CyanogenMod Domain Hijacked 143
An anonymous reader writes "The team behind CyanogenMod, one of the most popular community-driven, Android-based operating systems for phones and tablets, has announced that they're moving to Cyanogenmod.org after their .com domain was held ransom by a community member. He had been in control of the .com domain name for some time, but the team found out he was impersonating Cyanogen to make deals with community sites. When they removed his access to other parts of the CM infrastructure, he demanded $10,000 to relinquish control of the domain and threatened to change the DNS entries. When they refused to pay, he went through with it. The team is now disputing control of the domain with ICANN. They said, 'We will continue to be open about the what, when, how, but unfortunately, we may never know the "why" – though greed comes to mind. The team itself has not made a profit off of CM and that is not our goal. But to have one of our own betray the community like this is beyond our comprehension.'"
Nice guy! (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds like a real asshole. Enjoy the domain why you can - it'll be taken from you, or it'll be rendered worthless when the responsible adults get their own domain. Either way it's worthless.
Scumbag (Score:2, Insightful)
A real community member would be proud to shell out the 10 bucks for the domain name nenewal and donate it back to the project.
Re:Defamation of trademarks can be a criminal matt (Score:2, Insightful)
This guy is in England... the country where you get arrested for posting a photo of a burning paper flower on facebook.
Re:Nice guy! (Score:4, Insightful)
Sure, he's a jerk. But he cant really hold something he owns hostage.
There's no utility in "owning" a listing in a public directory for an organization that you're not a part of beyond misrepresenting yourself and deceiving the public. If the existing rules don't recognize that, that doesn't that we need to distort reality and pretend that what he's doing is perfectly right and good, it means that means the rules need to be fixed.
Re:Name and shame again and again. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Name and shame again and again. (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd love to hear both sides, but if one side just says "The other side is wrong" without telling me what happened in their view, I kinda doubt said side.
Re:This all looks to now be resolved (Score:1, Insightful)
Dudes still a shit bag for trying to get the money from a non profit org in the first place.
Re:Nice guy! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Name and shame again and again. (Score:5, Insightful)
Did you not read the summary or did you recently get a lobotomy? The summary clearly lays out the dick moves he pulled. Nothing in his lame excuse drivel clears any of that shit up other than saying other people are wrong.
And who submitted the entry? An AC. And with the high editorial standards at slashdot, I'm sure they did a thorough investigation and fact-checking before posting.
As to the fact that his excuses were lame - that is exactly what the previous poster said. So congratulations on missing the whole point (while implying he/she is an idiot).