Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Veoh once again beats UMG (after going out of business)->

Submitted by
NewYorkCountryLawyer
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "Veoh has once again beaten the record companies; in fact it has beaten them in every round, only to have been forced out of business by the attorneys fees it expended to do so. I guess that's the record companies' strategy to do an 'end around' the clear wording of the DMCA "safe harbor": outspend them until they fold. Back in 2009 the lower court dismissed UMG's case on the ground that Veoh was covered by the DMCA "safe harbor" and had complied with takedown notices. The record companies of course appealed. And they of course lost. Then, after the Viacom v. YouTube decision by the 2nd Circuit, which ruled that there were factual issues as to some of the videos, they moved for rehearing in UMG v. Veoh. Now, in a 61-page decision (PDF), the 9th Circuit has once again ruled that the statute means it says, and rejected each and every argument the record companies made. Sadly, though, it did not award attorneys fees."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Veoh once again beats UMG (after going out of business)

Comments Filter:

In any formula, constants (especially those obtained from handbooks) are to be treated as variables.

Working...