> There was no fraud, don't be paranoid. > There was no fraud in significant numbers. > There was no widespread fraud. > There was fraud but that's a good thing. [ WE ARE HERE ]
#2 is correct: There was no fraud in significant numbers.
Of the fraud that was caught, the majority of it was fraudulent votes... for Trump.
By the way, there is only one state for which most of the voting machines don't have a paper trail, and hence you have to simply rely on the software vote count. In that state the legistlature deliberately dragged their feet on upgrading and adding security to their voting system, despite federal money available to increase security.
Are you trying to back-handedly say that no poll watchers were denied entrance? Or that they were purposefully put at a distance from counters so they couldn't do their job? Or that they were deceived into leaving, only for counting to continue? Or that poll watchers weren't ejected?
Sorry, all of this happened.
Whether it was "widespread" or not is irrelevant. It happened. And it happened in an extremely tight race.
"Fortifying" our elections! Riiiight? (Score:3)
https://time.com/5936036/secre... [time.com]
It's about time to tell these people "Fuck No" and make it stick.
Re:"Fortifying" our elections! Riiiight? (Score:2, Insightful)
> There was no fraud, don't be paranoid.
> There was no fraud in significant numbers.
> There was no widespread fraud.
> There was fraud but that's a good thing. [ WE ARE HERE ]
Re: (Score:1)
#2 is correct: There was no fraud in significant numbers.
Of the fraud that was caught, the majority of it was fraudulent votes... for Trump.
By the way, there is only one state for which most of the voting machines don't have a paper trail, and hence you have to simply rely on the software vote count. In that state the legistlature deliberately dragged their feet on upgrading and adding security to their voting system, despite federal money available to increase security.
That state is Texas, which went for
Re: (Score:1)
Not the states that mysteriously flipped in the middle of the night after they stopped and kicked the watchers out? Rrrright.
Re: (Score:2)
It is very difficult to audit election results in states that do not exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you trying to back-handedly say that no poll watchers were denied entrance?
Or that they were purposefully put at a distance from counters so they couldn't do their job?
Or that they were deceived into leaving, only for counting to continue?
Or that poll watchers weren't ejected?
Sorry, all of this happened.
Whether it was "widespread" or not is irrelevant.
It happened.
And it happened in an extremely tight race.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have any ACTUAL evidence?
Of course not.