> There was no fraud, don't be paranoid. > There was no fraud in significant numbers. > There was no widespread fraud. > There was fraud but that's a good thing. [ WE ARE HERE ]
#2 is correct: There was no fraud in significant numbers.
Of the fraud that was caught, the majority of it was fraudulent votes... for Trump.
By the way, there is only one state for which most of the voting machines don't have a paper trail, and hence you have to simply rely on the software vote count. In that state the legistlature deliberately dragged their feet on upgrading and adding security to their voting system, despite federal money available to increase security.
"Fortifying" our elections! Riiiight? (Score:3)
https://time.com/5936036/secre... [time.com]
It's about time to tell these people "Fuck No" and make it stick.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
> There was no fraud, don't be paranoid.
> There was no fraud in significant numbers.
> There was no widespread fraud.
> There was fraud but that's a good thing. [ WE ARE HERE ]
Re: (Score:1)
#2 is correct: There was no fraud in significant numbers.
Of the fraud that was caught, the majority of it was fraudulent votes... for Trump.
By the way, there is only one state for which most of the voting machines don't have a paper trail, and hence you have to simply rely on the software vote count. In that state the legistlature deliberately dragged their feet on upgrading and adding security to their voting system, despite federal money available to increase security.
That state is Texas, which went for
Re:"Fortifying" our elections! Riiiight? (Score:2)
Do you have any ACTUAL evidence?
Of course not.