Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Cellphones Communications Government

FCC Inquires About Controversial Verizon Fees 178

Posted by Soulskill
from the just-what-do-you-think-you're-up-to dept.
olsmeister writes "As previously noted here on Slashdot, Verizon Wireless has been increasing their early termination fees and actively charging non-data customers who accidentally press the wrong button and go online. The FCC has now sent them a letter asking why. The PDF of the letter can be viewed online. Maybe someone at the FCC does read Slashdot."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FCC Inquires About Controversial Verizon Fees

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 05, 2009 @10:04AM (#30334590)

    ... If the theory behind the ETF is the amount of money they front to subsidize your device then shouldn't it stand to reason that the ETF should change according to the value of the device that you receive?

    Absolutely not! If they were to do that then someone might actually become curious as to the actual cost of the phones to Verizon. Then the fecal material would really impact the rotary air circulation mechanism.

  • by Sparky McGruff (747313) on Saturday December 05, 2009 @10:12AM (#30334624)
    I'm not sure what reply their lawyers will come up with, but I believe the original draft of the reply reads:

    Dearest FCC:

    Why are we screwing our customers? Because we hate our customers, and we really like money. Go away.

    Love, Verizon.

Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?