Forgot your password?

Close
typodupeerror
Input Devices Cellphones Displays United Kingdom Hardware

Tap Tech Brings Touch To Dumb Phones 70

Posted by timothy
from the now-that's-clever dept.
nk497 writes "A Cambridge-based firm has come up with a way to bring touch interfaces to phones without touchscreens. According to TouchDevice, the system uses the microphone to turn any surface on a handset into a touch-sensitive input panel by analysing sound signatures. 'For example, where icons are displayed on a non-touch screen display, you could tap on there and it would activate the application,' said founder Mike Bradley. TouchDevice believes there are two markets for the technology: firstly to augment input potential in touchcreen smartphones, and secondly as a way of adding touch to 'dumb' displays. The system should be making its way into devices by early next year."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tap Tech Brings Touch To Dumb Phones More

Tap Tech Brings Touch To Dumb Phones

Comments Filter:

  • Sounds flakey (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Moof123 (1292134) on Friday September 10 2010, @06:58PM (#33540478)

    Works great, unless:

    Your in a loud room.
    Your tap is outside "normal" strength range
    You are wearing gloves.
    You tap with your fingernail, pen, etc

    Just sounds like a hack to me, maybe Ok for Yes/No interactions, but I thought that was what the normal buttons are for...

  • Sounds like a dump idea at first... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Locke2005 (849178) on Friday September 10 2010, @07:06PM (#33540552)
    But with multiple microphones, sounds will come in out of phase. It should be possible to compute the delay time of the signal coming in on each microphone, which when combined with knowledge of the speed of sound should allow it triangulate the position of the tap. Yes, with a single microphone, this would be an abhorrent kludge. With multiple microphones, it works like the audio gunshot detection systems already in use in some cities.

  • Re:Sounds flakey (Score:4, Insightful)

    by vux984 (928602) on Friday September 10 2010, @07:50PM (#33540990)

    You are wearing gloves.
    You tap with your fingernail, pen, etc

    er... these also don't even work on state of the art touch devices -- androids / iphones / blackberries. Go ahead... try using your iphone with mittens on, or tap one with your fingernail.

    So I guess modern smartphones are just a hack to you?

  • Re:Sounds like a dump idea at first... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by treeves (963993) on Friday September 10 2010, @08:32PM (#33541278) Homepage Journal
    I suspect it doesn't use time delays, but just the difference in the audio spectra between tapping in the corner close to the mic, tapping in the middle, and tapping in the opposite corner. Different frequencies will resonate and/or be attenuated depending on where you tap. Have you ever played a guitar and noticed how the sound (timbre) changes depending on whether you pluck the string over the neck, over the sound hole, or close to the bridge? Same idea here, I imagine, just using a cell phone as the resonator instead of a guitar.

  • Re:A boon for the touch phone knock off makers. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by derGoldstein (1494129) on Saturday September 11 2010, @12:49AM (#33542442)
    Posts about modding is a call to be modded down, but here I go anyway:
    That was not Flaimbait. If you go around modding any post that pokes fun at a brand as "Flaimbait", you'll turn Slashdot comment threads into humorless, boring lists of generic observations. You may not agree with the logic of the post, but as the popular sig goes -- "there's no -1 'disagree' mod". Maybe there was some intention of "bating flame", but implying that Apple's response to the antenna problem was, in part, motivated by financial considerations, isn't the type of inflammatory content that the "Flamebait" mod was intended for.

Make it myself? But I'm a physical organic chemist!