Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Programming Windows

Microsoft Lays Out Money-Making Options For Windows Store Developers 85

tsamsoniw writes "With the release of Windows 8 just around the corner, Microsoft is eager to see its Windows Store well stocked with third-party, Metro-friendly apps. Hoping to get developers on board, the company has announced pricing structure, along with guidance and tools to help developers create trial versions of apps and set up lucrative in-app purchases."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Lays Out Money-Making Options For Windows Store Developers

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Fags and spics (Score:2, Insightful)

    by kurt555gs ( 309278 ) <<kurt555gs> <at> <ovi.com>> on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:03PM (#40740923) Homepage

    Actually, I just got a Nexus 7 tablet. M$ is done for. Apple should be scared.

  • Re:Fags and spics (Score:5, Insightful)

    by thetoadwarrior ( 1268702 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:07PM (#40740987) Homepage
    A smaller tablet with a lower resolution and all the ipad benefits (ie no SD card) and it's all controlled by an advertiser that wants me to hand over all my personal data. Where do I sign up?
  • by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:07PM (#40740989)
    Remember the good old days, when shareware developers built stuff that ran natively and didn't phone home?

    When open source developers built stuff that compiled natively and couldn't phone home?

    Yeah, Pepperidge farm and I remember.

    But then came "downloaders" (Look, Adobe Acrobat XYZ is only 1MB, never you mind the 90MB the 1MB "installer" is downloading in the background.)

    And finally came "apps" and "ecosystems", a world in which instead of having a locally-hosted .src.tar.gz/installer/executable that the user can install for him or herself, it all goes away to "the cloud", because it's just a bunch of HTML5 running in a stripped-down web browser that dignifies itself by calling itself a "container".

    I'm either getting old and becoming a luddite, or this industry has really taken a turn for the worse. Probably a little of both.

  • by xxxJonBoyxxx ( 565205 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:21PM (#40741225)

    Whereas you kept 100% revenues before, now you get to pay us 30% off the top AND rewrite your software, while pissing off your existing base (who still runs XP whenever they can).

    What's not to like?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:34PM (#40741393)

    If you just want to see somebody else win, then it's more logical to root for Apple since they're closer to winning.

    I did root for Apple for a long time until they started acting like little bitches with the patent bullshit.

  • by Sarten-X ( 1102295 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:34PM (#40741409) Homepage

    You and me both, kid...

    Frankly, what concerns me most about today's software ecosystem is the lack of concern for possession. Between subscription models and cloud services, paying for something gets you limited-time access in exchange for a permanent loss of money.

    Once upon a time, you could buy a program (or a license to it) and reasonably expect that the program would remain functional for the foreseeable future. Sure, it might not have the latest features or be compatible with the latest machine, but it'd work one way and stay that way. Now you've got a new interface to web apps every month, no expectation of permanence, and no recourse if your work disappears in a "service interruption".

    From an economics standpoint, I fear that this impermanence is devaluing the entire software industry. Since customers aren't getting anything permanent in exchange, they aren't as willing to pay as much (or anything) to purchase it. Since software is now expected to cost $10 or less for a mobile device, the notion that software is cheap is reinforced with every purchase made on a whim. Eventually the tragedy of the commons takes over, and the assumption is made that because the software costs so little to acquire, it also costs so little to produce. In turn, the pressure for low-profit software means there's no budget left for silly things like testing or support.

    Call me a cranky old fart if you like, but I'm starting to miss the days where software cost $10,000, but if you needed a bug fixed, you could get a technician on site to fix it in an hour. Sure it'd cost you another few hundred dollars, but it's still better than today's model where, if you're lucky, a bug that halts production might get a response after two weeks of jumping through customer service hoops in a third-world call center.

    Now get off my lawn.

  • by cpu6502 ( 1960974 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @04:59PM (#40741765)

    Will we still be able to get it, or should we buy our copies now?

  • by westlake ( 615356 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @05:05PM (#40741877)

    Whereas you kept 100% revenues before, now you get to pay us 30% off the top....

    You can be a very good programmer and a very bad salesman.

    To move your Windows product you had to place it where people would see it. Where it would stand out from the crowd. Places like Download,com

    You wanted entry into big box retail? Think 60 percent off the top and you'll be closer to the truth, .

  • by Nerdfest ( 867930 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @05:12PM (#40741969)

    Since iOS.

  • by Nerdfest ( 867930 ) on Monday July 23, 2012 @05:17PM (#40742055)

    And the proprietary connectors, and pretending to be police. Doing the embrace, extend, (with proprietary extensions of course) on perfectly good open standards (FaceTime, AirPlay, ePub) made MS look like amateurs at being evil as well.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 23, 2012 @05:40PM (#40742387)

    Actually, Ballmer is an old piece of shit that needs to die.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday July 24, 2012 @12:07AM (#40745353)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...