Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Book Reviews

Recent reviews from Slashdot readers:

Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus

Comments: 309 +-   Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages on Wednesday November 25, @09:39AM

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday November 25, @09:39AM
from the hindsight-and-voyeurism dept.
cellphones
An anonymous reader writes "Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks. The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse. Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort."
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • So much raw data (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Shrike82 (1471633) on Wednesday November 25, @09:45AM (#30225808)
    Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.
    • Re:So much raw data (Score:5, Informative)

      by megamerican (1073936) on Wednesday November 25, @10:06AM (#30226026)

      Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.

      The NORAD tapes, which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people. The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because "it wouldn't be good for the country."

      John Farmer, senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said, "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [during 9/11]"

      6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.
      http://patriotsquestion911.com/ [patriotsquestion911.com]

      “More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques,” writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast. [thedailybeast.com] “In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.”

      We've been lied to about 9/11 from day one. It needs to be investigated further. If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something isn't right. Burying your head deeper into the sand won't help.

      • by Richard_at_work (517087) <richardprice.gmail@com> on Wednesday November 25, @10:14AM (#30226126)
        If there was a conspiracy to find about 9/11, what do you think it would turn out to be?

        A. A concerted effort by the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies conspiring together to launch an attack on the US people in order to further the aims of the Government and selected private corporations and individuals.

        Or...

        B. A concerted effort by members of the Government and Department of Defence, and related military bodies to cover up their own inadequecies in being able to deal with an attack by a small number of persons against several targets using simplistic weapons, causing a massive over reaction over the next few years, and resulting in the inability of the largest military might in the world to subdue a country that has barely hit the 19th Century.

        Yes, there probably was a lie surrounding 9/11, but its almost certainly not the juicy one people are fantasising about...

        • Re:So much raw data (Score:5, Interesting)

          by PinkyDead (862370) on Wednesday November 25, @10:48AM (#30226570) Journal

          Can't I have both?

        • The middle (Score:3, Interesting)

          by copponex (13876)

          Read the Project for a New American Century's statement of principles here [newamericancentury.org]. Now read the PNAC letter to Clinton on Iraq here [newamericancentury.org]. Note that Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Jeb are all big supporters. Now read about their plans here [newamericancentury.org].

          The choice quote is: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

          My theory is that they had intelligence stating that the attack was going

        • by 1800maxim (702377) on Wednesday November 25, @11:01AM (#30226742)
          Was Reichstag fire just as unbelievable as 9/11? It was done to further gov't agenda.

          From Wikipedia: The Reichstag fire... is seen as pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.

          Don't think gov'ts now aren't capable of the same thing, or that they aren't doing it.

          But then it's much more comfortable to bury one's head in the sand.
          • Re:So much raw data (Score:5, Informative)

            by smooth wombat (796938) on Wednesday November 25, @12:26PM (#30227778) Homepage Journal
            Stop it. Just stop it. Not only are you a coward by posting anonymously, but the nine mile debris field has been debunked REPEATEDLY, including by police officers on the scene [debunk911myths.org].

            The nine mile debris field consisted of bits of paper which may or may not have been from the flight when it impacted in the field.

            Further, that nine mile figure is bogus. People used MapQuest to find the distance between the crash site and the supposed debris field. Sure, nine miles if you drive by road, but roughly 2.5 miles in a straight line.

            The debris field WAS NOT composed of engine parts, seats, body parts or anything else heavier than a piece of paper.

            Your friend is also an idiot as there are nearly a dozen eyewitnesses [debunk911myths.org] to the plane coming down, some of which watched the plane, intact, nose dive into the ground. Had the plane been shot down, it would have displayed some semblance of damage including smoke and/or fire trailing from it. Not one eyewitness described seeing anything of the sort.

            End of story, full stop.
  • that's nice (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Darth_brooks (180756) <clipper377@gmailBALDWIN.com minus author> on Wednesday November 25, @09:54AM (#30225900) Homepage

    I'm sure this will lead to rational debate, as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11, rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories.

    Also, when you bring me my pony, make sure it's pink.

  • Good Move (Score:3, Interesting)

    by carp3_noct3m (1185697) on Wednesday November 25, @10:04AM (#30225996)
    This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks. Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks. What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing. Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing. Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB." This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads. Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect. My personal opinions are far to complex to list here, but people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Sockatume (732728)

      I'd question the ethics of it. The very existence of this database is of huge political and social importance, thus falling under Wikileaks' remit, but by putting it into the public domain they're infringing the privacy of the citizens involved even further. You can bet all the TLAs, not to mention police forces, lawyers, insurance companies, and so on are having fun with it now it's in public view.

      • Mmmm (Score:3, Insightful)

        Wikileaks is simply an outlet for sensitive information. So what you're implying is that their privacy wasn't infringed by whichever entity collected the information, but by Wikileaks? That doesn't make any sense. I do see your point, but I think the potential benefits by far outweigh the cons of such a release. Now that the data is out there, nothing can be done to get it back. On top of this, Wikileaks has some serious credibility when it comes to their methods and what and when they decide to release, I'
      • Re:Good Move (Score:4, Interesting)

        by TheRaven64 (641858) on Wednesday November 25, @11:19AM (#30226964) Homepage Journal
        All the TLAs almost certainly had access to it already. Putting it in the public domain means that the public now has more of a clue about the amount of information the TLAs have on them. If it leads to more opposition to things like the USAPATRIOT Act then it will have served a beneficial purpose.
      • Re:Good Move (Score:4, Interesting)

        by thePowerOfGrayskull (905905) on Wednesday November 25, @11:33AM (#30227128) Homepage Journal

        I'd question the ethics of it. The very existence of this database is of huge political and social importance, thus falling under Wikileaks' remit, but by putting it into the public domain they're infringing the privacy of the citizens involved even further. You can bet all the TLAs, not to mention police forces, lawyers, insurance companies, and so on are having fun with it now it's in public view.

        Exactly- and especially true when you browse through and see messages like " " Andre-are you at work today? Gimme a call - 301-555-5555. Gerry". (number obviously changed in my repost) There's no doubt that these people will be targeted for 9/11-related scams and other obnoxious behavior in short order. You think Gerry's not already getting a call from someone looking to cash in, or who just thinks they're being funny?

        If this list were filtered so that it was just automated systems, non-personal, etc , that's fine -- but doing it in this way is just opening the door for all the abuse and stupidity that we're capable of. As it is - it's a gross breach of privacy, published in a way that ensures that there will be no accountability for any abuse of personal information found in it.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25, @10:04AM (#30226000)
    Who needs to make backups anymore? The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you. Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit.
  • by feedayeen (1322473) on Wednesday November 25, @10:08AM (#30226054)
    "computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse" 8:46 a.m. - "Ow, something hit me!" 8:47 a.m. - "Anyone else smell smoke?" 8:47 a.m. - "Admin has logged off" 10:28 a.m. - "System failure"
      • by rapiddescent (572442) on Wednesday November 25, @11:53AM (#30227362) Homepage

        Actually, I was working at Reuters in London at the time and the first we knew of the disaster was an automated alert from our trading system saying that Merrylls and APM had gone fully offline (these types of systems very very rarely go offline). At the same moment, one of the data feeds went DR (DataScope I think) - it had its DR facility in the other tower and so only lasted a short time before going off for good.

  • In this file [wikileaks.org] I noticed a message that, in hindsight, is especially morbid:

    Good morning. I haven't heard from you in a while. I'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you don't page me back. Have a good day. Todd

  • Pagers were working? (Score:5, Informative)

    by wandazulu (265281) on Wednesday November 25, @10:11AM (#30226092)

    I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.

    I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that *was* working that day was the Internet...phones, both land line and cell were unavailable. We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan (we were in Brooklyn) and every phone we tried, including the pay phone down the street (still had 'em back then...) gave us the "fast busy signal", indicating "We didn't even try to make your call..."

    So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where. Bad times...bad times.

  • by Black-Man (198831) on Wednesday November 25, @10:15AM (#30226142)

    For that text pager message: "Finished arming the detonating device, Herr Cheney".

  • by darkpixel2k (623900) <slashdot@darkpixel.com> on Wednesday November 25, @11:35AM (#30227156) Homepage
    Damn it--it looks like the terrorists stopped a Microsoft Exchange event...

    7 Skytel [002380116] B ALPHA Frank.Heisler@ubsw.com|FW: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED| -----Original Message----- From: Bucher, Gisela Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:54 PM To: DL-Perot-STAM-Permanent Cc: Subject: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED

    This confuses me greatly. On one hand I utterly despise the terrorists for what they did...but I really hate Exchange too...

  • by Tweezer (83980) on Wednesday November 25, @02:53PM (#30229734)

    I searched a whole bunch of these for the word "fuck" and couldn't find a single instance. I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why don't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      You still see them in the medical community (ER docs, nurses, etc), but that's about the only place I ever seen them nowadays.

      • Re:News to me (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Courageous (228506) on Wednesday November 25, @10:55AM (#30226646)

        I still see them in use for certain IT folks in the defense industry. The key is that they will permit them into secure facilities, as the old one-way versions cannot transmit.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by DJ Jones (997846)
      Most hospital physicians still use them for a few reasons.
      • There are no dead zones
      • They are easier to page than a cell phone (any nurse can pick up the nearest land line, no need to text)
      • They don't interfere with medical equipment (which is becoming less of a concern lately)
    • Re:News to me (Score:5, Insightful)

      by v1 (525388) on Wednesday November 25, @09:53AM (#30225890) Homepage Journal

      Pagers can be more reliable than TM. And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping. Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway. Not everyone has a cell phone. (I don't) A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers, not text messaging. (volunteer fire departments are good examples) Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability. Lots of reasons to stick with pagers.

      • by mcgrew (92797) *

        Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.

        Some are. Mine is. I used to have an old LG phone that sounded exactly like an old fashioned landline phone, the kind with a real bell in it. It was loud enough to wake you up, too.

        I use my phone for an alarm clock.

        • Re:News to me (Score:4, Insightful)

          by jandrese (485) <kensama@vt.edu> on Wednesday November 25, @10:19AM (#30226200) Homepage Journal
          You've never known anybody who is on call? SMS is unreliable, and if you're paying someone to be on-call, you want their service to be reliable. You don't want the message "Critical production server down, administrator needed" to be delayed 15 minutes because of some SMS issue. It doesn't matter nearly as much if "LOL, at movies" gets delayed, but the on-call message can literally be worth thousands of dollars per minute it is delayed. Of course on-call folks have cell phones too, but the pager tends to be the first method of communication employed.
          • Re:News to me (Score:4, Informative)

            by JWSmythe (446288) <jwsmythe@jwsmy[ ].com ['the' in gap]> on Wednesday November 25, @10:42AM (#30226496) Homepage Journal

                At one place I worked years ago, we used pagers. As cell phones became more popular, we stared switching over to them. Every once in a while, we'd test to see which ones worked better. Text messages emailed to the phones were usually faster than the alphanumeric pagers. In time, we ditched the pagers entirely, since they were slower to receive, and we felt silly carrying around too many devices.

                For completeness of coverage, the messages were sent to 5 different people via two methods each. Usually it was email and phone. If there was an emergency, and no admins checked in, the phone calls started going out. Most events were handled in 5 minutes, even if the primary person was unavailable. That wasn't bad considering not everything happened during normal working hours. Actually, most emergencies didn't happen during normal working hours. That would have made them too easy. :)

            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              SMS is unreliable? Where?

              Unreliable as in you get no guarantees if and when a message will actually be delivered. Try to find a carrier anywhere that offers you a contract with an SLA on SMS delivery. Granted, you won't often run into problems with SMS, but if you are bound by an SLA with a customer, you'd better have your underpinning contracts (yay for ITIL terminology) at the same level as that SLA.

              • Re:News to me (Score:5, Informative)

                by TheRaven64 (641858) on Wednesday November 25, @11:11AM (#30226860) Homepage Journal
                SMS is more reliable in this sense than a pager message. If a receiving mobile is out of radio range then it will be buffered for retransmit. Pagers are receive-only devices and don't send acknowledgements, so if they are out of range when the message is sent the message is permanently lost. My father used to have a pager but his company switched to sending SMS because at least then he'd get messages late, while previously he would sometimes never get them.
              • Re:News to me (Score:4, Interesting)

                by Albanach (527650) on Wednesday November 25, @12:30PM (#30227838) Homepage

                While you might be used to SMSs arriving instantly, they very often do not.

                This, too, seems to be a peculiarly US problem. I've heard of many many more lost and delayed SMSs in the US than in Europe. Perhaps that's because Europe has been making significant use of text messaging for far longer, so the systems there are now more reliable?

                Perhaps US users just have lower expectations, so cell networks can get away with such things?

        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          I've never met anyone who had a pager, I've never seen a pager in real life or heard of anyone using one outside the US.

          Your experience must be limited to geographical areas with pervasive cell network coverage.

          I live in an area of NH with moderate coverage, but prefer to head up to the mountains for R&R. But I'm on-call, so I carry a pager, it works nearly everywhere (cell phone start working again well above tree-line).

          I use procmail to duplicate messages to pager + SMS - between the two coverage is

    • Re:News to me (Score:4, Insightful)

      by khallow (566160) on Wednesday November 25, @10:00AM (#30225954)
      You do realize that 9/11 occurred over eight years ago. Even if pagers didn't exist now, they did exist then.
    • Re:News to me (Score:5, Insightful)

      by lawpoop (604919) on Wednesday November 25, @10:47AM (#30226550) Homepage Journal

      Pagers still exist?

      These are texts and pages from 9/11/2001, which is some 8 years ago.

    • by ledow (319597) on Wednesday November 25, @10:13AM (#30226118) Homepage

      Tech related: intercepted private pager messages from a variety of sources. Someone managed to collate these en-masse and distribute them.
      Politically related (Slashdot has a politics section): suggestion of interception and storage of pager messages on a grand scale beyond that needed for operational reasons (this is 24-hours worth, don't forget, from several sources).
      Privacy related: A release of otherwise private information, including private communications between ordinary people, presumably gathered direct from telco's, to a website known for doing that with politically-sensitive material. If nothing else, this shows you where your "private communications" end up when you're texting something erotic to your girlfriend... not "analysed", not "anonymised", just saved onto a disk somewhere at the telco for a random person to collect and leak to the Internet.

      I think it's relevant and I have zero interest in 9/11, conspiracy theories, or even most of the things the US does.

    • by Gadget_Guy (627405) on Wednesday November 25, @10:19AM (#30226194)

      Can there be moderation for editors please? I love how comments can be modded to oblivion, but useless editors and stories can't.

      If you log in then you can hide stories from particular editors (like that newbie CmdrTaco). Also, you have the chance to mod a story down using the Firehose [slashdot.org] before it gets approved.

      Finally, there is also the option of just not clicking on the link if you are not interested in the story. Woah, I've gone too far there!

One person's error is another person's data.