Cutting Through the 4G Hype 283
crimeandpunishment writes "Cell phone companies are about to bombard us with advertising for the next big thing — 4G access. The first 4G phone, Sprint Nextel's EVO, comes out this week. But just how big a deal is 4G? Is it fast enough to warrant the hype, or are consumers better off waiting a while? AP technology writer Peter Svensson looks at the differences between 4G and 3G technologies."
Difference between 3G and 4G (Score:5, Funny)
It's 9.80665 newtons of force per kilogram of mass [wikipedia.org].
for optimum data speed use, look for the 4G-spot (Score:5, Funny)
difficult to find at first, but when you find it, reactivity is good, data flow takes off
Re:Difference between 3G and 4G (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Difference between 3G and 4G (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Difference between 3G and 4G (Score:5, Funny)
Well, if it were an european swallow, it would be running GSM. But you see it is sprint, which uses CDMA based technology and so.....
Imaginary G (Score:5, Funny)
I hope Apple takes a shot at 'simplifying' the terminology.
I really want an 'iG' capable iPhone.
iG? An imaginary [wikipedia.org] connection will just make things more complex.
Re:Imaginary G (Score:5, Funny)
Re:4G is used for what? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:a brief experience with 4G, since november (Score:5, Funny)
I noticed you're still waiting for a response...
Re:4G? (Score:3, Funny)
The post should be "Funny", not "Informative". Rogers has had 3G for a few years now. It's only Bell and Telus that have recently adopted it, and that's because they switched over their whole network away from CDMA. I regularly get "3.5G" in and around the city, as well.
Rogers had planned on covering Vancouver with 4G/LTE for the Olympics, but that appears not to have worked out.
Re:4G? (Score:3, Funny)
Not entirely sure what you're smoking, but Telus, Bell, and Rogers are all now using HSPA+ 22mbit over GSM networks, and they both introduced it before any carrier in the states. (Rogers slightly before Bell and Telus, because Rogers' network was already GSM, whereas Bell/Telus have been using CDMA and had to build a sympathetic network to run alongside their existing network)
In other words: wireless/cellular data transfer is currently better coverage and faster speeds in Canada than the US. (Bell's network provides coverage to more than 90% of Canada's population). It's nowhere near as fast as the theoretical upper limit for 4G networks, but it does give both carriers the time needed to properly implement a 4G network, which, as I understand it, both Bell and Rogers are already building.