Mozilla Launches Firefox OS Devices In Stores, Opens Up App Payments 57
An anonymous reader writes "After almost two years of development, Mozilla today officially launched Firefox OS devices in stores. At the same time, the company has opened up payments for developers interested in charging for their apps or charging for content inside their apps. Last week, the first commercial Firefox OS devices arrived in Spain ready to be sold by Telefónica, starting on July 9 with the ZTE Open for €69 ($88.80) including VAT. Mozilla says Poland, Colombia, and Venezuela also have upcoming launches soon, and more countries will be joining the list as well, but today today marks the day official Firefox OS devices are available in store."
Spain? (Score:2)
Re:Spain? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It's an $88 USD offering, so that might be the point. Spain users might be able to latch onto it quicker than o thers.
it's almost too good, it includes 30 euros of prepaid. also you can pay 24*2.38 euros if you're on postpaid.
which begs the question is it simlocked? I know it would be.. well, counter to the name.. but still, can anyone confirm it is not sim-locked? it's telefonica after all...
Re: (Score:2)
which begs the question is it simlocked? I know it would be.. well, counter to the name.. but still, can anyone confirm it is not sim-locked?
At least the one that went one sale in Germany, recently, was not :-)
Re: Spain? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What I mean is that Android is pretty entrenched here, much more in the lower end smartphones segment, and I don't think Firefox OS has a good chance of succeding. I believe most Spaniards, faced with the choice of selecting a cheap smartphone would rather choose what they know, and that i
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You can Moderate, or you can Comment; choose one. Moderator Help is at the very bottom. =)
cyanogenmod (Score:3, Funny)
I want to see phones ship with Cyanogenmod by default. But while we're wishing, I want a free app that turns my smartphone into a portable unlimited beer tap. And also, a bag of holding would be nice.
Re: (Score:2)
Panda (Score:1)
Why is there a picture of a red panda with the article? Did some journalist actually think it was a fox?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Hard to believe anyone on Slashdot wouldn't know this.
Re:Panda (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
But the Firefox logo is clearly a fox, not a red panda.
Re: (Score:2)
From this [actsofvolition.com] blog I think the original sketch up for the logo looks more like a panda while the final rendition was for some reason made to look more like a fox. But maybe it's just my mind playing tricks on me. I honestly never knew a fire fox was a panda and not a fox (or just a made up name). And I had also completely forgotten about Phoenix and Firebird.
Re: (Score:2)
Replying to myself with some more information in lack of being able to edit Slashdot posts. Apparently it was a conscious decision to go with the fox instead of a panda as the panda "didn't quite conjure up the right imagery" [archive.org]. So there you have it.
Re: (Score:2)
Look at the shape of the head and snout in the most current logo, which is quite different from your linked article. It's a fox, not a red panda.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that picture leaves no doubt. Thanks.
Firesomething (Score:2)
Re:Waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
Because it doesn't leak and crash all the time. Check your add-ons.
Re: (Score:2)
You obviously don't run Firefox constantly open for months at a time. But that is my point if the browser can't handle addons without crashing and consuming all memory then that is something that should be addressed by at least having some tools in the browser to detect and/or fix the situation. One of the addons that I know that has some problems is the Flash Player plugin, but this plugin is basically required for browsing the web, so the Mozilla devs should work with Adobe to fix this situation or write
Re:Waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
No, I let it update periodically which necessitates closing it. Sometimes I even reboot so my system can install patches.
So the browser is supposed to be capable of solving the halting problem?
That's not an addon. That's a plugin. Mozilla has isolated it via the plugin host but it is still its own, closed source executable. How the hell can you possibly hold Mozilla to task for problems in flash?
Here, let me fix this for you:
Re: (Score:2)
Deploying Firefox as a pseudo OS on millions (maybe) of computer phones will give them an incentive to fix/improve their javascript host, at least. Which they have been doing for years already.
I don't have too many troubles with flash plugin, in fact if my browser is slow and my computer is swapping I can always do a killall -9 plugin-container, which I find myself doing in hard situations but not often at all. If you're auto-loading every flash object (which is the default) while browsing on over 100 tabs
Re: (Score:2)
It is able to crash. Sometimes it will crash once a day or more, sometimes it never crashes. That's with few and benign add-ons (though the most "heavy" of them is Session Manager) including Flashblock with tends to improve stability and resource usage by not auto-loading flash all the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Because mobile is the next big platform, and must have presence there to keep being relevant? Because none of the 2/3 main mobile platforms are truly open? Because their vision is open web everywhere? You don't need specifically Firefox OS to access that marketplace.
If/When those leaks are found they probably will be fixed (those devels "wasting their time" are users too), but there is a lot of people working in a lot of areas.
Re: (Score:2)
They did, it doesn't leak memory anymore. The browser still pegs CPU and still crashes, but crashes orders of magnitude less often than Netscape 4.x. That's because the web is horrible, it's a platform for automatic execution of perfectly portable interpreted code of varying and terrible quality and I don't bother filtering it (barring Flashblock).
Re: (Score:1)
A browser should never crash, period. If it crashes then it is because the Mozilla devs wasted their time on some pet projects instead of using that time for QA and testing of the core browser.
Re: (Score:2)
A browser should never crash, period. If it crashes then it is because the Mozilla devs wasted their time on some pet projects instead of using that time for QA and testing of the core browser.
Agreed.
Also, software should never have security vulnerabilities, should never lag and should never have unexpected behaviours of any kind.
The fact that Firefox is the only web browsing software which is less than absolutely perfect is very damning.
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't like software engineering is a new thing, there are known methods and ways to test for memory leaks and software crashes, there are also known methods for QA and regression tests for software. I understand there will always be some bugs in any software but as soon as a single crash occurs you should have enough information to identify the bug and fix it with an update.
Re: (Score:1)
How do we know that browser developers developed the OS, rather than newly-hired/volunteered OS developers?
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't matter as long as there are bugs in the browser you fix that as first priority before you focus on something else.
Re: (Score:2)
So does that mean when the servers are down, I'm supposed to pull the secretary into the meeting where we try to fix it?
How about the janitors?
You let the folks you hired for that task, work on that task. You don't reassign everyone to focus on one thing, that is overkill and a waste.
Re: (Score:2)
No but you prioritize the tasks based on how serious they are. Bugs are number one, new features are second, eye candy is third.
What's the full price? (Score:3)
I couldn't find the price of the ZTE Open yet, I mean unlocked, without SIM and without dealing with an operator at all. The Alcatel One Touch Fire is the other Firefox OS phone for now but I don't know how much it costs.
I guess if it's cheap enough it could be used as a PDA and media player only, or as a phone with no data plan and use wifi, SD, USB only.
But I'm fine with my small clamshell Samsung phone too (with no secondary display, no camera, no anything), long battery life and perfect form factor. It would be a pain to carry a rectangle everyday in one of my pants pocket (I carry enough crap already : tobacco, cigarette paper, keys, lighter, smartcards, corkscrew, a small purse with cash coins and USB drive)
Re: (Score:1)
It looks like it'll be in the same rough price bracket as the two Geeksphones. The price you are seeing is for an operator-locked device, and it may be subsidised, but it is not on contract; it's PAYG. These things are cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be a pain to carry a rectangle everyday in one of my pants pocket (I carry enough crap already : tobacco, cigarette paper, keys, lighter, smartcards, corkscrew, a small purse with cash coins and USB drive)
When I switched to a 4" touchscreen earlier this year, I was surprised to discover that it actually fits *better* in my tiny messenger bag/purse (or back pocket) than my compact dumbphone did because it's maybe half the thickness even with a case on. Alternately, you could just get a slightly bigger bag.
Re: (Score:2)
How about quit smoking? You halve the amount of crap in your purse and with the money you save at the end of the year you can buy yourself the latest and greatest phone, and a tablet, and a laptop, and likely a TV too.
Oh and you'll live longer too. And there's a possibility later in life your death may be less painful.
oh yay (Score:1)
HeyBubble (Score:1)