Fifty 'Connected Cows' Already Have 5G (reuters.com) 85
A herd of dairy cows in the U.K. "are enjoying the benefits of 5G connectivity before you," reports Reuters:
For the cows, among the 5G-connected gadgets they are wearing is a collar that controls a robotic milking system. When the cow feels ready to be milked it will approach machine gates that will automatically open. The device recognizes the individual to precisely latch on to its teats for milking, while the cow munches on a food reward. At the government-funded Agricultural Engineering Precision Innovation Centre (Agri-EPI Centre) in Shepton Mallet, in southwest England, around 50 of the 180-strong herd is fitted with the 5G smart collars and health-monitoring ear tags.
But -- why?! The Verge explains: According to Reuters, Cisco is testing infrastructure for the eventual global rollout of 5G that could be used by various industries that are not traditionally in the tech bubble but are still dependent on increasingly sophisticated hardware and software. That includes farming. In this case, Cisco is trying out 5G in three rural locations...
It makes a whole lot of sense when you think about it: farms are large and spread-out spaces, and cows are often shuffled between grazing grounds and areas of the farm where they can be more easily milked and checked on. With the 5G collars, Cisco says farmers can keep tabs on the animals at all times of the day without having to physically trek out to observe the cows up close... The future is wonderful and weird, and farmers have access to it before you and I because without them, we all starve.
"We can connect every cow, we can connect every animal on this farm," Cisco's Nick Chrissos told Reuters, in what may be the strangest boast a Cisco executive has ever uttered in public. "That's what 5G can do for farming -- really unleash the power that we have within this farm, everywhere around the UK and everywhere around the world."
But -- why?! The Verge explains: According to Reuters, Cisco is testing infrastructure for the eventual global rollout of 5G that could be used by various industries that are not traditionally in the tech bubble but are still dependent on increasingly sophisticated hardware and software. That includes farming. In this case, Cisco is trying out 5G in three rural locations...
It makes a whole lot of sense when you think about it: farms are large and spread-out spaces, and cows are often shuffled between grazing grounds and areas of the farm where they can be more easily milked and checked on. With the 5G collars, Cisco says farmers can keep tabs on the animals at all times of the day without having to physically trek out to observe the cows up close... The future is wonderful and weird, and farmers have access to it before you and I because without them, we all starve.
"We can connect every cow, we can connect every animal on this farm," Cisco's Nick Chrissos told Reuters, in what may be the strangest boast a Cisco executive has ever uttered in public. "That's what 5G can do for farming -- really unleash the power that we have within this farm, everywhere around the UK and everywhere around the world."
Why does this need 5G? (Score:2)
Not sure what 5G has got to do with this. Not a lot of detail, but I can't think of anything that wouldn't work on 4G, 3G or 2G for that matter.
Re:Why does this need 5G? (Score:4, Informative)
Lower power and extra features such as high resolution location tracking. Check out LWPA and narrowband iot.
Also, older technologies are being phased out so that the spectrum can be reallocated. If you target something like 2G now, you may run into diminishing coverage soon.
Wrong answer (Score:1)
Depending on where you are, 2G is NOT going to be phased out any time soon. In fact, many places'll likely end up phasing out 3G and possibly 4G before 2G. Moreover, the only real place where the cows need coverage is the barn. So something that uses a short range telemetry band will work just fine, and probably use far less power to boot. It certainly isn't dependent on third party telco conglomerates and government planning and zoning approval to track your cows.
So the correct answer is: Publicity stunt.
Re: (Score:3)
You may want tracking of animals outside of the barn, incase they escape...
Other than that you'd generally only need it inside the barn or farm area.
Re: (Score:1)
Low data rate telemetry in a relatively low frequency band (915 MHz, 868 Mhz, 433 MHz, ...) can get to kilometres easy in the open field. Especially in rural areas where there's little interference from other sources. Might want to put your base station nice and high up a pole in a central spot among your lands. Costs a bit but saves on telco bills for each cow. Besides, if we're talking Australian outback where single ranches might each cover the area of small European countries, 5G coverage might well be
Re: (Score:1)
5G fo the bandwidth that socially aware cows will need to find out that they should honor vegetarians but pee on vegans.
Re: Why does this need 5G? (Score:1)
why. vegans are the only folks whose diet doesn't contribute to the necessity of farmers perpetually raping cows then killing their offspring to ensure maximum milk production
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
5G operates using Ultra Wide Band technology. That is, you assign the device a set of frequencies, and it will monitor and attempt to communicate over all of those frequencies. So you can have 900mhz, 2.4ghz, and 28ghz assigned which pretty much covers you through all situations. This is why UHF, 2G, 3G and soon 4G bands are looking delicious to anyone who owns them (or is able to bid in the next auction).
5G is a buzzword, but it is the reality of our future. I can't see how we progress beyond 5G becaus
Re: (Score:3)
Not sure what 5G has got to do with this. Not a lot of detail, but I can't think of anything that wouldn't work on 4G, 3G or 2G for that matter.
Dairy farms do indeed already have this kind of thing and have for years. Maybe the carrier is just doing animal testing on its new product?
Re: Why does this need 5G? (Score:5, Informative)
2G specifically would have severe scalability problems. AFAIK, each 2G data link is basically a circuit-switched voice call that skips the modem part and goes straight to the bitstream. In landline terms... kind of like ISDN. The point is, if a given tower is provisioned to handle ~24 simultaneous voice calls, each 2G data connection eats up one of those slots for its duration.
So... 2G might work if the collars connected only infrequently, for a few seconds, and had the ability to wait random delays before attempting the next connection... but even a single herd with a few thousand cattle attempting to "phone home" daily would probably have a noticeable impact on at least a single tower's capacity.
3G could handle daily uploads without breaking a sweat, but would run into problems if collars tried to treat it like an "always on" connection. AFAIK, no single tower in a 3g network can handle more than a single subnet, and IP leases are (usually) for an hour, so after the first {n} radios connect and establish a session, nothing else can connect until users from the first {n} go away and stay away for the remaining duration of their lease.
I'm not sure how much of 3G's limit is hard-baked in to the standard itself, vs the de-facto limits imposed by off the shelf hardware, software, and configurations used by carriers out of habit, but I know 3G doesn't deal well with situations that involve HUGE numbers of transient users over a short window of time... the crowd blows through the tower site's DHCP pool, and for a while nobody else can connect at all.
I think 3G's max tower-users-per-time-interval can be tweaked upwards (by allocating more IP addresses per tower, reducing DHCP lease times, etc), but the point is that an "average" 3g tower with typical urban-suburban configuration would probably have issues if a farmer suddenly lit up tens of thousands of 3G radio collars over the span of a few days without at least coordinating it with the cellular network (to give it a few months to re-provision the affected tower site with a more appropriate configuration).
The point is, it goes beyond merely "total bits per second". There are also limits on the total number of user sessions per time-interval, and those limits can become significant if an area suddenly experiences an unanticipated surge in total connections, even if they aren't transmitting more than a few bytes of payload data apiece.
4G mainly gives enough headroom to make "lots of ephemeral connections from lots of users within a short interval of time" less of a problem. It HAD to, because the rapid emergence of Android & Iphone (all continuously making network requests in the background) pushed existing 3G networks to the breaking point. A 3G tower next to a 14-lane freeway that might have once served a few thousand users who "went online" deliberately suddenly had tens of thousands of users per hour driving by & establishing data sessions so they could ping Facebook or Twitter in the background. 4G had other benefits, but the increase in the default connection limit per tower site between middle-stage 3G and early 4G was a big one. It's also why it's legit to call HSPA "4G"... a tower configured for HSPA can basically handle as many connections per hour as a LTE tower of the same era, and WAY more than the same tower could back when it first went online in early-3G UMTS form. It's not as efficient as LTE, but most of the hard limits users associate with "3G" are gone.
Ditto, for 4G vs 5G. If you only care about ping times & speedtest benchmarks, a pimped-out LTE tower with lots of low AND high-frequency spectrum doesn't look all that different to end users than a "5G" tower with the same spectrum and users. 5G's benefits are mostly in the "efficiency" realm, plus features like enhanced location-positioning (basically, every 5G tower broadcasts a periodic beacon with GPS-like timestamp that can be combined with a database of known tower locations and acts like a terrestrial GPS satellite). I'm pretty sure 4G d
Re: Why does this need 5G? (Score:2)
Just to add another example of how 5G could offer improved location service...
GPS works by having a constellation of satellites with very accurate clocks onboard that periodically broadcast a timestamped beacon. At the receiving end, you note the (local) time the beacon was heard.
Then, you look up the coordinates, motion vector, and timestamp of the satellite's last ephemera update, then calculate where it OUGHT to be as of the instant specified in the timestamp... and repeat for all the satellites in view.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what 5G has got to do with this.
Cisco is just trying to create confusion between themselves and Sysco, the food service company. People will hear about connected cows, think about how great an investment food service is these days, and accidentally buy Cisco stock.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what 5G has got to do with this. Not a lot of detail, but I can't think of anything that wouldn't work on 4G, 3G or 2G for that matter.
Well... respectively, it has 1, 2, and 3 more G's. So ...
Mooooo. (Score:2)
Beta testing 5G on that herd, in order to prepare it for another herd.
At least we've been upgraded from lemmings. Or at least on paper we have.
Is 5G really relevant here? (Score:5, Funny)
I am no expert on anything related to wireless and broadband services, but something about this report seems a bit over-hyped, or am I missing something?
5G promises higher bandwidth and speed, but it does it also extend range? Does this a allow rancher's or farmer's cow's to communicate over a 50 mile ranch because 4G didn't do it? And if it's just a 50 acre spread with cell towers nearby, how does 5G help? It sounds like the applications, "Bessie phone home" to report that she hooked up to Mr. Milky is a rather low bandwidth need. Your old 2400 baud modem would probably suffice. If the intent is to download live video from a 500 head herd at once, maybe, or if you plan to download video so Bessie can watch the latest Star Wars movies and sour the milk, okay. But otherwise I do not understand how 5G is any better for this than any other telemetry technology of the past 15 years?
Or is this just a slow news day or marketing cow manure?
Can someone please enlighten me.
Re: (Score:2)
5G promises higher bandwidth and speed
Higher bandwidth and speed is very useful for short messages, because it means that your transmitter only needs to be enabled for a very short burst, saving power.
Bring back the old strap line. (Score:5, Funny)
Slashdot, Moos for herds.
fit explosives (Score:3)
If they add explosives to the 5G collar they can also remotely deal with the next Foot & Mouth outbreak.
Re: (Score:2)
LoRaWAN makes more sense (Score:2)
farms are large and spread-out spaces, and cows are often shuffled between grazing grounds and areas of the farm where they can be more easily milked and checked on.
It makes no sense to us 5G for this because 5G is for dense areas that need high-speed. LoRaWAN is cheaper, lower power and has a range of over 10 kilometers.
They might as well use WiFi for the cows. This is stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
It makes no sense to us 5G for this because 5G is for dense areas that need high-speed.
Presumably, the farmer making a technology choice would check first if the farm was covered by 5G network.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, while 5G needs GHz bands for dense areas it also works just fine on e.g. traditional 700MHz while still offering a better protocol and better channel management. Thus I guess better handling of a large number of low speed devices connecting to the same cell - like a herd of cattle.
Better channel management, dynamic bandwidth allocation and a more efficient protocol is what 5G is about.
Well, for carriers it's really about more revenue opportunities but let's ignore that for now.
Re: (Score:2)
and has a range of over 10 kilometers.
You don't seem to have a firm grasp on the scale of a cattle ranch or dairy. 10 kms, might as well just run a string between some cans.
Next up, virtual reality for cows (Score:1)
Set up each cow with a VR headset so you can herd them without herding them.
And this needs 5G (Score:2)
Interesting! This 5G thing is leading us to a brave New world!
Great, even more eggs in one basket... (Score:2)
It will be spectacular when that infrastructure goes down for a few days...
Cow Body Temperatures (Score:2)
I once worked on a defunct project to track the internal temperature of dairy cows. A rfid transmitter and temperature sensor were encapsulated in a bolus. When the cow walked by a rfid reader panel it would identify the cow and read its temperature. Great Idea but in the end, it wasn't fully funded. I still have a reader panel in my garage.
Re: Cow Body Temperatures (Score:1)
RFID tags to identify cow when it visits robot milking station seem standard today, and on calves visiting feeding stations, the feeding station makes sure that each animal only get the amount of feed they've been allocated.
Milking robots that sample the milk, per cow, into an automatic mini lab for analysis, the results sent to the dairy.
I've also seen wireless collars, technology unknown, that analyzed the rumination behaviour and can detect if the animal is feeling unwell, or is in heat.
Somehow the tech
I like that it's humane (Score:3)
Remember 2G? (Score:2)
When the telecoms rolled out stuff like GPRS [wikipedia.org] to support simple packet data applications. And lots of manufacturers embedded 2G GPRS modems in their products? Ant then the telecoms pulled the rug out from under 2G, rendering a lot of expensive equipment useless. Never again. Fooled me one, shame on you. Fool me again, shame on me.
Cows might not be a great example of this problem, as they are inevitably going to be rotated through a production line. Where new hardware can be fitted and the old stuff retired.
Simpler solution here (Score:2)
Just add those extra genes the Chinese researchers recently added to monkeys to the cows as well and have them be smarter about where their food is. Give them a smartwatch to tell the time and we're done.
The ethics of milking and eating cows that have near-human intelligence are of course, up for debate.
Not a substitute for physical health checks (Score:1)
question (Score:2)
Can you play Cow Clicker with them?
I approached and (Score:1)
got a free hand-job. Bad AI, but feels good. 5 Stars!
Yes, but how do they charge the batteries? (Score:2)
I don't think 5G is needed (Score:2)
Every hedgehog in Sussex (Score:1)
.... will get 5G before it comes to my neck of the woods in Upstate NY.