Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6S: Samsung Has the Upper-Hand, For Now (hothardware.com) 131
MojoKid writes: To look at Samsung's new Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge smartphones, on the surface, one might mistake them for only a modest uplift of bells and whistles, and perhaps a light rebuffing of the phone's design language. However, one of the primary new features of the US-targeted Samsung Galaxy S7 is its underlying power plant — Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 system-on-a-chip (SoC). The Snapdragon 820 is based on Qualcomm's new, custom ARM-based core architecture called Kyro. Kyro marks an evolution beyond Qualcomm's venerable Krait core architecture that the company claims offers 2X the performance and power efficiency of their previous-gen Snapdragon 810. In addition, the quad-core Snapdragon 820 has a beefed-up Adreno 530 graphics engine on board as well. In performance testing versus Apple's potent A9 platform in the iPhone 6S Plus, Samsung's Galaxy S7 with the Snapdragon 820 generally outpaces the iPhone in multithreaded performance as well as graphics. The Apple A9 still does a lot of work with just two cores, but overall it looks as though Qualcomm has a highly-competitive SoC and Samsung put it to good use.
Will it blend? (Score:1)
Performance? (Score:1, Informative)
What the people really want to know is how FBI Mode performs on new devices. -PCP
Re: (Score:1)
good question ^^
Re:Performance? (Score:4, Funny)
It's new and improved with force touch. If you hit it hard enough the information just falls right out.
Battery (Score:2, Insightful)
fast CPU, planned obsolescence with a soldered-in battery? Yeah, no. The LG G5 is supposed to be a solid choice.'
Re:Battery (Score:4, Insightful)
Agreed. I'm sitting this generation out -- again. iFIXIT's teardown of the S7 indicates that it's virtually impossible for those like me to replace the battery without damaging the back cover. I'll stick with my S5 until they come to their senses or, I'll have to look at that LG G5.
When will they learn to stop following Apple's lead?
Re:Battery (Score:5, Interesting)
LG G5 - now physically bigger, with a smaller screen and smaller battery, and the opportunity to spend an extra $600 on accessories (ahem, "friends") you'll use only once.
(NB: I'm a current G3 & G4 owner, really not impressed with the G5)
Re: (Score:3)
If you want a phone that is good in the sun, buy a phone designed for that. My Kyocera Brigadier works just fine in the sun.
https://www.kyoceramobile.com/... [kyoceramobile.com]
Not sure why the screen works so well outside, but the backlight is amazingly bright. Other phones with OLED screens seem to work well in the sun as well.
Just because the phone isn't made by Apple, Samsung, or LG, doesn't mean they don't exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Furthermore, Apple cannot make a device until Samsung and LG have created the next version of screen technology.
Wat?
Apple has a normal device cycle that comes around every year. In the September area. Apple doesn't give a shit about what Samsung or LG does.
Re: (Score:3)
I have an LG G4. Not long after I got it, I was in an automobile accident that damaged the screen. The phone was insured from the carrier, but the carrier insisted for no reason I can think of that it should be an issue for my auto insurance policy.
So I bought an aftermarket screen and fixed the damned thing myself. It takes about two minutes to strip all the components off, using only a small philips scewdriver and no other tools, and other than the TINY trick of knowing that you have to remove a little ru
Re:Battery (Score:5, Informative)
I have an LG G4. Not long after I got it, I was in an automobile accident that damaged the screen. The phone was insured from the carrier, but the carrier insisted for no reason I can think of that it should be an issue for my auto insurance policy.
On the plus side, you got a fairly cheap life lesson: never provide more information than necessary. "The screen on my phone is broken" was sufficient to have the phone insurance take care of the problem. "The screen on my phone got broken in a car accident" made it someone else's problem. Pretty much every insurance policy you'll find in almost any area you can buy insurance says something to the effect of "if you have other insurance that covers this, we won't." Since the property was damaged in the accident, your auto insurance would likely have covered the damage, had you submitted that as part of your claim.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course, I wasn't aware of it at the time. The damage manifested as a hairline crack at the corner of the screen and didn't become significant for another few days, after which my car had already been totalled.
Yes, I could've amended the claim, but $80 to buy a new screen + dropping the monthly insurance fee for my phone vs. the $15k I got for my wreck just didn't seem worth the hassle.
Re: Battery (Score:2)
No need to break anything, a heat gun and a cutting wire and Bob's your uncle. But yes, I'll keep my S5 as well.
Re: (Score:1)
Probably never. Apple got it right the first time.
100 bucks says there won't be a single flagship phone with a replaceable battery by 2017
Re: (Score:2)
100 bucks says there won't be a single flagship phone with a replaceable battery by 2017
I'll give you the flagship bit, but the phone stores where I live are getting full of fairly cheap, very nice Chinese Android phones. All of the features Apple and Samsung won't do, they do.
Smaller screens, larger screens, dual sim, micro sd, removable battery, whatever you're looking for Huawei, or Meizu or someone else will do it usually for a good price too.
Re: (Score:2)
How do you define, for this purpose, the term "flagship"? Is "flagship" limited to only certain vendors, OSes, or?
What, exactly, is "by 2017" supposed to mean? January 1, 2017 @ 00:00:01 or December 31, 2017 @ 23:59:59?
'Cause I *am* a betting man and there are a few acceptable escrow accounts online. Depending on how you define it, I might just be interested. I will need to vet the escrow service but any reputable service that you can think of is fine with me.
I'll be damned if I know what the future holds a
Re: (Score:1)
As soon as Apple, you know, stops leading the market by producing an incredibly popular and profitable device.
Why would they want to build their own kit, when they can produce shitty knock-offs that look the same as Apple's stuff?
Re: (Score:2)
If I were in the market for a smart phone, it would be likely top on my list because of the modular design (the ethical sourcing is a bonus).
Re: (Score:2)
When replacing a battery becomes a real problem?
My kids are still playing games on my phones from years and years ago... maybe the battery doesn't last for days like it used to, but it lasts a full day without a problem. My nexus 6 is more likely to run out of juice on a fairly new battery.
I would venture a guess that for the vast majority of people, being able to replace the battery is not a feature they even think about.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Phones are already obsolete by the time the battery goes bad. If you have a reasonable provider, you can upgrade once or twice a year. They'll refurb your old phone, including a new battery, and sell it to someone who doesn't want or can't afford the latest and greatest. I haven't had battery problems until year three or four, so that's never a problem. If I were poor, I wouldn't have a smart phone.
Re:Battery (Score:4, Interesting)
Glad that works for you. I like having the ability to refresh the battery in year 3/4. I may be a cheapskate. But, hey, at least I know it!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Wanting to 'field replace' your battery easily doesn't make you a cheapskate. The battery is extremely important but also fundamentally the easiest part to replace...or at least it should be. I've had phones/devices where the battery 'mysteriously started dying' (e.g. noticeable decrease in battery life far quicker than I'd have expected). I have no desire to have my 'phone upgrade cycle' dictated by the whims of the battery and I can afford to buy a whole freakin' new phone every month if I wanted to.
In fa
Re:Battery (Score:5, Insightful)
I have a smartphone. Now call me crazy, but I don't want to be perpetually paying for a phone, year after year.
As long as this phone continues to do what I need it to do, I plan to stick with it.
Re: (Score:3)
It kind of sucks the battery isn't replaceable, but surely it will last longer than a year. I've never noticed battery degradation with cell phones. Maybe after 5 years it's a problem? I'd guess not, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
planned obsolescence with a soldered-in battery?
My Galaxy S1 still works. As does my S3, and S4. All are on their original battery. This isn't the problem it appears to be. Your phone will be "obsolete" long before the battery gives up.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
There are lots of reasons for sealing in a battery. Cost, size, durability, waterproofing, safety, weight...
Re:Battery (Score:4, Informative)
> I'd be in support of a law in Canada prohibiting the sale of consumer devices with non-replaceable batteries.
Really? You'd disallow others to make the choice to buy one because you, yourself, don't like it? You'd impose your will on the rest of the Canadians and take away their liberty to purchase the product?
I am a Canadian citizen by grace of heritage. I spend quite a bit of time there and I'm normally within about 40 minutes from being on the Canadian side of the border. (My home is in NW, Maine and not far from the border.) Fortunately, I know zero Canadians who think like that.
I'm gonna give you a hand, however... I see you used "unique" in your username so I'm inclined to presume you believe yourself special. Seeing as you're so special, I've decided to help you out.
You can't just unilaterally take away people's liberties. They want the iPhone and that's got a sealed case. No, you have to convince them to change their mind. So, what you do is you point out all the evidence that shows (and this is easy enough to find) that a whole bunch of electronics don't end up being properly recycled, that they use rare Earth minerals in their construction, that they're bad for the environment so should be kept as long as possible, and things like that.
You convince them that they need to put a stop to the vendors who are perpetuating these abuses on Mother Nature.Nominally you've a liberal government right now, unless I missed something. I don't vote in Canadian elections even though I'm eligible to - I don't live there, it's not my call. You get a few pictures of the various disassembly processing plants (buildings in the slums) down in India, you get some stats about the concentrations of lithium, you point out the health-hazards as that can leech into the water supply, and you paint consumerism as bad and destroying the planet and that Canada needs to be first in the world to lead the way towards a cleaner, recycled, and reused future.
Now, normally I'd not help you out with this but my country's being really retarded on the whole liberties front. If you can just go ahead and get moving on that then it might take away some of the attention on my country and maybe we can get things settled down a bit down here. That way you can be the bad guys for once and take the heat off us.
So, there you go cupcake. Knock yourself out and take as many choices away from your fellow citizens as you can. You just gotta to it with a non-geeky way - it's very important to be environmentally aware. You can probably tie it in with GHG and climate change - the mining, shipping, and all that are increasing the levels of CO2. If people have batteries that are easy to replace then they'll be more inclined to keep their phone longer. Hell, for good measure, maybe you should limit them to buying a new phone only once every four years, just for that extra bit of authoritarianism. You'll do your country proud and maybe we can start having serious discussions about liberties down in the US.
Re: (Score:2)
The S7 is IP68 certified which means that you can submerge it in up to 1.5 metres of water for up to 30 minutes without damage being done to the phone. Accomplishing that with a removable battery would be an absolute nightmare
No, it's not. Here's a $23 phone [amazon.com] with a removable battery which is IP 57 rated (1 meter of water for up to 30 minutes). When you take the back cover off, there's a simple gasket [imgur.com] that prevents water from entering into the compartment that hold the battery, SIM and memory card. It's not complicated at all and it's certainly not a nightmare.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you want to replace the battery?
The battery on my iPhone 3GS is still fine and that phone is almost 7 years old now.
I'd be buying Samsung except... (Score:5, Funny)
...touchwiz
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
..and also their uninstallable bloated software, and lack of OS updates. Nexus for me, instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Oooh thanks for reminding me. My S5 is bugging me to install an update.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
there's still the navbar, status bar, stock apps, etc
None of which are a problem to the OS itself. The first 3 are essentially skins, the stock apps can be disabled so they're out of your way. And quite frankly none of what you mentioned comes anywhere close to the horrendously shitty bloated slow iPhone copying garbage experience that touchwiz provides.
Throwing out Samsung's launcher is an experience changing process.
Not having some random pre-installed app on the other hand doesn't even get noticed.
Re: (Score:1)
My reply was to Tochwiz, not other issues. I've used launchers, customer ROMs, and I have my phone rooted which allows me to delete bloatware. My point was if you like the hardware most geeks can have their way with the software - I know I do, so don't let Touchwiz stop you.
Honestly it's kind of funny that no one mentioned the worst thing about Sammy phones and that is that rooting them has become a nightmare. That is what will drive me to Nexus, not Touchwiz. I run App Ops which is the best thing you can
Apple does in 2 cores what Samsung needs 4 for (Score:5, Insightful)
See the problem here is that it's not an even comparison.
When you compare performance you ONLY compare the single-thread performance, because that is most reflective of real-world performance. Multi-threaded performance is seldom a useful metric, and is rare used properly, especially on Android devices. That's why Apple gets by with smaller batteries and balanced CPU's, while Samsung sticks undersized batteries for the CPU they use.
But when you then look at GPU performance, Samsung rarely puts a powerful GPU part in their devices, and that is reflected by devices that appear to nudge out Apple's devices in raw performance, but under synthetic benchmarks, the power management throttles back the GPU more on the Samsung devices, thus the real performance is less.
Ultimately you pick the device that will last you the longest, or use the apps you want to use, and for most people that's the Apple ecosystem. The average person shouldn't be buying an Android device without getting some guarantee that it will run all future versions of Android, otherwise you're just throwing away money.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Has there ever been an Apple device that comes with a guarantee that it will run all future versions of iOS?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci... [dailymail.co.uk]
Re:Apple does in 2 cores what Samsung needs 4 for (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Apple does in 2 cores what Samsung needs 4 for (Score:5, Insightful)
Google says "You COULD update those devices" and then leaves it upto the manufacturers to handle updates, which they only do if it suits them.
Re: (Score:2)
I have, in my hand now, an iPhone 4. It's a model md200ll/a which I think is the 4c from Verizon. It's peaked at 7.1.2 and the lady I got it from assures me that it was purchased, new in box from the cell company, about a year ago.
How do I get the current version? I'm not using it as a phone or anything. I'm just playing with it before I donate it to Goodwill or something. I already have a phone.
Re: (Score:2)
I have, in my hand now, an iPhone 4. It's a model md200ll/a which I think is the 4c from Verizon. It's peaked at 7.1.2 and the lady I got it from assures me that it was purchased, new in box from the cell company, about a year ago.
What does "new in the box" mean? The iPhone 4 came out in 2010 and Apple discontinued them in 2013. So I would say you were taken for a ride. The highest upgrade for the iPhone 4 is 7.1.2
Re: (Score:2)
No, it was new in the box from her cell phone company. I didn't pay for it. And yeah, she still has the box. Well, no, now I have the box. She bought it last spring. It's the 4c it would appear. She got it from the cell phone company, new in the box, a little less than a year ago.
I've got ample compute devices, so it's not like I was going to pay for it. It was given to me as a gift because she thought I might like to play with it. She, and her two kids, are currently staying with my girlfriend and I. There
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Alright. The last time (about a week ago) I mentioned it, I was told it was a 4c. I'm only poking at it 'cause I'd never tried to play with an iPhone before and the lady wanted to give me something for other reasons and probably not reasons you might expect. (She knows that I'll almost certainly donate it.)
Whichever that model is, 4 I guess, is what it is and it was new in the package a year ago, slightly less. "Around last May." It's a Verizon phone. That much I know. Anything else and I don't have a clue.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It appears to be the 4. I used the number on the back (which kind of does look like glass with white plastic beneath it). It is:
http://www.everymac.com/ultima... [everymac.com]
And I don't actually mind what version it is, I paid the total of zero dollars for it and will just end up donating it. The page says it was discontinued in 2013 but she says she bought it about a year ago - which makes it purchased more recently than that and I've some additional personal information that makes me believe that is correct. I suspec
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, but even Nexus devices don't get updated as much as Apple devices. I remember Google skipping on Kit Kat for the Galaxy Nexus, and there's some evidence there won't be Android N for the Nexus 5.
Having said that, i don't like iPhones. No notification light, no removable battery , no microSD, battery doesn't last long, no AMOLED and especially i don't like that you can't install apps outside the App Store.
Re:Apple does in 2 cores what Samsung needs 4 for (Score:5, Insightful)
When you compare performance you ONLY compare the single-thread performance...
I would go further and say that if you're comparing phones based on benchmarks, you're kind of missing the point. The speed and efficiency of the process matter, but only insofar as it lets you do something. Very few people are actually going to care about the raw processing power of their phone. They care about features and usability, and processing power only comes into play if it enables additional features, or if it's too lacking and the phone isn't responsive.
A benchmark like battery lifetime matters to people. CPU performance largely doesn't.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I see you didn't RTFA. Android properly multitasks, so four cores make sense. The thermal throttling issues with the 810 are fixed. Performance even with single threaded tasks is top notch. The GPU is as good as anything Apple makes in real world apps.
Anyway, performance is good enough these days. Battery life and flash performance are more important. Features and usability of the OS etc.
Android still has larger market share (Score:1)
... and for most people that's the Apple ecosystem.
According to ComScore, Android still has the lead in market share at 52%, compared to iOS at 44%. So most people don't pick Apple.
While there are 1.5 million apps available in the Apple ecosystem, and 1.6 million in Android's, the vast majority of time (85%) is spent in 5 apps. Few people use more than 25 apps in any month. Those top apps are available in both ecosystems.
The average person shouldn't be buying an Android device without getting some guarantee that it will run all future versions of Android, otherwise you're just throwing away money.
That is quite some guarantee - "all future versions." I'm very frugal and don't abuse my phone. Even I don't think I'd be carrying ar
Re: (Score:2)
... and for most people that's the Apple ecosystem.
According to ComScore, Android still has the lead in market share at 52%, compared to iOS at 44%.
The world-wide annual numbers are more like 80% Android and 15% Apple for the past 3 years (source: Gartner, IDC). Even in the USA 44% seems very generous for Apple, unless maybe if you cherry pick a quarter with a new iPhone launch.
Re: (Score:2)
Ultimately you pick the device that will last you the longest, or use the apps you want to use, and for most people that's the Apple ecosystem. The average person shouldn't be buying an Android device without getting some guarantee that it will run all future versions of Android, otherwise you're just throwing away money.
As mentioned in my reply to the battery complaint my Samsung Galaxy S1 still boots fine. Most popular apps still work. I can still browse the internet. Oh it's a phone so I should mention that calls still work too.
What was it about not getting every single small upgrade that makes it "throwing money away"? I suppose everyone here's throwing money away as well since they are still using Windows 7 instead of the latest and latest too then right?
As for the apps you want to use ... sounds like general hate from
Re: (Score:2)
To add on to PopeRatzo, the Samsung S6 compared to the iPhone 6, Samsung was the clear winner in battery life, I would expect that the S7 will similarly beat the iPhone 6S in battery life figures.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/... [trustedreviews.com]
All the rest of what you said was utter bullshit, yes you do compare the multithreaded performance between two devices, and the S7 came out the clear winner because it has more processor power.
Re: (Score:2)
Compatibility with all future versions of Android should not be a priority for consumers IMO. I have devices that probably will be stuck on 5.0.x forever, and I don't see a huge problem with that. The GUIs have matures, and I will still enjoy years of good application support. In fact, Kitkat should be also good enough for most people.
On the other hand, I don't necessarily agree with apple's policy of always updating the OS, even on a four years old device to the latest version. Case in point is the iPhone
Re: (Score:2)
PS: in some ways the above also explains why people shy away from AMD CPUs. Nice multithreaded benchmark will show that a quad-core AMD CPU is about as fast as dual-core Intel Core i3. But AMD cores have much slower single threaded performance, while really sucking at energy efficiency. But for some reason, this logic does not seem to apply to the mobile world, with many consumers thinking that more cores is better. So the market is now filled with cheap and mid-range android devices that have way too many
New phone beats 6 month old phone (Score:1)
Quality news Timothy
Comparing generations (Score:2)
Obviously it's unfair to pit a model 7 against a model 6! /sarcasm
Re:Comparing generations (Score:5, Insightful)
Breaking news! Last year's product slower than this year's product. Film at 11.
Who writes sh*t like this? (Score:4, Interesting)
Seriously ... words without meaning ....
and perhaps a light rebuffing of the phone's design language.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't rebuff mean to reject, not renew?
http://www.dictionary.com/brow... [dictionary.com]
Yeah...words have meaning, and they got that one way off.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I presume they meant 'buffing' but that's because I'm in a friendly mood. I'm probably wrong and they're probably just friggin' idiots.
They're probably assuming rebuff means to buff again. Buff meaning to polish. I'm going to presume that it was just a typo that got auto-corrected or overlooked. But no, I'm probably wrong and they are just stupid.
Hmm... Now they've been rebuked! Their next article will tell about how they're going to buke someone or something. It could happen. I wonder if they rewaxed it be
Why upgrade? (Score:1)
*Multicore (Score:5, Insightful)
Unfortunately apps that fully utilize 4 cores are few and far between, so take these numbers with a grain of salt, but the 820 seems to handle single-threaded applications better than its predecessors, putting real-world performance on par with the (admittedly 6 month old) Apple A9.
In any case, it's astounding how ARM designs have gone from a decade behind to modern PC level performance in the space of a few years—and they're not done; performance leaps year after year and for once Samsung and TSMC may beat Intel to 10nm. Intel should be worried, especially if AMD manages to become relevant again with Zen.
Re:*Multicore (Score:5, Informative)
Android makes good use of multiple cores. The OS uses them for tasks like encryption and application optimisation (memory management, async I/O etc.) Many apps use them, like Chrome which does background opening and rendering of tabs, JIT compilation of JavaScript, decoding images etc. The Google keyboard uses threads to handle input, spell checking and prediction. Meanwhile another thread is rendering the UI.
The iPhone looks good in synthetic benchmarks because they are mostly single threaded. For real world use where you are multitasking, opening multiple tabs, typing away, Android with four cores is what you want
Re: (Score:2)
In any case, it's not really as simple as "four cores versus two."
IIRC the Snapdragon isn't symmetrical. Two of the cores are the power-hungry performance cores and two are low power cores that wouldn't contribute under performance conditions.
Faster? No, not even close (Score:5, Informative)
Look at the browser benchmarks in the page here:
http://anandtech.com/show/1012... [anandtech.com]
The iPhone 6s is almost twice as fast as every other phone out there, and it came out nearly 6 months ago. I don't view the S7 as competitive, let alone faster. Other companies need to prioritize single-core performance as much as Apple. Multi-threaded performance isn't that big of a deal. This is a phone, not a server*.
-Android Fanboi and proud owner of a Nexus 6
*Yes, I know some power users out there utilize >2 cores on a regular basis. But most users (including myself) do not.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
From Anandtech's review, the following benchmarks show the iPhone is faster:
Kraken 1.1 (72%)
Octane v2 (68%)
WebXPRT (55%)
Basemark OS II 2.0 System (47%)
Basemark OS II 2.0 Web (7%)
Basemark OS II 2.0 Overall (3%)
The ONLY benchmark that showed it was slower were these two:
Basemark OS II 2.0 Graphics (14%)
Internal NAND Random Write (41%) -- It fared significantly better than the S7 on all other NAND performanc
Re: (Score:1)
And there are the real world performance tests , where the 6S trounces the S7 http://bgr.com/2016/03/07/iphone-6s-plus-galaxy-s7-edge-performance-test/
Android ain't helping . It's still java vs native after all and Android needs the extra hardware to keep up with iOS.
Re: (Score:1)
So, if I buy iPhone I can watch 2 hour movie in, say, 24 minutes, as opposed to, say, 28 minutes on Samsung?
That's a serious advantage.
Re: (Score:2)
For video, your statements are correct. As long as you can render the frames faster than they are displayed, the CPU is fast enough. That's why I focused on web browsing as the metric that really matters, and that's where basically all of the phones fall short.
Re:Faster? No, not even close (Score:4, Interesting)
There's also something to be said for Safari's performance relative to Android Chrome. The Nexus 6 beats the iPhone 6 in the BaseMark II OS - System benchmark by a good margin, but then loses in Sunspider by a factor of 2. There's obviously some significant room for improvement in either the Android or Chrome software stack (or both).
Silly person, iPhone 5E rocks (Score:1)
The new iPhone 5E is going to rock serious phonage. Small like the 5 but better than the 6.
All your future is belong to Apple fanboi
Hold up. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. In my household, all android phones are still based on the 2-3 year old Snapdragon 800/801 SoCs. This SoC is fast enough (the same used in LG G2, LG G3, Samsung Galaxy S5, Oneplus One, etc). And now I am thinking of picking up a Nexus 6 if the price drops below 300. The issues that concern me more right now are the battery life, audio quality, build quality, camera performance, the LTE performance, etc.
As for iOS, I could live with it, but personally I prefer the Android way. iOS is too limiting in
Re: (Score:2)
Not entirely true; the single thread speed of the processor does matter for the crucial resource that a phone lacks - power capacity. If a core is more efficient per clock (energy wise) and it can execute faster, it gets double the savings in battery life because it can shut park the CPU core faster. Granted, all of these savings are almost immediately eaten up by the size of the screens on modern phones, but I guess you could, by the transitive property of power envelopes, equate better, more efficient s
"for now" (Score:1)
That's still "bells and whistles" (Score:2)
"To look at Samsung's new Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge smartphones, on the surface, one might mistake them for only a modest uplift of bells and whistles, and perhaps a light rebuffing of the phone's design language."
More processing power on a smart phone is just bells and whistles.
Aside from the uber nerd who needs the latest and greatest gadget, who needs a faster smart phone nowadays? My S4 was plenty fast and I only got an S5 because it died on me. What are people doing on their phones that requires all this n
Samsung marketing (Score:2, Funny)
Marketing: "Let's add some extra cores that are only used by benchmark apps so we'll look better in reviews."
Product: "Sure."
Press: "wow, the Samsung he is faster! BuyBuyBuy it!"
User: "bleh"
Is Mojokid redefining power plants? (Score:1)
This is a picture of a semiconductor [starkinsider.com]
This is a picture of a power plant [ucsusa.org]
And another power plant, which is actually a power plant within a bigger... power plant [industrial...orsale.com]
Its important that we all speak the same language. That or I'm gonna start calling every square computer I see a "Hard disk"
Hooked on iOS Apps (Score:1)
Now if only... (Score:2)
...Samsung didn't completely cripple their amazing hardware with a godawful bastardization of the Android UI...
How much better over a S6 edge? (Score:2)
I wasn't impressed with my work's S6 edge. Bad battery life, its curved edge screen was too sensitive, etc.
It's "Kryo", not "Kyro". (Score:1)
I made the same mistake myself.