Datawind Not Blowing Smoke: $38 Tablet Coming To the US 210
BigVig209 writes "In a follow-up to a story we discussed in May, the Chicago Tribune is reporting that London-based Datawind it will begin selling its $38 UbiSlate tablet computer in the U.S. early next year. 'The $38 7-inch touchscreen UbiSlate 7Ci tablet runs on Google's Android 4.0 and features a 1-gigahertz, single-core processor. It has 4 gigabytes of storage with microSD card slots for additional storage. The 7-inch display offers a resolution of 800x480 pixels.' The specs aren't the greatest, fastest, or most powerful, but, for under $50, they're still pretty decent."
classroom tools (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Insightful)
Have you priced E-Text books lately? Maybe it's because I'm looking at college level stuff, but they get a LOT of money just to let you use their book for 6 months and a whole lot more to get the book forever. I just don't see that happening until the publishers back off the rental prices.
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Informative)
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Interesting)
The last 'ebook' I bought was for an astrophysics class. A mandatory $190 license to access a textbook online for three months. By Pearson of course. No one should be pleased with how things are going.
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm hoping to see a trend where professors or graduate students write new textbooks and just contribute them to the public domain. Inexpensive tablets plus free textbooks means inexpensive education.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4123035&cid=44658533 [slashdot.org]
It's still early days with ebooks, really. The publishers want to keep the prices high, but the barriers to entry into the market are low. Free textbooks will disrupt the pricing model.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, because of course people will do hundreds of hours of work for free. Personally, I'm looking forward to the trend where random people send me enough money that I can retire.
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, because of course people will do hundreds of hours of work for free.
They will, as it turns out. You'll find countless examples on the internet. Not everyone is as selfish as you.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is that SOMEONE will do that, but usually for most classes you don't just need a random textbook on the subject - you need a specific one that is normally chosen by the professor. Sometimes they have "incentives" to mandate a textbook from a certain publisher or sometimes they make a book that they wrote the mandatory textbook so that they get all the royalties.
I ended up buying a lot of my books at Half.com back when I was in school because I could get them cheaper used there (just had to make
Re: (Score:2)
So everyone who doesn't donate hundreds of hours of work for free is selfish? Just out of curiosity, what do YOU donate?
Re: (Score:3)
The incredulity that the parent expressed at the very prospect of laboring exclusively for the benefit of others implies that he's very selfish. So selfish, in fact, that he cannot even comprehend the idea that others would act selflessly.
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Interesting)
So everyone who doesn't donate hundreds of hours of work for free is selfish?
In my opinion, yes. Everyone should make time in their life to improve the world in some way.
Just out of curiosity, what do YOU donate?
1. I spend several hours a week teaching Scratch [mit.edu] programming to 3rd-6th graders.
2. I volunteer as a math tutor at my son's elementary school for two hours per week.
3. I am a member of the "Ten Gallon Club" at the Red Cross blood center (80 one pint donations).
4. I have written several free educational apps for iPads and Android Tablets, and plan to write many more.
5. My wife and I funded a scholarship for two Naxi [wikipedia.org] girls to attend a university.
Re: (Score:2)
what should be done is for most STEM subjects most of the courses should have an available FREE Standard Reference Volume Set which is designed to be used to either Teach the subject or be useful to "PreTeach" a subject. An example for you is Electronics there should be a standard text for AC/DC ,Semiconductor and Digital.
Also the questions/workbook should always be separate AND AVAILABLE FOR REASONABLE COST.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Also worth mentioning that even if no money changes hands it's not necessarily for free - academia if heavily vested in reputation, and having your book be the one that a generation of students learned from is a feather your cap.
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, because of course people will do hundreds of hours of work for free.
It would be deliciously ironic if you used a free software web browser such as Firefox to type the above comment.
Graduate students and professors need to "publish or perish". I'm hoping that at least some of them will use at least some of their publishing time to write free textbooks.
And, anyway, people are already writing books and giving them away. Take a look at BookBoon:
http://bookboon.com/en/textbooks-ebooks [bookboon.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, people give books away. I personally give both things and my time away. But we are talking about a wide variety of textbooks on a wide variety of topics that have to be really professionally produced. It is unreasonable (until the Marxist utopia arrives) to imagine that everything you want is going to be handed to you for free. Sometimes, you just have to exchange something of value for what you want.
Re: (Score:3)
The Marxist utopia never will arrive. Communism doesn't work.
But people do occasionally contribute their time to projects such as Firefox, Linux, or Wikipedia. (All it takes is for their satisfaction to be greater than the perceived costs to them.)
You don't have to tell me to pay for textbooks I want... I've been buying O'Reilly ebooks like a junkie lately. But there are a lot of kids who could use free textbooks if they were available, and mark my words, people will write those textbooks over time.
If ev
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:classroom tools (Score:5, Informative)
Which will of course be FAR more expensive than the textbooks were.
I don't get the impression that e-textbooks ever actually save anybody money as the publishers just jack up the prices.
I knew someone who worked in a library, and they got all excited about e-books, only to realize they spent about 50% or more of the annual book buying budget to get it set up and get just a half a dozen e-books. They ended up with far far less than if they'd bought traditional books, because they'd have been able to buy hundreds of books for what they spent.
At the end of the day, it makes more money for the publisher, but a small community library got absolutely burned in the process, and only ended up with a handful of books, and limited benefit
I can't imagine school boards would fare any better.
Re: (Score:2)
And since they are electronic they are so much easier to "Update". Oh, that's the old version. The {school board | stated education department | university managers} no longer certifies your old version. You'll have to get the new version.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I suspect that used textbooks are quite a bit cheaper than new ebooks.
How would a used ebook market work, I wonder?
Capacitive or Resistive? (Score:2)
That's a world of difference, Capacitive or Resistive is the difference between a budget and a usable tablet
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It has a capacitive display.
http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/review-datawind-ubislate-7ci/1/190518.html [intoday.in]
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Capacitive or Resistive? (Score:5, Informative)
Has no one here shopped online?
Here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA3DC17C8972 [newegg.com]
It's $44. Granted, that's $6 more, but that's certainly in the same ballpark, and it has (arguably) better specs (dual core, dual cameras, android 4.2, etc).
Or here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=0EJ-0019-00005 [newegg.com]
This one is just $34.99. It's only 4.3", but it has a 1.2GHz A8, and Android 4.2.
I don't know why this is making slashdot... 'el cheap-o tablets are already here in every form you could ask for. Most of the cheap ones sacrifice battery life first, which sucks, but corners must be cut if you're going to be the cheapest thing with a touchscreen... and in some cases, a short battery life is not a deal breaker (ex. car computer; kitchen wall mounted touch display; media controller; etc).
Re:Capacitive or Resistive? (Score:5, Informative)
That "$44" tablet has a shipping price of $23.
Granted, shipping usually isn't free (even when listed as such it's built into the price of the item), but a $20+ shipping price is just a lie. They're building most of the item price into the shipping price to make it look cheaper.
Yes the 4.3" device is actually $35 shipped but at that size I consider that a touch screen media player rather than a "tablet".
Re: (Score:2)
Microcenter has been offering the A700 for $40 since November: http://www.microcenter.com/product/423567/A700_Tablet_-_Grey [microcenter.com]
Granted, it is in store only, so you need to live near a Microcenter to buy one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
displays the time, weather
I have this app in my bathroom that displays the weather. It runs on Windows (yeah I know Windows sucks). All I have to do is look out of it. It also has a touch interface. I can doodle on it when it's a bit misted up.
Re: (Score:2)
I miss resistive screens. Sure, multi-touch is nice but being able to draw or write with precision using a pointy stylus or even a finger nail was much more useful. Yeah, I know, there are so-called stylus for capacitive screens. They are so blunt though.. There just isn't any precision possible in a capacitive screen.
I thought it might be nice to combine capacitive and resistive sensors in the same screen. It could default to the resistive one for precision until it detects a second touch then the cap
Re: (Score:2)
I miss resistive screens. Sure, multi-touch is nice but being able to draw or write with precision using a pointy stylus or even a finger nail was much more useful. Yeah, I know, there are so-called stylus for capacitive screens. They are so blunt though.. There just isn't any precision possible in a capacitive screen.
The way you do this properly is by adding a digitizer to that capacitive screen. There are numerous products that do so (e.g. Galaxy Note), and that give you all the advantages of both capacitive touch, and of a precise stylus.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know if it was the crap hardware (it was Samsung, after all) or the crap software (it was a Samsung OEM Android, after all), but my experience with the Galaxy Note tablet was less than stellar, and they used, IIRC, a Wacom digitizer. For some reason, though, new out of the box, it suffered from horrible input lag.
Okay, I'll be fair. It was "bad" input lag which was graduated to "horrible" in the face of the $500 price tag.
Ended up returning it, getting a Transformer, and going back to waiting for a
Re: (Score:2)
Most digitizer issues are on the software side, and the problem with Android is that it's not actually designed with pen input in mind, so Samsung has to add their own hacks to the system to add support - and they're notoriously bad at modding Android.
Anyway, Note is just an example - it seems that digitizer is becoming par for the course for the new Win8.1 tablets, even the budget ones (like Dell Venue 8), which is a nice trend. And Win8 actually has proper pen input support, both as a standard input metho
Re: (Score:2)
You want an accurate stylus.. Ever hear of Samsung?
Cheap Smartglass Controller (Score:4, Funny)
After MS clears you out for an XB One, you can buy a cheap tablet for their Smartglass "second screen" app.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Almost never except these apps including the one GP mentions. Seriously, did you not google?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/developer?id=Microsoft+Corporation&hl=en_GB
Always late (Score:5, Interesting)
Datawind is always late to the party. They make big annoucements about incredibly inexpensive items years in the future to generate interest. Then by the time they're actually selling something, everyone else has passed them by. Even now, you can pickup a tablet with similar specs from walmart for $50. By the time we see any DW tablets on the shelves, several companies will be selling $40 tablets, or better.
Re: "Early next year"?? Missing Christmas? (Score:2)
It's a consumer product. They'll sell a lot less of it if they introduce it in January than if they'd gotten it out Dec. 1, much less pre-Black-Friday.
Re: (Score:2)
Jeez..I can't even ship something for $38 anymore (Score:2)
NOW we're talking "ubiquitous" and "paperless" (Score:2)
Re:NOW we're talking "ubiquitous" and "paperless" (Score:4, Insightful)
Picture them all with a device made by someone else.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The price point of the device isn't the factor for adoption of devices in clinical settings - it's doing "simple" tasks like making sure they're secure and audit-able.
Your auditors don't like, "The vendor said it's safe," or "We probably didn't lose any."
Re: (Score:2)
Also things like "has the screen got high enough contrast that I can tell a tumour from a not-a-tumour?"
(not that I'd expect these to be primary diagnostic devices, but still)
Re: (Score:2)
The manufacturer/specs don't matter nearly as much as the $38 price point. THAT'S the big deal here.
Hardly. being able to do the work and reliability are what's important in the settings you originally described. These things are cheap, and they are going to be cheap in all the bad ways besides price also. There are already tablets out there that are cheaper. Using these rather than something more expensive will cost more money in the time it takes for them to complete work (assuming they can even do the work) than spending the extra time. Breakdowns and replacements are also a consideration in the profes
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want a 7" TV remote, thats fucking stupid. The TV is a display, why the fuck do you have a display on your remote? Because you've over complicated it to the point of stupidity.
Or maybe because you want to browse the program guide and configure the DVR without interrupting the show you're currently watching? (Before you say just pause it, consider that in family situations, someone else may be watching TV, or playing a game, and it may be deemed inconsiderate to interrupt their entertainment just because you feel like frobbing the remote. Doesn't apply to everyone, but it's a legitimate use case.)
Granted, these days one should just use a HTPC instead of a TV+DVR, but the same argu
Re: (Score:2)
The TV is a display, why the fuck do you have a display on your remote?
"Yo Dawg".
Re: (Score:2)
Why the hell does your thermostat run on batteries when it has to be wired to a power source anyway to trip the furnace/AC relays?
Because they don't want to put in a transformer or DC->DC convertor to reduce that voltage to 3V to run the thermostat, when you can just spend $0.50 on batteries every couple of years?
Cool (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably because you've never had real syrup.
Here's a tip -- The good stuff isn't made from corn.
Re: (Score:2)
I've had real maple syrup, and I'll admit that it tastes better, but it certainly doesn't taste better ENOUGH to warrant costing about 16x as much as the cheap stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Garbage (Score:5, Insightful)
I've purchased two barrel-bottom-scraping androids so far (not this model), with the expectation that that should be able to satisfy very basic needs like ebook reading.
I was wrong.
These 'landfill android' devices garbage in every possible way. Battery life is so poor that you can't even even expect it to last a day on stand by. Yet performance is so poor that you have to wait a good several minutes just for the damn thing to boot up, so forget about quickly pulling it out while on the bus to read a few pages.
And the wifi is so bad that it can't pick up a signal unless you have a router in the very same room, and even then you somehow don't get full bars.
The only use I can see for this class of devices, is in BDSM scenarios:
Master - Check my email, slave!
Slave - Yes Master, thank you master! Oh, I can't connect to the server!
Master - Are you telling me that you're failing me, you miserable wretch?
Slave - Nuh Matha! Ih I puf mah tong oh he corneh, wifi worgs!
Master - Good slave! Now play Words With Friends!
Slave - *whimper*
Not garbage in EVERY way... (Score:5, Insightful)
Devices like these, and the equivalent devices in the phone arena, help keep Android "market share" figures nice and plump!
Re: (Score:2)
Plenty of links if you just search (Score:3)
It's obviously true just from browsing numbers alone... but there's articles like this [instapaper.com] that say the same thing (in the phone/phablet world).
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, my brother bought something in that family ... when you turned it off, the clock stopped, so it never had the slightest idea of what the time was unless you set it every time you turned it on.
And, as you said, it had horrible battery life, was seriously underperforming, flaky wifi, and was generally not very good.
Granted, that was a few years ago, but one does worry about these low-end devices and just how useful they'll actually be.
Re: (Score:2)
So does the Raspberry Pi, but those seem to be selling quite well, and people are quite pleased with them. I have enough devices that can tell me the time. Sure it would be nice if it kept proper time, but I don't see how that's essential to many of the things you may want to use a tablet for. The GameBoy doesn't have a clock either. Didn't stop us from having
Games that use a clock (Score:2)
The GameBoy doesn't have a clock either. Didn't stop us from having tons of fun playing games on it.
That's because they had to put the clock in the cartridge. Games that make heavy use of the clock, such as Animal Crossing, had to wait for the DS that had its own clock.
If it can do games, reading, and play videos, none of which require a clock, or even network connectivity
A reliable clock is needed for making sure that the (agreed-upon) rental period for your rented video hasn't expired.
Re: (Score:2)
FWIW, I bought some of the $59 units NoMoreRack is selling (for video chat between grandparents and kids) and aside from a terrible viewing angle on the screen, they're no worse than my 3 year old phone. Wifi seems fine, boot time is reasonable, Hangouts works, Netflix is claimed to work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I had a generic Android tablet (with jellybean) before I bought my Asus Fonepad.
The only showstopper was battery life. Everything else was perfectly acceptable and it was an absolute breeze to root.
But the battery life was pretty dreadful -- an *absolute maximum* of 5 hours with all connectivity disabled and minimum brightness screen, whereas the Asus runs all day and night without even thinking about those things.
Re: (Score:2)
uhh... (Score:2)
well...if $38 is too rich for your blood..there is always this..
http://www.dhgate.com/product/lenovo-lepad-a2207-lenovo-idea-tab-a2207a/178135882.html#s1-14-1 [dhgate.com]|1005834550 ...AND it's Lenova!
Re:uhh...shit (Score:2)
...whoops didn't notice that minimum order...
never mind.
If you know someone who runs a store (Score:2)
Re:uhh... (Score:4, Funny)
AND it's Lenova!
No good. I'm holding out for a genuine Sorny, Panaphonic or Magnetbox.
There's already a $49 Kindle (Score:2)
http://www.beyond-black-friday.com/2013/12/17/amazon-discounts-kindles-to-49/ [beyond-black-friday.com]
Granted it's a one-day Christmas promotion, but it just shows they can drop prices pretty low. (Especially since they're hoping to make it all back with ebook sales...)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but that's an ebook reader, not a tablet.
It's about time (Score:2)
There have been $30 tablets available in Shentzen for a year. Most have an Allwinner ARM SOIC, which is a very cheap part yet quite powerful. It costs $1100 to move an entire shipping container from Shentzen to Los Angeles. Not clear what the hold-up has been.
Tablets will be sold in bubble-packs at the drugstore.
Patents (Score:2)
Not clear what the hold-up has been.
Patents perhaps? Microsoft owns exclusive rights in the FAT file system and Exchange protocol. That and possibly import duties, which in some countries are known to exceed 100% of the declared value.
Implications for OLPC (Score:2)
The One Laptop Per Child project should change its focus from hardware to software. Whether this tablet is suitable for kids, or some other tablet, they can count on inexpensive Android tablets being available.
Could kids use these things for reading textbooks? Yes. Could kids run educational software that drills them on math and other subjects? Yes. Could kids even watch movies, look things up on Wikipedia, learn to touch-type with a USB or Bluetooth keyboard? Yes, yes, yes. Tablets like these are ad
Re: Implications for OLPC (Score:2)
Also, better that they can work for 4+ hours on battery, cheap tablets are not great in that area.
So what? (Score:2)
tablet lower res than phone (Score:2)
Tablets are just big smart phones. Bigger allows for a bigger screen and bigger (longer lasting) battery.
800x480 was a mid-range phone more than three years ago. Mid range and high range phones have more pixels now.
It is possible that this device has a decent battery but, at $50,I'm skeptical of that too. So, why should anyone buy this tablet instead of a three year old smart phone on eBay?
Physical size matters too (Score:3)
So, why should anyone buy this tablet instead of a three year old smart phone on eBay?
Because not everybody likes to squint at tiny text.
Sounds like a possible "disruptive technology" (Score:2)
...the kind that starts out regarded by the established players as almost a joke, who ignore it because its not what the important customers are asking for, just some bargain-hunting fools... then the low-end, joke product develops its own specialized market, gradually improves, starts eating the lunch of the big guys, and somehow they fade away.
The Ford Model Twas regarded as such a piece of junk the "Ford joke" became a genre in itself, and people published entire BOOKS of nothing but Ford jokes. "Does yo
RAM? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
More storage than an iPad (Score:5, Insightful)
ewaste (Score:2)
Whats the industry ratio of circuit boards manufactured per month versus circut boards recycled per month? The eWaste stream is worth thinking about and should be included in the price of electronics. Maybe tablets shouldnt be $38 because so many of them will get thrown away, with their toxic components in a landfill that eventually leaks into the groundwater.
$39 Azpen (Score:2)
Microcenter already sells a $39 Azpen A700 with the exact same specs. What am I missing?
Re: (Score:2)
(with capacative screen)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It seems we're getting closer to replacing paper once and for all.
So, someone has invented a cheap digital data storage method that will last thousands of years?
There's a reason tombstones are still big-ass etched stones, and not digital displays, you know.
Re: (Score:2)
So, someone has invented a cheap digital data storage method that will last thousands of years?
No, but someone has invented something cheap that stops working when it gets rained on and can't be repaired when you damage it.
There's a reason tombstones are still big-ass etched stones, and not digital displays, you know.
And there's also a good reason they aren't made of paper.
Re: (Score:2)
So, someone has invented a cheap digital data storage method that will last thousands of years?
No, but someone has invented something cheap that stops working when it gets rained on and can't be repaired when you damage it.
A hard drive? Oh, no, you said cheap.
There's a reason tombstones are still big-ass etched stones, and not digital displays, you know.
And there's also a good reason they aren't made of paper.
... as well as a good reason why the information plate bolted to the side of the Voyager probe isn't made of paper, either.
Look, I ain't saying that paper is the be-all-end-all of communication methods; I'm just pointing out that anyone who thinks digital electronics will be a replacement for paper anytime in the near future is dreaming of pipes.
TL;DR version: sure, paper might suck, but digital storage sucks more.
Re: (Score:2)
Not all of them http://www.vidstone.com/ProductsGeneral.aspx?productID=26 [vidstone.com]
And I'm pretty sure none of the books I have on my bookcases are big-ass etched stones either. I also suspect there's a better chance of one of my e-books still existing in 2,000 years than one of my paperbacks. I doubt either will, but the paperback is more likely to become ash in a house fire or mush in a flood than the file.
Re: (Score:2)
Not all of them http://www.vidstone.com/ProductsGeneral.aspx?productID=26 [vidstone.com]
Ha, what a trip! $1500 for an LCD panel ($2400 if you opt for the 5 year anti-vandalism warranty)? Proves the old adage, 'a fool and his money are soon parted.'
Really, if you absolutely had to memorialize someone that way, you'd be better off buying one of those $20 commercial digital photo frames, wiring it to a solar panel, and drilling a couple mounting screws into the stone monument (which would have the added advantage of removable parts, since something will eventually fail).
I also suspect there's a better chance of one of my e-books still existing in 2,000 years than one of my paperbacks.
Then you have far more fai
Re: (Score:2)
Regular paperbacks are generally of noticeably higher quality than "Mass Market Paperbacks" (which are the small-ish versions sold in most supermarkets and such).
The Mass Market variety aren't really designed to last. They're meant to be read once or twice (if ever) and if they tear up after that just toss them.
If you're buying a book for a collection you want to buy a higher quality version.
That said - I'm not sure why they charge what they do for the better versions. Barnes and noble puts out very good
Re: (Score:2)
Regular paperbacks are generally of noticeably higher quality than "Mass Market Paperbacks" (which are the small-ish versions sold in most supermarkets and such).
The Mass Market variety aren't really designed to last. They're meant to be read once or twice (if ever) and if they tear up after that just toss them.
If you're buying a book for a collection you want to buy a higher quality version.
That said - I'm not sure why they charge what they do for the better versions. Barnes and noble puts out very good quality hard-cover versions of some public domain books for less than $10. That's generally less than the price difference between the MMPB and the hardcover version of most books, so you're actually paying a lot more than just the additional materials cost there.
You're paying copyright fees. With the $10 books, the content is usually public domain, so you're only paying for the price of printing and cost of materials. When you're buying a paperback, you're purchasing the right to read the work for as long as the book lasts (which has been getting shorter and shorter on the mass market paperbacks). With the higher quality hardcover books, often printed on acid-free paper, you're purchasing the right to read the same content for as long as copyright lasts, barring
Re: (Score:2)
Regular paperbacks are generally of noticeably higher quality than "Mass Market Paperbacks" (which are the small-ish versions sold in most supermarkets and such).
Not anymore [publishersweekly.com].
Re: (Score:2)
So, someone has invented a cheap digital data storage method that will last thousands of years?
There's a reason tombstones are still big-ass etched stones, and not digital displays, you know.
Gosh, you might just have stumbled on the next big thing.
You know these annoyingly bright, giant, color led displays along the highway? Imagine that integrated into a tombstone, showing the dearly departed smiling and waiving and if someone walks by, serving them with some ads: "Don't do what I did. Call a qualified electrician."
I can appreciate any innovation that makes reality more like an episode of Futurama.
Re: (Score:3)
How difficult is it to install another version of Android on devices like this? I would love to use something like this as a console-on-the-go, but would hate to deal with advertising crap while I'm trying to do work.
http://www.xda-developers.com/ [xda-developers.com]
Your answer should be contained within.
My experiences with Android 4.0 (Score:2)
I've got a Coby 10" tablet running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich (i.e. really vanilla, with no manufacturer's software value added.) It'll run Google Play Store apps just fine.
The main thing it's missing is a program to sync the calendar with MS Outlook or at least accept iCal events; it really really wants you to sync its calendar app with Google Calendar, and I'm not going to sync my $DAYJOB calendar with Google. The free Play Store apps to do this haven't been very reliable, and $30 is more than I wan
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not going to sync my $DAYJOB calendar with Google.
Why not, exactly?