Why Does Amazon Want To Sell Its Own Smartphone, Anyway 60
curtwoodward (2147628) writes "Amazon is well-established as an e-commerce and cloud computing pioneer. So why do its ambitions include a bigger push into consumer electronics, including a long-rumored leap into the very competitive smartphone market? In a word, control — of data, consumer profiles, and royalties on purchases."
Re:Bottom pop up ads on slashdot (Score:5, Interesting)
A stillborn, hopefully...
Drones, baby. (Score:2)
Re:Drones, baby. (Score:5, Funny)
They'll come preloaded with heartrate monitors. When you die the drones will come for you like Valkeries.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
USDA Prime.
Re: Drones, baby. (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Smart customers can avoid being exploited for d (Score:5, Insightful)
Amazon understands piracy. Is so damned easy to order books on my Kindle I don't even bother to download them even though it'd save me $8. It's just not worth me getting out of my reading chair and dinking around with it. I can search for the book, click a button, viola. The prices aren't crazy and I can get my books when I want them. If the music and movie industries did something similar I'd probobly start paying them again as well. But when they still think they can manipulate how, when, and where I watch their content... force me to watch inane previews, bribe my TV manufacturer to limit its features... all just to extort the maximum profit out of me, it's just easier to pirate it.
Re:Smart customers can avoid being exploited for d (Score:5, Informative)
Except that you have no control over whether that book will remain on your Kindle. You just have to have faith that your books won't be revoked for $SomeRandomReason.
Famous example: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07... [nytimes.com]
More recent example: http://digitaljournal.com/arti... [digitaljournal.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd find the book "rental" via Amazon/Kindle would be more palatable if the price were lower - $1 per novel would put it into the "ok, fine, it's just a rental" category (despite being more expensive than a library ..). A cursory look finds kindle versions are 80-90% of the price of a dead tree version. That's not a sufficient discount to surrender control.
Re: (Score:2)
How many times do you generally read a novel you purchase? The minor risk that I won't be able to re-read a book some years from now because Amazon has folded or otherwise stopped honoring my purchase is an easy price to pay for the convenience. I enjoy the look of a well stocked home library as much as the next guy, but why really hoard stacks of books you will never open again?
There are other uses for the books. I regularly lend, to friends, some dead tree books that I bought more than ten years ago. Many were bought from Amazon...
Re: (Score:1)
Except that you have no control over whether that book will remain on your Kindle. You just have to have faith that your books won't be revoked for $SomeRandomReason.
Oh yes I do. I strip the DRM and keep copies on my computer. Easy as pie. I bought 'em, they are MINE.
Re: (Score:2)
Why is it that the purveyor of walled gardens is the last to get in on this? Apple's never removed content from people's devices. Sure, they've removed content, but if you have a backup copy (on your PC, say), it remains perfectly usable, even installable on new devices. All content too - music, movies, TV shows, books, apps.
It seems every OTHE
Re: (Score:2)
Thats fine, if they do that I'll just pirate it. I'm paying for the convenience of not having to go find the damned book.
Re: (Score:2)
This is one of the reasons I have not bought into the Amazon ecosystem.
GP is right - Amazon have largely solved piracy for the majority of users by simply making it way easier. As an avid reader and someone that has been almost exclusively reading e-books since about 2005, I love the idea of the Amazon ecosystem.
But I can't bring myself to buy a book that I then don't own. I understand the revoking is, when considered as a percentage of books, tiny - but the point is /it can happen/. I don't want their DRM
Re: (Score:2)
Buying books from Amazon is easy but buying music from Apple is too compl
Re: (Score:2)
I wouldn't know since I don't own an Apple computer. iTunes doesn't support Linux, and using it via windows nearly drove me insane with rage. My kindle doesn't even require a computer... just wifi. How would I get that music into my car? I'm sure there are answers to all these questions, but if they want my money they need to make it easier to buy the music than simply copying it to a USB stick and carrying it out to my car.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Buy from Apple without iTunes, an iPod touch/iPhone/iPad? No.
But they've been selling regular, non-DRM'ed AAC files for years now. The tunes play without any problem in my Nintendo DSi.
But music videos, TV shows and movies are still DRM'ed, AFAIK.
Re: (Score:2)
Ponies! (Score:2)
Wait until they sell ponies. Then you become the Amazon [wikipedia.org]!
No really!!! How long will it take before you become their pony? When will you be the drone? When will they get you to deliver their goods and be happy about it?
Re: (Score:2)
Have you seen Amazon's Mechanical Turk?
Re: (Score:2)
Which one are you talking about? Google, Facebook, Amazon, Visa, Equifax/Experian/Transunion, ...?
Apple (Score:3)
Didn't people ask the same thing when Apple, a computer company, started selling portable music players? And then again when they started selling phones?
Re: (Score:1)
Why does a company known for its search engine put out a mobile OS and their own mobile devices? Why doesn't anyone ask that around here?
Hey, same as Google! (Score:1)
But we don't dare speak badly of teh Googles!! here.
Google wants you to see their ads and mine your data. You are the product. Scream it from the rooftops! As much as we hear this endless drone about Facebook and we can see where Amazon can make the same move the truth of the matter is that Google is currently the industry leader in selling all your data to their customers. Even Facebook can't imagine the kind of data mining that Google does and Amazon can't imagine the exposure that Google gives to
Apple, Google, Amazon... (Score:2)
I don't care who it is, but the first company to give me a free-to-use, no monthly fee smartphone is getting me as a customer.
Re: (Score:2)
FTFM
Amazon's push into smartphones (Score:4, Insightful)
needs (Score:1)
By predicting their specific needs.
Predicting needs is easy: food, water, air, medical and sex.
All the data collection and analyzing shit is to try to get people to buy wants - shit they don't need.
Remember, our ecnomy is 70% consumption and aside from true needs, the rest takes marketing to get us to think we need tham.
Re: (Score:2)
Is it really what happened? Or are they struggling because the makers are now getting their parts from places like eBay and AliExpress? There's only so many parts that a hardware store can physically stock.
How long until they become a carrier/ISP? (Score:2)
Given the kinds and amount of data they want to move to end users, either directly via video or audio streaming/downloads or indirectly from their cloud infrastructure, having an "Amazon Device" only seems to be part of the equation.
With the future of net neutrality seriously in doubt and rent-seekers like Comcast holding their customer base hostage it seems like it would make sense for them to try to get into that market, too.
Google is approaching this, albeit teasingly and slowly to probably not scare reg
Gatekeeper (Score:2)
Every company and his dog would like to be the gatekeeper for your data. Only the top tier technology companies can take a shot at it: Google, Apple, MS, Amazon.
Portable checkout terminal (Score:3)
I suspect Amazon sees the smartphone as a portable checkout terminal. Rather than leave it open to any competitors, they want to own the OS and get a peek at what you're looking for. It's also a consumption device, and is the hook to selling movies, books, etc. It may be the case that they really don't want to be in the smartphone business, but fear what a competitor might do.
expand or die (Score:2)
Going into a new area such as smartphones keeps investors interested.
If they stopped expanding into new areas and technologies, then shareholders would start expecting them to make a profit and that has yet to happen at Amazon.
Re:expand or die (Score:4, Interesting)
In a previous /. topic, it was stated that shareholders want growth above everything, and that a firm with a market niche that was profitable was considered far less attractive than one that was operating at a net loss, but was expanding into new markets and buying out other companies [1].
Amazon is playing the market quite smartly. Shareholders want growth, Amazon is giving them what they want. I wouldn't be surprised to see an Amazon MP3 player (although that market is a tired one), if it kept the shareholders thinking the company was "growth-focused".
[1]: Maybe it is a good thing long-term. Buy companies like IBM or GE that are established and have stocks paying dividends, and hold those until this "growth" fad dies off and the stocks of functioning companies becomes mainstream again.
Wall-E was a documentary (Score:2)
Amazon = Buy 'n Large. I think that answers this and basically any other question about Amazon, ever.
Because of Google Play Store (Score:1)
Trusting Amazon vs. Trusting Google (Score:2)
In several conversations recently among various tech, marketing, and entrepreneurial/business types here in Austin, there has been near universal agreement on the following really interesting points of perception:
1) Google used to be trusted, but definitely is not trusted anymore. They have blown their trust and probably can never earn it back. A surprising number of people who were comfortable "running their company" on Google until recently are now actively looking for other alternatives, as they are t
Re: (Score:2)
BTW, all Amazon would have to do to get me onto their phone platform would be to build a modern WebOS phone (or something that works like it.) We still desperately need a platform that is really web-centric (web apps were first-class under WebOS - all of the "native" apps, including the dialer, were just web apps themselves that happened to be pre-loaded on the phone or tablet.)
That, and it really ticks me off to have brain damage on the iPhone that was elegantly fixed 20 years ago in PalmOS. (Including
DRTFA (Score:1)
Oh I couldn't possibly imagine any reason why amazon would want to break into the smartphone market at all. The Kindle Fire isn't overly successful with their own app store enabled and the google app store stripped out. They don't sell kindles at a loss so they can reap huge profits from their chunk of a digital content sale. No sir.
Come on.