No Hand-Held Devices In Ontario Cars 584
NIK282000 writes "To cut down on accidents caused by drivers who aren't paying attention, in Ontario it is now a ticketable offense to text, email, or navigate with your GPS while driving. But it seems to me that they have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because it is now also a $500 fine to change your radio station, change songs on your MP3 player, or even drink your morning coffee. It can also be enforced to the point where changing the climate controls on your dash can get you fined because it requires you to take your hands off the wheel. Though this was a good idea, it seems to have been taken a little too far."
RTFS (Score:5, Informative)
The law applies to handheld electronic devices. So unless your coffee mug is electronic or your climate control is handheld you are probably fine with coffee and a nice temp in your car
Steering Wheel Controls (Score:2, Informative)
Re:RTFS (Score:5, Informative)
The law contains exceptions for EVERYONE to use a cell phone to call 911. So whether it's you calling the police, or the police calling the police, it's the same rules.
FTFA:
I don't see any real problem here ... the REAL problem I see is that you get bus drivers, etc., still yacking on their cell phones despite the laws in place.
Terrible Summary (Score:5, Informative)
Copy/pasting for those not interested in downloading the pdf:
What would not be allowed while driving, unless the vehicle is pulled off the roadway or lawfully parked
* Hand-held wireless communications devices such as cell phones, smartphones
* Hand-held electronic entertainment devices such as iPods, or other portable MP3 players, or portable games
* Texting and emailing
* Viewing display screens on devices not required for driving such as a laptop or DVD player
What would be allowed while driving
* Hands-free wireless communications devices with an earpiece or Bluetooth device
* 911 calls
* Pressing the button of a hand-held device to activate hands-free mode for incoming or outbound calls
* GPS units mounted on dashboards
* Collision avoidance systems
* Use by emergency services personnel such as police, fire and ambulance
* Logistical transportation tracking devices used for commercial vehicles
Re:RTFS (Score:4, Informative)
The law also contains a blanket exemption for *all* emergency vehicles. Fire/Ambulance as well as Police.
As for the why, it's because those emergency vehicles need to be able to use the radio to stay in touch with dispatch and be able to actually perform their emergency services. There's an exemption for professional uses as well... so that truck drivers and bus drivers can use their radios, too, but I don't think it applies to would-be "professionals" with a mobile office using the cell phone.
Irregardless, TFS is completely wrong and FUD. The law applies to hand-held devices. Cell phones, Nintendos, portable DVDs, GPS devices, etc.. It does not apply to drinking coffee, changing the radio station, or even people who like to drive with one arm hanging out the window.
Re:I'm a west coast Canadian (Score:5, Informative)
You do realize that this particular law is in place in Ontario and Quebec because we were following suit from Alberta and BC?
Re:Terrible Summary (Score:4, Informative)
Re:RTFS (Score:1, Informative)
Irregardless, TFS is completely wrong and FUD. The law applies to hand-held devices. Cell phones, Nintendos, portable DVDs, GPS devices, etc.. It does not apply to drinking coffee, changing the radio station, or even people who like to drive with one arm hanging out the window.
Irregardless? We let the illiterate on slashdot now?
Re:Why we'll never solve distracted driving (Score:3, Informative)
Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book (Score:5, Informative)
Re:RTFS (Score:3, Informative)
Cell phones aren't police radios. The original poster wasn't talking about police radios.
Re:Get off your high horse (Score:3, Informative)
Everyone has a right to travel. No one has the right to endanger others.
I generally agree with your post, and normally I don't like picking nits, but, in Canada, mobility rights are enshrined in the Constitution.
6. (1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right
(a) to move to and take up residence in any province; and
(b) to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
There are some qualifications to those rights that allow provinces to make laws that require a person to be resident in a province before they can collect social support, and there's protection for affirmative action laws, but otherwise, a Canadian is free to go where she wishes.
Re:WTF? (Score:3, Informative)
This law has nothing to do with drinking coffee while driving, despite what the summary says. It's specifically targeted and hand-held electronics devices.
Re:why no hands-free police radios? (Score:4, Informative)
Remember its a policeman's word against yours - at least with two of the buggers you've got a chance of one of them being straight-up.
Wow... across the ocean but it sounds like another planet.
Over here, there are three mutually exclusive groups of people, as far as a cop is concerned.
1) Cops.
2) Cops' families.
3) Bad guys.
Making there be 2 of them is padding the odds for them, not us.
Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book (Score:3, Informative)
But, you know, no need to get facts in the way of a good story. I mean, it's not like you could have found this stuff at the top link in google or anything.
Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book (Score:3, Informative)
Unless your vehicle is considered a place of business (like a highway tractor, for instance) in which case it is against the law to smoke a cigarette while driving in Ontario.
Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book (Score:3, Informative)
According to that website, as long as your iPod is connected to your car stereo, there is no need for a mount. I also noticed that the exact wording of the law is absent from the website, which seems rather odd, and makes it difficult to verify the claim.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)