SatPhones — Why Can't They Make It Work? 337
RedEaredSlider writes "Satellite phones aren't as clunky as they once were, and technology has made them more powerful. Gone are the days when satellite phones had to be accompanied by a suitcase. Yet to date, the field is littered with bold attempts at a phone that could be used anywhere, without depending on earthbound cell phone networks. Billions have been invested, with relatively little to show for it. Part of the answer is debt. TerreStar is only the latest casualty of a crushing $1.2 billion debt load. The company introduced its Genus phone last month, but is in the middle of Chapter 11 proceedings. It's unclear that the phone will sell enough to help TerreStar stay in business, especially when it carries a $799 price tag."
It's not cost effective. (Score:5, Insightful)
Just another way of saying (Score:5, Insightful)
Saying that the problem is 'debt' is just another way of saying that the value of the service over traditional cell networks isn't enough to outweigh the enormous initial investment required.
Which makes sense. Satellites are enormously expensive and only a handful of people really get any benefit over a normal cell phone. For those who do find a benefit, there are more cost-effective ways of dealing with communication than launching dedicated satellites into orbit.
Is this a real question? (Score:5, Insightful)
But if not, I can hazard a guess why sat phones haven't taken off. Cost. Putting satellites in orbit is exponentially more expensive than putting up terrestrial towers. It's always going to cost a LOT more than cell phones. Combine that with the fact that the market of people who NEED sat phones because cells aren't good enough is very small. So you end up with expensive infrastructure, plus very small user base, that equals enormous individual consumer expense.
Anyone shocked by this revelation? anyone other than RedEaredSlider at least?
Not cost effective for casual user (Score:3, Insightful)
Isn't it obvious? (Score:4, Insightful)
Therefore, anywhere with more than a relatively low density of people who aren't penniless and living in their own filth and an absence of militias blowing up cell towers with impunity already likely has a superior GSM network of some sort.
Satellite has its niches, they just aren't big enough to spread the fixed costs, thus making calls extremely expensive, which doesn't make the niche any bigger. At present, the only reason they exist at all is that foolish investors took a huge bath on the project and then the corpse was snapped up for pennies on the dollar(almost certainly just so that the CIA could continue to chat with their BFFs in assorted hellholes without interruption).
Not much of a market (Score:4, Insightful)
The only people I see this of being a real use for, in any quantities making it worthwhile to pursue, is the military market, with researchers that operate in very remote areas being a smaller secondary market.
Who else is really going to be away from a traditional cellular network for long enough to need such a phone, outside of military and research folks? It just doesn't seem like a reasonable product for 99.9% of the population.
Just a bit more than an iPhone (Score:5, Insightful)
$799,- is just a bit more than a SIM-lock free iPhone costs. So the price is most probably not the problem.
Re:Let's see... (Score:2, Insightful)
3. Doesn't have Twitter client
That's a benefit, not a disadvantage! Twitter is for twits.
SatPhones — Why Can't They Make It Work? (Score:2, Insightful)
"...especially when it carries a $799 price tag."
Didn't this story answer itself with this last line?
Besides, the women I saw at the grocery store last week isn't going to pay this kind of money to yell into a sat phone about her husbands vasectomy. Oh wait, it won't work in the grocery store anyhow. Now that I think about it, all phones should be sat phones.
Re:Can't make a call from inside (Score:2, Insightful)
Um...why doesn't the sat phone provider build in a crappy little GSM/CDMA into the hand unit, and then gateway from the cell phone network into the sat phone (when needed, although I don't know why you'd do it that way). That way you can have your cake and eat it too, swapping from sat to cellphone as necessary.
Also, if the sat phone providers were any way more business 'savvy', they'd way oversell the service like any internet/mobile phone provider anyhow. Charge $199 for the unit and make a monthly fee/super expensive phone packages.
Satellite is still like any other Satellite Servic (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Yeah, but it comes with cool perks (Score:2, Insightful)
RING RING!
"Just a minute honey. Sip on that martini while I get this satellite call"
"HELLO?? Yes. WHAT? Sorry, I can't hear you I'm indoors. YOU ARE BREAKING UP. WHAT? I'LL HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PARKING LOT TO TALK TO YOU. WHAT?"
"Sorry honey, I guess I gotta go. I guess the blowjob is off?"
Re:It's not cost effective. (Score:3, Insightful)