Don't Super-Size My Smartphone! 660
New submitter Steve Max writes "Editor Paul Ockenden wonders, 'Has anyone else noticed what's been happening to top-end smartphones recently? They've started to get big – really big. But do people really want that at the expense of carrying around such a huge, heavy lump of tech in their pocket?' The trend for bigger and bigger screens is clear, but is it what consumers want? Is it what you want?"
Bigger != Better (Score:3, Insightful)
I carried a Palm III and then a Handspring Visor for decade. I thought the size was the biggest negative. Now phones are even larger in height and width but a little thinner in most cases. Good grief. Which is why I looked around and got a tiny import Android phone with a puny 2.3" screen, just to carry something small for a change.
If I wanted to carry a tablet around I'd buy a frickin tablet. And that might be an option to consider if a tablet could replace both my laptop and phone but they currently can't. Even if you buy a tablet with a cell link they never seem to allow them to make a call or send a SMS text, but with a BT earpiece or a good speakerphone implementation a tablet could serve as a phone, it is just an arbitrary 'product differentiation' decision that disallows the option. Meanwhile tablets with keyboards are getting close to the lower bound of laptop territory. So someday I might be able to replace two devices with one... but not today.
If consumers didn't want big phones (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes I do, thanks for asking (Score:5, Insightful)
I personally like the larger screen devices that are going on the market. Being a male of above average height and hand size, these kinds of phones are just as easy for me to carry, and offer a better visual experience (after all why have such a powerful smartphone if you are limited to 3.5" of screen space). Surely the larger phones aren't for everyone, and to that end there are still smaller screened phones you can buy, no one is making you buy a large screen phone. Choice is good!
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
I use monthly about 4-5 minutes air time on my phone. Rest of time is maps, browsing, reading and games. Phablets are prefect for me. I keep telling people that I don't have a phone but a small tablet with a phone app.
Re:If consumers didn't want big phones (Score:4, Insightful)
If I buy cable TV and it includes ESPN, does that mean I want ESPN? No.
Consumers want certain features. If those features are only available on a phone with an extra-large screen, they are forced to buy it, or otherwise skip the feature they want.
I own a iPhone, not because I'm in love with Apple or it's feature sets, but because I like the size. I do not want a larger phone.
Yes. (Score:4, Insightful)
I want the biggest screen that fits comfortable in my pocket. Thin and light would be good, too.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
The whole debate is dumb: There's no shortage of choice at the small end; there's just more choice at the bigger end.
How is more choice a bad thing?
Re:Big Phones? No. Small Computers (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
You got that from my head! You nailed it! The debate is dumb. Just look at the numbers...Samsung sold millions of the Galaxy Note in a few months.
And guess what: I am waiting for the next version. I spend little of my time making calls. To me, what matters is that big screen and I have come to love it.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
Why are we even complaining about this? You can buy anything from a dumb-phone to a Galaxy Note. Pick what you like and leave people alone.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:3, Insightful)
Pretty sure "phablets" was an intentional misspelling to create a portmanteau from the source words phone and tablet.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
Apple only sell one size.
This is their astroturf, like that asinine "Google doesn't get packaging" Slashvertisement earlier.
Re:If consumers didn't want big phones (Score:2, Insightful)
Henry Ford said something like "They can have any color they want, as long as it is black." That is the situation we are in and why you cannot appeal to a free market argument.
Does Ford currently sell cars in colors other than black? That is the free market for you. Ford sold only black because it cut his costs and made the manufacturing line more efficient. Enter the free market with other manufacturers making cars other than black and suddenly Ford offers cars in different colors. That is exactly how the free market works.
Browsing the phones available from different carriers makes your argument seem completely ridiculous.
There's only one solution to this... (Score:5, Insightful)
The phones are getting bigger, because customers seem to be attracted to bigger screens. But once the screens become too big, the devices also get too big, at which point people start to want smaller phones again. After all, the main reason to carry it with you is because it's a portable communications device; all that computing power is great, but only if the devices remain small.
Therefore, the only solution is to not have such big screens on the phones and instead use external display devices. The possibility of using e.g mini HDMI connectors to couple them to larger monitors is one solution, but I think a much better one would be to connect them to head-mounted displays (HMDs). Then it would once again not be a problem for the phones themselves to have smaller displays, allowing them to be used primarily as input devices.
Re:If consumers didn't want big phones (Score:5, Insightful)
That's an interesting theory you have there, but I'd like to know what features it is that consumers want that are only available with a large screen. I did a bit of shopping recently, and none of the sales reps or literature mentioned anything that the large-screen phones could do that the small-screen ones couldn't, at least with Android-based models from the same manufacturer.
I know many people who bought large-screen phones because they watch video and view pictures on their phone far, far more than they use it for calls. However, they've pretty much reached the limit of pocket size. Once the phone won't fit in someone's shirt pocket, they're not interested in it as a phone and seem more likely to opt for a full-scale tablet instead.
I know very few people who make heavy use of smart phones as phones. The heavy phone users still seem to prefer older, smaller devices whose screens are completely useless for displaying photos or browsing the 'net, much less watching a video.
I suspect most people who buy smart phones are like my friends: they need/want a portable internet device more than they want to make phone calls. Technically they have to be able to make phone calls, but it's the "extras" that guide their buying choices because every cell phone can make a call, right down to the $30 clamshell phones.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe so, but a 'spelling checker' wouldn't have caught it - "prefect" is a real word.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, that's what my first impression was.
When screen sizes were often small, the iPhone's large screen was heralded as a great thing.
But now that somebody else (Samsung) has a best-selling larger screen, iFans say "don't make it bigger".
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
How many smartphones with modern features, modern specs, and popular OS can you name that are compact enough to comforably fit in most people's pockets?
I think that part may be overstating things a bit. Admittedly, I'm not a small man, but if I can fit a Nook Color with cover in my pocket, then I can't help but think someone complaining about a 4" phone in their pocket may be playing "princess and the pea" just a little.
Re:Bigger != Better (Score:5, Insightful)
I believe you've hit the nail on the head. This is an iPhone concentric view point.
There is no shortage of smart phone models to choose from. People can have the size they want from any of 6 more manufacturers, in any platform except IOS. You often see people drawing a line in the sand that suggest 4.3 inch screens are the absolute maximum size they would ever buy, and a year later they post about 4.7. In the mean time they saw 4.6 and fell in love with it.
There is no reason for a blogger to jump into this fray. The market is deciding quite nicely.
(Actually it seems there was no fray until Ockenden decided to create one to garner readership, so I stand corrected, there apparently was a rather self serving reason for him to jump in).
I can't imagine a worse situation than having phone development directed by bloggers.
When large phones go unsold in favor of small ones the market will know exactly what is too big. The "Samsung Note" sells well. But not well enough for many others to enter that niche. The smallest smartphones [thetechworld.net] are selling as well. But again not as well as the flag ship phones from all the big manufacturers.
So Ockenden, please just butt out and vote with your wallet like the rest of us.