What The Banned iPhone Ad Should Really Look Like 463
Barence writes "To demonstrate just how misleading the latest (and now banned) iPhone television ad really is, PC Pro has recreated it using an iPhone 3G and a Wi-Fi connection — with laughable results. Apple was forced to pull the advert today after the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) decided it exaggerated the speed of mobile browsing. 'In the 30-second clip the iPhone is shown loading a webpage, finding its current location in Google Maps, opening a PDF from an email and finally taking a phone call. The ASA concluded that the iPhone cannot do what was shown in the mere 29 seconds afforded in the advert, ruling that it was misleading.' Try it for yourself and you'll undoubtedly agree."
This is tipical for apple (Score:5, Interesting)
Apple should really be slapped for repeatedly misrepresenting [brej.org] their products. I will buy a beer to anyone who can find a single photo of any of their products on the store website. Every single one has been hand generated usually with incorrect proportions.
No, this is typical for virtually anyone selling (Score:4, Insightful)
Who doesn't? Went to Wendy's the other day and got a #2 combo because it looked pretty awesome on the order board. Got back to the office and opened it up to discover something pretty gross looking, a mash of squashed bun and grey meat. Yum. This isn't a rare case, and is pretty much the norm of advertising.
Are you as awesome as your resume paints you to be?
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Funny)
I'm even awesomer! I left off all the parts about how I can play drums, my massive Spawn toy collection, and my mad pepper-growing skillz.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You're HIRED!
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:4, Funny)
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Insightful)
Uh their ad showed it to be 4x as good as it really is. If i went to wendys and got a 1/16th pounder i'd be pretty pissed. If on my resume I said I could build a bathroom to finished in 4hours they would likely be disappointed. Beyond that their speed was the WHOLE advertisement.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't start replies with Uh. It's combative and makes you look like a dink.
I'm hardly defending Apple here, but I think "4x as good" is rather ridiculous. While you seem to think a 1lb'r would be "4x as good" as a 1/4lb, in the Wendy's example I consider what I got 1/10th as satisfying as what's promised on the board (and it would be even worse if they just stuck more meat on it). Instead
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Funny)
Quite right.
It was 4.86 times faster, cooler and better. In the PC Pro video it looked like celebrities in one of those "with&without makeup" slideshows. [youtube.com]
De-glamored and like just another mobile phone. Which nobody really needs.
Not at all like something hand-sculpted from pieces of the true cross and philosopher's stone by (female) virgins gently rubbing their pelvises over the aforementioned imaginary artifacts.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Funny)
Son, if this is how you think a good cell phone is created... well, lets just say you appear to have a few serious issues that would be best dealt with in long term counseling.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Funny)
Well duh, of course cell phones are not made this way, which is why the iPhone is so superior.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:4, Insightful)
Just to make sure I have this right, do you mean to imply that telling people how they should express themselves is not combative and does not make you look like a "dink"? Or is this more of an "it's okay when I do it" situation?
I think the only reason why Apple might appear exceptional is because they were required to pull the ads. Normally advertisers use various propaganda techniques to give a certain impression that may be true or false but they do it without actually making verifiably false statements. They might say "9 out of 10 dentists recommend brand X toothpaste!" instead of "9 out of 10 dentists recommend brand X toothpaste after we paid them a large amount of money!" even though both would be true and even though they only asked 10 individuals instead of doing anything remotely like a proper study of a representative sample.
I very much like your idea about fast-food advertisements. I don't think the burgers in the ads are even edible most of the time (lots of plastic or other things you really wouldn't want to eat) although I regret that I don't have a source/reference handy. Advertising in general, or at least the way it is currently done, is something that I believe a more enlightened society would view as either a great evil or at least a corrupting influence. It's a happy smiling face on what is straight up manipulation and the power of its influence is often underestimated. If it were otherwise, then why the need to exaggerate, misrepresent, and selectively omit facts (not just talking about Apple)?
Healthy people who can think for themselves don't need to be constantly told what to eat, what to drink, where to go, what to buy, for whom to vote, etc. They just need to know what their options are, which is a far simpler affair. To give what I hope isn't a bad analogy, it would be more like "client pull" and less like "server push". I consider obsolete or irrelevant any business model that would collapse if this were the norm, no matter how large or widespread it may be.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Interesting)
I think it's an evolutionary result, though. Industrial manufacturing introduced a glut of consumer goods to the world, and made it possible that multiple players could be in the same market trying to sell essentially the same thing, or at least the same thing with normally imperceptible differences. One company who advertises could take a market-share far disproportionate to the comparative advantage they have against a company with a similar product, but no advertising. Increased publicity ability gave the means, and anyone outside the competition really just can't compete.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I thought the job of today's advertising is to warn smart people about what not to buy because it needs serious marketing dollars to move it off the shelves.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Please don't spread this around. I'm rather hoping that the advertising agencies take this as a "we're going to come down harder on misleading advertising" rebuke rather than a "you didn't use enough weasel words" rebuke. People like you might give them the wrong idea, no matter how true.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Funny)
Don't start replies with Uh.
Correct as you are, I can't help but giggle at the irony :P
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's why the ad had a countdown timer at the bottom of the screen showing how long it took to perform those tasks. Oh, wait. It didn't.
What it did do is claim that you can accomplish these tasks quickly by using an iPhone communicating at 3g speeds.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Obvious to who? Someone who is seeing all these Apple ads and talking about how much "different" and "better" the iPhone is? Looking up an address without text entry? Might be "obvious" that there's some kind of "automagically linking addresses in text", or "copy and paste", but there's not, too. The selling point of this ad was just how, quote, "really really fast" everything was on an iPhone, except it's not, n
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Whatever it was, it wasn't "copy and paste." The iPhone can't do that.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think the burger comparison is even worth pursuing; that was a $5 burger at a fast food outlet, and theoretically an employee who took the time to make a good one could have given you a burger that looked like the advertised one.
It's more like if Dell advertised a laptop with hardware specs from 2 years ago and showed it playing Crysis at 40fps. When you got home and your frame rate was 10fps you wouldn't think "oh it's just an ad, I should have expected them to exaggerate the performance"
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think the burger comparison is even worth pursuing; that was a $5 burger at a fast food outlet, and theoretically an employee who took the time to make a good one could have given you a burger that looked like the advertised one.
Assuming said employee had access to toothpicks, Elmer's glue, food coloring, clear epoxy, road salt and black paint, I hope you meant. Food in commercials is constructed like skyscrapers.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's an ad about a $200+ phone, demonstrating how fast the phone is,
I see it more as an ad demonstrating the variety of things it can do. As much as I hate apple, the misleading part appears to be a side effect in this case.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't think the burger comparison is even worth pursuing; that was a $5 burger at a fast food outlet, and theoretically an employee who took the time to make a good one could have given you a burger that looked like the advertised one.
As a member of the exclusive club of former fast-food employees, I can tell you that it's not only theoretically possible, but occasionally required! Fast food places are regularly audited by their parent company - if you're working the kitchen when corporate comes to audit, you'll be expected to assemble a burger that looks exactly like the advertisement, down to the placement of the pickles and those neat overlapping onions, in under 15 seconds. If you screw it up, the auditor will ream you, and show yo
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Quantifying "goodness" hasn't really got much to do with it. Here are a few things to consider.
1. The main point of the ad, no the whole point of it was how fast the iPhone performed.
2. It is not a case of puffery, but appears to be an entirely formal and objective demonstration.
3. They used an edited video to show off the fast performance despite the fact that the phone is not capable of performing like that.
Typical, indeed. (Score:3, Insightful)
Indeed.
Further, it's pretty obvious why the commercial is really laid out in the fashion it is: It shows off far more features and how they work together than would be possible otherwise.
I'm all for truth in advertising, but only if we're going to apply the same higher standards to everyone. To me this judgement seems both absurd and targeted.
Last, what alternative are we pushing for with judgements like this? More ads that don't even really feature the product or service being pimped? I know
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
2) The Apple ad started with a web page that was previously cached before they clicked on a link. The Pc Pro guys started from google, had to type in the URL, then wait for the page to load... that was a HUGE chunk of time over what the ad was doing.
Basically between the two videos, both are not accurate and I agree with pulling the Apple ad - but the Apple ad is way more representative of real world use than the PC Pro video. I don't see you (or anyone else chastising Apple) complaining about those missteps, I wonder what your motivations could be... Apple Hater.
You are right! I know that in real world web surfing, I always make sure to preload various websites before I actually go to them. I like to go to every website I might encounter throughout the week every Sunday night, because then, when I encounter them on Thursday, they load ultra fast! The news sites were tricky, but ever since I got that flux capacitor installed next to my heat sink, caching future events in my web browser has gotten a whole lot easier. By the way, sorry, but I modded you down next
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:4, Informative)
Not even mentionning that the iPhone used is not an iPhone 3G but an iPhone Edge (CPU speed and other factors actually do matter in these tests) and that the demo starts with the iPhone turned off in the PCPro demo. And they don't zoom with double tap, they go to "big" websites, etc...
I am not saying the Apple version was realistic, but hey, the PCPro one is just as biaised in the other direction.
True, but shouldn't be. (Score:5, Insightful)
It is the norm. It should not be.
I believe that the standard should be that the advertisement must show an accurate representation of the average product as it will be delivered to the consumer. To do otherwise, is fraud.
That includes Wendy's and all the rest of the fast-food crowd. In fact, pretty much all food advertising. (Many years ago the Wall Street Journal had a very funny article about making food adverts. Jello was mixed at several times the usual concentration to keep it solid under the lights. Tensions got high on the set and someone hurled a jello chunk at someone else. The other person ducked and the jello rebounded off the wall like a superball.)
How about stores? I sure wish the nearby Safeway were bright, clean and open instead of old, dingy and cramped.
The before/after pics for weight-loss schemes would be pretty funny.
Oh, sorry. Lost myself for a moment there. Forgot that it is our Patriotic Duty to buy into the advertising fantasies in order to keep the economic fantasy growing.
Re:True, but shouldn't be. (Score:4, Interesting)
You're right that they should be honest, but no ads are. Yet most of the arguments against the ad being banned are that everyone is doing the same thing. Well maybe I'm an idiot but doesn't that then make the point that we ought to enforce such a standard on all ads then? If they're all lying then they all should be punished, rather than allowing everyone to lie as much as they want.
The "they're doing it too" excuse is just weak overall. Maybe you could argue that the standards are applied unevenly, but still that's only a good argument for applying the standard evenly rather than dropping all standards whatsoever.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. I tell the truth. ("Telling the truth" doesn't mean bad in any case.)
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:3, Funny)
You forget that those burgers are paid professional models (I mean, take a look at their buns!) Do they have to be taken up close? And those bottled drinks...do they always have to glisten with small drops of sweat?
I heard some of them were real bitchy divas too...
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Informative)
I mean, some car manufacturer recently ran a TV ad in Germany where they deconstructed the usual car ad by gradually switching off the humans (all professional models), the beautiful scenery (completely computer-generated), the brilliant highlights on the car (ditto), the majestic music and finally the street. I don't remember which car it was but the ad strikes me as insightful - it shows just how much of the ads you see has to do with the actual car (not much at all, not even the car's appearance is realistic).
Ads lie. Ads lie all the time. Do not expect anything you hear in an ad to be remotely true, apart fom "product XYZ exists".
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:3, Insightful)
This isn't a rare case, and is pretty much the norm of advertising.
While technically true, I'm more of a glass half-empty sort of guy: I say that the norm is for poor product delivery - and seems to apply to more than just the fast food gang. The trouble isn't that advertising exaggerates (which it does) - the problem is that the products are lousy and rather than improve product, the dollar-dollar-bill-y'all goes to advertising.
Re:No, this is typical for virtually anyone sellin (Score:5, Informative)
Who doesn't? Went to Wendy's the other day and got a #2 combo because it looked pretty awesome on the order board.
Got back to the office and opened it up to discover something pretty gross looking, a mash of squashed bun and grey meat. Yum.
I actually worked at Wendy's back in high school, and we did a challenge once where we tried to make the food look like the 'order board' to use your words. Turns out its not that hard... but
1) You had to use fresh toasted buns straight off the toaster
2) You had to 'cherry pick' things like lettuce and tomatoes.
3) You had to have someone who really knew how to work 'grill' to get perfect looking meat.
4) Most importantly - you couldn't wrap it up. You had to serve it unwrapped. Wrapping ALWAYS squashes it to at least some degree, and meat drippings and condiment get spread to the wrapper.
That said, a significant percentage of burgers actually look a lot like the advertising, prior to wrapping, when made by competent staff.
So...I'm not saying Wendy's isn't false advertising, but in their case at least, the real food CAN actually look like the ads, even though it usually doesn't. So at least they aren't showing food that simply can't come out of their 'kitchens'.
Re:This is tipical for apple (Score:5, Funny)
Chick? (Score:5, Funny)
Not much different from (Score:2)
"you take the shirt, you put it in the water, you wash it you wash it... you riiiince, you riiince. you smell... it smells like a flower!
you take the underwear, you put it in the water, you wash it you wash it... you riiiince, you riiince. you smell... you put it in the water, you wash it you wash it..."
Re: (Score:2)
And who really thinks that what they show in the ads are the truth?
Re: (Score:2)
Great, I'll remember that next time I buy a frozen pizza that doesn't even resemble the picture on the packaging...
Citroen has a commerical of one of there cars transforming into a robot, don't see many of those on the streets either. And in broadband commercials I see people downloading full HD movies in about 3 seconds over a 20Mbit connection.
There's nothing Apple about this, everything in marketing and advertisements is fake, exaggerated or just outright untrue and misleading.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, if they also spelled out "What's great about this product is that you get something that looks like THIS!" in their advertisement, I'd get the picture someone would complain.. Had the Apple ad plainly told "iPhone is great, it can do all this" without emphasizing on the speed, few people would have problem with that.
Goes over most people's heads (Score:3, Interesting)
Most people would view this commercial and think, wow, you can do all that with a phone? I want one!
By the time they have bought it and figured out how to run it, they'll long since have forgotten how speedy it looked in the advert.
Ads aren't supposed to be starkly realistic. Just think how awful they'd all be if they were.
For example, most car companies don't show you the sad realities of operating their vehicles in traffic. I think a realistic portrayal should include an occasional collision ("note how
Re: (Score:2)
I'd interpret it as "all those other adds shouldn't have run"
It's still false advertising even if everyone is doing it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So what? (Score:5, Funny)
SOLD, bitches!
Re: (Score:2)
I want my money back so I can pay my phone sex bill.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
That would make me a Porn star in Japan, you insensitive clod!
Jeez... (Score:4, Insightful)
The commercial is done by the time they finish with Google.
Maybe if they'd put a warning similar to "screen images simulated, not really an iphone, 5x speed, etc." it wouldn't have been pulled.
1 million dollars for reading this post! (Score:5, Interesting)
This ruling was made in the UK. We have slightly different advertising standards to the US. In the UK, the sort of thing you're suggesting is not allowed:
I will give you all 1 million dollars* for reading this post!
.
.
*1 million imaginary dollars
Re:1 million dollars for reading this post! (Score:5, Funny)
So I can rotate those dollars 90 degrees and they are real dollars?
Re:1 million dollars for reading this post! (Score:5, Interesting)
Whoa, slow down there, bucko - I think you might confusing rotation with projection.
Project those imaginary dollars onto the real axis and you'll get exactly what this post is worth!
Homework assignment: Using this reasoning, show the recent financial troubles could have been predicted using simple vector analysis. Bonus points from computing the cross-product of Al Greenspan and Warren Buffet.
App store (Score:5, Insightful)
There's a similar advert for the app store here in the UK. It has some guy instantly downloading and using games, location software and so on. It has an amusing "actual sequence speeded up" disclaimer at the bottom, rather like those cosmetics adverts that say "some post-processing done on model".
Why don't they just say "this advert is a total lie, but it looks pretty and you're a gullible moron, so buy buy buy!"
What bugs me about the app store advert is that it finishes saying "this is going to change everything!" No, it isn't - it's another incremental improvement on smart phones, which is quite similar to many competing products. Ever since I found out about the reality distortion field [wikipedia.org] I've started noticing that Apple try to use this in all their advertising.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple is no different than any other company in that regard. Haven't you ever seen a MSFT commercial where they say Vista is fast and secure?
You can't use your desktop that fast either. It just takes time to actually use the products they are showing. And over 3g connections it is slow.
Re: (Score:2)
We don't have those disclaimers here across the pond yet. I find mascara adverts most annoying in their false eyelash using false advertisementness.
Re:App store (Score:4, Informative)
It is the UK advert that has been banned.
Wait, wait, wait... (Score:4, Insightful)
You're telling me there's an organization that actually checks advertisements for false and misleading information, and has the power to pull blatant lies off the air? When did this happen?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You're telling me there's an organization that actually checks advertisements for false and misleading information, and has the power to pull blatant lies off the air? When did this happen?
I was going to mod you funny, then I saw your sig. Since there is no '+5 listened to H2G2 Series 2', I had to comment instead :)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
'Well, actually, RedBull helps temporarily restore wakefulness when experiencing fatigue or drowsiness.'
Re:Wait, wait, wait... (Score:4, Informative)
You're telling me there's an organization that actually checks advertisements for false and misleading information, and has the power to pull blatant lies off the air? When did this happen?
1962. [wikipedia.org] That's in the UK, though. I don't think we have anything like that in the U.S.
Re:Wait, wait, wait... (Score:5, Insightful)
Beauty treatments (Score:4, Insightful)
Its a shame that the ASA doesn't come down with the same force on the incessant bombardment of beauty treatments we have with obviously fake material in them. I mean there is one for getting rid of deep set wrinkles, in the before shot the actress is frowning, in the after shot she's not. Viola! The wrinkles have gone!
I guess the problem is that the there isn't the degree of competitive scrutiny going on. All of the beauty companies pull the same trick so no one wants to upset the Apple cart.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder where it should end? In some ways, I wish the ASA would actually take a moral stance on adverts too.
You're right that cosmetics adverts are appalling, but in my view perfume adverts are even worse. Since all scents are basically a matter of preference and cost nothing to produce, all you're paying for is the marketing and the image you feel it projects. This is a bit dubious to a geek like me, but I accept that this is an aspirational lifestyle product and therefore must be advertised as such.
What
Re: (Score:2)
In conclusion: the human race is doomed. (why do all my Slashdot posts seem to end with this conclusion?)
Because it's the truth.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The easiest way to spot a scent ad is to look if it appe
Re:Beauty treatments (Score:5, Funny)
That's a stupid idea.
--
The human race is doomed.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
For those of you that don't know Cadbury are a chocolate company that are big in the UK and Ireland, I'm not sure if their products are sold elsewhere. They are most popular for their milk chocolate, not to get into a flame war about chocolate, but for mass produced stuff it bloody good :)
Anyway here's a Youtube link [youtube.com] to ad.
Also for some reason every time
News at 11! (Score:5, Insightful)
Next up: Giant footsteps in Alaska not done by Yetis - Signs of prehistoric giantmice found.
Whatever... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Whatever... (Score:5, Funny)
I don't really think I can drive 60mph on a sheet of ice like I see in BMW commercials all the time
You can, its just the ending that would differ somewhat from the commercial. More crunching sounds for one thing...
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I noticed that too, but I don't remember seeing that previously. It was probably a change apple made in advance of the ASA ruling to show willing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
like all of them? (Score:2)
So there's a line for "acceptable lies" and "too much of a lie"?
Because, if you know any TV ad that does not paint the product in a better light than the real world, I'd really like a youtube link. Yes, it is misleading. That's what advertisement is all about, isn't it? Yeah, that supermodel has really great hair after using that shampoo... and two conditioners (not shown), a very expensive hairdresser (not shown) and two hours in the make-up room (not shown). Let's not even get started about car ads.
I gues
Re:like all of them? (Score:4, Insightful)
Something else the advert didn't reflect... (Score:5, Informative)
I would expect this if I was visiting weird websites, but I'm talking about sites like Slashdot, BBC News etc. The entire page can be loaded, and I can be halfway through a Slashdot comments page and Safari will crash, I haven't even hit anything that should trigger Safari to do anything other than scroll down the page!
On another note, on every iPhone or iPod Touch device I have used (one first gen iPhone, one 3G iPhone and two iPod Touches), Safari has one hell of a difficult time picking up link clicks on the BBC News website - I haven't had any problems elsewhere, just on the BBC News site. It manifests itself as a total lack of registering the fact that I am clicking on a link, with Safari only reacting at all either after I have held down the click for several seconds, or zoomed right in and clicked then. Has anyone else experienced this?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Ah, to mod up, or reply. I was having this exact same problem, safari would crash sometimes when the page seemed to be attempting to render, sometimes when i'd scroll, and some times if a dog barked. This was happening upwards of five times a day. So I googled it, followed suggestions and cleared history, cache, cookies, but that didn't help. Then I disabled javascript and add-ons, and changes allow cookies to from visited, and it hasn't crashed in two days. Hope it works for you, b/c it was getting bad
Totally Unfair (Score:5, Insightful)
Okay, that was BS.
I'm certain that Apple sped things up for the commercial. Big whoop. But I would have been a lot more sympathetic if PC Pro had done anywhere near a realistic comparison.
The ad starts with the phone unlocked, and the user opening Safari to a pre-loaded page. The fumbling PC Pro fingers slowly unlock the phone and go to Google to find the page, rather than even entering the URL or opening a bookmark!
How about a realistic comparison? I'd like to see how fast the iPhone can work, not how slow your damn sausage-fingers are at molesting it.
WARNING: iPhone 3G browsing speeds may be impeded if you're an idiot.
How the ad got banned (Score:5, Informative)
Seems to me Apple didn't really defend this one very appropriately, but then again, who cares?
Pfffffft (Score:5, Funny)
I can do all those things on my iPhone 3G and at the same time drive my car at 100 mph over twisty mountain roads while an exhausted super model runs her hand over my ultra smooth face (which I shaved in one stroke with my 9 bladed razor) and tells me how great I shag since I started taking Erectzor.
Anyone who can't is a pansy.
trudat!!!! (Score:3, Funny)
Either the cretins at PCPro Mag are morons... (Score:5, Interesting)
...Dishonest, or just incompetent. The same goes for the UK Ad council responsible for demanding the ad be pulled. I couldn't help but make a video this morning to see what the results should really look like...
Try 48 secs and that is with me flubbing a bit, waiting for GPS to lock and timing a call to myself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwbZkkJhfcA [youtube.com]
I don't even like my iPhone that much, but there are better reasons to dislike it than simply fabricated, untruthful criticisms.
Re:Either the cretins at PCPro Mag are morons... (Score:5, Informative)
You are not testing the same thing. The UK advert was promoting fast 3G browsing speed on the O2 network. Your video is clearly not using O2's 3G network - Google maps takes a lot longer to load up tiles than the 1/2 second or so it does in your video. And you don't do the full claim - "finding directions" is not the same as starting Google maps, zooming in, and exiting. In fact, you don't appear to use the keyboard at all in your video, so apparently you're just loading pre-generated data, and not actually carrying out any of the tasks the adverts says are being carried out.
I generally avoid responding to AC's... (Score:3, Insightful)
...especially those who insult me, but to make it clear, it is not a question of the ad being truthful so much as PCPro being full of shit. If you cannot understand the difference, then you are the dense one. If I can recreate the series of actions in 48 secs on my first 'attempt' then PCPro is clearly distorting the 'truth'.
Unless you are simply biased, and note I am the first to say that the iPhone is not the second coming, to criticize any company's advertising on such a tiny, nit-picking issue is moro
The recreation is a little misleading too. . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe it's meant to reflect the actual user experience, but they spend a lot more time diking around with websites than the iPhone add. They load two webpages instead of one, and spend time scrolling around those webpages, where as the add merely shows the phone zooming in. They also enter the URL manually, while the add shows them only loading a link. They also spend time scrolling around the PDF document, while in the add the user receives a call immediately after the PDF has loaded. Not to mention that they obviously used different sites and files. They also started from the unlock screen instead of the home screen. You can't call something a recreation if you didn't even try to recreate the add.
Why didn't they actually try to recreate the add ? The iPhone is obviously not that fast over a 3G network (though it is that fast over a 802.11 connection in my experience). What is it about journalists that makes them think they need to exaggerate things that are already plenty bad?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
This is where I stopped reading.
Re:Not a good example (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, I did the whole test and did it in 42 seconds on 3G. Here are the results:
14 seconds to load the apple iphone page (the main google page loads in about 8)
10 seconds to load my location on gps
10 seconds to load a pdf attachment from an email (exchange, 100KB pdf)
8 seconds to call my house (I dialed it directly).
The same test took about a minute an a half on wireless (my iphone doesn't gps well on wireless and took over a minute).
My iphone is not unlocked either, and I am on Rogers in Canada. Maybe our 3G is different, but I doubt it. Also, the same pdf from a pop3 account took 36 seconds, so that might also make a difference.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
> 'Cause the iPhone doesn't have WiFi.
You sure about that, chief?
'cause I can somehow connect to the AP in my house, and I'm pretty sure it's not a 3G base station.
The grandparent DID miss one thing, though -- the location test. He can't do it properly on his touch, since AFAIK the touch doesn't have an adaptive GPS unit. It just tries to guess based on known locations of nearby WiFi APs.
I just tested mine, it took about 15 seconds to narrow down my location to a region about 1/2 mile in radius. And it
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Notice that PC Pro had to unlock the phone, whereas Apple already had the phone unlocked. There are other instances in the video where the PC Pro demonstrator fumbled to press the right button. All of these things add up the time significantly. Apple didn't need any special effects at all to cut down on the time PC Pro gives us.
Oh please, you freaking shill. So he fumbled a few buttons... did he fumble FIVE TIMES AS LONG as the advert? Hell no, don't be an idiot.
The ad is a lie. Just like "It just works" campaign is a lie. Apple is full of lies.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Not a good example (Score:4, Funny)
And he used wifi instead of Apple's lightning fast 3G network!
Re: (Score:2)
The point was they were advertising the speed of the product which was a total lie and they made it seem realistic. Its not like the slogan for blackberry is 'Blackberry Storm - it can magically fix neon lights from across the street' if it is I take it back. Plus the magic is not realistic... like why axe commercials aren't banned.
Re:Vodafone Blackberry Storm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Vodafone Blackberry Storm (Score:5, Insightful)
Just to clarify, if the Apple advert says "Fast browsing" then you will most likely focus on the time it takes to browse in the advert, so it isn't immediately obvious that that might not be "true".
On the other hand, it's pretty easy to guess that you couldn't fix a light in another building from your phone. And that a Citroen C4 doesn't transform into a dancing robot
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
On the other hand, it's pretty easy to guess that you couldn't fix a light in another building from your phone. And that a Citroen C4 doesn't transform into a dancing robot
Noooooooooo!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The phrase "self-centered prick" comes to mind.
Nah, it's just that the negligible cost associated with producing each additional stream of packets of information really turns the internet into a socialized information utopia. See, I pay for my internet connection. You pay for yours. That should be it.
But the telcos are the ones really cashing in, as they have been ever since the first telegraph line. They have the capacity. The fiber is laid, and our monthly fees