Since he's on a twitch stream he knows people are watching him play, so for example he would not do something like instantly fold KK preflop when an opponent has AA (the only possible better hand) - if he did that it would be extremely obvious he magically knew another player had AA. Instead he'll make a small raise as expected, then when the player with AA raises he'll act like its a really difficult decision for him then throw his cards away.
The problem is that you need to be fairly competent at poker
That's something I always wondered about, isn't that what they meant when they wrote "Jury of your peers"?
This guy's peers would be poker players and understand what's going on.
this was in contrast being tried by the king himself.
The notion that such a right applied to us commoners comes *much* later . ..
Also, fwiw, an impeachment is, roughly, a trial by the full jury of his peers, but instigated by Commons rather than a prosecutor. (or in the US, by the House before the Senate).
finally, impeachment is an exception to the usual US constitutional bar against bills of attainder; it is a very specific type of bill of attainder.
hawk
COMPASS [for the CDC-6000 series] is the sort of assembler one expects from
a corporation whose president codes in octal.
-- J.N. Gray
It's basically a certianty that he's cheating (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is that you need to be fairly competent at poker
Re:It's basically a certianty that he's cheating (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"peers" meant "the other lords of the realm".
this was in contrast being tried by the king himself.
The notion that such a right applied to us commoners comes *much* later . . .
Also, fwiw, an impeachment is, roughly, a trial by the full jury of his peers, but instigated by Commons rather than a prosecutor. (or in the US, by the House before the Senate).
finally, impeachment is an exception to the usual US constitutional bar against bills of attainder; it is a very specific type of bill of attainder.
hawk