Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones China Privacy Your Rights Online

China Smartphone Maker Xiaomi Apologizes For Unauthorized Data Access 64

SpzToid writes Following up an earlier story here on Slashdot, now Xiaomi has apologized for collecting private data from its customers. From the article: "Xiaomi Inc said it had upgraded its operating system to ensure users knew it was collecting data from their address books after a report by a computer security firm said the Chinese budget smartphone maker was taking personal data without permission. The privately held company said it had fixed a loophole in its cloud messaging system that had triggered the unauthorized data transfer and that the operating system upgrade had been rolled out on Sunday. The issue was highlighted last week in a blog post by security firm F-Secure Oyg. In a lengthy blogpost on Google Plus, Xiaomi Vice President Hugo Barra apologized for the unauthorized data collection and said the company only collects phone numbers in users' address books to see if the users are online."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Smartphone Maker Xiaomi Apologizes For Unauthorized Data Access

Comments Filter:
  • by Virtucon ( 127420 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:39PM (#47648963)

    Why is it considered okay to do this until you get caught? Then you apologize? How about not stealing the information in the first place for starters. Fuckwads!

  • by x0ra ( 1249540 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:39PM (#47648973)
    "It's easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission." ...
  • Please excuse us (Score:5, Insightful)

    by phorm ( 591458 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:41PM (#47649001) Journal

    We'll try to hide it better next time...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:52PM (#47649155)

    Why is it considered okay to do this until you get caught? Then you apologize? How about not stealing the information in the first place for starters. Fuckwads!

    Seems the only "Fuckwads" around here are us dumbass consumers who actually think that all those free apps we download wouldn't dare do the exact same fucking thing.

    The only real difference is you blindly agreed to the spying in the EULA you didn't bother to read.

  • by rodrigoandrade ( 713371 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:57PM (#47649213)
    A cheap high end smartphone. Apple couldn't do it, Nokia couldn't do it, Blackberry couldn't do it, Samsung couldn't do it, etc.

    If you're not paying with dollars, you're paying with something else...
  • by 0123456 ( 636235 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @01:57PM (#47649215)

    Of course, if the operating system actually had real user-level security controls, the apps wouldn't be able to do that.

    I can't see myself buying another Android device so long as they expect me to allow pretty much every possible permission for every piece of crap app that doesn't even need half of them.

  • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @02:23PM (#47649441)

    In a lengthy blogpost on Google Plus, Xiaomi Vice President Hugo Barra apologized for the unauthorized data collection and said the company only collects phone numbers in users' address books to see if the users are online.

    I realize there is some translation going on here, and that can sometimes lead to misinterpretation - but in what context can this possibly make any sense? Collecting phone numbers from your address book to see if you're online? Seriously?

  • by maroberts ( 15852 ) on Monday August 11, 2014 @02:31PM (#47649523) Homepage Journal

    Well in a roundabout way of thinking, its one of the simplest tests you can do to see if the phone can be accessed over the intertubes. All phones will have a contacts list/address book, so this will be supported by all Android phones.

    Of course, when you think about it however, you realize that its more than a little absurd and creepy.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 11, 2014 @02:43PM (#47649607)

    No, it wasn't lazy programming. It was broken by design.

    From the blog post:

    "A: For those interested in specific details about the MIUI Cloud Messaging implementation:

    - The primary identifiers used to route messages are the sender and receiver’s phone numbers. IMEI and IMSI information is also used to keep track of a device's online status."

    That's not a programming mistake.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 11, 2014 @03:43PM (#47650105)

    This is the stupidest logic I've read in a long time. It's like saying that if I apologize after raping you, then you shouldn't be angry at me for raping you. I mean, I apologized right! No harm, no foul.

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...