Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Networking United States Wireless Networking

1st 'Super Wi-Fi' Net Goes Live In North Carolina 60

Posted by samzenpus
from the greased-lightning dept.
alphadogg writes "Lucky residents of Wilmington, N.C., will be the first in the nation to have access to a 'Super Wi-Fi' network. Officials from New Hanover County, N.C., announced Thursday that they had become the first in the United States to deploy a mobile data network on so-called 'white spaces' spectrum that the FCC first authorized for unlicensed use in 2008."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

1st 'Super Wi-Fi' Net Goes Live In North Carolina

Comments Filter:
  • by Sooner Boomer (96864) <[sooner.boomr] [at] [gmail.com]> on Friday January 27, @01:55AM (#38836707) Journal

    ...on details. Like exactly what frequencies were used, hardware, networking scheme, etc.

  • Re:Congradulations (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 27, @05:09AM (#38837283)

    I don't know the exact speed, but

    http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/66587

    points out that the "White Spaces" channels are only 6 MHz wide, while Wi-Fi "needs 20-40 MHz". So if you were doing something like 802.11n, but for the White Spaces channels, you would need more channels to get the same bandwidth.

    The real advantage seems to be improved range.

  • Re:Wow. (Score:4, Informative)

    by tlhIngan (30335) <slashdotNO@SPAMworf.net> on Friday January 27, @12:55PM (#38840845)

    The bad news is that residents of Wilmington NC will soon see TV channels disappearing as the devices broadcast over existing stations. (The distant stations from neighboring cities.)

    Actually, that's what keeping whitespace devices (which have been talked about for years prior to the digital TV transition) from taking off - how to keep from interfering with regular TV.

    The initial proposal was to simply have the devices scan for free channels, but that lead to the hidden node effect (just because you can't detect it doesn't mean that someone in your transmission range can't detect it).

    The next proposal was a GPS receiver and a database lookup. Which had the chicken-and-egg problem - you need to get online to get the free channel list, but you can't get online until you get on a free channel. Google proposed to run this database (for free), and proposals were made to have that database available in offline form so devices could embed it in. But then there are "freshness" problems.

    The current solution seems to be manually mapping out the free channels, and isolating the devices to within the surveyed geographic area. But of course, that's led to the current very slow deployment of white space devices. On the plus side, it means there's a very low chance of interference (it's been surveyed) and if a new station wants in, the existing devices can be updated to not use the channel over the air, while new channels get the new updated channel list on setup.

Fun Facts, #14: In table tennis, whoever gets 21 points first wins. That's how it once was in baseball -- whoever got 21 runs first won.

Working...