Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones Technology

Nanocoating Waterproofs Any Gadget 314

An anonymous reader writes "Water has always been the bane of electronics, however American company Liquipel just announced that they have developed a way to completely waterproof any device against the elements. Using a revolutionary process, Liquipel applies a hydrophobic nanocoating to phones, computers, and other devices that completely waterproofs them and protects them against accidental exposure to liquids."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nanocoating Waterproofs Any Gadget

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 12, 2012 @11:14PM (#38681864)

    The link is from a questionably "objective" source that has no real info on how (or if) it works. But by all means mail them your gadgets! They were nominated for an award you've never heard of!

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Thursday January 12, 2012 @11:19PM (#38681900)
    why is my $15 Walgreens watch waterproof to a depth of 20 meters, but if I sneeze on my $400 Android / iPhone it's ruined and I voided the warranty?
  • by QuasiSteve ( 2042606 ) on Thursday January 12, 2012 @11:37PM (#38682088)

    I think you'd have to do a little more than sneeze on it - but I am well aware of stories in the past where e.g. sporters who sweated a little (much) got told by the service center that the humidity indicators in their iPod (or similar) indicated the device got wet and thus the warranty was void.

    But just to address your specific example - your $15 Walgreens watch probably has little to no openings and whatever interface controls are there are very easy to make waterproof. Compare to the many slots and compartments on a typical smartphone which often are required to be easily user-accessible. You wouldn't want to have to unscrew the back of your smartphone every time you'd just want to recharge it (if it ran for 2 years on a few button cells like your watch, then that wouldn't be much of an issue).

    But, more importantly, your $15 Walgreens watch is $15. If they actually got a claim from somebody with valid proof that they only dove to 19.95m and not over 20.00m, sending out a new $15 Walgreens watch is a heck of a lot cheaper than going over that paperwork and trying to tell you that you must be mistaken.
    For $400+ devices, on the other hand, it's a lot cheaper to open it up, point at the humidity tags, and say "sucks to be you".

  • by ScentCone ( 795499 ) on Thursday January 12, 2012 @11:43PM (#38682134)

    why is my $15 Walgreens watch waterproof to a depth of 20 meters, but if I sneeze on my $400 Android / iPhone it's ruined and I voided the warranty?

    A couple of thoughts, here.

    1) How do the microphone, micro SD slot, speakers, and charging/data port on your watch work after you've taken it down to 20 meters?

    2) Has it ever occured to you that the makers and retailers of your $15 watch are simply banking (literally) on the fact that essentially nobody will every submit that cheap watch to 20 meters of water? And if someone does do so, and the watch inevitably fails, what percentage of that already tiny percentage are going to actually bother to pursue warranty service/replacement on something that costs less than a decent pizza? They could simply replace that costs-them-$3 watch every time all three people in that group take a shower, and they'll still make more money than they would have by not saying "Waterproof to 20 meters!" on the packaging and not having to service such claims.

  • Re:shower tv (Score:5, Insightful)

    by artor3 ( 1344997 ) on Friday January 13, 2012 @12:06AM (#38682306)

    At least for the kindle, waterproof gadgets have already been invented.

    It's called a zip-loc bag, and it is great for unwinding in the tub.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 13, 2012 @12:20AM (#38682388)
    And yet, somehow they don't happen to everybody.
  • by thePig ( 964303 ) <rajmohan_h @ y a h oo.com> on Friday January 13, 2012 @12:41AM (#38682514) Journal

    In that case, the best and cheapest option is to nano-coat the humidity tag.
    No problems with replacement then ...

  • by EvanED ( 569694 ) <evaned@NOspAM.gmail.com> on Friday January 13, 2012 @12:44AM (#38682534)

    I've killed two separate MS Natural 4000s, one about 30 minutes after getting it. It's very rare that I'll spill, but man, it seems like just a little splash has a high probability of rendering it useless.

    Personally though, the extra comfort of a comfortable-to-use keyboard is worth an occasional fairly-expensive (at least for a grad student) replacement. I never understand people who spend like $1500 for an awesome gaming rig or something and then get a cheapass keyboard, which is one of the couple components you actually use. But I might just be overly sensitive or something; I do pay a lot of attention to arm ergonomics as fallout from wrist problems many years back.

  • by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Friday January 13, 2012 @01:05AM (#38682646)
    Not only conductivity, but how does the coating hold up under the friction of plugging in the charger every day? If you peek at the metal contacts of a USB cable with a flashlight, I'll bet they have spots worn into them from being plugged in. I doubt any coating could survive that, and the parts which suffer the most wear are also the parts that need waterproofing the most.
  • by zazzel ( 98233 ) on Friday January 13, 2012 @04:11AM (#38683432)

    I wonder how people can actually do this kind of thing. I always feel relieved when I'm in the quiet sanctity of my bathroom, and the only thing I hear is water flowing and bubbles bursting. I still prefer actual books, too. They just work, and when I drop them, all I lose is a cheap paperback.

    There's way too much noise (aka "entertainment") in the world anyways.

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...