South Korea Rules Pre-Installed Phone Bloatware Must Be Deletable (zdnet.com) 112
New industry guidelines in South Korea will allow smartphone users the option of deleting unnecessary pre-installed bloatware. "The move aims to rectify an abnormal practice that causes inconvenience to smartphone users and causes unfair competition among industry players," said the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, in a press release. ZDNet reports: The measure will also help give users more data storage and improve battery life, said the ministry. Under the new guidelines, telcos are required to make most of their pre-installed apps deletable except for four necessary items related to Wi-Fi connectivity, near-field communication (NFC), the customer service center and the app store.
That means you can even delete the dialer (Score:1, Interesting)
So operators are completely out of the loop if you use data only and use vpn and a VOIP dialer. This could work for Android but what about iOS?
Re:That means you can even delete the dialer (Score:5, Informative)
It explicitly does not mean that. It means "except for four necessary items related to Wi-Fi connectivity, near-field communication (NFC), the customer service center and the app store." Basically, boatware is anything that doesn't need to be on a restore image to make the phone immediately functional and allow convenient re-installation of desired apps.
Re: (Score:2)
Basically, boatware is anything that doesn't need to be on a restore image to make the phone immediately functional and allow convenient re-installation of desired apps.
Except on Android the shipped bloatware is part of the read only portion of the image and thus specifically part of the core restore image.
Can we make rules for removable batteries too? (Score:5, Interesting)
And headphone jacks, let's bring those back...
When the market fails us, call in the cavalry
Re: (Score:1)
unlockable bootloaders..
1MB (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft's app sent 1MB of data from my phone to their servers. It came pre-installed, and I never used it. At what point exactly did I agree for Microsoft to slurp down 1MB worth of my private data from my phone?
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft's app sent 1MB of data from my phone to their servers. It came pre-installed, and I never used it. At what point exactly did I agree for Microsoft to slurp down 1MB worth of my private data from my phone?
Out of curiosity, what permissions does that app have? What might it have sent?
Re: (Score:2)
At what point exactly did I agree for Microsoft to slurp down 1MB worth of my private data from my phone?
Woopse, someone didn't read the EULA that came with their device. Trust me, you agreed for the things shipped with your phone to slurp away.
In any case why would you not want that app to slurp down data? Would you prefer that you had to manually open every single app before they were allowed to download anything from the internet? Can you imagine the resulting unpatched security hole nightmare? ... this is a Microsoft app afterall.
Re: (Score:1)
Google probably lobbied for app store exemption (Score:2, Interesting)
Google Play probably runs 24x7 in the background so that it's "instantly available" when you click on it, instead of having to wait a second or 2 while it loads. Of course this drains the battery and makes other apps slower because Google Play is "stealing cycles" in the background.
Re: (Score:3)
No need for special lobbying - store needs to remain to allow installation of new software. Otherwise people would delete everything and be left with no way to fix it themselves.
Re: (Score:3)
But the factory default contain the install of these bloatwares. And when it is Facebook that take over your phone your are skrewed :/
Re:Google probably lobbied for app store exemption (Score:4, Informative)
No. There's an out.
the ADB interface allows the installation of apk files over a usb cable.
Re:Google probably lobbied for app store exemption (Score:4, Informative)
No need for special lobbying - store needs to remain to allow installation of new software. Otherwise people would delete everything and be left with no way to fix it themselves.
No. There's an out.
the ADB interface allows the installation of apk files over a usb cable.
Or it could be a function in the customer service app.
Re: Google probably lobbied for app store exemptio (Score:2)
Trying explaining that to your grandmother...
Re: Google probably lobbied for app store exemptio (Score:5, Informative)
Granny wont be the one doing the fixing. That's "what she has you for, dear."
Since it is you that needs to know, why bother telling her?
Just turn on developer mode, plug in the damn cable, do the one liner from the console, and stop being a bitch about it. :P
In case you were wondering, it's
abd install [somefile.apk]
AND-- if you want to back up all of granny's stuff, modern android versions support a backup operation, so you can back up all of granny's apps and their associated private data too, and restore it just as easily. (so when she deletes everything and corks up her phone, you can just restore everything and say fuckit.)
See this handy little article for details.
https://9to5google.com/2017/11... [9to5google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Granny wouldn't uninstall it in the first place. And any half-brain with half a clue who would can also figure out how to do a factory reset and not be so stupid the second time around.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Google probably lobbied for app store exemption (Score:4, Interesting)
Agreed, I was point out that you can potentially get the playstore back again if somebody deletes it.
(and a properly backed up system image will have a legit copy in the backup.)
Sideloading is intended for testing apps, and for installing private apps that are not on the app store. However, it can be used to get out of the sticky problem that was posed-- what happens when end user deletes the store app.
Re:Google probably lobbied for app store exemption (Score:4, Informative)
"Installation of APK files is a big security risk. Having an properly manged app market that checks packages are safe is the best way to make sure people don't install malware on their devices. Apple are doing the best job at that bet Google is catching up."
Apple and Google have both delivered malware through their app stores. App stores don't make you safe.
"Sideloading is so fcking dangerous."
Do you need the ghost of Steve jobs to hold your dick for you while you piss, too? Loading software from any source is an inherently risky activity, but taking the ability to sideload away from the user is turning their general purpose computing device into a toaster.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you kidding? Android and iOS both allow you to side load.
iOS requires you to jump through hoops, Android doesn't. So no, I'm not kidding.
Only in Korea? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Only in Korea? (Score:2)
As far as battery and data usage go, disabling the app is just as good as deleting it.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not being critical of you personally, but when people sugarcoat bad aspects of android as if it were a 'feature', it really seems like it's shilling. The undeletable preinstalled bloatware is incredibly annoying. Merely being able to disable it, sucks too. Why on earth is it a feature of android that some apps can't be deleted?
When I first got an android phone, I made the mistake of getting one from a carrier, so it came with a fair bit of bloatware, and updates delayed even more than just the manufactu
Re: Only in Korea? (Score:2)
I'm not being critical of you personally, but when people sugarcoat bad aspects of android as if it were a 'feature', it really seems like it's shilling.
If you're not being critical of me, why would you bring this up out of the blue? If you're not accusing me of doing it, who exactly have you seen do this, and what does it have to do with my comment?
The undeletable preinstalled bloatware is incredibly annoying. Merely being able to disable it, sucks too.
I understand that the bloat is annoying, but what sucks about "merely being able to disable it"? Is it just one of those pet-peeve things? If not, what's the actual difference between deleting it and disabling it, and how does it impact you?
Why on earth is it a feature of android that some apps can't be deleted?
It's not; the feature is being able to factory reset the phone to it
Re: (Score:2)
If you're not being critical of me, why would you bring this up out of the blue? If you're not accusing me of doing it, who exactly have you seen do this, and what does it have to do with my comment?
The community, as I mentioned in my last paragraph, does this all the time, so while I'm not being personal in my criticism to you specifically, what you say is consistently touted by the android/google shills around.
I understand that the bloat is annoying, but what sucks about "merely being able to disable it"? Is it just one of those pet-peeve things? If not, what's the actual difference between deleting it and disabling it, and how does it impact you?
Why should it matter how I want to use my device? If I want to delete crap, why shouldn't I be able to? If I want to reclaim space from bloatware which I know I'll never use, why can't I even remove it from the image? Next you'll say that I'm holding my phone wrong...
Don't pretend that this is an android only thing, either. I've never seen a phone which lets you arbitrarily delete included programs. My original 1990s Nokia certainly wouldn't let you do that, nor any of my subsequent flip phones or BlackBerrys. And certainly the iCrap devices won't let you delete or modify the system in any significant way. So this has always been standard across all mobile devices; the only thing that differs is how much crap is bundled onto them in the first place.
Your last point is basicall
Re: Only in Korea? (Score:2)
The community, as I mentioned in my last paragraph ...
I asked what it has to do with my comment, and you just repeated your complaints about "the community". You didn't answer me at all.
Why should it matter how I ...
I asked what the difference was, and why it bothered you. Again, you didn't answer my question at all.
Your last point is basically the problem; android consistently gets ridiculous amounts of bloatware and crapware included in it. Why does iOS and even windows phone (when it was a thing) manage to avoid that?
They don't; you're delusional. Let's see what T-Mobile says about their phones.
https://support.t-mobile.com/d... [t-mobile.com]
Apple iOS 12 = 44 applications.
https://support.t-mobile.com/d... [t-mobile.com]
Microsoft Lumia 640 = 46 applications.
https://support.t-mobile.com/d... [t-mobile.com]
Galaxy S8 = 49 applications
Re: (Score:2)
I did answer your questions. If your command of english is so weak as to not being able to understand that I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, then I can't help you. Maybe enrol into some english classes. I'm not being critical of you if english isn't your native language.
They don't; you're delusional. Let's see what T-Mobile says about their phones.
...
That's a difference barely worth mentioning. Apple and Microsoft come with plenty of bloat, and no, you can't remove it.
I think it's you who is deluded, have a look at those lists and you can clearly see most of the apps are from the manufactuer/OS and core functions of the phone. Just t-mobile apps, android has 5, WP has 1 and iOS has 0. Also regard
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm more interested in this magic bloatware free base image. The key part about Android is that the bloatware is part of the read only image of the phone and the apps then download on first acceptance of play store conditions. That's the reason why there is only a "disable" function but you can't fundamentally uninstall it. You can only get the bloatware back to its factory shipped condition.
Obeying this ruling will require shipping a device with a different configuration than Android builds normally do.
Am I alone— (Score:5, Insightful)
In noticing that the article linked is 5 years old?
I mean, I know /. usually lags a little, but this is crazy.
Re:Am I alone-- (Score:2)
If you complain, a dupe will be posted.
Re: (Score:2)
What, next year?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, at least within two years. What lightning reaction do you expect here?
Re:Am I alone— (Score:4, Funny)
Reading the article is like looking at how the sausage is made: it leaves you with questions you don’t want answered.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Am I alone— (Score:4, Funny)
This latency sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
so are they making special phones for S Korea then? because everybody else in the world is still not able to remove pre-installed bloat from their phone.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Am I alone— (Score:2)
No, it's not. Pre-installed apps are stored on the system partition. Deleting it would make absolutely no difference to your usable space.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's not. Pre-installed apps are stored on the system partition. Deleting it would make absolutely no difference to your usable space.
The storage used by the system partition is carved out of the same pool of storage used by the data partition. If the apps weren't pre-installed, the system partition would be smaller and the data partition would be larger.
Re: Am I alone— (Score:2)
The system partition is already far larger than it needs to be. Manufactures reserve space for future upgrades. There's no reason to think that they would significantly shrink the system partition just because you forced them to make some of the bloat deletable ... especially since they would almost certainly maintain copies of it on the system partition in order to restore them during a "factory reset".
If we really wanted to maximize the amount of space we would just eliminate partitioning entirely. May
Re: (Score:2)
The system partition is already far larger than it needs to be. Manufactures reserve space for future upgrades. There's no reason to think that they would significantly shrink the system partition just because you forced them to make some of the bloat deletable
OEMs leave extra space for upgrades, but they definitely make them smaller when fewer apps are preinstalled. I've spoken to several about exactly this topic.
Re: Am I alone— (Score:2)
That's possible; I have no inside info on how exactly they make those determinations so I'm fine with deferring to your anecdote. Either way it's irrelevant. Modern phones come with 32 GB of storage minimum, and most have 64+. Minimizing the system partition would have been helpful when the standard was 8-16, but these days it's entirely pointless. And any such changes aren't going to help you with your old phone anyway.
Dialer? (Score:2)
Considering that this is about mobile phones, why isn't the phone dialer on the list of exemptions?
The phone companies will find a loophole (Score:2)
I don't know about Korean phone companies, but the American ones will make sure they have a loophole. For example, allow stuff to be deleted, but reinstall it with the next "patch" which happens at least weekly. Yes, I know patches aren't that often, but they will be.
good, its about time (Score:2)
Re:good, its about time (Score:5, Insightful)
You need to buy a phone from Korea sold after the law have become active first.
Isn't it interesting how the market haven't provided you with what you want and you have to rely on the legislation in another country for companies to get it.
It is almost as if market capitalism doesn't work as advertised unless there are more than a hundred vendors to choose from.
Re: good, its about time (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: good, its about time (Score:2)
Isn't it interesting how the market haven't provided you with what you want and you have to rely on the legislation in another country for companies to get it.
It is almost as if market capitalism doesn't work as advertised unless there are more than a hundred vendors to choose from.
Market capitalism has never meant that every whim of every individual will be satisfied. You're thinking of "magic".
Re: good, its about time (Score:2)
I always do. I've yet to see anyone other than you suggest that the market is supposed to be magic, though.
Re: (Score:2)
It's ironic that you would level that charge against an industry which was nearly crippled by overzealous regulation. The EU mandated all phones must adhere to the GSM standard. A bunch of regulators sat down, and stamped out what they thought would be the ideal way to use the technology, and mandated that everyone use the system they came up with. Most countries outside the EU fol
Re: (Score:2)
That's a neat bit of revisionism there. GSM ruled the actual world (except the US) for voice communication; it was so succesful that by the time it needed an update for high-bandwidth data, the owners of the CDMA IP begged to be taken into the UMTS standard.
The question is why they made it ever not be (Score:2)
This is moderately more effort t
Re: (Score:1)
Outstanding! (Score:2)
Now if only this applies to phones in North America as well...
Great news! (Score:1)
So what happened (Score:1)
Re: So here's what Mueller should rule (Score:2, Funny)
Re: So here's what Mueller should rule (Score:3)
Propaganda operators, domestic and foreign both I suspect.
https://cryptome.org/2012/07/g... [cryptome.org]