Asus EeePad Transformer Gets a Thumbs-Up 160
Android Central has taken a close look at the new Transformer tablet from Asus, giving it an overall positive review, with minor points deducted for a 'plasticy' feel. The Transformer joins the Motorola Xoom in the world of Honeycomb (Android 3.0), and has very similar, high-end specs (though it's Wi-Fi only) with one big difference: the Transformer is marketed with a not-included-in-the-price attachable keyboard that adds a secondary battery. Notably, given inevitable comparison to the Xoom, the SD card slot, and Flash 10.2, work out of the box. The reviewer says Asus has done a credible job of making Honeycomb work well with a keyboard, but I wonder what other OSes will eventually be hacked onto this device. 16 hours of battery life in a netbook-sized computer sure sounds good to me, but I might want that to be with standard Linux apps instead of only with Android.
Autobot or Decepticon? (Score:3)
mm? (Score:2)
but I might want that to be with standard Linux apps instead of only with Android.
Why? Wouldn't most Linux (or even Windows) apps be a huge pain to use on just a touch screen?
Re: (Score:2)
but I might want that to be with standard Linux apps instead of only with Android.
Why? Wouldn't most Linux (or even Windows) apps be a huge pain to use on just a touch screen?
Did you see the part where it's called a "Transformer" because there is a detachable keyboard/battery?
Re: (Score:2)
Man, I thought that was because it could turn into a car [imdb.com].
This is essentially just a docking station. How lame is that? ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Did you see the part where it's called a "Transformer" because there is a detachable keyboard/battery?
I did make an error, but that wasn't it. I interpreted that statement as "only Linux apps" to the exclusion of Android. I misread that.
My bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure about your mouse, but mine is pretty simple.
The best windows touch screen I've used worked something like this:
click - quick tap
double click - two quick taps
move mouse - move finger around the screen
drag - click hold
The only time I miss the mouse is with high precision clicking, like text selection or grabbing small sliders. Most everyday apps, getting within 5 pixels or so is completely acceptable.
Re: (Score:2)
but I might want that to be with standard Linux apps instead of only with Android.
Why? Wouldn't most Linux (or even Windows) apps be a huge pain to use on just a touch screen?
This is the core problem with Android tablets so far. They are currently having trouble bootstrapping their software/hardware co-dependent marketplace. So what is this device really for, then, if it's not going to get many of the best tablet-sized apps being developed on the iPad?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if native Linux were available on devices and toolkits became better geared for handling multiple modes of interaction, there's no reason you couldn't load the same software on your tablet and on your desktop. It'd load one UI for the tablet and one UI for the desktop, with no code changes whatsoever between them.
Android does not magically make applications work in the touch formfactor. It simply has no non-touch-f
Re: (Score:2)
The full Transformer setup has a keyboard and a touchpad, as well as USB for plugging in whatever you want. I doubt they'll sell many lone tablets without the dock; having seen the UK prices, I'd guesstimate about 75 USD more for the keyboard attachment bundle.
For portable use, you'll probably just be browsing docs or taking quick notes, so it's not that big of a deal.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd guesstimate about 75 USD more for the keyboard attachment bundle.
RFTA, you retard. It's 150 USD. Sheesh, where do these people come from?
We've come full circle (Score:5, Insightful)
"Yes, this tablet is good but it needs a keyboard."
"Ah, yes, this keyboard is fine, but it needs a real OS."
"Whoa, this OS is killing the battery, what this needs is a big ol' battery and a charger brick to charge it."
"My hand is getting tired with all the pinching and zooming. I need a good touchpad and sometimes a good mouse."
So we're just reinventing the laptop. Great. Turns out doing something productive on a tablet is borderline impossible.
Re: (Score:2)
Quote Story:
We initially began writing this review in it [The Polaris Office documents app] to get a feel for the keyboard -- until the tablet froze up and we lost a couple hundred words.
There may be some problems with the initial choice of software, but that's not to say you can't do anything productive.
One would probably not set out to write the next great Novel on such a device, but that is not the only definition of "productive".
You can read email, the web, and books, create and edit spread sheets, documents and photos. You can collaborate over the
internet with video conferencing.
And you can choose to do this without the keyboard while sitting on the couch pounding down a b
Re: (Score:2)
Err, the laptop its actually SITTING ON MY LAP. Opposed to a tablet which I need to hold and use my other hand to control it. I can literally use a laptop with a beer in one hand, but its a lot more tricky with a tablet. You may to rethink this one.
Re: (Score:2)
Tired of roasting my knees. Hate laptops on the lap.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure it's not the knees that you should be most concerned about...
Just sayin!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Err, the laptop its actually SITTING ON MY LAP. Opposed to a tablet which I need to hold and use my other hand to control it. I can literally use a laptop with a beer in one hand, but its a lot more tricky with a tablet. You may to rethink this one.
You don't actually own one, apparently. Among the problems everyone I know who has an iPad have mentioned, that's never one of them.
Re: (Score:2)
That's precisely because people don't actually use it for anything where holding the tablet with a hand is a major problem. Like, say, typing any noticeable amount of text.
Re: (Score:2)
>Turns out doing something productive on a tablet is borderline impossible.
And this has never been the target audience...which is why you probably don't have one ;-)
Switching from consumption to production (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Weird. I've been using my tablet all day to do reasonably productive things like handle work email, put together and modify a couple of web pages for different projects, drawn a few comps for proposed changes, remote in to our web server and reconfigure a couple of settings, and also do a little bit of video and sound editing for an event we just had. I've been traveling and so a couple of times where I normally wouldn't be able to work on a laptop easily (like in a cab) I've been a bit more productive than
Re: (Score:2)
What!? Point me to the man who first came up with the idea of eliminating the awesome trackballs that came on ALL laptops way back when, and replaced them with the god-awful painful, slow, clumsy, and often accidentally activated touch pads, and I will find him and kill him with a rusty ax...
Whoever it was, the same mindset spilled over into the keyboard as well... Honestly, I can find hundreds of awes
The price is pretty reasonable. (Score:2)
The 16-gigabyte version will cost $399; the 32GB version runs $499. The keyboard dock is another $149. So for $550 -- less than the cost of a 32GB Wifi-only Motorola Xoom, you can have a 16GB Android tablet/laptop.
I'm guessing this thing will spend most of its life undocked, once you read your email and start surfing the net. Tablets are couch computers for the most part.
How often will want to dredge up the keyboard, balance it on their lap while using it anywhere other than a desk or table?
For the amount of typing one does on a tablet, it might be that some of the predictive on-screen keyboards [swiftkey.net] would be faster for most typing.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but let's get over the SD card and Flash issue.
Those are not yet functional on the Xoom, and the fact that they released the Xoom without the SD support was rather silly, but the hardware is there and SD and Flash will soon be supported on the Xoom.
Claiming Flash and SD as an advantage of the ASUS product will just confuse people.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you sure you are replying to the right person?
I mentioned nothing about SD.
Re: (Score:2)
Asus are having an each-way bet. Along with the Transformer, there's also the Slider, which includes a slide-out keyboard.
The Transformer, minus keyboard is lighter and more iPad-like. If they can keep the weight and depth down, the slider mechanism is robust and the keyboard doesn't stink, I'd be choose the retractable keyboard that doesn't need attaching. A problem with traditional tablet pcs is that the keyboards get in the way when you don't need them - there's some awkward rotation mechanism to hide th
Re: (Score:2)
And along with those two there is also the Acer-Iconia Tablet [bestbuy.com] which is just about the same spec as the transformer without the keyboard option.
So they appear to be jumping into the tablet market full force.
I wonder what MS will do about this? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There was also like the 40%-ish customer satisfaction rate. IIRC. People like the idea of tablets and netbooks, but that loathe actually using them.
Good job attempting to lump tablets in with netbooks. Too bad you're completely off base [cnbc.com].
Re: (Score:2)
I only have my own personal experience to go on - but I bought a netbook about two months ago, tossed Ubuntu on it, finally settled on Plasma Desktop as a shell, and have never been happier. My main laptop only makes it to the car once a week these days.
So it's like a touchbook (Score:2)
Just like a touchbook from Always Innovating (http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/home/index.htm) but with an actual production capability and an OS that the maker didn't have to write from scratch.
Better Review (Score:2)
http://www.anandtech.com/print/4277 [anandtech.com]
Tempted to jump on this for $399 (Score:2)
For me the big thing is the price... $399 (Even in Canada) is getting pretty close to a price point I'm comfortable with. The keyboard dock for an extra $150 I'd probably get at the same time.
Although a 10" keyboard isn't ideal, I'm wondering what options there are, if any, to do real Android application development on something like this? I need to replace my old MacBook where I do most of my work right now, and my desire to try this tablet thing out and the fact it has a keyboard makes me wonder if that
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Netbook running Android (Score:2)
The pricing is really well done.
The differentiation is either in price ($100 lower than even the iPad) or in form-factor (keyboard dock) but not simultaneously.
The reversed scrolling sounds particularly annoying.
The Android invasion so far has only crippled Nokia and RIM (and assimilated Samsung, HTC, and Motorola), but now it's going for Microsoft.
If this is a successful product, it's not clear how WinTel will be able to stop the second wave when the other Android manufacturers pile on.
Re: (Score:2)
Way more than a netbook? Ridiculous.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm wondering what options there are, if any, to do real Android application development on something like this? I need to replace my old MacBook
I wouldn't consider Android 3.0 a reasonable replacement for OSX. One is a mature OS, the other is very immature and still having the bugs ironed out. That said, I've heard that the eeePad is extremely easy to root and can therefore run any ARM Linux (e.g. Ubuntu), which would be much more powerful than Android. (And before you start complaining about the UI, consider that Gnome 3.0 will work pretty well for this).
So an Android site likes an Android tablet? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't this nearly as big a deal as when an iPhone site likes a new iPhone?
Well the difference is that they have many Android devices to chose from. So it's more like a PC site recommending an HP laptop instead of a Dell. Besides, it's a fairly good review of an interesting device.
From AndroidCentral? (Score:2)
Android tablet/netbook hybrid gets thumbs up from Android blog...
In other news, AppleInsider likes some Apple products.
The real question is whether the market will give the EeePad (and you guys thought "iPad" is was a dumb name?) a thumbs up. I wouldn't get my hopes up. They may very well sell a few thousand, though, making it one of the top Android tablets, so there's that.
I guess i'm in the minority because I'm impressed. (Score:2)
Wow, I actually like this. It seems like it's very well done.
I like the keyboard attachment, I really like that the keyboard got it's own battery and that you can decide if you want to use this as a tablet or as a laptop. Long term battery life, a good form factor, and it's not apple. I'm sure there will be lots of bugs to work out, but it sounds pretty cool to me so far. Oh, and the price is quite good. (Remember the price listed is the starting price... and it goes down from there.) We may get down
Re: (Score:2)
I want two more cores and will pay another $150. I will sell all my netbooks (I have three) and maybe some other hardware to pay for it if necessary. With two cores I would only buy it if I had disposable income. I trust Asus in a way I don't trust any other manufacturer though, so I could believe they could get this hinge thing right. Having both uSDHC and SDHC slots is a big win. Having bgn wireless likewise. I've been dreaming of a laptop with touch for a long time, and fantasizing about a tablet, and th
Stability? (Score:2)
Other reviews mention random reboots [anandtech.com]. Is Android Central at a point where they don't see that as a problem?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't. We're still waiting for that elusive software update.
Re:"notable" SD slot? (Score:5, Insightful)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
Re: (Score:1)
Maybe because nobody wants to fumble with little cards and little doors to break off, or remember which card has what on it? I wonder why camera companies waste volume with SD cards and don't just put 32GB of flash on the MLB and call it a day. The SD slot is an obsolete waste of product volume and complexity, and for some reason people (meaning people on Slashdot, not as a whole) don't seem to get it.
Re: (Score:2)
You can't imagine how removable media is useful? You've never used a floppy, CD, or DVD drive in your life?
Re:"notable" SD slot? (Score:4, Insightful)
I wonder why camera companies waste volume with SD cards and don't just put 32GB of flash on the MLB and call it a day.
Because photographers don't want to waste time during a picture shoot downloading all their photos through the USB port, or they want to be able to take some shots and hand the card to someone to process them while they keep the camera doing camera-like stuff.
The most expensive part of a camera is not the electronics, it's the optics. Making the optics sit idle while you deal with an electronic issue is big big waste of money and time.
The SD slot is an obsolete waste of product volume and complexity, and for some reason people (meaning people on Slashdot, not as a whole) don't seem to get it.
I don't "get it", because I use the SD slots on the devices I have to move data back and forth, and have compact storage for things I want to carry with me. Yes, it's hard to remember which card contains what, sometimes, but I've found the same problem with USB sticks. What I also like is that most of the SD slots my things have are completely internal, so there isn't anything sticking out of the device while I'm using one, unlike USB sticks which 'stick out' and get in the way.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not saying you're wrong or right for using an SD card - I'm saying that you're in a very small minority. Big difference. My problem is that people assume that what's good for a small number of tech savvy individuals is good for the whole, which is most definitely not the case.
I shoot large format film, but I'd be delusional for saying that users need 100 megapixel images, or judging people as somehow lacking for using a point and shoot.
Re: (Score:2)
The one aspect of fanboys that disgusts me is how they twist drawbacks into being "features", and then other assholes come along and mod them up for it. You, sir, are a fanboy of the most disgusting kind.
Also, none of what you said has any truth in it whatsoever.
Re: (Score:2)
And you're the hater of the worst kind. Other people made intelligent arguments against me, like civilized people. You, instead, resort to name calling.
Re: (Score:2)
> The one aspect of fanboys that disgusts me is how they twist drawbacks into being "features"[...]
Well, it's either that or Zoloft...
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but the only "screeching irrationality" here is your own. Notably, you're making an awfully long strawman argument here, and fail to address anything I actually said while imagining a lot of other things. So kindly fuck of and die.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think I'd miss the slot on a tablet, but I can tell you why camera manufactures still use them. Shooting raw, my wife can fill a 32GB card quite easily shooting a wedding. A long wedding she can fill it completely and make a dent in a second. Once the photos are culled, cropped, and turned into JPEGs they don't take up anywhere near that much space, but during the event there's really not time for that stuff, nor for downloading pics to a computer.
Re:"notable" SD slot? (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you out of your mind?
Do you want to buy a new device because you suddenly need 32 gigabytes of storage instead of 16 because your media library grows? Or maybe throw the device away when flash memory starts having problems after a few years?
Well, I don't. I'd rather replace a micro sd card with a larger one.
Re: (Score:2)
Call me cynical but the whole point of non-upgradeable storage is dictating the supply of internal storage.
Apple has 2 models available on their store for iPad. Wifi only or 3G. Yet they have the 16/32/64GB options - exactly the same computer but at $US100 price increments.
Re: (Score:2)
With removable cards I can carry a lot of data around in my wallet.
Re: (Score:2)
Only a complete idiot would say that the SD/SDHC/SDXC is obsolete, the fact that the development of the SDXC card at 1tb is just about to be released is proof that it is going to be the default removable storage medium of the first quarter of the 21st century.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm arguing that removable storage itself is becoming obsolete except for specialized applications. I stand by that. We'll see who's right in about 15 years.
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, even when the iPad 12 has a terabyte of internal memory, everyone else in the world will be offering similar products with a slot that will take a 2 terabyte card. These things tend to leapfrog each other. So I don't think he'll ever be right, except perhaps momentarily due to vaguarities in the market.
Re: (Score:2)
But your camera itself must be obsolete now. If the included storage is on the correct scale compared to size of a single shot, there's no longer a point to the removable media. How many photos will you take in a single session? 100? 1000?
And don't get me wrong - I don't believe in planned obsolescence, which is why I like large format film instead.
Re: (Score:2)
The DSLRs that I looked at don't have any internal storage. And I don't think I would want it too. The ability to store and organize pictures based on SD cards is nice. You buy a good DSLR camera and it will last you a long time
I'll sometimes takes 500 pictures on an outing at 10megs each
Re: (Score:2)
So 32GB of flash would hold on the order of 3000 photos for you, or a week's shooting. For a DSLR class device, one could see justifying 64GB or more. I think I'd personally take the embedded version. That said, I can see the argument that a DSLR is an inherently large device, where volume doesn't matter that much. On a pocket point and shoot, it would be that much more compelling to embed.
Re: (Score:2)
But why, for fuck's sake? What's the benefit limiting a camera to internal memory only, is it the 10 cents saved by not making a latch? (recommended response difficulty: construct an argument without invoking Apple).
For now, let's all take a minute to pray that Canon and Nikon continue not to listen to ideas like these in the future.
Re: (Score:2)
Because, in the case of small cameras, it makes them larger. As I said, earlier, I carry a larger camera than most anybody who posts here, but that doesn't mean that it makes sense for most people. I bet you the SD card slot, mechanism, and door is multiple percent of the volume of a small point and shoot. Oh, and the 10c, because every cent does matter if it's a waste. And the gram, because it matters too.
But bring on the personal attacks, because it's easier than having a rational debate.
Re: (Score:2)
WTF? My camera has an SD slot (I think they pretty much all do...) and I've never even heard of doors breaking off. The point is that it's upgradable. When I bought my camera 256 MB of flash was a little pricey. Today, I have a 16 GB card in there. And I can carry spares; if I fill one up, I can swap it in a few moments, something you can't do with built in flash.
And it's easier to carry 10 cards and 10 batteries than it is 10 cameras. Not everyone goes on trips where power is ubiquitous and computers are available.
But of course, GP thinks that we should all be using iCamera/PictureFrames and just buy new ones when the memory fills up (because you can't transfer Apple's IP [your photos] to another device).
Re: (Score:2)
You're seriously saying that an 11mm wide slot would compromise the device's structure in any significant way?
Re: (Score:2)
You're seriously saying that an 11mm wide slot would compromise the device's structure in any significant way?
No, I'm saying I wouldn't make that compromise.
Re: (Score:2)
> No, I'm saying I wouldn't make that compromise.
I have no idea what that means. If you mean you wouldn't accept an 11mm slot in any gadget on the miniscule chance that it'll change the structural integrity in any way that you're at all likely to notice, then all I have to say is, that's taking "purist" to a whole new level. ...So, none of your devices have, for instance, a removable battery?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh brother. Am I *really* being that unclear?
No, I'm saying I don't want a flimsy tablet. I like my iPad because it is rigid. If it has an SD slot, and it's still rigid, great! If it had an SD slot, but its design was flimsy, then it would not be great. There is no 'purist' about it. I had a TabletPC that was flimsy and I hated it. It felt like one wrong turn and it'd crack. The iPad, nope, I can carry it around without fear of that. Does this make sense now that I've stripped away the nonsense you
Re: (Score:2)
Okkkaaay, fine, but what does that have to do with having an SD slot?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh brother. Am I *really* being that unclear?
Yes, you are. Phrasing it as a trade-off shows that you think there's some relationship between them.
There is. But if it's unnoticable.....
Re: (Score:2)
Well, as a counter point to that ... I have never found myself thinking "boy, what I really need is an SD card slot in my iPad". Not even a little.
Maybe, just maybe, not everybody wants or needs an SD reader in a device like this. I've got most of my iPad filled with MP3s and movies, the rest is apps and
Re: (Score:2)
The iPad is a really great media consumption device. Unless you are near a good wifi access point though, (like your house), you will get charged and arm and a leg for streaming that media over AT&T or Verizon.
Since slower read/write speed SD cards are pretty inexpensive (you don't need class 10 to watch a video), you can conceivably load up several cards once with lots of movies and shows and just pop them in and out as you wish.
Moving large videos off and on the iPad's internal storage takes tim
Re: (Score:2)
A 32GB SDHC card can be had for $40+ so you save yourself money right there. Oh and if you did want to swap photos off a camera you save money by not having to buy some expensive dongle Apple for the purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
Well, as a counter point to that ... I have never found myself thinking "boy, what I really need is an SD card slot in my iPad". Not even a little.
Well, as a counter point to that ... I have often found myself thinking "boy, what I really need is a micro SD card slot in my iPhone" because I want to easily transfer data (usually PDFs) to my phone. Instead I have to email them to myself or put them up on a secure website. Apple is pretty dumb about some stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
Apparently because that something like 95% of people in the market for a tablet don't feel like they need an SD slot? Just guessing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 100% of tablets don't have a working SD card slot it is even more so.
Xoom's SD slot is non functional and flash on honeycomb is a nightmare in all aspects.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
It's an add-on for those that want one.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
It's an add-on for those that want one.
It's an expensive, hobbled add-on.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering 95% of all tablets in the wild (meaning the iPad) have no SD Card, having a card reader in a tablet is still somewhat of a novelty. How Apple gets away with that kind of thing I'll never know.
It's an add-on for those that want one.
It's an expensive, hobbled add-on.
It's $29, and works with any camera. That's not expensive, nor is it hobbled to any but a small niche of geeks.
Re: (Score:3)
It's $29, and works with any camera. That's not expensive, nor is it hobbled to any but a small niche of geeks.
A USB SD card reader that reads SD/SDHC cards costs a dollar [amazon.com]. Of course if you wanted to go with a brand name such as Sandisk for your reader that would set you back a whopping three dollars [amazon.com].
So Apple's dongle enjoys a mere 10 times more expensive that an equivalent reader that plugs into a USB port. And yes it is hobbled since SD cards work in a variety of roles, and in a variety of applications
Re: (Score:2)
It's $29, and works with any camera. That's not expensive, nor is it hobbled to any but a small niche of geeks.
A USB SD card reader that reads SD/SDHC cards costs a dollar [amazon.com]. Of course if you wanted to go with a brand name such as Sandisk for your reader that would set you back a whopping three dollars [amazon.com].
What a load of shit. You can also buy iPad SD adaptors from other companies if you want, but your comparison is irrational. The adaptors you are linking to don't have a dock connector, they don't include two adaptors, and they don't connect to an iPad. Also, you are not comparing the price of buying them in a store, which is usually about $20, you're comparing the cheapest price you can find straight off the docks (or even straight out of the factories in China). Few people buy their parts this way.
All of t
Re: (Score:2)
> That's notable these days? Every single consumer electronics device I've bought in at least 5 years, from my television set to my digital camera to my ultra-mobile PC has an SD slot. I didn't think it was possible to buy anything these days that _doesn't_ have one.
Any Apple product.
That's what makes it notable -- not that other Android devices don't have them, but that no Apple touchscreen device has them. Or ever will. Apple's business model is built on you paying their prices for memory, and discar
Re: (Score:2)
More to the point, can I boot this device from the SD card slot? My eeepc can do that. Thats how I install ubuntu. Maybe its not so bad to not have root access on a phone (I still want it though) but its pretty important to me on a laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Spoken like someone who has never owned a touch screen device.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Heh. Every tablet I have ever seen is a smudge-fest.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd rather just use a standard distribution natively than have to play second-class under Google's thumb.
Re: (Score:2)
A gadget like this is going to make a lot of people people ask why they need an expensive, complicated, flaky and vulnerable Windows/Office box at all.
Re: (Score:2)
You can easily run pretty much any kind of Linux in a chroot on your Android device (once it's rooted). I had Ubuntu running on my Nexus One, just for fun.
The only catch is that you need to use VNC to connect to the running GUI apps. As I recall, there was some project for X server for Android, but I don't know far that got.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah they may cost a fortune, have shit battery life and an OS that handles touch with the grace of a tambourine thief with Parkinson's. But hey, it'll keep your hands warm in the winter!