Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Comments: 146 +-   Land Rover Unveils "World's Toughest Phone" on Thursday July 02, @11:41AM

Posted by samzenpus on Thursday July 02, @11:41AM
from the crushed-by-the-foot-of-a-humble-ant dept.
technology
Land Rover says their new S1 mobile is the world's strongest phone. Testing done by Land Rover and the staff at The Sun showed the S1 would still work after being stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees centigrade. A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight. The phone comes with 1,500 hours of battery life, a 2.0 megapixel camera, an extra loud ringtone and an unconditional three-year guarantee.

story

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by timpdx (1473923) on Thursday July 02, @11:45AM (#28559447)
    ...but does it blend?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Almost!

      There's a great interview by Dan Lane with a chap from Sonim about the phone / Land Rover deal over at The Really Mobile Project [thereallym...roject.com]. It's a few weeks old if that tells you anything about the /. story! They drove around the Land Rover test track with it attached to one of the wheels, so it got to be spun around, submerged, and I think at one point they drive over it too.

  • Although it's unbelievably ugly, I need this phone! I broke 2 to 3 phones a year for the last 5 years... It'd be nice if it came to Canada. My last misadventure with my last Sony Ericsson: the screen died after a bicycle ride.
  • I read "World's Thoughest iPhone". Think I have to stay off the Apple news for a while...
  • by Critical Facilities (850111) * on Thursday July 02, @11:47AM (#28559485) Homepage
    Naomi Campbell [people.com] is first on the waiting list to get one.

    Nothing can stop her now.
    • Well, she may have to fight it out with Russel Crow to see who gets it first. I'm sure he goes through lots of phones when he bounces them off other peoples' heads.

  • Or... (Score:2, Interesting)

    ...Just take better care of your shit.
    • Or just realize that there are certain environments where nice/expensive gadgets shouldn't be taken. My girl friend is pretty notorious for losing things or damaging them. When she goes out with her friends, she leaves the Blackberry at home and puts her SIM into a cheap LG phone. If the phone gets lost or damaged it isn't as big of a deal.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        <quote>When she goes out with her friends, she leaves the Blackberry at home and puts her SIM into a cheap LG phone. If the phone gets lost or damaged it isn't as big of a deal.</quote>

        She does it so you don't see her calling history and can't track her via GPS to see what she's actually doing. Don't be naive man! Her tinfoil hat is even thicker than the average slashdotter's
        • Trust me, if anyone needs a tracking device and call history checking its me... or at least, it was me a few years ago.
    • Re:Or... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by kent_eh (543303) on Thursday July 02, @11:57AM (#28559691)

      ...Just take better care of your shit.

      Or don't have a job where you are in a rough environment.

      As it said in TFA, this is just the thing for tradesmen.
      I regularly see electricians, plumbers, carpenters and movers phones being dropped from ladders, or bashed into in some way. Or splashed with anything from paint to concrete to sewage.
      It's a tool for them, and as such it needs to be durable. Just like their other tools.

      • dust kills my phones... I work in the tile laying business

        • The "Land Rover" branding does suggest a product aimed more at the yuppie who thinks that driving a jeep and wearing hiking boots are a viable substitute for actually going outside; but it is absolutely false that (some) tradesmen don't have access to expensive tools. They very well might not own them; but if it is cheaper to do the job with high end hardware than it is with low end hardware, people will do it with high end hardware.
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            Its a bummer that Land Rover gets the "yuppie" label. Thats pretty much what I always thought too. Then a friend got one for the right reasons(to drive it off-road), and he invited me to ride along on the half day land rover course down in Carmel. The guy showed us all the features, and how they worked and how to use them. Then we went and spent the rest of the time doing actual driving. Leaning the rover over so far on its side I still don't know how it didn't fall over. Getting the rover on 3 wheels wit
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              Some years back I had a Series IIa short wheelbase job. Bought secondhand of course and reconditioned. No traction control, just 2-wheel and 4-wheel selection then low and high ration. The original spec was 45 degs tip in any direction with a ton in the back. I took mine on 30% roads and up and down hills off-road. Don't think I made the 45 degrees slopes though.

              The downside was this was a true landrover - the main cushioning was your ass and it drank fuel. Eventually, I had to give it up.

            • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

              Ask an American laborer whether they would buy four $50 phones or one $200 phone.

              And while you're at it, ask him how much it is worth to him if his phone dies early in the day, and he's not be able to receive calls from potential clients until he gets finished the current job and gets to a phone store to buy another $50 phone.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I work for a timber distributer. I have to provide phones to warehouse staff, lorry loaders and sawmill operators. Even if the environment wasn't so hostile I think the workmen would be! We have a large site with lots of warehouses so phones are essential to get the job done.

      I have one loader who in the last few years has been through several Nokia 6310s, a Nokia 5210, 5410, and a JCB phone. The JCB was supposed to be indistructible and had a similar demo video to this Land Rover phone but he still broke it

  • Psh (Score:4, Funny)

    by sys.stdout.write (1551563) on Thursday July 02, @11:49AM (#28559513)

    A forklift truck proved to be its match, and was able to crush the S1 under its three-tonne weight

    Well then it's no good to me.

  • Has it been given to a 3 yr old for an hour? Or my brother?

    Either one could be given a bowling ball in an empty room...and 5 minutes later come out with a bucket full of pieces.

    • by vux984 (928602) on Thursday July 02, @11:54AM (#28559609)

      Either one could be given a bowling ball in an empty room...and 5 minutes later come out with a bucket full of pieces.

      The truly amazing thing isn't that they can destroy a bowling ball in under 5 minutes. It's that they were able to craft a bucket using the pieces.

  • 62.5 days of battery life?! Is this for real!?


    What kind of battery are they using?
    • 62.5 days of battery life?! Is this for real!?

      Yes, when attached to your Land Rover.

    • Maybe they put an oversize battery in it and got rid of any features other than basic phone service. Even so, I, also, find that number to be hard to believe even if it just assumes 62.5 days in sleep mode.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Not hard at all to believe.

        When cell phones went smaller, their battery packs also became smaller. In size and in capacity (of course more in size).

        A battery the size of the one in my old Nokia 5510, but made from LiPO, would have about 5-10 times the capacity of the tiny batteries in modern phones.
        As a modern phone will last a week in standby easily, even with those small 300mAh cells, i think 62 days is entirely reasonable if one can live with the phone being 100g heavier.

  • Ultimate test (Score:5, Insightful)

    by girlintraining (1395911) on Thursday July 02, @11:55AM (#28559663)

    Was it given to an eight year old boy? Those tender little blossoms can destroy anything.

  • Didn't they already make the "World's Toughest Phone" a long time ago?

    I swear I've seen one [urbandictionary.com].

  • Is this anything like those "unbreakable" combs or MagLites which are guaranteed to never break? Cuz I've broken both. With proper normal usage.

    • What could you possibly break on a LED Maglite? The only thing I have ever seen is the top of the rubber cover for the switch being torn off and even then the switch still works, it's just not as water resistant. If you're saying you broke the bulb on a filament Maglite, that's nothing special.
  • I had a metal rotary phone.
    I think it was steel. I pretty sure it could withstand everything in these tests as well.
    Where it failed was in that it ddn't fit into most pockets, it wasn't wireless, and the greatest tragedy of all, it didn't ahve a camera.

    Side note: I can no longer right click on a mispelled word to choose from a list. This happens about 50% of the time. I don't know if it's caused by firefox 3.5 or slashdot.

  • Top Gear features this a few weeks ago, funny stuff:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVgRVyt6N1U [youtube.com]

  • I still want my DeWALT laptop, dammit.

  • > stepped on by an elephant, run over by a Land Rover, dropped from a second-story window, buried in mud, soaked in a pint of beer, and roasted in an oven at 150 degrees c

    Hey, coincidentally, that exactly describes what happened to me last night. And I'm still working.

  • by GameMaster (148118) on Thursday July 02, @12:31PM (#28560451)

    Most of those tests aren't as impressive as they sound.

    The Beer/Mud tests are, effectively, the same thing. The phone's waterproofing gaskets will either hold the moisture out or they won't, much like a water proof watch. This gets even easier to accomplish if they installed an iPhone style "permanent" battery, eliminated the headset jack in favor of Bluetooth, and installed an inductive charging system like a cordless toothbrush.

    The test where it's being run over by a Land Rover is easier than it sounds because the flexibility of the tires serves to spread out the weight of the vehicle. As long as they don't over-inflate the tires or use ultra-high efficiency/low rolling resistance tires then the actual PSI on the phone should be relatively low. Coincidental, they featured a stunt just like this last night on that Billy Mays show "Pitchmen". In the show they were trying to sell a gel pad designed to absorb force so they ran over one of the salesmen's hands with an SUV. As for the elephant, I don't know enough about the forces at the bottom of an elephant's foot but it might be the same issue. Another thing to consider is how soft the surface was under the tire or the elephants foot. If either was done on earth instead of pavement/concrete then that will play a factor too.

    Inversely, the above explanation serves to explain why the phone, finally, broke under the forklift. The tires on most forklifts I've ever seen tend to be made of a very hard rubber-like material (possibly just pure natural rubber). I'm sure that this manages to eliminate the need to replace tires over the life of the forklift and forklifts don't need the shock absorbing effects of a pneumatic tire since they move so slow and are only designed to be used over very flat surfaces. The hard tires transmit a much higher percentage of the forklift's weight to a much smaller patch of ground and the 3 ton forklift is, probably, as heavy or heavier than the Land Rover.

    As for being dropped from a second story window, I would want to know what kind of surface it was dropped on. It would be much more impressive if it were dropped onto concrete. It would be less impressive if it were dropped onto thick grass and much less impressive if it were dropped onto a mattress (I doubt that one but, as it wasn't mentioned, I wouldn't put it past some marketing agencies).

    As for the oven test, I would want to know how long it was left in. 150C is a pretty high temperature but people have been walking over 1000+ degree Fahrenheit coals for a long time and I've seen Shaolin monks lick red hot pokers. The trick is how long your body part is in contact with the hot stuff. In both cases, you move your foot/tough away from the contact immediately and don't give enough time for most of the heat to transfer. In the case of licking the red hot poker, they also have a thick layer of spit on their tough that absorbs much of the heat and evaporates away protecting the tongue.

  • If they send the bill in triplicate, I think we know what to get our favorite Vogans for christmas this year.

  • Nothing shocking here. Casio has there G'zone which is pretty damn hard to break. I got mine for Mountain Climbing,and also because I seem to drop phones into any water source (don't know if I'm cursed or not.)

    One thing not advertised, these phones are rather large for a cellphone these days, so you can also use it as a blunt weapon.

  • by 6Yankee (597075) on Thursday July 02, @12:56PM (#28560939)

    Extra loud ringtone?

    Buy shares in forklift manufacturers.

  • by bADlOGIN (133391) on Thursday July 02, @01:27PM (#28561515) Homepage
    As in, if you smash the device into an iPhone, you can kill the iPhone and the device in question will keep working. Given what the G1 and Palm Pre have turned out to be, this is the only true valid definition of the term "iPhone killer" in the market today;)
  • Destroy my SIM (Score:3, Interesting)

    by itomato (91092) on Thursday July 02, @01:33PM (#28561627)

    The phone is fragile. Less fragile, but it has considerably more chinks than my SIM card. If the phone numbers are the important thing, keep them on the SIM. They cost what - $0.02? $0.05?

    I can't understand why, aside from status, anyone would need this particular phone. Granted, it's a ruggedized phone with GPS, but the screen is something from 2002, barely pocketizable, and has glitzy buttons. What kind of GPS could it be packing, if it's (A:) a proprietary phone, (B:) has 600 pixels to work with? If location was so important to me, and I were driving my Land Rover, or my Hyundai (and pretending it's more than it is), why wouldn't I put my eggs in more baskets, and bring along my Suunto watch, TomTom, or traditional GPS unit?

    If the ability to make a phone call after leaving your phone in a pint (or similarly brown, wet, and bubbly environment) is the question, how is this better than my SIM alone, with a spare clunker phone/charger in the glovebox?

    I bet an average SIM could tolerate 3 tonnes of compression without a sneeze.

    • Yes, but do you leave the basement?

      Though you may not realize it, some people lead more active, more hazardous lives than you.

      Factory workers, construction workers, hands-on engineers, mechanics, even laboratory workers may work in places that place their phones in danger. If it falls out of their pocket and down three stories or into a vat of lye or under the treads of a cement truck or out of the window of a speeding car, they know its safe.

      Personally, I'm a code monkey and so long as my phone ca
      • One of my endeavors finds me at the top of wind turbines occasionally. I'd love to get one of these and see if it survives the fall to the ground. If so, I'd buy two.
    • This is indeed a branding exercise, but ruggedized phones are damn useful. I have a ruggedized Samsung after my RAZR died from water inhalation, and it's brilliantly dependable. It's no iPhone in terms of features, but I can drop it on concrete, use it in the shower, charge once every 2 weeks, etc. A phone is a tool to me, not a fashion accessory.
I'm also against BODY-SURFING!!