023 and offers wireless service under the Boost Mobile brand. As The Wall Street Journal notes, the firm "has spent years wiring thousands of cellphone towers to help Boost become a wireless operator that could rival AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, but the project has been slow-going. Boost's subscriber base has shrunk in the five years since Ergen bought the brand from Sprint." [...]

EchoStar will have to prove its case in the two FCC proceedings. The FCC set a May 27 deadline for the first round of comments in both proceedings and a June 6 deadline for reply comments. The proceedings could result in the FCC letting other companies use the spectrum and other remedies. "In particular, we seek information on whether EchoStar is utilizing the 2 GHz band for MSS consistent with the terms of its authorizations and the Commission's rules and policies governing the expectation of robust MSS," the FCC Space Bureau's call for comments said. "We also seek comment on steps the Commission might take to make more intensive use of the 2 GHz band, including but not limited to allowing new MSS entrants in the band."
Last month, SpaceX urged the FCC to reallocate the spectrum, saying "the 2 GHz band remains ripe for sharing among next-generation satellite systems that seek to finally make productive use of the spectrum for consumers and first responders."

EchoStar countered that SpaceX's filing is "intended to cloak another land grab for even more free spectrum," and that its "methodology is completely nonsensical, given that EchoStar's terrestrial deployment is subject to population-based milestones that EchoStar has repeatedly demonstrated in status reports."

FCC Threatens EchoStar Licenses For Spectrum That's 'Ripe For Sharing'

Comments Filter:
  • It's one of those things we can't make any more of. I know it's fashionable to hate anything Elon, but StarLink is kinda great and if we can get more like it, that's a good thing.
    • by will4 ( 7250692 ) on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @11:48PM (#65375149)

      The US should license the spectrum and pay citizens 75% of the licensing fees every year in the form of a check.

      The airways are public and should benefit the public with direct payment of yearly license fees from the broadcasters, wireless providers, satellite owners, etc..

      Instead of a one time auction fee, there should be yearly fees and broadcasters bid on a 10 year block of using that part of the radio spectrum.

      • EchoStar has 13 million customers so if EchoStar pays $13 million dollars each year for a licensing fee, divided by 360 million citizens, your 75% would equal 2 cents. That's ignoring the administrative costs to manage the program. Creating a yearly spectrum license fee would just increase the cost of doing business and they would pass the costs on to you the consumer. You want everyone to need to pay a TV tax, a radio tax, a cellphone tax, a WiFi tax, a Bluetooth tax, etc?

        The government held a one-time

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          13 million customers doesn't sound like squatting. Is there a legal definition of that?

          Given that Starlink is one of the companies that stands to benefit from this, the default assumption would be that this is a favour to Elon Musk.

    • I agree we should give everything to leon for free. He should have more power and wayyyyy more money. Each american should stop paying taxes and just be forced to give their money to king elon(leon).
  • SpaceX urged the FCC to reallocate the spectrum, saying "the 2 GHz band remains ripe for sharing..."

    He's going to share his profits too, right?

  • In Europe, the did a pretty job shaming Tesla, but not in the states.
  • And d00d will be a germophobic recluse demanding that people build pyramids in his honor.
  • ... another land grab ...

    The kleptocracy is moving from 'voluntary' bribes to 'my boyfriend likes that' wanton theft.

Maybe you can't buy happiness, but these days you can certainly charge it.

Working...