Details of Android 3.0, SIP, Video Chat 188
dkd903 was one of several folks to note that a bunch of details about Google's Android 3.0 are
beginning to leak out. The platform is codenamed Gingerbread; it includes video chat to compete with the iPhone, and a graphical overhaul to try to make it look a bit better compared to its rivals.
Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:4, Interesting)
I gotta say, after messing around with Sense, I can't freakin' STAND the stock Android OS look. I'm currently running xtrSense on my Eris, which is a freakin' GREAT rom...but yeah, stock Android is just fugly.
Looking forward to a system-wide visual update.
Re:Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You don't normally have to do anything to write an arbitrary app for an Andriod phone that happens to have Sense. You just write your app using the regular Android SDK and don't worry about it. Sense and other skins are just not relevant factors for almost any app you would want to write.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As someone who uses his phone and complains about the battery life constantly- I'd rather that any dev who thinks these are a good idea gets his hands smashed with a hammer so he can never code again.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
bitblit operations and other 2D graphical effects are nearly free in terms of CPU and battery life.
or should be, at any rate.
Re:Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:5, Insightful)
People don't get it. UI animations -- done correctly -- aren't just bling. They tell people what happened, where things went, and where they're at in the application. The classic example is minimizing a window to an icon in the dock. The zooming rects reinforce what happened, where the window went, and where to find it again.
On the iPhone such things are implemented as GPU effects, with a totally insignificant impact on battery life. If you're on Android, firing up the 3G radios for a single background check on Twitter posts burns through more power than all the daily UI animations on your phone combined.
And if your battery life is really that bad, then buy a better phone next time...
Re: (Score:2)
No, they are exactly that- just bling. I know what happens when I minimize a window. Showing an animation only serves to slow me down and waste my time. I turn them off on any app and OS which allows it for precisely that reason. They're not a feature, they're a bug and a fucking annoying one at that.
Re:Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:4, Interesting)
No. They're not. Those visual cues are important to A LOT of people.
Of course, you're probably the kind of person who shuts off text anti-aliasing too.
Re:Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:4, Funny)
If you're all that, perhaps I can interest you in Microsoft's new MS-DOS Command Line phone?
No graphics whatsoever.
Re:Sense (or Sense inspired) all the way (Score:5, Interesting)
Ah, fond memories of ECHO ATDP 63489 > COM1...
(Greybeard three-fer: Dialing from the MS-DOS command prompt, pulse dialing no less, and, God as my witness, I actually used to be able to dial my uncle by using only five digits.)
(Holy crap, I just remembered that my first modem was an acoustic coupler job that couldn't even dial, and I used to hand-dial into the BBS using a rotary phone. And for kicks I practiced pulse dialing by rapidly clicking the receiver button. I guess it's about time I got a lawn...)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I know what happens when I minimize a window.
You, sir, are not a typical user then. I know us geeks like to think we are a huge market segment that can dictate how things should be done but that is fantasy.
Alas! We nerds are but a small pimple on the market's arse.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an option (Score:5, Informative)
Android has an All/Some/None setting [android.com] to turn off UI animations, in Settings/Display/Animation, so once again it gives people the choice.
It's been there since 1.6 at least.
Re: (Score:2)
This is why we never let developers have hammers.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
really? ever seen touchwiz? ADW? What slick effects magically exist on iphone that aren't on android?
I really hope you have actual examples in your next post, not just "wah iphone is better than android"
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I believe, as a developer of apps, he means the API's he has available to use those effects in *his app*. Not just the UI overlay that Samsung or HTC provides.
But go on knee-jerking.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't suppose it'd hurt for an actual example, not just saying that magically API's aren't capable? It's not like these people are programmers who can create their own functions or anything.
*facepalm*
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Oddly enough, after using both stock Android and Sense, I can't stand Sense and would much, much rather have the standard Android UI. I think Sense is clunky and ugly and full of pointless changes (such as replacing a lot of the standard Android tabbed activities with strange ones with the tabs at the bottom and icons instead of textual labels).
You may be interested to know that a colleague of mine recently reflashed his HTC Desire with a standard Froyo setup using the HTC drivers. He's now getting almost
Re: (Score:2)
I feel the exact opposite way. Sense is annoying and just clutters things up. CM6 for the win.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the person who needs smashing is the scumbag responsible for locking up my Desire, so I have to root it to remove Sense if I want to. (I like Sense, but I hate the phone being locked down - we are not forced to have the bonnet of our cars welded shut).
However, Steve Jobs should probably still be hammered for suggesting consumer choice is bad, while not actually going to live in a commun
Video chat to compete with the iPhone (Score:4, Insightful)
How about video chat that works with the iPhone as well?
Would be nice to use my Epic to video chat with a friends iPhone.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I would like to know if the video chat for android will actually work over 3G (or 4G) then in comparison to the iPhone only working over wifi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would like to know if the video chat for android will actually work over 3G (or 4G) then in comparison to the iPhone only working over wifi.
It would surprise me if it didn't. 3G was launched with video calling, it was advertised back in the day. The technology to put the feature in shouldn't be a problem.
Having said that, someone would still need to figure out why video calling didn't take off last time and how to stop that happening again.
Re: (Score:2)
My friends EVO can do video calls over 3g if you have a relatively strong signal with a little frame dropping. Where I live, the signal is pretty low (max out around 300kbps) so I have not had a chance to test my new Epic that well, and we both don't live in 4g areas. You will notice an improvement in video quality and stability if you use wifi though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I enjoy being able to see my friends who live in distant countries when I am chatting with them. Sure its not necessary, and I would probably never use it with someone I see every day, but in some ways, it is kind of nice.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should get better looking friends.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How about video chat that works with the iPhone as well?
I hope so too, but I fear that there's a penis size contest about to begin here. :-(
I'm afraid Google would feel that following the FaceTime standard would risk giving away users to Apple.
Re: (Score:2)
> I'm afraid Google would feel that following the FaceTime standard would risk giving away users to Apple.
I think you're right that they would feel like that. I see it as an opportunity to take users from Apple.
Re:Video chat to compete with the iPhone (Score:5, Informative)
How about video chat that works with the iPhone as well?
I hope so too, but I fear that there's a penis size contest about to begin here. :-(
I'm afraid Google would feel that following the FaceTime standard would risk giving away users to Apple.
How the fuck is FaceTime a standard? It was first mentioned on June 7, 2010. I've been using Skype to video chat on my N900 for about a year. And people in Europe have been video chatting using some other Nokia thingamajig for a year or two before that. May have been using Gizmo or something.
Really. Apple didn't do anything impressive with FaceTime. Just use the Google Voice or Skype apps to video chat. They've been around long enough to be mentioned as a standard without people laughing in your face.
Re:Video chat to compete with the iPhone (Score:4, Informative)
Just use the Google Voice or Skype apps to video chat. They've been around long enough to be mentioned as a standard without people laughing in your face.
Presumably you mean Google Talk, which uses the Jabber/XMPP messaging standard. The Skype protocol is spooky and mysterious, but I guess it's a defacto standard. FaceTime on the other hand is such a non-standard that it doesn't even work on Macs yet.
Re:Video chat to compete with the iPhone (Score:5, Informative)
Presumably you mean Google Talk, which uses the Jabber/XMPP messaging standard.
Specifically, it uses Jingle for voice and video. Jingle originated at Google, but they published it as a standard (actually, a family of standards), in the form of a set of XEPs. In contrast, Steve Jobs said that FaceTime would be published as a standard, but I have yet to see any documentation of the protocol from Apple.
Re:Video chat to compete with the iPhone (Score:4, Interesting)
FaceTime is using open, unencrypted protocols and is looking to share it and make it interoperate with others. Skype is proprietary closed-source that blocks competitors (like Fring).
FaceTime uses H.264, AAC, SIP, STUN, TURN, ICE, RTP, and SRTP. All open standard protocols that someone could make work with iPhones/iPods. I'm surprised nobody put together a Windows app to connect to them. Imagine how popular Oovoo would be against Skype if they had this feature
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, is there facetime for linux, windows, or mac? Google does more than just phones, and the linux support is usually pretty good, even when it is only "works with wine"
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Apple's specification is open, so... hopefully?
Re: (Score:2)
What specification? All I see are a bunch of phones and iPods being sold that can video call each other. I see no specification that anyone else could follow even if they wanted to, even Google.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The calls themselves are STUN and SIP [roychowdhury.org]. FaceTime server registration is another matter apparently.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple announced it would be an open spec; I have no idea if they released it yet or not. Just going off of what Steve Jobs said during his key note address at WWDC.
Re: (Score:2)
Since Steve said that FaceTime specification will be open, and we have access to Android source, can't others just take the source, add FaceTime support, and make the modified binary/source available? (sometime if not today)
If Google wants to add support for something else fine... why not keep support for both?
I'm assuming that people can actually do useful things like this with the Android source.
Did I miss something? Have any here modified/built/installed the Android you're running?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Apple showed the list of protocols [appleinsider.com] in FaceTime during the keynote.
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent (Score:2)
Open System (Score:2)
Awesome, who is going to download and install the upgrade?
Re:Open System (Score:5, Informative)
Everyone who was smart enough to get a Nexus One rather than locked down Motorola garbage.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
My Motorola Droid isn't locked down. I probably would have gotten a Nexus One if it had made it to Verizon, but it didn't. And switching to AT&T or T-Mobile wasn't an option, since Verizon is the only network with halfway decent coverage where I spend most of my time.
Unless things change drastically, however, my next phone will not be a Motorola.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone who was smart enough to get a Nexus One
The key word being "was", past tense. As of now, you have to be a registered Android application developer to get one.
Just in time... (Score:2)
...for AT&T/Motorola to delay upgrading my Backflip to 2.1 again.
Worst purchase ever.
Re: (Score:2)
AT&T/Moto (Score:2)
I feel your pain... I got one of those initially, but eventually (as many have done) paid full price for a no one just to not have to use an AT&T/motorola android phone anymore
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you Google for the fragmentation.
I've see some posts of users claiming *they* upgraded to 2.2 without waiting for their MFR to lockdown their own.
Can you brick the Phone if you try to upgrade to 2.2?
Re: (Score:2)
> Can you brick the Phone if you try to upgrade to 2.2?
Can you? Sure. Will you? Probably not.
We already have video chat (Score:5, Insightful)
but google wants to compete with google talk video chat with the rest of video providers.
They better have API support for front cameras and all that new stuff, because thats something that is clearly missing in todays API, while there are already several phones with front-facing cameras in the market.
Its possible to interact with them by setting the appropiate parameters in the API, but those parameters are not consistent across devices.
Overall, I think the biggest 3.0 change should be look&feel.
And I hope they don't just overhaul the UI and write beautiful google apps. I hope they do a complete UI tools overhaul so develpers can effortlessly create beautiful apps. Im not buying any of that fragmentation nonsense crap. The real issue is a lack of a "Interface builer" so we can build beautiful apps with no extra effort.
Combine a really good "interface builder", "default layout settings" or whatever it might be with Android's customization and we got a clear winner in the UI and UX space.
Thats my 2c
Re:We already have video chat (Score:5, Interesting)
Speaking of effortless nice Android UIs:
In an effort to make creating a nice Android UI less painful I started this small project called Android Theme Samples.
Its just like the Android Samples, where many examples are combined into a single downloadable app so you can browse it, try it and get those parts that better fit your own app.
Its up in github for anyone to take and contribute: http://github.com/pllopis/AndroidThemeSamples [github.com]
I just got started and only a "light" theme and an "Action Bar" UI pattern are included. (Mind the design, I am not a designer). :)
Would be really great if others contributed their own design
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Why not contribute to the existing project instead of making your own?
I think this is where Android is failing, developers ego's
Re: (Score:2)
Interface builder is needed, i'm tired of trying to write UI's in relational XML.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Android UI Utilities [tumblr.com], it is no interface builder but good for prototyping before building the XML UIs
Try Google App Inventor (Score:5, Informative)
> The real issue is a lack of a "Interface builer" so we can build beautiful apps with no extra effort.
> Combine a really good "interface builder", "default layout settings" or whatever it might be with
> Android's customization and we got a clear winner in the UI and UX space.
Try Google App Inventor, an official tool from Google itself
http://appinventor.googlelabs.com/about/ [googlelabs.com]
Re:Try Google App Inventor (Score:4, Interesting)
As someone who just started using App Inventor, it's AWESOME. For someone who doesn't have time to learn how to code Android deep down, it works wonders.
Maemo (Score:3, Interesting)
Encryption please! (Score:3, Interesting)
Waiting for manageable full disk encryption, plus capability to encrypt the SD card. Android will never be fully accepted into the enterprise if this doesn't happen. Touchdown is ok, but doesn't really scale well across a huge client base.
SIP would be great (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd like to know if other users of Google Voice will get SIP access, or only mobile users.
Re: (Score:2)
There are already full SIP apps in the market, you're saying Google is going to cripple their own Voice app to make carriers happy?
Re: (Score:2)
I've been using SIP since 2007 on my Nokia E61, E51 and now E63 and it has always been that bit finnicky. Very finnicky compared to a proper decent Cisco IP phone anyway
Re:SIP would be great (Score:4, Interesting)
What I'm really looking forward about this is that the current (to my knowledge) most battery efficient app on the market today (Sipdroid) absolutely DEVOURS my battery, making it impossible for me to leave it running in the background. I'd really love a completely "virtual" phone in the sense that I could use it as a full time SIP phone, but so far, it's either take a charger everywhere I go or just use it for outgoing calls. Hopefully (probably?) Google will make an awesome app that doesn't use a lot of battery, making it usable.
Google providing a SIP account would be great too. One less thing to configure.
And yes, I'm in Europe, and yes I pay less than 15 Euro/month for my calls + internet. It's even a prepaid "plan", so I didn't sign anything. /bragging (I DID however have to pay 150 Euro for my free {as in freedom} HTC Magic {yay eBay!}.)
Re: (Score:2)
Get and support CSipSimple! It's much better even in alpha.
I'm still waiting for a SIP client that does G729, I'm hoping they provide that in CSipSimple soon (even if it costs $$)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the tip, will check it out!
Re: (Score:2)
I agree but from what I've read, isn't 3g bad with latency?
OpenVPN without root (Score:3, Interesting)
The only thing that I need is to be able to connect to my office OpenVPN without having to root the freakin' phone.
My N900 does it, but I'm stuck with IPSec on the Desire which fails completely because of damnable NAT from the telco (Vodafone and O2 in my case!)
Our sales droids would love to have an Android!
Catch up (Score:4, Insightful)
It's disappointing that they are now playing catchup again. How about some features that the iPhone doesn't have that it would want to copy? Android may have some great devs behind it but they surely don't seem to have anyone that is trying to come up with new and interesting things to put on the Android (like some sort of "idea man"). Everything they seem to do is to make it more and more commoditized and more generic. I'm not saying they shouldn't work on things like Video Chat, but I think they should also try to come up with that one "great new shiny thing" at least once a release. Flash was a complete bomb since it took months and months for it to roll out to everyone and then it was super buggy and slow. Pretty soon, phone manufacturers aren't even going to advertise "This phone is using Android"... because there's no buzz about it anymore. Consumers could hardly care less about building in "me too" features 6-12 months after a competitor's phone has it.
This is from a long time Android user.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I don't think they're playing catchup. They've already described some of the upcoming features like C2MD (cloud to mobile device) and there are a lot of things in iOS land that don't exist in Android land. For example bluetooth file transfers are enabled in 2.x androids while iOS doesn't have it. Similarly Android still has a lot of design that hasn't been copied by iOS (yet) like fully replaceable components such as keyboards and clients (SMS, email, etc). Multitasking still makes more sense in Android fro
Re: (Score:2)
Great troll. I believe the numbers posted on TechCrunch yesterday say it all... both platforms are accelerating neck and neck ... iOS devices had 300k/day activations in the past month. Which is similar to Android.
Also, these numbers are getting inflated because lower end phones are being sold with Android now. So it's not like people are picking between Droid and iPhone so it's apples to apples... it's more like iPhone 4 vs Crappy $50 Android Phone. Those aren't technically direct competitors.
On the ot
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
So it's not like people are picking between Droid and iPhone so it's apples to apples... it's more like iPhone 4 vs Crappy $50 Android Phone. Those aren't technically direct competitors.
If you're an app developer and your app isn't CPU or GPU intensive, the "crappy" $50 Android phone is just as much another potential customer as someone with an Evo or Epic or Droid is.
Re: (Score:2)
it's more like iPhone 4 vs Crappy $50 Android Phone.
Out of interest what $50 android phones are there?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dwireless-phones&field-keywords=android&x=0&y=0 [amazon.com]
A bunch of phones are on that list and under $50.
When I got my phone, my wife got hers (Droid Eris) for free. There were a bunch of other promotions like buy a Droid X and get any other phone for free etc... It's stuff like this that inflates the numbers. My wife probably wouldn't have gotten an Android based phone and she doesn't download apps in the marketplace or anything like that. So I
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dwireless-phones&field-keywords=android&x=0&y=0 [amazon.com]
A bunch of phones are on that list and under $50.
They only seem to go at that price with a service plan, and the iphone4 is free on service plans here in australia.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about you, but my experience is MUCH worse. Flash ads on a desktop might be a bit annoying but on a Droid, they completely make the site unusable. Also, I am a Flash and Android dev and the performance if you want to do any normal "Flash" stuff is horrendous. Try doing anything that involved drawing to the screen. Unless all you have is a static app you can't make a performant Flash app on Android yet. It's just not possible.
"video chat to compete with the iPhone" (Score:3, Funny)
includes video chat to compete with the iPhone
Great! So Google intends to release a completely proprietary chat application that only supports WiFi and only works with people who have the same exact model phone as you? Oh wait, this is Google... Hmmmm.... somehow, I don't think that's what they will do...
FIX. THE. FUCKING. DATEPICKER.. (Score:2)
Goddamn it.
+/- keys are not appropriate in a touch/drag interface. Dials are better.
DONT FIX. THE. FUCKING. DATEPICKER.. (Score:4, Insightful)
+/- is very scalable, if I want the count to go faster I just hold the button down, moving your thumb around in a circle is a very unnatural motion even for someone who's been playing video-games for 25 years. The wheel interface needs to die.
Further more, if the +/- arent up to the task, I'll just type in the fucking date/time.
If Google want to improve it, I'd suggest adding a few buttons for common usages or perhaps even a dial-pad (12 key interchangeable between 0-9 and months). On 800x400 screens, this should be easily doable.
This irks me (Score:5, Interesting)
I feel aggrieved to be honest. I suspect this isnt a software problem and it may be hardware now.
I was visiting another town the other day, and collegues from another org, were giving me gip as they all had IPhones and merrily pointed out locations, as mine couldnt get a lock at all. "Well, you have your Live Wallpaper. I guess thats something."
If you like a bit of corporate show boating I would advise against a Samsung Galaxy S.
Re: (Score:2)
Whats broken about your GPS?
My Epics GPS seems to work fine most of the time, but with all the military bases around here any GPS/cellular device will go out of service in some parts of town.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Wikipedia entry(under Issues): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_i9000_Galaxy_S [wikipedia.org]
YouTube(dozens, if not hundreds of videos): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmIx6SR9lXo [youtube.com]
The EPIC issue: http://www.gadgetvenue.com/galaxy-gps-problems-fixed-samsung-epic-4g-08190515/ [gadgetvenue.com]
I could paste links till my 6gb ram is full but just google "Galaxy S GPS problems"
Oh yes, plenty of "A fix in september
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This irks me (Score:5, Informative)
The problem is Samsung in this case. Most if not all HTC and Motorola high-end phones have 2.2 already and have no GPS issues.
I agree with a lot of the Android criticism but those issues you listed are specific to Samsung.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's the downside of "open". Sometimes a hardware manufacturer delivers dud. The upside is that you can change handsets without any fuss.
For the record, my Motorola Droid's GPS works perfectly. If your problems *are* a software problem, it's still a Samsung issue.
Blurb is (potentially) wrong (Score:2)
But its fragmented! (Score:2)
I hope they're including a defragmenter in 3.0... ;)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure a few months ago at some conference, the Android team did Q&A with the audience and this came up. They explicitly said that this is a feature they are working on.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)