Samsung To Sell Refurbished Galaxy Note 7 With a Smaller Battery, Says Report (androidauthority.com) 73
According to a report via The Korean Economic Daily, Samsung is said to be putting refurbished Galaxy Note 7 handsets on sale with new batteries following the cancellation of the device late last year. The speculation suggests the smartphones could be relaunched this June. Android Authority reports: Samsung is said to be swapping the Note 7's 3,500 mAh batteries with a "3,000 to 3,200 mAh" batteries, according to The Korean Economic Daily's sources, predominately for sale in emerging markets such as India and Vietnam. The move is said to be part of Samsung's plan to recover costs from the initial device recall and avoid environmental penalties from the estimated 2.5 million or so Galaxy Note 7s it would have to dispose of. Samsung hasn't made any official announcements in this vein, but before the battery investigation concluded, a spokesperson did tell us that the company was: "Reviewing possible options that can minimize the environmental impact of the recall." Shifting refurbished units would certainly be one way to achieve that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So damaged that if it is available cheaper, I'm buying one.
Re: (Score:2)
Same. I am really hoping to see this sell for 500 but not to hopeful.
Heck, if I could buy the possible exploding version for around 300-400, I'd do it a a heartbeat.
Things that go boom (Score:1)
In other news - Vietnam has an ongoing problem dealing with unexploded ordinance.... looks like it isn't getting better any time soon.
Re: (Score:2)
But they can spell ordinance perfectly. It just doesn't explode like they think it does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Fire sale on refurbished Note 7's in June (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually a good plan to save an otherwise really nice phone. I'd buy one if the price was right.
Re: (Score:2)
Frak yes! On 300 mAh less battery and will probably be a lot cheaper. Want one!
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
I will never buy Samsung anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Congratulations. I'd vote you insightful but I'll give you an internet cookie instead.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Fire sale on refurbished Note 7's in June (Score:4, Funny)
I'll shill for them!! My cost: one refurbished Note 7.
I'd pay full price for pre-installed SuperSU... (Score:2)
...but not one dime for a Samsung phone that includes a straitjacket that I cannot escape. I will also require an sd-card slot, and the ability to replace my own battery (and glue really annoys me).
What about the airlines? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe we'll need some certification sticker on the refurbs to take them on airplanes?
Re: What about the airlines? (Score:1)
Not officially, but since the problem was the battery and not the phone, and over 95% of shipped units were recovered, it doesn't make sense to continue the ban.
Especially when they still haven't banned the iPhones over in China that have been blowing up due to similar battery problems.
Re: (Score:2)
They no longer announce them on planes.
While still banned, it's not something on the immediate radar anymore.
Plus Samsung just needs to brand them 'Note 7a' or 7.1 or something so it's clearly different.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. When it was revealed like 95% of the recalled phones have been returned, the FAA removed the ban seeing that most of the phones are gone, and the few remaining ones were to commit digital suicide by refusing to charge the battery anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
Your FAA may have stopped the ban but I caught international flights with Qatar this week and they still made pre-flight announcements.
Deflation (Score:5, Funny)
If the battery is smaller, it cannot be a galaxy. Rename it Star Cluster Note 7.
Or more appropriately, Cluster Fuck 7.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone (well, many) on the other side of the planet would dearly love to have the "nice things" that you and I take for granted.
the 7 will always be cursed (Score:2)
I'm not sure I follow (Score:4, Insightful)
The smaller battery could've fixed it in the first place if you'd left the easily replaced battery as a bloody option. Twats.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me break it down for you: high end phone for a low end price. Everybody's a winner.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you're a Samsung stockholder. Or the original battery supplier. Or the engineer that designed or spec'ed it. Or one of the victims.
Re: (Score:3)
Or an iPhone fatality [cultofmac.com] or you, soon to suffer a gastric detonation due to excessive anal tension.
Re: (Score:2)
Did one explode in your pocket? In your house? Anywhere? Did you *own* one even? No???
Then what's your frikkin' gripe??
First of all the batteries with issues weren't make by Samsung, second only an extremely, extremely small number of them had any issues. Third, I give the company a lot of credit for attempting to push the envelope as close to margins as possible with their designs - that's something to be applauded, not derided.
I'm sick of these idiotic, griping posts bashing the company by ppl with a
Re: (Score:2)
We've been through this before: It wouldn't have helped.
Sure, it'd have fixed the fire problem for people who follow the rules. But it'd still be banned from commercial flights because there's no way in hell an airline will inspect the battery to ensure that it has been properly replaced and is of the correct vintage.
Furthermore, plenty of folks (myself included, because I'm daft like that) would have refused to return the old, too-big battery and kept it as a spare.
As much as I want easily-swapped batter
Re: (Score:1)
Or maybe with the user replaceable battery it would have been smaller to begin with and even smaller now. But clearly you're much smarter than the world's largest smartphone manufacturer.
Best phone to use on International trips (Score:2)
Use it on international trips and when you come back and CBP wants to spy on your phone tell them its a Note 7 and watch them clear you immediately so they dont have to deal with it. Alternately you can offer to let them keep it in their evidence locker but if it blows up all their evidence not to blame you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By re-marking the outer case.
Not that there are likely any actively used Note 7's in the wild.
Re: (Score:2)
You offer it at a slight discount and watch consumers stumble over themselves to get one.
Downsizing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right, so insightful. The only real question remaining in consumer's minds these days is whether to buy their dangerous device from Samsung or Apple [gsmarena.com]
Why only in warm countries? (Score:2)
They'd probably sell better in areas above the Arctic circle (especially if they left the original battery in).
They won't just be cheap... (Score:2)
.. it'll be a fire sale! ;)
What happens to the Note 7s bricked by carrier... (Score:1)
Now that Samsung is saying the phones could have been fixed by replacing the battery, those phones where bricked for no reason.
Good move, difficult marketing (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Though in Samsungs case, "Third times the charm"?
I still think its funny there's this talk about e-waste from disposal of the phones. Somehow it was left out that they need to get rid of 2.5 million 3500 mAh batteries. Don't those count as environmental waste? Are they going to be properly disposed of?
no media campaign nor massive advertising (Score:2)
That was the decision of , no not the CEO, but the Prime Minister of North Korea. The resulting headline Kim Jong Un shoots down Samsung's plans was definitely more agreeable and PR friendly compared to Samsung comes up with a Big Bang which was perceived to be taken literally by the smart phone crowd, which turned out be be smarter than average after all.
I would buy one (Score:1)
Happy to hear. (Score:2)
As long as the smaller batteries allow for expansion in situ, this is great... better than destroying an otherwise good product (and yes, I am an iPhone fanatic).