60GHz Uber-WiFi Proposed By New WiGig Group 127
judgecorp writes "A new vendor group has promised a Gigabit wireless specification by the end of this year. The Wireless Gigabit (WiGig) spec is apparently 80 percent done and, since it is aimed at high-definition TV, it has to go at more than 3Gbps. There's around 7GHz of spectrum freely available in the 60GHz band, so it's technically feasible, and with all the major Wi-Fi silicon vendors on board (as well as Microsoft, Dell, Nokia and others) WiGig looks to have the political muscle too. They should be aware of the Sibeam-led WirelessHD group, though, already in the 60GHz space, and Ultrawideband (UWB) is not dead, as there are actual, real UWB products."
Re:Scary energy levels? (Score:5, Funny)
WiGigroup? (Score:2, Funny)
I've been to that meeting and took a picture of the WiGig steering committee. [photobucket.com] Good times.
Re:Scary energy levels? (Score:5, Funny)
"80% done?" (Score:5, Funny)
The Wireless Gigabit (WiGig) spec is apparently 80 percent done and, since it is aimed at . . .
. . . Duke Nukem Forever players, it will never see the light of day.
Re:60GHz is available because its almost useless (Score:5, Funny)
There's a way around that. If you place another material between the transmitter and the receiver, so that there is a path with no oxygen on it, then there will be very little signal degradation. I recommend something like a thin strip of aluminum or copper, insulated with some non-conductive material (which can also act as a ground between the transmitter and receiver).
Re:60GHz is available because its almost useless (Score:3, Funny)
That's no antenna...
Re:60GHz is available because its almost useless (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ABC? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:60GHz is available because its almost useless (Score:3, Funny)
Re:HDMI 1.3 supports 10 Gbps I believe (Score:3, Funny)
Believe me, I want to support 48 bpp!
I'm so sick of fucking 16777216 colors. I need more, lots more, and a display that can actually render them!