How Africa Will 'Leapfrog' Wired Networks 183
umarkalim writes "In an interview with Al Jazeera, Les Cottrell at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory explains how Africa will actually 'leapfrog' the need to install hard-wired cables. He says it's often overlooked that the continent is huge and that the countries are diverse. He says, 'the cost of the infrastructure is quite high, especially if you have to connect every home with copper cables and fiber-optic cables ... I think in many cases Africa will actually "leapfrog" the need to install hard-wired cables everywhere, and will be able to use different techniques such as the BRCK modem, the low-earth orbiting satellites or the 3G solutions to get connectivity to where they need.'"
Re:That's cool and everything, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: You're sharing bandwidth. (Score:5, Insightful)
Not necessarily.
You're sharing SPECTRUM with everyone and their brother. And that's actually even worse.
And building capacity for wireless is non-trivial as well. It's not just a matter of putting up another access point or uplink.
Example: GenCon.
Downtown Indianapolis has a plethora of connection options. Wired, wireless, cellular, etc.
On a Friday evening it just doesn't matter. Getting online via ANY means is a joke. You're better off with IP over smoke signal. As 50,000 people (over twice the population of the city I live in and an increase in Indy's total population to the tune of about 5-6%) in the area blitz the available spectrum for wifi and cellular, while wired connections in the hotels are drowned by rooms filled to capacity and everyone sporting a laptop/tablet/etc. And it's a static population increase for those 4-5 days.
Granted, in much of Africa, the population density is NOWHERE near that high. But you also have the same problems you would laying out a "universal" internet or power grid in the US. You have densely populated areas that are difficult and expensive to build capacity into. And you have very sparsely populated areas where people building the capacity likely will never see a return on investment. And the latter actually outnumbers the former by an order of magnitude or more. And Africa is the same thing, but with over 3x the landmass and population.
If something like this was going to be as simple as they're talking about, it'd have been done already.
Re:Leapfrog implies better (Score:4, Insightful)
Wireless gets them some access which is better than nothing but not even close to fiber. Your not going to magic around the spectrum issues .
This.
But the biggest issue in Africa is not spectrum (yet) it's copper theft.
This is pretty much the only reason wireless is better than wired. There are very few components worth stealing.
Re:OLD news (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh... Mozambique is the 3rd least developed country IN THE WORLD according to the UNDP [undp.org]
So yeah, this Les Cotrell is just a guy wanting to sound smart by explaining things about Africa to people who know nothing about Africa. This happened long ago.