Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Orphaned works and the requirement to preserve metadata-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Orphaned works legislation promises to open older forgotten works to new uses and audiences. Groups like ASMP think it's inevitable. But it comes with the risk of defanging protection for current work when the creator cannot be located. Photographer Mark Meyer wonders if orphaned works legislation also needs language to compel organizations like Facebook to stop their practice of stripping metadata from user content in order to keep new work from becoming orphans to begin with. Should we have laws to make stripping metadata illegal?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Orphaned works and the requirement to preserve metadata

Comments Filter:
  • Stripping the metadata essentially is creating a derivative of the original work.

    If the original work creator so licenses their work (for example, by agreeing to terms of service and submitting their work to a service that creates derivative works and distributes them), they deserve it.

Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?

Working...