Samsung Galaxy Note Edge Review 75
MojoKid writes Differentiation is difficult in the smartphone market these days. Larger screens, faster processors, additional sensors and higher resolution cameras, all are nice upgrades but are only iterative, especially when you consider the deluge of products that come to market. True innovation is coming along with less frequency and Samsung, more so perhaps than some other players, is guilty of punching out so many different phone models that it's hard not to gloss over new releases. However, the new Samsung Galaxy Note Edge may offer something truly useful and innovative with its supplementary 160 pixel curved edge display. The Note Edge is based on the same internal platform as the Galaxy Note 4, and features a 2.7GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 SoC with Adreno 420 graphics and 3GB of RAM. What makes the Galaxy Note Edge so different from virtually all other smartphones on the market is its curved edge display and what Samsung calls its "revolving UI" that offers app shortcuts, status updates, data feeds and features all on its own, but integrated with the rest of the UI on the primary display. You can cycle through various "edge panels" as Samsung calls them, like shortcuts to your favorite apps, a Twitter ticker, news feeds, and a tools panel for quick access to the alarm clock, stop-watch, a flashlight app, audio recorder and even a digital ruler. The Galaxy Note Edge may not be for everyone, but Samsung actually took curved display technology and built something useful out of it."
Re: (Score:3)
The iphone rocks 1GB like it's 2004
Re: (Score:3)
I wasn't the anonymous coward, however:
http://www.cnet.com/news/apple... [cnet.com]
Re: 3 gig of ram? (Score:1)
Yet the iPhone actually does multitask...
Re: (Score:2)
I think many state issues are due to poor app writing. For example, the ms excel app bails out of the active file when the app goes to the background, but other spreadsheet apps have no problem maintaining open files in the background.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Uhhh, 32 and 64 gigs would be the storage it has, not the amount of RAM. What on earth has slashdot come to that people don't know the difference between these?
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, what the hell is this, HackerNews? :-)
Re: (Score:1)
It all started when they let the womens in.
Re:3 gig of ram? CORRECT, 32GB of Flash Storage (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
You just demonstrate your lack of knowledge on the subject that you misunderstood the summary (which wasn't wrong, though you asserted it was) But don't let lack of knowledge of the subject stop you from asserting your wrong opinion as truth.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When I submit articles, I summarize them properly. That's why mine have been rejected every time. Even when the same article was accepted by someone else who submitted it later,
Re: (Score:2)
Given that most android devices have expandable (flash) storage
Mine doesn't and I bought it this summer. Sucks to be me, I guess :-) Merry Xmas.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
In the end it doesn't affect me much - I just transfer my files to my laptop to free up space. It's a lot more convenient to do that than dump it in some "cloud".
On a side note, we're seeing the end of personal computing, in the sense that most computer-related activities aren't (or can't) be confined to your personal space - your computing devices. Even games that should be able to run independent of the network somehow "need" to phone home.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty normal for high end smartphones (Score:2)
They just don't need the same kind of RAM as systems. Remember this is RAM, not the flash storage. That they have 32 and 64gb of.
As a practical matter all but a very few ARM processors are 32-bit and so can't address all that much memory anyhow without some kind of paging.
Re: (Score:2)
" Is this 2010?"
No, but its not even 2061 yet, let alone 3001
A distinguished but elderly scientist once wrote that petabyte storage devices would be enough for 3001
Re: (Score:2)
Congratulations Samsung... (Score:5, Insightful)
For inventing a phone that's not only even easier to crack the screen on than a regular smartphone but also can't be held on both sides AND can't use a protective case.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
can't use a protective case.
lots of cases [google.co.nz]
can't be held on both sides
http://cdn01.androidauthority.... [androidauthority.net]
even easier to crack the screen on than a regular smartphone
A lie to go with the other lies you gave.
Why are you bashing something for being different? None of your complaints are even valid, 2/3 disprovable with simple searches.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
lots of cases [google.co.nz]
Which aren't protective cases like otterbox...except the one that is an otterbox, but is a different phone
http://cdn01.androidauthority.... [androidauthority.net]
You can "hold" a knife by the blade by barely touching the edge too, the same for a broken piece of glass. No reasonable person would consider that a substantive reliable grip however.
Why are you bashing something for being different? None of your complaints are even valid, 2/3 disprovable with simple searches.
Translation "I actually couldn't even make up a dishoenst response to this one like I did the other 2 so I'm going to bluff and hope nobody actually clicks those links and thinks critically about what they're seeing". Dif
Re: (Score:1)
Or are you saying that you'd only accept an otterbox? I saw one officially announcing it, but the Edge isn't fully released. So yes, there aren't 10,000 cases for it.
Re: (Score:2)
A ziplock, really?
Re: (Score:1)
And your comments about the edges are stupid. THey aren't sharp. The reviews all indicate it's easy to hold. I still don't understand why you are going so far out of your way to make up lies about something. It's a phone, why would y
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The phone is designed with the Asian market in mind. Phablets are insanely popular there among women, who put a cover on them and carry them in their purses. The problem is that if you get a text, you have to pull the phone out of your purse and flip open the cover to read it. A cover with a cutout for the screen is one solution, but still requires taking out the phone to read the
Re: (Score:2)
In other words, it's a pr
What's the problem? (Score:1)
Innovation and invention requires there be a problem. The first principle in the utility of a claim to actually solving a problem is a new idea or novel innovation. The highest embodiment of the solution to the problem is the invention.
What's the problem? I don't see a real use case that this Samsung UI solves.
Re:What's the problem? Use case, better multitask (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That depends on the device and how it's set up.
Re: (Score:1)
What's the problem? I don't see a real use case that this Samsung UI solves.
Some of the screenshots showing it being used as, basically, a taskbar. That gives it desktop-esque single-tap app switching without losing any of a small device's precious screen space. There were also images of it showing hardware controls (wifi on/off, etc.), app controls (camera shutter and settings), app settings, etc.
The problem it seems to be solving is how to cram easier, faster device control into a phone without reducing usable area.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting use-case. A slider widget would be the highest embodiment rather than toggle widgets. As you suggest controls are disruptive interfering and not easy sometimes while using devices at the same time. SO that would be architectural kernel level interrupts and scheduling which could enable the device to work uniquely rather than decorative buttons along the edge.
I'm curious if they went to that level of innovation or if its just gingerbread design kitsch. Thanks...I'll check it out.
Re: (Score:1)
So earlier in the discussion we've got a post confusing RAM and storage, and now one "thinking" that 1080p is the limit of usefulness. WTF?
Re: (Score:2)
1080p monitors are rolled out, 4K monitors are too new. Anything bigger, uhm, you're going to need to assemble a video wall to get that to work.
Re: (Score:2)
Glossy print, you fool.
Re: (Score:2)
Until the 4K TVs become popular, 1080p is the limit your camera can successfully show to you.
There are other ways to make images viewable other than looking at them on a monitor, and plenty of reasons for wanting more pixels than can be displayed on most monitors.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess I forgot to account for 300-600 dpi printers... but the point is, most photos are being shown on displays, not paper.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
4K is out in release, but there's nothing to watch on it yet. TV is limited to 1080i simply because nobody is providing higher. Blu-Ray discs go to 1080p, the disc is ready for 4K but no movie has been put on that kind of disc yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So what's it a knock-off of? I don't see it being all that useful, but that's another matter entirely. Anyway, this is supposed to be news for nerds, and shoving another touchscreen into a device in a silly place is a very nerdy development.
Re: (Score:1)
Festivus.... A holiday for the rest of us
Not for me (Score:2)
While the idea is neat in general it seems to only make the biggest complaint I have with my phone even worse, accidental touches of the frame.
The industry is chasing ever narrower bezels and ever more sensitive touch panels to the point where phones can only be easily held with the palm. I have to disable the sensitivity boost on all the Galaxy phones I own (impacts the ability to use hover preview functions which are great if I'm cooking and someone sends me a txt) because I like using my phone upside dow
blech samsung UI (Score:2)
Give us QWERTY (Score:1)
> Differentiation is difficult in the smartphone market these days.
> all are nice upgrades but are only iterative
Please give us one huge upgrade - simple QWERTY. Last QWERTY phone is N900 [wikipedia.org] from 2009. The next will be Jolla [jolla.com]+TOHKBD [kickstarter.com] in 2015 just thanks to a community funding effort (but still with weak hardware from 2013). Everybody in forums wants QWERTY but no single manufacturer makes one.
Interesting both QWERTY phones also run Linux OS (that is not Android) despite both features are technically comp
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather have a bigger screen and smaller form.
That said, there are a ton of phones for me. You'd think they'd make one just to own that niche market
Re: (Score:2)
> Differentiation is difficult in the smartphone market these days.
> all are nice upgrades but are only iterative
Please give us one huge upgrade - simple QWERTY. Last QWERTY phone is N900 [wikipedia.org] from 2009. The next will be Jolla [jolla.com]+TOHKBD [kickstarter.com] in 2015 just thanks to a community funding effort (but still with weak hardware from 2013). Everybody in forums wants QWERTY but no single manufacturer makes one.
Huh? I can immediately name two examples of a modern QWERTY phone here [blackberry.com] or here [blackberry.com].
Re: (Score:1)