Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Google

+ - What The Final Decision On Oracle v. Google Really Means->

Submitted by
snydeq
snydeq writes "The jury decided yesterday that Google did not infringe on Oracle's patents related to Android. Fantastic news — but the wider view offers little comfort, writes Simon Phipps. 'While the specific news of the patent phase verdict is good news for most people, the case still tells a sad story about software patents. The complexity found by the jury shows why software patents fail to deliver on the contract with society that they should represent. Unlike real patents, software patents contain little of value to the programmer: no sample code, only stylized algorithms. Instead, they consist mainly of a list of ways a lawyer can assert that the patent has been infringed. Even then, they are linguistically complex, leaving juries scratching their heads to interpret.'"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

What The Final Decision On Oracle v. Google Really Means

Comments Filter:

"The Street finds its own uses for technology." -- William Gibson

Working...